Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12618001212246
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
14/07/2018
Date registered
19/07/2018
Date last updated
4/03/2019
Date data sharing statement initially provided
19/11/2018
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Changing driver behaviour during floods using an e-health imagery intervention
Query!
Scientific title
Testing a novel implementation imagery e-health intervention to change driver behaviour during floods: A randomised controlled trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
295557
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1217-4684
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Promoting safe driving behaviour during floods to prevent drowning and injury
308828
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Injuries and Accidents
307756
307756
0
0
Query!
Other injuries and accidents
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The intervention is an online tool that uses a series of infographic videos in which participants are prompted to engage in exercises using imagery and planning to change behaviour their beliefs and intentions toward driving into floodwater. The intervention integrates implementation intentions and mental imagery behaviour change techniques to form a novel implementation imagery intervention.
The study will be administered online using the Qualtrics online survey tool. All participants will complete a baseline survey, an activity (different for intervention and control groups), and a survey immediately post-intervention at the first time point. Four weeks later, all participants will complete a follow-up survey.
Between the baseline and post-intervention surveys, participants randomly assigned to the intervention group will complete a series of activities constituting the implementation imagery intervention. The activities will run for 10 to 15 minutes and will be delivered in the form of videos embedded within the online survey tool. Video 1 will include factual information to educate participants about the risks of driving into floodwater and will then provide information to encourage participants to form a goal of avoiding driving into floodwater if they encounter it on their route. Video 2 will guide participants through a process mental simulation followed by a short writing task where participants will be asked to record the things they imagined. Video 3 will guide participants through an outcome mental simulation followed by a short writing task where participants will be asked to record the things they imagined.
Two questions will be embedded within the baseline (T1) survey to assess whether participants are reading instructions properly or carelessly responding (Maniaci & Rogge, 2014; Schroder, Dawood, Yalch, Donnellan, & Moser, 2016). The questions instruct the choice of a particular answer so that it is not possible to answer the question incorrectly if the item is read carefully (e.g., “please choose option two to ensure you are paying attention”). Participants who do not answer both of the items correctly will be excluded prior to randomisation.
Fidelity of the intervention will also be assessed using a modified version of a four-item scale developed by Knäuper et al. (2011). The items assess vividness, clarity, detail, and ease of imagery on 7-point scales (e.g., “How CLEAR was the mental image that you had of yourself avoiding driving through the floodwater?”).
Query!
Intervention code [1]
301856
0
Behaviour
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Between the baseline and post-intervention surveys, participants randomly assigned to the control group will watch a short video. This video will present the factual information to educate participants about the risks of driving into floodwater that is provided in the first part of Video 1 administered to the intervention group.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
306743
0
Change in intention toward driving through floodwater.
Note: All outcome measures are contained within a study-specific questionnaire delivered through the Qualtrics online tool. All outcome measures are based on theoretical guidelines for measurement of these constructs. Please see attached file for items used to measure each construct.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
306743
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
306743
0
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) [primary timepoint], 1-month follow-up post-intervention (T3).
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
349418
0
Change in attitudes toward driving through floodwater.
Note: All outcome measures are contained within a study-specific questionnaire delivered through the Qualtrics online tool. All outcome measures are based on theoretical guidelines for measurement of these constructs. Please see attached file for items used to measure each construct.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
349418
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
349418
0
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), 1-month follow-up post-intervention (T3).
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
349419
0
Change in subjective norm regarding driving through floodwater.
Note: All outcome measures are contained within a study-specific questionnaire delivered through the Qualtrics online tool. All outcome measures are based on theoretical guidelines for measurement of these constructs. Please see attached file for items used to measure each construct.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
349419
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
349419
0
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), 1-month follow-up post-intervention (T3).
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
349639
0
Change in perceived behavioural control regarding driving through floodwater.
Note: All outcome measures are contained within a study-specific questionnaire delivered through the Qualtrics online tool. All outcome measures are based on theoretical guidelines for measurement of these constructs. Please see attached file for items used to measure each construct.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
349639
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
349639
0
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), 1-month follow-up post-intervention (T3).
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
349640
0
Change in risk perception regarding driving through floodwater.
Note: All outcome measures are contained within a study-specific questionnaire delivered through the Qualtrics online tool. All outcome measures are based on theoretical guidelines for measurement of these constructs. Please see attached file for items used to measure each construct.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
349640
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
349640
0
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), 1-month follow-up post-intervention (T3).
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
349641
0
Change in perceived susceptibility to the consequences driving through floodwater.
Note: All outcome measures are contained within a study-specific questionnaire delivered through the Qualtrics online tool. All outcome measures are based on theoretical guidelines for measurement of these constructs. Please see attached file for items used to measure each construct.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
349641
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
349641
0
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), 1-month follow-up post-intervention (T3).
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
349642
0
Change in perceived severity of the consequences of driving through floodwater.
Note: All outcome measures are contained within a study-specific questionnaire delivered through the Qualtrics online tool. All outcome measures are based on theoretical guidelines for measurement of these constructs. Please see attached file for items used to measure each construct.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
349642
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
349642
0
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), 1-month follow-up post-intervention (T3).
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
349643
0
Change in anticipated regret regarding driving through floodwater.
Note: All outcome measures are contained within a study-specific questionnaire delivered through the Qualtrics online tool. All outcome measures are based on theoretical guidelines for measurement of these constructs. Please see attached file for items used to measure each construct.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
349643
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
349643
0
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), 1-month follow-up post-intervention (T3).
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
349644
0
Change in barrier self-efficacy regarding avoiding driving through floodwater.
Note: All outcome measures are contained within a study-specific questionnaire delivered through the Qualtrics online tool. All outcome measures are based on theoretical guidelines for measurement of these constructs. Please see attached file for items used to measure each construct.
Query!
Assessment method [8]
349644
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
349644
0
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), 1-month follow-up post-intervention (T3).
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
349645
0
Change in action planning regarding avoiding driving through floodwater.
Note: All outcome measures are contained within a study-specific questionnaire delivered through the Qualtrics online tool. All outcome measures are based on theoretical guidelines for measurement of these constructs. Please see attached file for items used to measure each construct.
Query!
Assessment method [9]
349645
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
349645
0
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), 1-month follow-up post-intervention (T3).
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- Australian resident
- Holder of a registered driver’s licence (excluding learner’s permit)
- Only one household member may participate in the survey
Query!
Minimum age
17
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Nil
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation concealed. Eligibility screened online by survey tool. Allocation to groups conducted by Qualtrics software (central randomisation) following consent procedure and baseline survey.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation using Qualtrics embedded randomiser.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
All aspects of the study will be administered online using Qualtrics online survey tool.. Participants will be screened on the following demographic characteristics and quotas will be imposed to ensure that the sample is proportional to the distribution of flood-related transport deaths in the Australian population:
- Age
- Sex
- Region (state and metropolitan vs. rural)
- Household income
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Hypotheses will be tested using a series of mixed-model ANCOVAs. In the analyses, condition/group will be a between-subjects variable; Time (T1, T2, T3) will be a within-subjects variable; and the primary outcome (intention) and secondary outcomes (attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control, risk perception, anticipated regret, perceived susceptibility, barrier self-efficacy, action planning) will be separate dependent variables. Consistent with the approach taken in our prior work (Hamilton, et al., 2018), demographic variables (gender, age, relationship status, educational level, number of years driving, number of children, and past frequency of driving through floodwaters) will be included as covariates in the analyses. Mental imagery ability and willingness to form a goal to avoid driving into floodwater will also be included as covariates.
An a priori power analysis was conducted using G*Power v3.1 for an ANCOVA model estimating fixed effects, main effects, and interactions. The effect size was set to f = .25 (corresponding to the effect size of intention from pre- to post-intervention in Hamilton, Peden, Keech & Hagger, 2018), with power set to .95 and a=.01 (adjusted to protect from inflation of type I error rate due to multiple tests). Nine covariates were also specified. The total minimum sample size required is n = 289. Target sample size will therefore be 460 (230 per group) at baseline to allow for up to 35% attrition at follow-up (n=300; n=150 per group).
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
23/07/2018
Query!
Actual
16/11/2018
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
26/11/2018
Query!
Actual
15/01/2019
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
24/12/2018
Query!
Actual
14/02/2019
Query!
Sample size
Target
460
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
460
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,NT,QLD,SA,TAS,WA,VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
299890
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
299890
0
Royal Life Saving Society – Australia
Query!
Address [1]
299890
0
Suite 6, Level 4, 173-179 Broadway (Cnr Mountain St), Broadway, NSW 2007
Query!
Country [1]
299890
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
300134
0
University
Query!
Name [2]
300134
0
Menzies Health Institute Queensland
Query!
Address [2]
300134
0
Gold Coast campus, Griffith University, Cnr Parklands Drive and Olsen Avenue, Southport, QLD 4222
Query!
Country [2]
300134
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University
Query!
Address
176 Messines Ridge Rd, Mt Gravatt, QLD 4122
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
299571
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
299571
0
None
Query!
Address [1]
299571
0
None
Query!
Country [1]
299571
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
300759
0
Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
300759
0
Nathan campus, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, QLD 4111
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
300759
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
300759
0
30/10/2017
Query!
Approval date [1]
300759
0
20/11/2017
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
300759
0
2017/895
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The current project will evaluate the effectiveness of a theory-based intervention utilising implementation imagery to reduce Australian drivers’ intentions to attempt to drive through floodwaters–a behaviour that carries significant risk of drowning. The aim is to develop an effective intervention that can be used as content by stakeholders with interests in drowning prevention to minimise risky driving behaviours and drowning risk. Hypotheses Hypothesis 1: We hypothesise that drivers assigned to the intervention condition will report significantly lower intentions to drive through floodwater, relative to the control condition immediately post-intervention at T2 (primary outcome). Hypothesis 2: With regard to the secondary outcomes, we hypothesise that drivers assigned to the intervention condition will report significantly less favourable attitudes and reduced perceived social pressure to drive through floodwater, as well as greater perceptions of behavioural control, risk perception, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, and anticipated regret toward driving through floodwater, relative to the control condition immediately post-intervention at T2. Hypothesis 3: We further hypothesise that that drivers assigned to the intervention condition will report significantly greater barrier self-efficacy and action planning regarding avoiding driving through floodwater, relative to the control condition immediately post-intervention at T2. Hypothesis 4: We also expect that the effects of the intervention will be maintained four-weeks later at T3. Given our previous research has identified sex differences in changing beliefs (Hamilton, et al., 2018), we will also test for gender differences in the effects of the intervention on study outcomes. Timepoints: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), 1-month follow-up post-intervention (T3).
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Attachments [1]
2890
2890
0
0
/AnzctrAttachments/375415(v17-07-2018-18-38-40)-Measures Table - Changing driver behaviour during floods.pdf
(Supplementary information)
Query!
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
84718
0
Dr Kyra Hamilton
Query!
Address
84718
0
School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt Campus, 176 Messines Ridge Road, Mt Gravatt, QLD 4122
Query!
Country
84718
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
84718
0
+61737353334
Query!
Fax
84718
0
Query!
Email
84718
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
84719
0
Kyra Hamilton
Query!
Address
84719
0
School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt Campus, 176 Messines Ridge Road, Mt Gravatt, QLD 4122
Query!
Country
84719
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
84719
0
+61737353334
Query!
Fax
84719
0
Query!
Email
84719
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
84720
0
Kyra Hamilton
Query!
Address
84720
0
School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt Campus, 176 Messines Ridge Road, Mt Gravatt, QLD 4122
Query!
Country
84720
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
84720
0
+61737353334
Query!
Fax
84720
0
Query!
Email
84720
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Deidentified raw participant data
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Data will be made available immediately following publication of the trial and will remain available with no-end date.
Query!
Available to whom?
Anyone who wishes to access it
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Any purpose
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
Data will be available with unrestricted access at: osf.io/z7xph/
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
293
Study protocol will be published in a peer-reviewe...
[
More Details
]
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Protocol for developing a mental imagery intervention: A randomised controlled trial testing a novel implementation imagery e-health intervention to change driver behaviour during floods.
2019
https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025565
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF