Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00464269
Registration number
NCT00464269
Ethics application status
Date submitted
19/04/2007
Date registered
23/04/2007
Date last updated
21/07/2022
Titles & IDs
Public title
Double-blind, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Brivaracetam in Adults With Partial Onset Seizures
Query!
Scientific title
An International, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Study: Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Brivaracetam in Subjects (>= 16 to 70 Years Old) With Partial Onset Seizures
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2006-006345-14
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
N01253
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Epilepsy
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Neurological
0
0
0
0
Query!
Epilepsy
Query!
Neurological
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional(has expanded access)
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Other interventions - Placebo
Treatment: Drugs - Brivaracetam 2.5 mg
Treatment: Drugs - Brivaracetam 10 mg
Treatment: Drugs - Brivaracetam 25 mg
Placebo comparator: Placebo - Matching Placebo tablets administered twice a day. Daily oral dose of two equal intakes, morning and evening, of Placebo in a double-blinded way for the 12-week Treatment Period.
Experimental: Brivaracetam 5 mg/day - Brivaracetam 5 mg/day, 2.5 mg administered twice a day. Daily oral dose of two equal intakes, morning and evening, of Brivaracetam 5 mg /day in a double-blinded way for the 12-week Treatment Period.
Experimental: BRV 20mg/day - Brivaracetam 20 mg/day, 10 mg administered twice a day. Daily oral dose of two equal intakes, morning and evening, of Brivaracetam 20 mg /day in a double-blinded way for the 12-week Treatment Period.
Experimental: BRV 50mg/day - Brivaracetam 50 mg/day, 25 mg administered twice a day. Daily oral dose of two equal intakes, morning and evening, of Brivaracetam 50 mg /day, in a double-blinded way for the 12-week Treatment Period.
Other interventions: Placebo
* Active Substance: Placebo
* Pharmaceutical Form: Film-coated tablet
* Concentration: 2.5 mg, 10 mg and 25 mg
* Route of Administration: Oral use
Treatment: Drugs: Brivaracetam 2.5 mg
* Active Substance: Brivaracetam
* Pharmaceutical Form: Film-coated tablet
* Concentration: 2.5 mg
* Route of Administration: Oral use
Treatment: Drugs: Brivaracetam 10 mg
* Active Substance: Brivaracetam
* Pharmaceutical Form: Film-coated tablet
* Concentration: 10 mg
* Route of Administration: Oral use
Treatment: Drugs: Brivaracetam 25 mg
* Active Substance: Brivaracetam
* Pharmaceutical Form: Film-coated tablet
* Concentration: 25 mg
* Route of Administration: Oral use
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Other interventions
Query!
Intervention code [2]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Partial Onset Seizure (Type I) Frequency Per Week Over the 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Partial (Type I) seizures can be classified into one of the following three groups:
* Simple partial seizures
* Complex partial seizures
* Partial seizures evolving to generalized tonic-clonic convulsions.
Partial Onset Seizure (POS) Frequency per week over the Treatment Period (TP) was calculated as:
(Total Type I seizures over the TP)\*7/(Total number of days with no missing seizure count in the TP)
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Responder Rate for Partial Onset Seizure (Type I) Frequency Per Week Over the 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The responder rate was presented as the number of responders and non-responders. A subject is a responder, if the subject has at least 50 % reduction in partial onset seizure frequency per week from Baseline to Treatment Period. Subjects with zero seizure frequency per week at Baseline were considered as non-responders.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
All Seizure Frequency (Type I+II+III) Per Week Over the 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
There are three different types of seizures:
* Type I: Partial seizures
* Type II: Generalized seizures
* Type III: Unclassified epileptic seizures.
All seizure frequency per week over Treatment Period (TP) was calculated as: (Total number of seizures over the TP)\*7/(Total number of days with no missing seizure count in the TP)
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percent Change From Baseline to the 12-week Treatment Period in Partial Onset Seizure (Type I) Frequency Per Week
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as percent reduction by:
(weekly seizure frequency Baseline - weekly seizure frequency Treatment)\*100/(weekly seizure frequency Baseline).
The higher the values for percent change in Partial Onset Seizure (POS) frequency, the higher the improvement from Baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Categorized Percentage Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency for Partial Onset Seizure (Type I) Over the 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Subjects were classified in 1 of the following categories based on their percent reduction from Baseline to Treatment Period in Partial Onset Seizure (POS) frequency per week: \<-25 %, -25 % to \<25 %, 25 % to \<50 %, 50 % to \<75 %, 75 % to \<100 %, and 100 %.
Subjects having zero for Baseline seizure frequency per week were classified in the \<-25 % category.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Seizure Freedom Rate (All Seizure Types) Over the 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Subjects were considered seizure free if their seizure counts for every day over the Treatment Period (TP) was zero and if they did not discontinue before the end of the TP. Seizure freedom rate was calculated as:
(total number of seizure - free subjects in treatment group during TP)/(total number of evaluable Intent-To-Treat (ITT) subjects in treatment group)
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Time to First Type I Seizure During the 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The time to first Partial Onset Seizure (POS) in the Treatment Period is defined as the time between beginning of the Treatment Period and the date of occurrence of first Type I seizure. Subjects withdrawing during the Treatment Period before having a first Type I seizure were considered as having a first Type I seizure on the last day of their Treatment Period.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Time to Fifth Type I Seizure During the 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The time to fifth Partial Onset Seizure (POS) in the Treatment Period is defined as the time between beginning of the Treatment Period and the date of occurrence of fifth Type I seizure. Subjects withdrawing during the Treatment Period before having a fifth Type I seizure were considered as having a fifth Type I seizure on the last day of their Treatment Period.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Time to Tenth Type I Seizure During the 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The time to tenth Partial Onset Seizure (POS) in the Treatment Period is defined as the time between beginning of the Treatment Period and the date of occurrence of tenth Type I seizure. Subjects withdrawing during the Treatment Period before having a tenth Type I seizure were considered as having a tenth Type I seizure on the last day of their Treatment Period.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Reduction of Type IC/Type I Seizure Frequency Ratio From Baseline to the 12- Week Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The type IC/Type I seizure frequency ratio is represented by the percentage of subjects having a reduction in the ratio of Type IC seizure frequency over Type IA, IB, and IC seizure frequency from Baseline to Treatment Period.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change From Baseline to the 12-week Treatment Period in Total Patient Weighted Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-Form 31 (QOLIE-31-P) Score
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
The Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-Form 31 (QOLIE-31-P) is an adaptation of the original QOLIE-31 instrument that includes 30 items grouped into seven multi-items subscales - seizure worry (5 items), overall quality of life (2 items), emotional well-being (5 items), energy / fatigue (4 items), cognitive functioning (6 items), medication effects (3 items), and social function (5 items) - and a health status item.
The subscale scores, the total score and the health status item score range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating better function.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Change From Baseline to the 12-week Treatment Period in Seizure Worry Patient Weighted Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-Form 31 (QOLIE-31-P) Score
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-Form 31 (QOLIE-31-P) is an adaptation of the original QOLIE-31 instrument that includes 30 items grouped into seven multi-items subscales - seizure worry (5 items), overall quality of life (2 items), emotional well-being (5 items), energy / fatigue (4 items), cognitive functioning (6 items), medication effects (3 items), and social function (5 items) - and a health status item.
The subscale scores, the total score and the health status item score range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating better function.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Change From Baseline to the 12-week Treatment Period in Daily Activities / Social Functioning Patient Weighted Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-Form 31 (QOLIE-31-P) Score
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
The Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-Form 31 (QOLIE-31-P) is an adaptation of the original QOLIE-31 instrument that includes 30 items grouped into seven multi-items subscales - seizure worry (5 items), overall quality of life (2 items), emotional well-being (5 items), energy / fatigue (4 items), cognitive functioning (6 items), medication effects (3 items), and social function (5 items) - and a health status item.
The subscale scores, the total score and the health status item score range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating better function.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Change From Baseline to the 12-week Treatment Period in Hospital Anxiety Score
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to evaluate anxiety and depression. The HADS was developed as a self administered scale to assess the presence and severity of both anxiety and depression simultaneously. It consists of 14 items that are scored on a 4-point severity scale ranging from 0 to 3. A score per dimension was calculated with each score ranging from 0 to 21 and higher scores indicating higher depression / anxiety. A negative value in change from Baseline shows an improvement in HADS from Baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Change From Baseline to the 12-week Treatment Period in Hospital Depression Score
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to evaluate anxiety and depression. The HADS was developed as a self administered scale to assess the presence and severity of both anxiety and depression simultaneously. It consists of 14 items that are scored on a 4-point severity scale ranging from 0 to 3. A score per dimension was calculated with each score ranging from 0 to 21 and higher scores indicating higher depression / anxiety. A negative value in change from Baseline shows an improvement in HADS from Baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Patient's Global Evaluation Scale (P-GES) Evaluated at Last Visit or Early Discontinuation Visit
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Patient's Global Evaluation Scale (P-GES) is a global assessment of the disease evolution which was performed using a seven-point scale (1= Marked worsening to 7 = Marked improvement) with the start of the study medication as the reference time point. The subject completed it by answering to the following: 'Overall, has there been a change in your seizures since the start of the study medication?'
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Baseline to Last Visit or Early Discontinuation Visit in the 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale (I-GES) Evaluated at Last Visit or Early Discontinuation Visit
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
The Investigator's Global Evaluation Scale (I-GES) is a global assessment of the disease evolution which was performed using a seven-point scale (1 = Marked worsening to 7 = Marked improvement) with the start of the study medication as the reference time point. The investigator completed it by answering to the following: 'Assess the overall change in the severity of patient's illness, compared to start of study medication.'
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline to Last Visit or Early Discontinuation Visit in the 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Change From Baseline to the 12-week Treatment Period in Energy/Fatigue Patient Weighted Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-Form 31 (QOLIE-31-P) Score
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
The QOLIE-31-P is an adaptation of the original QOLIE-31 instrument that includes 30 items grouped into seven multi-item subscales - Seizure Worry (5 items), Overall Quality of Life (2 items), Emotional Well-Being (5 items), Energy/Fatigue (4 items), Cognitive Functioning (6 items), Medication Effects (3 items) and Daily Activities/Social Functioning (5 items) - and a Health Status item. The subscale scores, the Total score and the Health Status item score are calculated according to the scoring algorithm defined by the author with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating better function. A positive value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
From Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Change From Baseline to the 12-week Treatment Period in Emotional Well-Being Patient Weighted Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-Form 31 (QOLIE-31-P) Score
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
The QOLIE-31-P is an adaptation of the original QOLIE-31 instrument that includes 30 items grouped into seven multi-item subscales - Seizure Worry (5 items), Overall Quality of Life (2 items), Emotional Well-Being (5 items), Energy/Fatigue (4 items), Cognitive Functioning (6 items), Medication Effects (3 items) and Daily Activities/Social Functioning (5 items) - and a Health Status item. The subscale scores, the Total score and the Health Status item score are calculated according to the scoring algorithm defined by the author with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating better function. A positive value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
From Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Change From Baseline to the 12-week Treatment Period in Cognitive Functioning Patient Weighted Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-Form 31 (QOLIE-31-P) Score
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
The QOLIE-31-P is an adaptation of the original QOLIE-31 instrument that includes 30 items grouped into seven multi-item subscales - Seizure Worry (5 items), Overall Quality of Life (2 items), Emotional Well-Being (5 items), Energy/Fatigue (4 items), Cognitive Functioning (6 items), Medication Effects (3 items) and Daily Activities/Social Functioning (5 items) - and a Health Status item. The subscale scores, the Total score and the Health Status item score are calculated according to the scoring algorithm defined by the author with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating better function. A positive value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
From Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Change From Baseline to the 12-week Treatment Period in Medication Effects Patient Weighted Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-Form 31 (QOLIE-31-P) Score
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
The QOLIE-31-P is an adaptation of the original QOLIE-31 instrument that includes 30 items grouped into seven multi-item subscales - Seizure Worry (5 items), Overall Quality of Life (2 items), Emotional Well-Being (5 items), Energy/Fatigue (4 items), Cognitive Functioning (6 items), Medication Effects (3 items) and Daily Activities/Social Functioning (5 items) - and a Health Status item. The subscale scores, the Total score and the Health Status item score are calculated according to the scoring algorithm defined by the author with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating better function. A positive value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
From Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Change From Baseline to the 12-week Treatment Period in Overall Quality of Life Patient Weighted Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-Form 31 (QOLIE-31-P) Score
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
The QOLIE-31-P is an adaptation of the original QOLIE-31 instrument that includes 30 items grouped into seven multi-item subscales - Seizure Worry (5 items), Overall Quality of Life (2 items), Emotional Well-Being (5 items), Energy/Fatigue (4 items), Cognitive Functioning (6 items), Medication Effects (3 items) and Daily Activities/Social Functioning (5 items) - and a Health Status item. The subscale scores, the Total score and the Health Status item score are calculated according to the scoring algorithm defined by the author with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating better function. A positive value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
From Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Change From Baseline to the 12-week Treatment Period in Health Status of Life Patient Weighted Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-Form 31 (QOLIE-31-P) Score
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
The QOLIE-31-P is an adaptation of the original QOLIE-31 instrument that includes 30 items grouped into seven multi-item subscales - Seizure Worry (5 items), Overall Quality of Life (2 items), Emotional Well-Being (5 items), Energy/Fatigue (4 items), Cognitive Functioning (6 items), Medication Effects (3 items) and Daily Activities/Social Functioning (5 items) - and a Health Status item. The subscale scores, the Total score and the Health Status item score are calculated according to the scoring algorithm defined by the author with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating better function. A positive value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
From Baseline to 12-week Treatment Period
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Subjects were 16 to 70 years, both inclusive. Subjects under 18 years of age were only included where legally permitted and ethically accepted
* Subjects with well-characterized focal epilepsy or epileptic syndrome according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification
* Subjects had a history of partial onset seizures (POS) whether or not secondarily generalized (Type I seizures according to the ILAE classification)
* Subjects had at least 2 POS whether or not secondarily generalized per month during the 3 months preceding Visit 1 (V1)
* Subjects had at least 8 POS whether or not secondarily generalized during the 8-Week Baseline Period
* Subjects were uncontrolled while treated by 1 to 2 permitted concomitant antiepileptic drug(s) (AEDs). Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) was allowed and was not counted as a concomitant AED
Query!
Minimum age
16
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
70
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* History or presence of seizures occurring only in clusters (too frequently or indistinctly separated to be reliably counted) before Visit 3
* History or presence of status epilepticus during the year preceding Visit 1 or during Baseline
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/09/2007
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/01/2009
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
400
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,SA,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
- Chatswood
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
- Randwick
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
- Woodville
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
- Clayton
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
- Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
- Parkville
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
- Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
0
0
- West Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Chatswood
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
- Randwick
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
- Woodville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
- Clayton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
- Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
- Parkville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
0
0
- Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
0
0
- West Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Arkansas
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
District of Columbia
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Kansas
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Kentucky
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Mississippi
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Wisconsin
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Campinas
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Curitiba
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Florianópolis
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Porto Alegre
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Ribeirao Preto
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Salvador
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Sao Jose do Rio Preto
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Sao Paulo
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
São Paulo
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
DF
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
NL
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Aguascalientes
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Chihuahua
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Mexico DF
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Monterrey
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Nuevo León
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
San Luis Potosi
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
UCB Pharma
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Brivaracetam to support the submission file in the indication of adjunctive treatment in adolescents and adults with partial onset seizures.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00464269
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Biton V, Berkovic SF, Abou-Khalil B, Sperling MR, Johnson ME, Lu S. Brivaracetam as adjunctive treatment for uncontrolled partial epilepsy in adults: a phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Epilepsia. 2014 Jan;55(1):57-66. doi: 10.1111/epi.12433. Epub 2013 Nov 8. Toledo M, Whitesides J, Schiemann J, Johnson ME, Eckhardt K, McDonough B, Borghs S, Kwan P. Safety, tolerability, and seizure control during long-term treatment with adjunctive brivaracetam for partial-onset seizures. Epilepsia. 2016 Jul;57(7):1139-51. doi: 10.1111/epi.13416. Epub 2016 Jun 6. Ben-Menachem E, Mameniskiene R, Quarato PP, Klein P, Gamage J, Schiemann J, Johnson ME, Whitesides J, McDonough B, Eckhardt K. Efficacy and safety of brivaracetam for partial-onset seizures in 3 pooled clinical studies. Neurology. 2016 Jul 19;87(3):314-23. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002864. Epub 2016 Jun 22. Brodie MJ, Whitesides J, Schiemann J, D'Souza J, Johnson ME. Tolerability, safety, and efficacy of adjunctive brivaracetam for focal seizures in older patients: A pooled analysis from three phase III studies. Epilepsy Res. 2016 Nov;127:114-118. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.08.018. Epub 2016 Aug 18. Mukuria C, Young T, Keetharuth A, Borghs S, Brazier J. Sensitivity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L in patients with uncontrolled focal seizures: an analysis of Phase III trials of adjunctive brivaracetam. Qual Life Res. 2017 Mar;26(3):749-759. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1483-3. Epub 2016 Dec 21. Moseley BD, Sperling MR, Asadi-Pooya AA, Diaz A, Elmouft S, Schiemann J, Whitesides J. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam for secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures: Pooled results from three Phase III studies. Epilepsy Res. 2016 Nov;127:179-185. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 3. Brandt C, Borghs S, Elmoufti S, Mueller K, Townsend R, de la Loge C. Health-related quality of life in double-blind Phase III studies of brivaracetam as adjunctive therapy of focal seizures: A pooled, post-hoc analysis. Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Apr;69:80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.11.031. Epub 2017 Feb 23. Klein P, Johnson ME, Schiemann J, Whitesides J. Time to onset of sustained >/=50% responder status in patients with focal (partial-onset) seizures in three phase III studies of adjunctive brivaracetam treatment. Epilepsia. 2017 Feb;58(2):e21-e25. doi: 10.1111/epi.13631. Epub 2016 Dec 18. Asadi-Pooya AA, Sperling MR, Chung S, Klein P, Diaz A, Elmoufti S, Schiemann J, Whitesides J. Efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam in patients with prior antiepileptic drug exposure: A post-hoc study. Epilepsy Res. 2017 Mar;131:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 27. Erratum In: Epilepsy Res. 2017 Nov;137:165-166. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.04.019. Benbadis S, Klein P, Schiemann J, Diaz A, Elmoufti S, Whitesides J. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of brivaracetam with concomitant lamotrigine or concomitant topiramate in pooled Phase III randomized, double-blind trials: A post-hoc analysis. Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Mar;80:129-134. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.12.024. Epub 2018 Feb 3. Brodie MJ, Fakhoury T, McDonough B, Colson AO, Stockis A, Elmoufti S, Whitesides J. Brivaracetam-induced elevation of carbamazepine epoxide levels: A post-hoc analysis from the clinical development program. Epilepsy Res. 2018 Sep;145:55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 4. Klein P, Laloyaux C, Elmoufti S, Gasalla T, Martin MS. Time course of 75%-100% efficacy response of adjunctive brivaracetam. Acta Neurol Scand. 2020 Aug;142(2):175-180. doi: 10.1111/ane.13287. Epub 2020 Jun 9. Moseley BD, Dimova S, Elmoufti S, Laloyaux C, Asadi-Pooya AA. Long-term efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam in adults with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic (secondary generalized) seizures: Post hoc pooled analysis. Epilepsy Res. 2021 Oct;176:106694. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106694. Epub 2021 Jun 24. Ryvlin P, Dimova S, Elmoufti S, Floricel F, Laloyaux C, Nondonfaz X, Biton V. Tolerability and efficacy of adjunctive brivaracetam in adults with focal seizures by concomitant antiseizure medication use: Pooled results from three phase 3 trials. Epilepsia. 2022 Aug;63(8):2024-2036. doi: 10.1111/epi.17304. Epub 2022 Jun 10. Bresnahan R, Panebianco M, Marson AG. Brivaracetam add-on therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 14;3(3):CD011501. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011501.pub3. Lee SK, Heo K, Kim SE, Lee SA, Elmoufti S, Laloyaux C, Hur B. Effect of Number of Previous Antiseizure Medications on Efficacy and Tolerability of Adjunctive Brivaracetam for Uncontrolled Focal Seizures: Post Hoc Analysis. Adv Ther. 2021 Jul;38(7):4082-4099. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01816-5. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
UCB Clinical Trial Call Center
Query!
Address
0
0
+1 877 822 9493 (UCB)
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Type
Citations or Other Details
Journal
Biton V, Berkovic SF, Abou-Khalil B, Sperling MR, ...
[
More Details
]
Journal
Toledo M, Whitesides J, Schiemann J, Johnson ME, E...
[
More Details
]
Journal
Ben-Menachem E, Mameniskiene R, Quarato PP, Klein ...
[
More Details
]
Journal
Brodie MJ, Whitesides J, Schiemann J, D'Souza J, J...
[
More Details
]
Journal
Mukuria C, Young T, Keetharuth A, Borghs S, Brazie...
[
More Details
]
Journal
Moseley BD, Sperling MR, Asadi-Pooya AA, Diaz A, E...
[
More Details
]
Journal
Brandt C, Borghs S, Elmoufti S, Mueller K, Townsen...
[
More Details
]
Journal
Klein P, Johnson ME, Schiemann J, Whitesides J. Ti...
[
More Details
]
Journal
Asadi-Pooya AA, Sperling MR, Chung S, Klein P, Dia...
[
More Details
]
Journal
Benbadis S, Klein P, Schiemann J, Diaz A, Elmoufti...
[
More Details
]
Journal
Brodie MJ, Fakhoury T, McDonough B, Colson AO, Sto...
[
More Details
]
Journal
Klein P, Laloyaux C, Elmoufti S, Gasalla T, Martin...
[
More Details
]
Journal
Moseley BD, Dimova S, Elmoufti S, Laloyaux C, Asad...
[
More Details
]
Journal
Ryvlin P, Dimova S, Elmoufti S, Floricel F, Laloya...
[
More Details
]
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00464269
Download to PDF