Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02831855
Registration number
NCT02831855
Ethics application status
Date submitted
11/07/2016
Date registered
13/07/2016
Date last updated
4/12/2019
Titles & IDs
Public title
Methotrexate Withdrawal Study of Tofacitinib Modified Release Formulation in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Query!
Scientific title
A PHASE 3B/4 RANDOMIZED DOUBLE BLIND PLACEBO CONTROLLED STUDY OF METHOTREXATE (MTX) WITHDRAWAL IN SUBJECTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (RA) TREATED WITH TOFACITINIB 11MG MODIFIED RELEASE (MR) FORMULATION
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2016-001825-15
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
A3921192
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Rheumatoid Arthritis
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Osteoarthritis
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Rheumatoid arthritis
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - CP-690,550
Treatment: Drugs - Methotrexate
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo
Experimental: CP-690,550 and methotrexate - Open-label tofacitinib tablet and blinded methotrexate capsule
Placebo Comparator: CP-690,550 and placebo - open-label tofacitinib tablet and blinded matching placebo for methotrexate capsule
Treatment: Drugs: CP-690,550
During the open-label run-in phase (Day 1 to Week 24), all subjects will receive one tablet open-label tofacitinib MR 11mg orally QD and open-label methotrexate capsule(s) orally every week at prior stabilized dose.
During the double-blind phase, subjects who are randomized to the treatment arm will receive the same dosage of tofacitinib and methotrexate as describe above.
Treatment: Drugs: Methotrexate
During the open-label run-in phase (Day 1 to Week 24), all subjects will receive one tablet open-label tofacitinib MR 11mg orally QD and open-label methotrexate capsule(s) orally every week at prior stabilized dose.
During the double-blind phase, subjects who are randomized to the treatment arm will receive the same dosage of tofacitinib and methotrexate as describe above.
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo
During the double-blind phase, subjects who are randomized to the comparison arm will receive 11mg QD tofacitinib and the placebo capsules matching for methotrexate.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints Using 4 Variables (DAS28-4) (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate [ESR]) at Week 48
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from swollen joint count (SJC) and tender/painful joint count (TJC) using 28 joints count, ESR (millimeters per hour [mm/hr]) and participant global assessment of arthritis (PtGA) on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) less than or equal to (<=) 3.2 implied low disease activity and greater than (>) 3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) less than (<) 2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70*In(ESR in mm/hour) + 0.014*PtGA in mm; ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root of.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Week 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in DAS28-4 ESR at Week 36
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hr) and PtGA on a 100 millimeter (mm) VAS (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) less than or equal to (<=) 3.2 implied low disease activity and greater than (>) 3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) less than (<) 2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70*In(ESR in mm/hour) + 0.014*PtGA in mm; ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root of.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Week 36
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in DAS28-4 (C-reactive Protein [CRP]) at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, CRP (milligrams per liter [mg/L]) and PtGA on a 100 mm VAS (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) <= 3.2 implied low disease activity and > 3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) < 2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (CRP) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(CRP in mg/L +1) + 0.014*PtGA in mm+ 0.96; ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root of.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
CDAI was calculated from tender and swollen joints using 28 joint count, PtGA and physician global assessment of arthritis (PhyGA). PtGA and PhyGA both were assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) VAS scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. CDAI score of <=10 indicated low disease activity and a score of <= 2.8 indicated remission. CDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm).
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
SDAI was calculated from tender and swollen joints using 28 joint count, PtGA, PhyGA and CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhyGA both were assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). SDAI total score ranged from 0 to 86, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. SDAI score of <=11 indicates low disease activity and a score of <=3.3 indicates remission. SDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm) + (CRP in mg/dL).
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) Assessed by DAS28-4 (ESR) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 3.2 at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hr) and PtGA on a 100 mm VAS (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicated worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) <=3.2 implied low disease activity and >3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) <2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70*In(ESR in mm/hour) + 0.014*PtGA in mm; ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root of.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With LDA Assessed by DAS28-4 (CRP) <=3.2 at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, CRP (mg/L) and PtGA on a 100 mm VAS (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) <=3.2 implied low disease activity and >3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) <2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (CRP) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(CRP in mg/L +1) + 0.014*PtGA in mm+ 0.96; ln = natural logarithm, sqrt = square root of.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With LDA Assessed by CDAI <=10 at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
CDAI was calculated from tender and swollen joints using 28 joint count, PtGA and PhyGA. PtGA and PhyGA both were assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. CDAI score of <=10 indicated low disease activity and a score of <= 2.8 indicated remission. Percentage of participants with CDAI <=10 were reported. CDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm).
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With LDA Assessed by SDAI <=11 at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
SDAI was calculated from tender and swollen joints using 28 joint count, PtGA, PhyGA and CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhyGA both were assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). SDAI total score ranged from 0 to 86, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. SDAI score of <=11 indicated low disease activity and a score of <=3.3 indicated remission. SDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm) + (CRP in mg/dL).
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission Assessed by American College of Rheumatology-European League Against Rheumatism (ACR-EULAR) Boolean at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
ACR-EULAR Boolean remission was when a participant satisfied all of the following: tender joint count, swollen joint count (both based on a 28-joint assessment), CRP (in mg/dL), and PtGA (VAS: 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst], higher scores indicated worse health condition) and all scores were <=1.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission Assessed by DAS28-4 (ESR) Less Than [<] 2.6 at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hr) and PtGA on a 100 mm VAS (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (ESR) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) <= 3.2 implied low disease activity and >3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) <2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70*In(ESR in mm/hour) + 0.014*PtGA in mm. Percentage of participants with DAS remission (DAS28-4-ESR<2.6) were reported in this outcome measure.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission Assessed by DAS28-4 (CRP) <2.6 at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, CRP (mg/L) and PtGA on a 100 mm VAS (VAS: scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [worst], higher scores indicate worse health condition). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) score range: 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) <=3.2 implied low disease activity and >3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) <2.6 implied remission. DAS28-4 (CRP) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(CRP in mg/l +1) + 0.014*PtGA in mm+ 0.96. Percentage of participants with DAS remission (DAS28-4-CRP<2.6) were reported in this outcome measure.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission Assessed by CDAI <=2.8 at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
CDAI was calculated from tender and swollen joints using 28 joint count, PtGA and PhyGA. PtGA and PhyGA both were assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). CDAI total score ranged from 0 to 76, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. CDAI score of <=10 indicated low disease activity and a score of <= 2.8 indicated remission. CDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm).
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission Assessed by SDAI <=3.3 at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
SDAI was calculated from tender and swollen joints using 28 joint count, PtGA, PhyGA and CRP (in mg/dL). PtGA and PhyGA both were assessed on 0-10 cm VAS scale (VAS: scores ranging from 0 cm [very well] to 10 cm [worst]), where higher scores indicated greater affliction due to disease activity). SDAI total score ranged from 0 to 86, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity. SDAI score of <=11 indicates low disease activity and a score of <=3.3 indicates remission. SDAI = (28TJC) + (28SJC) + (PhyGA in cm) + (PtGA in cm) + (CRP in mg/dL).
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20 Percent (%) (ACR20) Response at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Participants with 20% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: PtGA, PhyGA, participant's assessment of arthritis pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and CRP. PtGA: participant assessed health on VAS, 0 mm (very well) to 100 mm (worst health condition), higher scores = worse condition. PhyGA: physician judged participants' pain on VAS, 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher scores = more pain. Participant's assessment of arthritis pain: participant assessed pain on VAS, 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (most severe pain), higher score = more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score implied more disability. The improvement was relative to baseline (Day 1).
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Participants with 50% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: PtGA, PhyGA, participant's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI and CRP. PtGA: participant assessed health on VAS, 0 mm (very well) to 100 mm (worst health condition), higher scores = worse condition. PhyGA: physician judged participants' pain on VAS, 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher scores = more pain. Participant's assessment of arthritis pain: participant assessed pain on VAS, 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (most severe pain), higher score = more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score implied more disability. The improvement was relative to baseline (Day 1).
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Participants with 70% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 measures: PtGA, PhyGA, participant's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI and CRP. PtGA: participant assessed health on VAS, 0 mm (very well) to 100 mm (worst health condition), higher scores = worse condition. PhyGA: physician judged participants' pain on VAS, 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain), higher scores = more pain. Participant's assessment of arthritis pain: participant assessed pain on VAS, 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (most severe pain), higher score = more pain. HAQ-DI: functional disability evaluation, score: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), higher score implied more disability. The improvement was relative to baseline (Day 1).
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has experienced during the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing/grooming; arising; eating; walking; reach; grip; hygiene; and other activities.. There were total of 30 items distributed in these 8 domains. Each item was scored on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0= no difficulty; 1= some difficulty; 2= much difficulty; 3= unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 (least difficulty) and 3 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate more difficulty while performing daily living activities.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey 8 Domain Scores at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
SF-36 is a participant reported standardized survey designed to assess generic health related quality of life. It consisted of 36 items evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, social functioning, mental health, role emotional, vitality, and general health perception. The score range for each of the 8 health aspects was from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health), higher scores indicating good health condition. Scores of 8 health aspects were summarized to derive the 2 component scores (physical component scores [PCS], mental component scores [MCS]) ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), where higher PCS/MCS indicated good health condition.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in the SF-36 Health Survey Component Scores at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
SF-36 is a participant reported standardized survey designed to assess generic health related quality of life. It consisted of 36 items evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, social functioning, mental health, role emotional, vitality, and general health perception. The score range for each of the 8 health aspects was from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health), higher scores indicating good health condition. Scores of 8 health aspects were summarized aggregated to derive the two 2 component scores PCS and MCS ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), where higher PCS/MCS indicated good health condition.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Scores at Week 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
WPAI is 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the impact of rheumatoid arthritis and yields 4 types of outcomes: absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment while working), work productivity loss (overall work impairment), and daily activity impairment (activity impairment) for a period of 7 days prior to a visit. These 4 outcomes are expressed as an impairment percentage (range from 0 to 100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Week 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Scores at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
EQ-5D was a participant completed instrument designed to assess impact on quality of life in terms of a single utility score in 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. 3 possible answers for mobility: 1=no problem in walking, 2=moderate problems in walking, 3= confined to bed; self-care: 1=no problem, 2=moderate problems, 3= unable to wash/dress; usual activities: 1=no problem, 2=moderate problems, 3= unable to do usual activities; pain and discomfort: 1=no pain or discomfort, 2=moderate pain or discomfort, 3= extreme pain or discomfort; anxiety and depression: 1=not anxious or depressed, 2=moderately anxious or depressed, 3= extremely anxious or depressed. The 5-dimensional systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 and 1, where higher score indicated a better health state.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Change From Randomization in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale Scores at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
The FACIT-Fatigue scale was a participant completed questionnaire consisted of 13 items that assessed fatigue. Each item was scored on a scale of 0 (maximum fatigue) to 4 (no fatigue), higher scores indicate less fatigue. Total FACIT-fatigue score was obtained by addition of scores from 13 items, giving a possible overall range from 0 (maximum fatigue) to 52 (no fatigue). Higher FACIT-fatigue scores indicated lower level of fatigue, better participant status.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Randomization (last non-missing measurement on or prior to the first dosing date in DB phase at Week 24), Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Double Blind Phase: Percentage of Participants Achieving an Improvement of at Least 0.22 Units in HAQ-DI at Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has experienced during the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing/grooming; arising; eating; walking; reach; grip; hygiene; and other activities.. There were total of 30 items distributed in these 8 domains. Each item was scored on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0= no difficulty; 1= some difficulty; 2= much difficulty; 3= unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 (least difficulty) and 3 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate more difficulty while performing daily living activities. Percentage of participants with an improvement of at least 0.22 units in HAQ scores from baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 36 and 48 were reported in this outcome measure.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria
- Must be 18 years of age or older.
Have a score of 6 or greater on the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League
Against Rheumatism Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis at and/or prior to
Screening Visit.
- Have =4 tender/painful joints on motion and =4 swollen joints (28 joint counts) at
both Screening Visit and Baseline Visit (Visit 1).
- Have moderate to severe disease activity as defined by CDAI>10 and DAS28-4(ESR) =3.2
at Baseline Visit.
- Have taken an oral MTX treatment regimen (15-25mg/week) continuously for at least 4
months prior to the screening visit and has taken a stable weekly dose of oral MTX
with supplemental folic acid or folinic acid for at least 4 weeks prior to the
baseline visit (conversion from parenteral MTX to oral MTX will require stabilization
of the treatment regimen for at least 1 month).
- Subjects must screen negative for active tuberculosis or inadequately treated
tuberculosis infection (active or latent).
Key
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Exclusion Criteria
- Pregnant female subjects; breastfeeding female subjects; male subjects with partners
currently pregnant; male subjects able to father children and female subjects of
childbearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use 2 highly effective methods
of contraception as outlined in this protocol for the duration of the study and for at
least 3 months after the last dose of investigational product.
- Subjects with infection or infection history; subjects with any current malignancy or
a history of malignancy (except adequately treated or excised non-metastatic basal
cell or squamous cell cancer of the skin or cervical carcinoma in situ); subjects with
history of, or current evidence for, severe gastrointestinal narrowing (pathologic or
iatrogenic); and subjects with history of documented diverticulitis.
- Subjects with a history of insufficient response to =2 biologics, regardless of the
class.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 4
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/09/2016
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
17/12/2018
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
694
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Genesis Research Services Pty Ltd - Broadmeadow
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Optimus Clinical Research Pty Ltd - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Rheumatology Research Unit - Maroochydore
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Emeritus Research - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2292 - Broadmeadow
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2217 - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
4558 - Maroochydore
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
3124 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Arkansas
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Idaho
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Mississippi
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
North Dakota
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Genk
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Roeselare
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Pleven
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Plovdiv
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Sofia
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Czech Republic
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Brno
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Ostrava
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Praha 2
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Uherske Hradiste
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Zlin
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Balatonfured
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Miskolc
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Ciudad DE Mexico
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Guanajuato
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Philippines
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Batangas
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Philippines
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Metro Manila
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Bialystok
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Bytom
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Krakow
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Nadarzyn
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Orenburg
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Saint Petersburg
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Saint-Petersburg
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Samara
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Smolensk
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Yaroslavl
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Dunajska Streda
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Martin
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Partizanske
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Poprad
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Rimavska Sobota
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Kwazulu Natal
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
A Coruna
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Vizcaya
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Cheshire
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Hampshire
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Merseyside
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
WEST Midlands
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Manchester
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name
Pfizer
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib modified release
formulation (11mg QD) versus tofacitinib modified release formulation plus continued
methotrexate treatment in subjects with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis who are
insufficiently responding to their stable dose of methotrexate treatment.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02831855
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Karaman MW, Herrgard S, Treiber DK, Gallant P, Atteridge CE, Campbell BT, Chan KW, Ciceri P, Davis MI, Edeen PT, Faraoni R, Floyd M, Hunt JP, Lockhart DJ, Milanov ZV, Morrison MJ, Pallares G, Patel HK, Pritchard S, Wodicka LM, Zarrinkar PP. A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity. Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Jan;26(1):127-32. doi: 10.1038/nbt1358.
Meyer DM, Jesson MI, Li X, Elrick MM, Funckes-Shippy CL, Warner JD, Gross CJ, Dowty ME, Ramaiah SK, Hirsch JL, Saabye MJ, Barks JL, Kishore N, Morris DL. Anti-inflammatory activity and neutrophil reductions mediated by the JAK1/JAK3 inhibitor, CP-690,550, in rat adjuvant-induced arthritis. J Inflamm (Lond). 2010 Aug 11;7:41. doi: 10.1186/1476-9255-7-41.
Murray PJ. The JAK-STAT signaling pathway: input and output integration. J Immunol. 2007 Mar 1;178(5):2623-9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.5.2623.
O'Sullivan LA, Liongue C, Lewis RS, Stephenson SE, Ward AC. Cytokine receptor signaling through the Jak-Stat-Socs pathway in disease. Mol Immunol. 2007 Apr;44(10):2497-506. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2006.11.025. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
Fleischmann R, Cutolo M, Genovese MC, Lee EB, Kanik KS, Sadis S, Connell CA, Gruben D, Krishnaswami S, Wallenstein G, Wilkinson BE, Zwillich SH. Phase IIb dose-ranging study of the oral JAK inhibitor tofacitinib (CP-690,550) or adalimumab monotherapy versus placebo in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Mar;64(3):617-29. doi: 10.1002/art.33383.
Fleischmann R, Kremer J, Cush J, Schulze-Koops H, Connell CA, Bradley JD, Gruben D, Wallenstein GV, Zwillich SH, Kanik KS; ORAL Solo Investigators. Placebo-controlled trial of tofacitinib monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 9;367(6):495-507. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109071.
Kremer JM, Cohen S, Wilkinson BE, Connell CA, French JL, Gomez-Reino J, Gruben D, Kanik KS, Krishnaswami S, Pascual-Ramos V, Wallenstein G, Zwillich SH. A phase IIb dose-ranging study of the oral JAK inhibitor tofacitinib (CP-690,550) versus placebo in combination with background methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate alone. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Apr;64(4):970-81. doi: 10.1002/art.33419. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
Kremer J, Li ZG, Hall S, Fleischmann R, Genovese M, Martin-Mola E, Isaacs JD, Gruben D, Wallenstein G, Krishnaswami S, Zwillich SH, Koncz T, Riese R, Bradley J. Tofacitinib in combination with nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Aug 20;159(4):253-61. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-4-201308200-00006.
Burmester GR, Benda B, Gruben D, Bradley J, Mebus C. Tofacitinib for rheumatoid arthritis - Authors' reply. Lancet. 2013 May 25;381(9880):1812-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61115-0. No abstract available.
van Vollenhoven RF, Fleischmann R, Cohen S, Lee EB, Garcia Meijide JA, Wagner S, Forejtova S, Zwillich SH, Gruben D, Koncz T, Wallenstein GV, Krishnaswami S, Bradley JD, Wilkinson B; ORAL Standard Investigators. Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 9;367(6):508-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112072. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 18;369(3):293.
Felson DT, Smolen JS, Wells G, Zhang B, van Tuyl LH, Funovits J, Aletaha D, Allaart CF, Bathon J, Bombardieri S, Brooks P, Brown A, Matucci-Cerinic M, Choi H, Combe B, de Wit M, Dougados M, Emery P, Furst D, Gomez-Reino J, Hawker G, Keystone E, Khanna D, Kirwan J, Kvien TK, Landewe R, Listing J, Michaud K, Martin-Mola E, Montie P, Pincus T, Richards P, Siegel JN, Simon LS, Sokka T, Strand V, Tugwell P, Tyndall A, van der Heijde D, Verstappen S, White B, Wolfe F, Zink A, Boers M; American College of Rheumatology; European League Against Rheumatism. American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism provisional definition of remission in rheumatoid arthritis for clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Mar;63(3):573-86. doi: 10.1002/art.30129.
Fries JF, Spitz PW, Young DY. The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales. J Rheumatol. 1982 Sep-Oct;9(5):789-93. No abstract available.
Ware JE KM, Dewey JE. . How to score Version 2 of the SF 36 Health Survey (Standard & Acute forms). In: How to score Version 2 of the SF 36 Health Survey (Standard & Acute forms). Lincoln, Rhode Island: QualityMetric, Incorporated. 2000.
Hurst NP, Kind P, Ruta D, Hunter M, Stubbings A. Measuring health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: validity, responsiveness and reliability of EuroQol (EQ-5D). Br J Rheumatol. 1997 May;36(5):551-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/36.5.551.
Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM. The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Nov;4(5):353-65. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304050-00006.
Cella D, Lai JS, Chang CH, Peterman A, Slavin M. Fatigue in cancer patients compared with fatigue in the general United States population. Cancer. 2002 Jan 15;94(2):528-38. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10245.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Query!
Address
0
0
Pfizer
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Summary Results
For IPD and results data, please see
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02831855
Download to PDF