Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12606000214538
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
29/05/2006
Date registered
31/05/2006
Date last updated
31/05/2006
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Clinical trial question prompt list.
Query!
Scientific title
Enhancing cancer patient participation when discussing clinical trial enrolment: evaluation of a question prompt list.
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Cancer (any type)
1192
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
1277
1277
0
0
Query!
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Patients will be randomised to receive a question prompt list to use when discussing clinical trial participation with their treating clinician. The Question Prompt List is a series of example questions that patients might like to ask, to gain a better understanding of the clinical trial and help them make an informed decision about participating. Those patients who receive the list will be given a few minutes to review its content. Both the patient and the clinician will then refer to it during their discussion about participating in a clinical trial.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
1027
0
None
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Patients will be randomised to not receive a question prompt list to use when discussing clinical trial participation with their treating clinician. For those patients who do not receive the prompt list, the subsequent recruitment discussion will proceed in the usual manner.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
1726
0
Patient quality of understanding of clinical trial information
Query!
Assessment method [1]
1726
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
1726
0
Measured within 3 weeks of the patient making a decision about clinical trial participation
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
3079
0
1) Achievement of patient information/involvement preferences
Query!
Assessment method [1]
3079
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
3079
0
Measured in a follow-up questionnaire within 3 weeks of the patient making a decision about participating in the clinical trial they were offered.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
3080
0
2) Patient satisfaction with the informed consent and decision making process.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
3080
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
3080
0
Measured in a follow-up questionnaire within 3 weeks of the patient making a decision about participating in the clinical trial they were offered.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
3081
0
3) Clinician satisfaction with the informed consent process.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
3081
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
3081
0
Measured in a follow-up questionnaire within 3 weeks of the patient making a decision about participating in the clinical trial they were offered.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Confirmed diagnosis of cancer (any type), who are eligible to be invited to take part in Phase 3 randomised cancer clinical trial at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, can read/speak English.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
Not stated
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Psychological/cognitive disorder, too sick as advised by treating doctor.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Centrally randomised opaque envelopes will be distributed to each site and used to conceal allocation.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
A centralised, computer-generated randomisation procedure will be used.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/06/2006
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
150
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
1397
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
1397
0
The Cancer Council Victoria
Query!
Address [1]
1397
0
Query!
Country [1]
1397
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
1398
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [2]
1398
0
The Cancer Council NSW
Query!
Address [2]
1398
0
Query!
Country [2]
1398
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [3]
1399
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [3]
1399
0
The Cancer Council SA
Query!
Address [3]
1399
0
Query!
Country [3]
1399
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Royal Adelaide Hospital
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
1229
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
1229
0
None
Query!
Address [1]
1229
0
Query!
Country [1]
1229
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
2749
0
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
2749
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
2749
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
2749
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
2749
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
2749
0
X06-0045
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
2750
0
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
2750
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
2750
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
2750
0
Query!
Approval date [2]
2750
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
2750
0
06/22
Query!
Ethics committee name [3]
2751
0
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Query!
Ethics committee address [3]
2751
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [3]
2751
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [3]
2751
0
Query!
Approval date [3]
2751
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [3]
2751
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Provision and use of a question prompt list by patients during a consultation increases question asking, reduces anxiety and improves recall. Previous work on question prompt sheets has found that when patients ask more questions, they gain a better understanding of the topic and satisfied with their treatment decisions. Medical staff also tend to be more satisfied with the consent process when patient’s display a better understanding of the discussion. A Question Prompt List has been developed for patients to facilitate patient participation in clinical trial consent discussions. This project aims to examine patient attitudes to clinical trials and to investigate the effects of promoting question asking when people with cancer are asked to consider entering a randomised clinical trial. The question prompt list will be evaluated by comparing results for the control and intervention groups on understanding of clinical trial information, satisfaction with the consent process and decision-making about trial participation and achievement of their information and involvement preference. It is expected that those patients receiving the question prompt list will have a higher mean knowledge score in the informed consent questionnaire, have enhanced achievement of their information and involvement preference and be more satisfied with the informed consent and the decision making process.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
35603
0
Query!
Address
35603
0
Query!
Country
35603
0
Query!
Phone
35603
0
Query!
Fax
35603
0
Query!
Email
35603
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
10216
0
Martin Tattersall
Query!
Address
10216
0
Department of Cancer Medicine
University of Sydney
Blackburn Buiilding
DO6 Room 381
Camperdown NSW 2006
Query!
Country
10216
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
10216
0
+61 2 93513675
Query!
Fax
10216
0
Query!
Email
10216
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
1144
0
Martin Tattersall
Query!
Address
1144
0
Department of Cancer Medicine
University of Sydney
Blackburn Buiilding
DO6 Room 381
Camperdown NSW 2006
Query!
Country
1144
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
1144
0
+61 2 93513675
Query!
Fax
1144
0
Query!
Email
1144
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Parallel multicentre randomised trial of a clinical trial question prompt list in patients considering participation in phase 3 cancer treatment trials.
2017
https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012666
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF