Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00420849
Registration number
NCT00420849
Ethics application status
Date submitted
9/01/2007
Date registered
11/01/2007
Date last updated
21/05/2012
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Multicentre, Single-arm, Open-label Safety Study of Lenalidomide Plus Dexamethasone in Previously Treated Subjects With Multiple Myeloma
Query!
Scientific title
A Multicentre, Single-arm, Open-label Safety Study of Lenalidomide Plus Dexamethasone in Previously Treated Subjects With Multiple Myeloma
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2006-002517-12
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
CC-5013-MM-018
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Multiple Myeloma
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other cancer types
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Lenalidomide
Treatment: Drugs - Dexamethasone
Experimental: Lenalidomide plus Dexamethasone - Lenalidomide administered orally, 25 mg daily (QD) for the first 21 days of each 28-day cycle. Pulse dexamethasone administered orally, 40 mg daily on Days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20 for each 28-day cycle during Cycles 1 to 4 (approximately months 1-4). Beginning with Cycle 5 (approximately month 5), a maintenance dose of dexamethasone (40 mg QD) was administered on Days 1 to 4 of each 28-day cycle.
Treatment: Drugs: Lenalidomide
Oral lenalidomide at a dose of 25 mg daily for 21 days every 28 days. Treatment as tolerated until disease progression, drug became commercially available or limited to 6 treatment cycles.
Treatment: Drugs: Dexamethasone
Oral pulse dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg daily on days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20 for each 28-day-cycle for cycles 1 through 4. Beginning cycle 5, a maintenance dose of dexamethasone (40 mg QD) was administered on Days 1 to 4 of each 28-day cycle.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Overall Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), by Severity, Seriousness, and Relationship to Treatment
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Counts of study participants who had treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) defined as any reported AE that started on or after the first day of study drug dosing. A participant with multiple occurrences of an adverse event within a category is counted only once in that category.
National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE version 3.0) was used by investigators to assess TEAEs. Severity scale ranges from 0 (none) to 5 (death). Grade 3=severe AE; Grade 4=life threatening or disabling AE; Grade 5=death.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
up to 123 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Peripheral Neuropathy
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Number of participants with at least one peripheral neuropathy treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), and number of participants reporting AEs coded to preferred terms that comprise the search terms for peripheral neuropathy in MedDRA version 9.0 are listed. A participant with multiple occurrences of a TEAE was counted only once for that category.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
up to 124 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Time to First Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Time between first dose and when a TEAE for peripheral neuropathy was reported. The mean is the univariate mean without adjusting for censoring. The treatment duration was used for censored participants.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
up to 124 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Venous Thromboembolic Events
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Number of participants with at least one venous thromboembolic treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), and number of participants reporting AEs coded to preferred terms that comprise the search terms for venous thromboembolic events in MedDRA version 9.0 are listed. A participant with multiple occurrences of a TEAE was counted only once for that category.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
up to 124 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Time to First Venous Thromboembolic Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Time between first dose and when a TEAE for venous thromboembolic event was reported. The mean is the univariate mean without adjusting for censoring. The treatment duration was used for censored participants.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
up to 124 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning Scale
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. EORTC QLQ-C30 includes functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), global health status, symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and other (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of physical functioning.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline (Day 0), Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Role Functioning Scale
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of role functioning.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline (Day 0), Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Emotional Functioning Scale
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score = better level of emotional functioning.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline (Day 0), Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Cognitive Functioning Scale
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score = better level of cognitive functioning.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline (Day 0), Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning Scale
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score = better level of social functioning.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline (Day 0), Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue Scale
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the fatigue scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline (Day 0), Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Pain Scale
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the pain scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline (Day 0), Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Nausea/Vomiting Scale
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the nausea/vomiting scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Baseline (Day 0), Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Constipation Scale
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the constipation scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline (Day 0), Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Diarrhea Scale
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the diarrhea scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline (Day 0), Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Insomnia Scale
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the insomnia scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Baseline (Day 0), Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Dyspnoea Scale
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the dyspnoea scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline (Day 0), Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Appetite Loss Scale
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the appetite loss scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Baseline (Day 0), Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Financial Problems Scale
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a problem scale like the financial problems scale = higher level of financial problems.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Baseline (Day 0), Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life Scale
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
EORTQ QLC-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score = better quality of life.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Baseline (Day 0), Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms Scale
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. EORTC QLQ-MY20 includes four scales: disease symptoms, treatment side-effects, future perspective, and body image. Questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for the disease symptoms scale = higher level of symptomatology.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Baseline (Day 0), Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Side Effects Scale
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. Questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for the side effects scale = higher level of symptomatology.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Baseline (Day 0), Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Future Perspective Scale
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. Questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale. For the future perspective scale, higher score = better perspective of the future.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Baseline (Day 0), Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Body Image Scale
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. Questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale. For the body image scale, higher scores = better body image.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
Baseline (Day 0), Week 24
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- Must be diagnosed with multiple myeloma that is progressing after at least 2 cycles of
anti-myeloma treatment or that has relapsed with progressive disease after treatment.
- Subjects must discontinue all anti-myeloma drug or non-drug therapy prior to the first
dose of study drug with the exception of radiation therapy initiated prior to
baseline.
- Females of childbearing potential must agree to use two reliable forms of
contraception simultaneously or to practice complete abstinence.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
- Pregnant or lactating females
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
N/A
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/11/2006
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/11/2009
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
587
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
The Mater Private Centre for Haematology & Oncology - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
QLD 4101 - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Montlearstrasse 37
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Ireland
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Dublin
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Salamanca
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
London
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name
Celgene Corporation
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This is a multi-centre, single-arm treatment study combining lenalidomide plus high dose
dexamethasone.
Subjects who qualify for participation will receive lenalidomide plus high dose dexamethasone
in 4 week cycles. Subjects will be seen every 2 weeks for the first 3 cycles of therapy and
then every 4 weeks after the third cycle until disease progression is documented, study drug
is discontinued for any reason or lenalidomide becomes commercially available for this
indication. Assessments of safety and quality of life are performed during the study.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00420849
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Robert Knight, MD
Query!
Address
0
0
Celgene Therapeutic Area Head
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Summary Results
For IPD and results data, please see
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00420849
Download to PDF