Trial Review

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial registered on ANZCTR


Registration number
ACTRN12606000102572
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
16/03/2006
Date registered
16/03/2006
Date last updated
16/03/2006
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered

Titles & IDs
Public title
Neuropsychiatric, Neurocognitive And Quality Of Life Outcomes In Patients With Epilepsy Treated With Levetiracetam (Keppra) Verses Older AEDs As First Substitution Monotherapy.
Scientific title
Neuropsychiatric, Neurocognitive And Quality Of Life Outcomes In Patients With Epilepsy Treated With Levetiracetam (Keppra) Verses Older AEDs As First Substitution Monotherapy.
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
KONQUEST: Keppra versus Older AEDs and Neuropsychiatric, Neurocognitive and QUality of life outcomes in treatment of Epilepsy as first Substitution monoTherapy.
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Epilepsy 1066 0
Condition category
Condition code
Neurological 1146 1146 0 0
Epilepsy

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Keppra will be used in those who failed their first antiepileptic drug either because of side effects or because of lack of efficacy. Enrolment will take place over 52 weeks and total duration of the study is 2 years.
Intervention code [1] 941 0
Treatment: Drugs
Comparator / control treatment
Older antiepileptic drugs
Control group
Active

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 1542 0
1. Proportion of patients who show improvement in anxiety scores, by treatment group (improvement’ is defined as 12 week score < baseline score on HADS)
Timepoint [1] 1542 0
From baseline to 12 weeks.
Primary outcome [2] 1543 0
2. Proportion of patients who show improvement in QOL (Quality of Life) based on QOLIE-89 scores by treatment group
Timepoint [2] 1543 0
From baseline to 12 weeks.
Secondary outcome [1] 2781 0
Neurocognitive
Timepoint [1] 2781 0
At 12 and 52 weeks.
Secondary outcome [2] 2782 0
Neuropsychiatric
Timepoint [2] 2782 0
At 12 and 52 weeks.
Secondary outcome [3] 2783 0
QOL
Timepoint [3] 2783 0
At 12 and 52 weeks.
Secondary outcome [4] 2784 0
Seizure control
Timepoint [4] 2784 0
At 12 and 52 weeks.
Secondary outcome [5] 2785 0
Retention rates
Timepoint [5] 2785 0
At 12 and 52 weeks.

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patients with Epilepsy (except for primary generalised epilepsy), who have failed treatment with their first anti epileptic drug.
Minimum age
16 Years
Maximum age
90 Years
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
Patients with Primary generalised epilepsy, and patients with major psychiatric morbidity, substance abuse, intellectual disability (inability to consent), and those women plannning pregnancy.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Randomization schedule prepared and converted to sealed envelopes by trial statistician who has no contact with patients or recruiting physicians during the trial.
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Computer generated random binary digits in permuted blocks of variable length.
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 4
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
27/02/2006
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
200
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)

Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1] 1252 0
Commercial sector/Industry
Name [1] 1252 0
UCB Pharma Belgium
Country [1] 1252 0
Belgium
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Name
Associate Prof. Terence O'Brien and RMH Neurosciences Foundation
Address
Country
Secondary sponsor category [1] 1111 0
None
Name [1] 1111 0
None
Address [1] 1111 0
Country [1] 1111 0

Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Ethics committee name [1] 2585 0
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Ethics committee address [1] 2585 0
Ethics committee country [1] 2585 0
Australia
Date submitted for ethics approval [1] 2585 0
Approval date [1] 2585 0
Ethics approval number [1] 2585 0
Ethics committee name [2] 2586 0
Western Hospital
Ethics committee address [2] 2586 0
Ethics committee country [2] 2586 0
Australia
Date submitted for ethics approval [2] 2586 0
Approval date [2] 2586 0
Ethics approval number [2] 2586 0
Ethics committee name [3] 2587 0
St.Vincent
Ethics committee address [3] 2587 0
Ethics committee country [3] 2587 0
Australia
Date submitted for ethics approval [3] 2587 0
Approval date [3] 2587 0
Ethics approval number [3] 2587 0
Ethics committee name [4] 2588 0
Alfred
Ethics committee address [4] 2588 0
Ethics committee country [4] 2588 0
Australia
Date submitted for ethics approval [4] 2588 0
Approval date [4] 2588 0
Ethics approval number [4] 2588 0
Ethics committee name [5] 2589 0
Austin hospitals
Ethics committee address [5] 2589 0
Ethics committee country [5] 2589 0
Australia
Date submitted for ethics approval [5] 2589 0
Approval date [5] 2589 0
Ethics approval number [5] 2589 0

Summary
Brief summary
Epilepsy is a chronic condition with complex effects on a person’s social, vocational, and psychological function. Physicians are increasingly recognizing that there is more to managing epilepsy than seizure control alone. Side effects of Anti epileptic drugs (drugs used to treat epilepsy), psychiatric and cognitive problems associated with epilepsy are increasingly recognised. Cognition can be loosely explained as an individual’s mental ability to process information and accounts for virtues such as memory, worldly knowledge and problem solving to name a few. It is becoming increasingly recognized that these problems could adversely influence the quality of life of patients, even in those whose seizures are well controlled. The psychiatric and cognitive problems could be due to illness itself or could be due to the side effects of antiepileptic medications. By effectively managing these problems we could maximise the quality of life (QOL) and over all well-being of patients suffering with epilepsy. Only six antiepileptic drugs were available prior to 1990. In the last decade several new anti epileptic drugs have become available increasing our therapeutic options. There has been great deal of research into formulating better anti epileptic drugs, primarily spurred by the fact that the available anti epileptic drugs did not provide adequate control or patients’ were experiencing side effects from drugs. Older Anti epileptic drugs have many undesired side effects. As a group, they have been shown to adversely influence body’s ability to process bodily hormones and drugs. This leads to unwanted side effects such as sexual dysfunction, bone thinning (Osteoporosis), and failure of oral contraceptives to name a few. Side effects such as drowsiness, lethargy and psychiatric and cognitive problems are also more common with older anti epileptic drugs. The newer drugs as a group overall have been shown to have less side effects and are better tolerated. The efficacy of newer drugs is comparable if not superior to older drugs but with less side effects. It is a well-known fact that approximately two thirds of patients would become seizure free with the first or second drug given to them. In recent studies, these treatment responsive patients responded to low doses of essentially all the anti epileptic drugs studied, both old and new. Because these patients will remain on the initial or second therapy for several years, and because they will respond to most drugs, the burden is on the treating physician to select the anti epileptic drug that is most tolerable, has the lowest potential for harm, and has the least likelihood of negatively impacting quality of life.Despite their potential benefits, use of newer anti epileptic drugs thus far is largely limited to refractory cases and to tertiary centres. The newer drugs such as Levetiracetam (Keppra), have the potential to improve quality of life in subjects with epilepsy. The rationale of this project is to compare the tolerability, side effect profile and quality of life outcomes in treatment with levetiracetam versus the “older AEDs” - carbamazepine and valproate; the two drugs most commonly used as first line treatment. We hypothesize that levetiracetam’s efficacy and favourable side effect profile will enhance QOL and will improve health outcomes. We intend to test our hypothesis by prospective assessments of seizure control, cognitive and psychiatric effects and QOL. Cognitive assessments are done through a computerized battery of tests called IntegNeuro. We will also, as part of this study, perform a pilot study of to assess the utility of ocular motility (eye movement) testing as a practical method of assessing anti epileptic drug effects on cognitive performance. It is being increasingly recognized that subtle abnormalities of eye movements are seen in cognitive dysfunction. We intend to perform computerized eye movement testing in a subgroup of 20 patients randomized to each drug, and assess its use as an index of cognitive dysfunction that could be associated with anti epileptic drug use. Psychiatric and QOL assessments are done through well-validated questionnaires. The study population will be patients with epilepsy who have failed treatment with first anti epileptic drug. Failure is defined as lack of efficacy in controlling seizures or need to stop the drug because of side effects. Previous studies of Levetiracetam have been performed in either medically refractory patients who have taken multiple anti epileptic drugs or newly treated patients, whose clinical course is not yet clear. If positive the results of this study will provide evidence for the earlier use of newer anti epileptic drugs, in particular levetiracetam, especially in early stages of epilepsy and help improve the health outcomes of patients with epilepsy.
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 35252 0
Address 35252 0
Country 35252 0
Phone 35252 0
Fax 35252 0
Email 35252 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 10130 0
Associate Professor Terence O' Brien
Address 10130 0
Department of Neurology
Royal Melbourne Hospital
4N
Main Building
Grattan St
Parkville VIC 3050
Country 10130 0
Australia
Phone 10130 0
+61 3 93427722
Fax 10130 0
+61 3 93428628
Email 10130 0
[email protected]
Contact person for scientific queries
Name 1058 0
Dr Srinivasa Raju Yerra
Address 1058 0
Royal Melbourne Hospital
4N
Main Building
Grattan St
Parkville VIC 3050
Country 1058 0
Australia
Phone 1058 0
+61 3 93427722
Fax 1058 0
+61 3 93428628
Email 1058 0
[email protected]

No information has been provided regarding IPD availability


What supporting documents are/will be available?

No Supporting Document Provided



Results publications and other study-related documents

Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.

Documents added automatically
SourceTitleYear of PublicationDOI
EmbaseMonotherapy with Levetiracetam Versus Older AEDs: A Randomized Comparative Trial of Effects on Bone Health.2016https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-016-0109-7
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.