Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12606000234516
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
23/02/2004
Date registered
23/02/2004
Date last updated
23/02/2004
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
The effect of a decision aid for prenatal testing of fetal abnormalities compared to a pamphlet on improving women’s informed choice and decreasing decisional conflict: a randomised controlled trial.
Query!
Scientific title
Evaluation of a decision aid for prenatal testing of fetal abnormalities compared to a pamphlet on improving women’s informed choice and decreasing decision al conflict: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
52
0
Perinatal Trials Registry: PTR513
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
53
0
International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): ISRCTN22532458
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
ADEPT
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Women's decision-making regarding prenatal genetic tests.
49
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Reproductive Health and Childbirth
55
55
0
0
Query!
Antenatal care
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Intervention:
A decision aid provided to women for use during the time they are making decisions about prenatal test options.
Both resources are provided to the participating woman by her GP at the time of her first visit in pregnancy (varies from 5 –12 weeks gestation) and are to be used during the time she is making decisions about test options (dependant on test). The duration of use varies from 1 -9 weeks depending on presenting gestation and choice of test.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
1097
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Control:
A pamphlet provided to women for use during the time they are making decisions about prenatal test options.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
87
0
Informed choice and decisional conflict
Query!
Assessment method [1]
87
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
87
0
Measured at 14 weeks gestation
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
173
0
Acceptability of the decision aid/pamphlet to women and GPs.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
173
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
173
0
Measured at 14 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
174
0
Anxiety, Depression, attitudes to the pregnancy/fetus.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
174
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
174
0
Measured at 14 weeks, 24 weeks and 3 months post partum.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
175
0
Satisfaction with the decision, and decisional regret.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
175
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
175
0
Measured at 24 weeks and 3 months post partum.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
176
0
Changes in informed choice and decisional conflict.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
176
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
176
0
Measured at 24 weeks and 3 months post partum.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Victorian GPs will be eligible for participation provided they consult with least 30 women meeting the selection criteria in a 12-month period. Pregnant attending a participating GP will be eligible if they are: less than 12 weeks gestation.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
Not stated
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. are non-english speaking2. are unable to give written informed consent3. require genetic counselling due to a familiy history of an inherited disorder4. have not undertaken any testing to date for fetal abnormality in this pregnancy5. are currently experiencing vaginal bleeding6. have a known multiple pregnancy
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
All GPs provided verbal consent to be randomised prior to randomisation and were therefore unaware of the group to which they would be allocated. A statistician independent of the project conducted all randomisation. The allocation schedule was “off site”.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
computer generated random list
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Active, not recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
13/08/2004
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
664
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
79
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
79
0
National Health & Medical Research Council project grant (ID 237124) 2002-2004.
Query!
Address [1]
79
0
Query!
Country [1]
79
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Jane Halliday, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
65
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
65
0
Nil
Query!
Address [1]
65
0
Query!
Country [1]
65
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
584
0
the ethics committee of Royal Australian College of General Practices
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
584
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
584
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
584
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
584
0
20/12/2004
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
584
0
NREE03-16
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
In recent years new prenatal tests have been developed and these are available earlier in pregnancy. There has also been a dramatic increase in the uptake of screening tests for women in all age groups. Peak obstetric and genetic bodies in Britain, Canada and Australia now recommend that: 1. all women pregnant be informed of, and offered screening tests for fetal abnormality and 2. women who are at an increased risk of chromosomal abnormality on the basis of their age or previously affected pregnancy should be informed of, and offerred the choice of screening or diagnostic tests. This means that an ever-increasing number of women are confronted with information that is complex and women are required to make decisions that are often difficult and confusing. To date, technological developments have not resulted in commensurate improvements in the resources available to support women faced with important decisions regarding prenatal testing. Studies from a variety of health settings such as cancer treatments and hormone replacement therapy, have demonstrated that decision support strategies such as decision aids have facilitated an increase in the capacity of individuals to make an informed choice and have decreased levels of uncertainty and conflict. However, the role of decision aids in prenatal testing is not established. This trial aims to evaluate a decision aid for prenatal testing of fetal abnormalities in the Victorian primary health cre setting using a cluster randomised controlled trial. Fifty GPs will be randomly allocated to either the intervention or the control arm of the trial. GPs will recruit 10 consecutive women using pre-specified selection criteria. The primary outcomes will be the difference in the rate of informed choice and decisional conflict between the two groups assessed at 14 weeks gestation
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
36018
0
Query!
Address
36018
0
Query!
Country
36018
0
Query!
Phone
36018
0
Query!
Fax
36018
0
Query!
Email
36018
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
10286
0
Cate Nagle
Query!
Address
10286
0
Public Health Genetics
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
Flemington Road
Parkville VIC 3052
Query!
Country
10286
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
10286
0
+61 3 83416370
Query!
Fax
10286
0
+61 3 83416212
Query!
Email
10286
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
1214
0
Cate Nagle
Query!
Address
1214
0
Public Health Genetics
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
Flemington Road
Parkville VIC 3052
Query!
Country
1214
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
1214
0
+61 3 83416370
Query!
Fax
1214
0
+61 3 83416212
Query!
Email
1214
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF