Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12622001174774
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
26/08/2022
Date registered
30/08/2022
Date last updated
6/04/2023
Date data sharing statement initially provided
30/08/2022
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Mask-fit education in health workforce students: comparing the efficacy of self-fitting versus quantitative fit testing on mask fit.
Query!
Scientific title
Mask-fit education in health workforce students: comparing the efficacy of self-fitting versus quantitative fit testing on mask fit.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
307847
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
infection
327459
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Public Health
324584
324584
0
0
Query!
Other public health
Query!
Infection
324585
324585
0
0
Query!
Other infectious diseases
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Participants will receive education on mask selection and mask fit checking.
The content provided focuses on learning objectives:
1) To identify the rationale behind mask fit testing for clinical health care settings.
2) To identify factors affecting mask performance
3) To compare the difference between a mask fit check and a mask fit test
4) To identify factors in the selection of an appropriate P2/N95 mask
5) Demonstrate correct fitting of a P2/N95 mask
This education resource has been specifically designed for this study.
The duration of education is approximately 30 minutes as a one-off session.
The mode of administration is online (text and video materials).
Adherence is monitored via online platform, participants must complete an online quiz opened after opening of online material before they are allowed to book for physical testing.
Participants will then self-select from a range of brands/models of N95 masks and undertake self-performed fit-checks until they are satisfied that they have a suitably fit mask. Self-performed fit-checks will take place within 1 week of undertaking the educational component. Testing will take <10 minutes. Physical testing will take place at the Monash University Peninsula or Clayton Campus depending on the student course location.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
324313
0
Prevention
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Gold standard comparator:
Participants will the same receive education on mask selection and mask fit checking as provided to the intervention group.
Participants will then undertake a Quantitative Fit Test procedure. This involves selection of 3 brands/models of N95 masks followed by particle counting of participants' ambient air (via porta-count machine). The method requires a device that counts particles of a predefined size, and provides a 'fit factor' calculated as the ratio of substance concentration outside to inside a face mask respirator. Fit factor values > 100 indicate adequate fit (pass). To achieve this sampling, quantitative fit testing requires the filtering facepiece respirator to be pierced in order to insert a sampling tube that is then sealed airtight. The sample inside the mask is compared to the ambient measure. Participants will be asked to perform five tasks while sampling is conducted:
1. Normal breathing;
2. Speaking;
3. Bending from the waist to 90 degrees;
4. Nodding head up and down; and
5. Turning head from side to side.
These participants will be told of their quantitative fit testing result and the brand/model of mask that best fits them. Physical testing will take place within 1 week of undertaking the educational component. Physical testing will take ~45 minutes. Physical testing will take place at the Monash University Peninsula or Clayton Campus depending on the student course location.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
332404
0
Proportion of participants who "pass" the fit factor threshold of 100 calculated via Quantitative Particle Count Fit Test
Query!
Assessment method [1]
332404
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
332404
0
Immediately following provision of intervention / control condition.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
332405
0
Proportion of participants who "pass" the fit factor threshold of 100 calculated via Quantitative Particle Count Fit Test
Query!
Assessment method [2]
332405
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
332405
0
2 weeks following provision of intervention / control condition.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
413383
0
Mask selection brand/model. This is recorded based on reading the brand/model label of the mask product that was selected.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
413383
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
413383
0
Immediately following provision of intervention / control condition.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
413412
0
Mean score for the fit factor calculated via Quantitative Particle Count Fit Test
Query!
Assessment method [2]
413412
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
413412
0
Immediately following provision of the intervention / control condition.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
413413
0
Mean score for the fit factor calculated via Quantitative Particle Count Fit Test
Query!
Assessment method [3]
413413
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
413413
0
2 weeks following provision of the intervention / control condition
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Students at Monash University undertaking health professional courses
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Have previously undertaken mask fit education and/or testing
Unwillingness to be clean shaven (interferes with Quantitative Fit Testing)
Aged younger than 18 years
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Sealed opaque envelopes
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Permuted block randomisation generated via computer
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Participants allocated to the intervention group will receive the gold standard control condition immediately following their 2-week follow-up assessment.
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Fit factor scores will be compared between groups at the immediately following provision of the intervention / control condition time point using ordinary least squares "linear" regression.
Fit factor scores will be compared between groups at the 2-weeks following provision of the intervention / control condition time point using ordinary least squares "linear" regression.
An interaction effect will be examined between intervention group and time point using ordinary least squares "linear" regression with data clustered within participant and use of robust variance estimates.
Differences between groups in mask brand/model selection (secondary outcome) proportions will be examined for each model using logistic regression.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
2/09/2022
Query!
Actual
31/08/2022
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/06/2023
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
21/07/2023
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
400
Query!
Accrual to date
160
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
312122
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
312122
0
Monash University
Query!
Address [1]
312122
0
McMahons Road, Frankston, Victoria, 3199
Query!
Country [1]
312122
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Monash University
Query!
Address
McMahons Road, Frankston, Victoria, 3199
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
313670
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
313670
0
Query!
Address [1]
313670
0
Query!
Country [1]
313670
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
311521
0
Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
311521
0
1 Wellington Rd, Clayton, Victoria, 3168
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
311521
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
311521
0
02/03/2022
Query!
Approval date [1]
311521
0
14/03/2022
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
311521
0
2022-31488-73118
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Well fitting filtering masks (N95 masks) have become standard practice for personal protective equipment for workers performing aerosol-generating procedures during COVID-19. Currently, all health care workers in forward facing hospital roles are required to be undertake education (~20 minutes, low cost) regarding mask fitting and complete mask fit testing as directed by the Victorian Department of Health. This is also true for all Monash University students entering hospital and emergency service placements. However, there is scant evidence supporting the effectiveness or sustained benefit of current procedures used to undertake mask fit testing in this context. We hypothesise that there will be no difference between the intervention and control group in terms of the proportion of participants who "pass" the Quantitative Particle Count Fit Test either immediately following provision of the intervention / control condition or 2 weeks later.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
121390
0
Prof Terry Haines
Query!
Address
121390
0
Room 304, building G, Monash University Peninsula Campus, McMahons Road, Frankston, Victoria, 3199
Query!
Country
121390
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
121390
0
+61 433 596526
Query!
Fax
121390
0
Query!
Email
121390
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
121391
0
Terry Haines
Query!
Address
121391
0
Room 304, building G, Monash University Peninsula Campus, McMahons Road, Frankston, Victoria, 3199
Query!
Country
121391
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
121391
0
+61 433 596526
Query!
Fax
121391
0
Query!
Email
121391
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
121392
0
Terry Haines
Query!
Address
121392
0
Room 304, building G, Monash University Peninsula Campus, McMahons Road, Frankston, Victoria, 3199
Query!
Country
121392
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
121392
0
+61 433 596526
Query!
Fax
121392
0
Query!
Email
121392
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Deidentified demographics and outcome measures.
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Available following publication of trial results, and for 7 years following this date.
Query!
Available to whom?
Available to the public
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Any
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
https://www.monash.edu/medicine/spahc/research
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF