Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12608000386336
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
7/07/2008
Date registered
1/08/2008
Date last updated
1/08/2008
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Ruling-out Coronary Artery Disease utilising non-invasive investigations in place of Invasive Coronary Angiography: a comparison between Computer Tomography Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in patients with an intermediate probability of coronary artery disease
Query!
Scientific title
In patient groups with an intermediate probability of coronary artery disease is there a difference between computer tomography coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging in ruling out significant coronary artery disease
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
RoCAD
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Coronary Artery Disease
3370
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cardiovascular
3522
3522
0
0
Query!
Coronary heart disease
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Computer Tomography Coronary Angiography (CTCA) or Coronary CT is a new technique which involves injecting dye into an arm vein and performing a specialised x-ray of the heart called a CT scan. While CT scans have been extensively used to image many organs, it is only recently that the technology has evolved to be fast enough to scan a beating heart. It is important for test accuracy that the heart is beating in a regular rhythm so that the scan can give the best results. This means that you will be given a medication (called a beta-blocker) to slow your heart down before the test. These same tablets are regularly used to treat coronary heart disease, and your specialist is very familiar with their use. Like the Nuclear Medicine study, the Coronary CT does not have the coronary angiography hazards associated with the placement of catheters but appears to have similar accuracy to angiography. Patients randomised to the CTCA test will undergo one CTCA.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
3101
0
Diagnosis / Prognosis
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging involves injecting a radioactive material into the blood via a small needle in the arm or hand after stimulating the heart either by an exercise test or injecting a drug. The heart is then scanned with a specialised camera to see how much of the radioactive material has gone into the heart muscle. If there is a reduced amount of radioactivity in the heart muscle then this implies that there are blockages within the coronary arteries we can then determine approximately how many of the coronary arteries are blocked. This test does not involve the hazards of placing catheters into the coronary arteries and thus is considerably safer than coronary angiography but is also less accurate. Patients randomised to the Myocardial Perfusion Imaging test will undergo just one scan.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
4425
0
The primary endpoint of this study is the number of Invasive Selective Coronary Angiography (ISCA) undertaken in each group within 6 months of the randomised diagnostic test
Query!
Assessment method [1]
4425
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
4425
0
6 months post imaging
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
7467
0
Total number of additional invasive/non-invasive Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) imaging studies in the 6 months following the randomised diagnostic test.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
7467
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
7467
0
6 months post imaging
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
7468
0
Cardiologist satisfaction as determined by Cardiologist Feedback Form scores
Query!
Assessment method [2]
7468
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
7468
0
1 month post imaging
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
7469
0
Patient satisfaction as determined by Patient Post-test Feedback Form scores
Query!
Assessment method [3]
7469
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
7469
0
1 and 6 months post imaging
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
7470
0
Patient 6 month progress as determined by; (a) Patient 6 month Follow-up Form scores, (b) SF-36 physical and mental health summary scores, and (c) Seattle Angina Questionnaire domain scores.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
7470
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
7470
0
baseline and 6 months post imaging
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
7471
0
Cost-effectiveness Evaluation. This will be measured by the number of ISCA studies avoided by undergoing less invasive and costly CTCA scans.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
7471
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
7471
0
end of study - 6 months after the patients scan (either CTCA of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patient fulfilling all of the following criteria (a, b & c) will be considered: a) Intermediate pre-test probability of CAD (10-70%), ie Men = 40 years without typical angina Women = 60 years without typical angina; b) One of the following clinical presentation: 1) Chest pain with Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB), or 2) Equivocal exercise test (ie Duke Treadmill Score -10 to 4), or 3) Suspected Dilated Cardiomyopathy (ie Unexplained global left ventricular systolic dysfunction) and c) Treating-cardiologist would undertake ISCA if these non-invasive tests were not available.
Query!
Minimum age
40
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Patients with following features will be excluded from the study: 1) Patients with high pre-test probability of CAD ( > 70%), ie those with typical angina, 2) Patients with low pre-test probability of CAD ( < 10%) including those with normal coronary angiography within the past 2 years, 3) Previously Documented CAD, ie. Previous myocardial infarction, Previous revascularisation therapy (Percutanious Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft) Previous coronary angiography demonstrating > 50% stenosis or Regional wall motion abnormality 4) Contra-indications to undertaking CTCA or MPI such as: Contrast allergy, Pregnancy, suspected pregnancy, Contra-indications to beta-blockers (asthma), Absence of sinus rhythm, Renal Impairment (Creatinine = 180 umol/L or eGFR < 50ml/min) or Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) < 0.36 mU/L
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Diagnosis
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Recruiting Cardiologists identify appropriate patients fulfilling the above criteria
Informed patient consent obtained
Cardiologist contacts QE Imaging Receptionist and notify them of the patient’s participation in the study
The Pre-randomisation Checklist will be completed. Items 1-4 will be completed by the QE Imaging Staff and assign the Patient Identification Code.
Randomisation by QE Imaging Staff using the sealed envelope system. This system utilises a 6 patient block design stratified per referring cardiologist.
The cardiologist will be informed of the study randomisation and a booking will be made by the QE Imaging Reception for CTCA or Stress MPI as required. The CTCA studies will be booked in for a Friday.
The QE Imaging Reception will notify the Study Co-ordinator as to the patient’s recruitment into the study and forward the Pre-randomisation Checklist.
The Study Co-ordinator will arrange to meet with the patient prior to the diagnostic test to ensure the Pre-randomisation Checklist is completed, including providing the patient with the Patient Information Sheet and obtaining a signed patient informed consent. Also during this meeting, clinical details for the Case Report Form will obtained and the patient will complete the quality of life surveys (SF-36 & Seattle Angina Questionnaire).
(PLEASE NOT 'QE' is a correct name, as is SF-36)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
A total of 50 Computer Tomography Coronary Angiogram (CTCA) and 50 Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) slips were written and placed into envelops. 5 CTCA and 5 MPI envelops were then labelled with consultant number 1. 3 of each of these two groups were then taken and shuffled and labelled consultant 1, envelop number 1 through 6 and placed in the front of a devided box. The remaining 4 envelops were also shuffled and then labelled consultant 1 number 7 through 10 and placed with the first 6 envelopes. This process was repeated until there were 10 groups of 10 envelops
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
21/07/2008
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
100
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
3557
0
Other
Query!
Name [1]
3557
0
BUPA Australia
Query!
Address [1]
3557
0
600 Glenferrie Road
Hawthorn Victoria 3122
Query!
Country [1]
3557
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Query!
Address
Woodville Road
Woddville 5011
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
3195
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
3195
0
Query!
Address [1]
3195
0
Query!
Country [1]
3195
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
5599
0
Ethics of Human Research Committee (TQEH & LMH)
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
5599
0
Woodville Road Woddville 5011
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
5599
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
5599
0
17/01/2008
Query!
Approval date [1]
5599
0
25/02/2008
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
5599
0
2007154
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to assess the clinical applications of the proven diagnostic abilities of Computer Tomography Coronary Angiography (CTCA). Specifically, in patient groups with an intermediate probability of coronary artery disease is there a difference between computer tomography coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging in ruling out significant coronary artery disease.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
28729
0
Query!
Address
28729
0
Query!
Country
28729
0
Query!
Phone
28729
0
Query!
Fax
28729
0
Query!
Email
28729
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
11886
0
Jennifer Cranefield
Query!
Address
11886
0
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Radiolgy Department
Ground Floor
Woodville Rad
Woddville 5011
Query!
Country
11886
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
11886
0
08 8222 6894
Query!
Fax
11886
0
Query!
Email
11886
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
2814
0
John Beltrame
Query!
Address
2814
0
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Cardiology Department
Level 3
Woodville Road
Woodville 5011
Query!
Country
2814
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
2814
0
08 8222 7632
Query!
Fax
2814
0
Query!
Email
2814
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF