Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12606000245594
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
22/05/2006
Date registered
19/06/2006
Date last updated
19/06/2006
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Literacy Pathway
Query!
Scientific title
Does binocular vision training enhance literacy among primary school children with poor reading?
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
LP
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Binocular vision
1222
0
Query!
Literacy
1223
0
Query!
Poor reading due to dyslexia or other conditions but excluding poor reading due to major intellectual disability.
1224
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Eye
1306
1306
0
0
Query!
Diseases / disorders of the eye
Query!
Mental Health
1307
1307
0
0
Query!
Learning disabilities
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
There are three intervention groups all with some efficacy. Interventions A and B will each be compared to C.
A. visual predominant/phonological training, 10 weeks ( one hour per week face to face, 6 hours a week homework)
B.phonological predominant/visual training , 10 weeks( one hour per week face to face, 6 hours a week homework)
Query!
Intervention code [1]
1063
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
C. parent-child educational program, 10 weeks (comparison intervention)( no face to face, 7 hours a week homework)
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
1786
0
Reading
Query!
Assessment method [1]
1786
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
1786
0
Measured at baseline, 10 weeks and 26 weeks
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
1787
0
Rate of reading test.
Woodcock Reading Mastery Test - Revised:
- Passage comprehension
- Letter identification
- Word identification
- Word attack
Query!
Assessment method [2]
1787
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
1787
0
Measured at baseline, 10 weeks and 26 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
3142
0
Visual acuity (3m LogMAR)
*Binocular
*Monocular
Stereotest
Lang test
Worth 4 dot
Near point of convergence
*Objective
*Subjective
Accommodative facility
Near vision
Query!
Assessment method [1]
3142
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
3142
0
Vision, to be measured at baseline, 10 weeks and 26 weeks.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
3143
0
Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) test
d2 Test of Attention
Copying test – error rate per 100 words
Visual attention span
Query!
Assessment method [2]
3143
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
3143
0
Visual Processing, to be measured at baseline, 10 weeks and 26 weeks.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
3144
0
Conner Parent Rating Score – Revised, short form
Conner Teacher Rating Score – Revised, short form
Query!
Assessment method [3]
3144
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
3144
0
Attention Defict Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), to be measured at baseline, 10 weeks and 26 weeks.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Children in the lowest decile of literacy according to Grade 3 national literacy and numeracy tests who also have poor stereovision on screening assessment. Children must reside in Southern Tasmania (telephone 0362).
Query!
Minimum age
7
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
13
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Major intellectual impairment or epilepsy.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Sealed opaque envelopes
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Permuted block randomisation. Block sizes are not variable
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
19/06/2006
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
300
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
1433
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
1433
0
Australian Research Council
Query!
Address [1]
1433
0
Query!
Country [1]
1433
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Menzies Research Institute, University of Tasmania
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
1264
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
1264
0
Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania
Query!
Address [1]
1264
0
Query!
Country [1]
1264
0
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [2]
1265
0
University
Query!
Name [2]
1265
0
Deapartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Tasmania
Query!
Address [2]
1265
0
Query!
Country [2]
1265
0
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [3]
1266
0
Other
Query!
Name [3]
1266
0
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
Query!
Address [3]
1266
0
Query!
Country [3]
1266
0
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [4]
1267
0
Government body
Query!
Name [4]
1267
0
Deapartment of Education, Tasmanian Government
Query!
Address [4]
1267
0
Query!
Country [4]
1267
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
2806
0
Northern Tasmanian Health and Medical Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
2806
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
2806
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
2806
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
2806
0
12/04/2005
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
2806
0
H0008202
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Five to ten percent of primary school children fail to learn to read at the standard expected from their intelligence and educational and cultural background. This condition is known as dyslexia. In 2005-2006, a dyslexia project is being conducted in participating Southern Tasmanian schools. Past work has shown that some children with normal intelligence have reading problems because of problems with coordinating both eyes to read visual images. The project aims to screen for vision coordination problems among children with low literacy. It is not currently known what proportion of children who have difficulty reading have vision problems in relation to scanning text with both eyes working together. The main aim of the Literacy Pathways Project is: To assess how children may benefit from different programs to assist them with reading. Each program contains a mixture of activities that are based on past work indicating that they have benefited some children with reading problems. The relative importance of the different components within or between the programs is currently not known and is the subject of the educational trial. Participants are unaware of the intervention status and commercial names of the reading programs in the study. The programs are referred to as the orange, yellow or green program. Participants are not aware of the content of the other programs. The people conducting the assessments are blind to intervention status. Analysis - The true group allocation will be removed for the analysis and only added back in at the end. That is, the analyst will only analyse the data being aware of the orange, yellow or green categories but not the intervention status associated with each.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
36031
0
Query!
Address
36031
0
Query!
Country
36031
0
Query!
Phone
36031
0
Query!
Fax
36031
0
Query!
Email
36031
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
10252
0
Prof Anne-Louise Ponsonby
Query!
Address
10252
0
Menzies Research Institute
University of Tasmania
GPO Box 23
Hobart TAS 7000
Query!
Country
10252
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
10252
0
+61 401678382
Query!
Fax
10252
0
+61 3 62267704
Query!
Email
10252
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
1180
0
Prof Anne-Louise Ponsonby
Query!
Address
1180
0
Menzies Research Institute
University of Tasmania
GPO Box 23
Hobart TAS 7000
Query!
Country
1180
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
1180
0
+61 401678382
Query!
Fax
1180
0
+61 3 62267704
Query!
Email
1180
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF