Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00477295
Registration number
NCT00477295
Ethics application status
Date submitted
21/05/2007
Date registered
23/05/2007
Date last updated
24/12/2015
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Double-blind Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Zonisamide and Carbamazepine as Monotherapy, in Newly Diagnosed Partial Epilepsy
Query!
Scientific title
A Randomized, Multi-centre, Double-blind Study, to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Zonisamide and Carbamazepine as Monotherapy, in Newly Diagnosed Partial Epilepsy
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2006-000156-40
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
E2090-E044-310
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Epilepsy
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Neurological
0
0
0
0
Query!
Epilepsy
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Zonisamide
Treatment: Drugs - Carbamazepine
Active comparator: Zonisamide -
Active comparator: Carbamazepine -
Treatment: Drugs: Zonisamide
Week 1 and 2 either 100mg zonisamide or 200 mg carbamazepine Week 3 and 4 either 200mg zonisamide or 4800 mg carbamazepine Week 5 and 6 either 300mg zonisamide or 600 mg carbamazepine; this dose then to be maintained unless a subject has a seizure more than two weeks post a dose increase.
Treatment: Drugs: Carbamazepine
Week 1 and 2 either 100mg zonisamide or 200 mg carbamazepine Week 3 and 4 either 200mg zonisamide or 4800 mg carbamazepine Week 5 and 6 either 300mg zonisamide or 600 mg carbamazepine; this dose then to be maintained unless a subject has a seizure more than two weeks post a dose increase.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Seizure Freedom for 26-weeks During the Maintenance Phase
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
A subject achieved a 26-week seizure-free period if they were free of all seizures, regardless of seizure type, for 26 weeks while receiving the same dose. The occurrence of seizures was documented in the seizure diary, which was maintained by the subject and reviewed at each following visit.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Week 31 through Week 109
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Seizure Freedom for 12-months During the FDP and Maintenance Period
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
A subject achieved a 12-month seizure-free period if they were free of all seizures, regardless of seizure type, for 12 months while receiving the same dose. The occurrence of seizures was documented in the seizure diary, which was maintained by the subject and reviewed at each following visit.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Week 5 through Week 109
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Analysis of Time to Drop Out Due to an Adverse Event (AE)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the medicinal product. Adverse events were identified by: any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom or disease temporarily associated with the use of a medicinal product; any new disease or exacerbation of an existing disease; any deterioration in nonprotocol-required measurements of laboratory values or other clinical test; and recurrence of an intermittent medical condition not present at Baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Week 1 through Week 109
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Analysis of Time to Drop Out Due to Lack of Efficacy
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Lack of efficacy was evaluated by the subject and on the basis of whether zonisamide and carbamazepine gave the subject at least a 26-week seizure free rate. The subject could withdraw at any time due to lack of efficacy.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Week 1 through Week 109
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Time to 6-months Seizure Freedom
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
A subject achieved a 6-months seizure-free period if they were free of all seizures, regardless of seizure type, for 6-months while receiving the same dose. The occurrence of seizures was documented in the seizure diary, which was maintained by the subject and reviewed at each following visit.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Week 5 through Week 83
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Time to 12-months Seizure Freedom
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
A subject achieved a 12-month seizure-free period if they were free of all seizures, regardless of seizure type, for 12-months while receiving the same dose. The occurrence of seizures was documented in the seizure diary, which was maintained by the subject and reviewed at each following visit.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Week 5 through Week 83
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Total ABNAS Score at Maintenance Period Visit 1
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The Aldenkamp-Baker Neuropsychological Assessment Scale(ABNAS) is a subject based questionnaire to measure subjective perceived drug-related cognitive impairments. The ABNAS measured seven critical domains of cognition(tiredness/fatigue,hyperexcitability, slowing(mental and motor),memory impairment,attention disorders,impairment of motor coordination, and language disorders). The total score ranged from 0 to 72, with a higher score reflecting a high level of problems.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Bond and Lader VAS Mood Sub-Scores at Maintenance Period Visit 1
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The Bond-Lader Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is made up of 16 pairs of alternative descriptors of mood and attention at either end of a 10 cm line.
Subjects were asked to rate their feelings at the time of assessment by indicating the point on the line which best represent their mood. Each item was scored by measuring the position relative to the left hand end of the line and levels of anxiety, sedation, and dysphoria were then calculated from the combined scores of selected items. The scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a high score reflecting a high level of anxiety, sedation or dysphoria.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change From Baseline in QOLIE-31-P Overall Score at Maintenance Period Visit 1
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The Quality of Life in Epilepsy - Problems(QOLIE-31-P) was completed by the patient and contained 30 items covering seven subscales(seizure worry, overall
Quality of Life (QOL),emotional well-being,energy-fatigue, cognition,medication effects and social function) and one item covering health status. It also included seven items addressing overall distress related to each subscale, an item addressing the relative importance of each subscale topic, and an item addressing perception of overall change in QOL at the end of the study. A high score reflects a good QOL. The following scale range is a sample of 1 of the 7 of the subscales:
10 (Best possible quality of life) - 0 (Worst possible quality of life);
Rand Corporation QOLIE-31 Scoring Manual was used. The QOLIE-31 overall score is calculated by summing the product of each scale score times its weight and summing overall all scales.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Aggregate Mental and Physical Component Score at Maintenance Period Visit 1
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The Short Form 36 Health and Well-Being Questionnaire (SF-36) is a 36-item generic health related QOL instrument covering the following domains: physical functioning, role-physical,bodily pain, general health, social functioning,role-emotional, mental health, and vitality. It yields a profile of eight scores, one for each domain, and physical and mental health summary measures. Each domain is described by a score ranging from 0 to 100, for a range of total possible scoes of 0-400 for physical and 0-400 for mental. An increase represents an improvement, whereas a decrease reflects a worsening.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With EQ-5D Scores at Maintenance Period Visit 1
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
The European Quality of Life Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a preference based generic health related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument which classifies health states across five domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each domain has three levels, they are (1) no problems, (2) some problems, (3) extreme problems. The percentages shown are calculated from the number of subjects at that visit with non-missing data for that score.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Week 31 through Week 83
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
Subjects will be eligible for the study if they meet all of the following inclusion criteria:
1. Male or female subjects, 18 to 75 years of age inclusive.
2. Subjects with untreated, newly diagnosed epilepsy having at least two well documented, unprovoked, clinically evaluated and classified partial seizures (with or without secondary generalization) or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (without clear focal origin) within 12 months of the Screening Visit, of which at least one seizure occurred within three months of the Screening Visit (> one seizure within a 24 hour period will be counted as one seizure).
3. Subjects will either have had no previous use of an AED, or treatment with one AED for a maximum duration of two weeks before the Randomization Visit (T1).
4. Subjects have a documented electroencephalogram (EEG) within 12 months of the Screening Visit, compatible with localization-related epilepsy (to exclude primary generalized epilepsy).
5. Subjects have a documented computed axial tomography (CAT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan confirming the absence of a progressive neurological lesion within 12 months of the Screening Visit.
6. Female subjects without childbearing potential (two years post-menopausal, bilateral oophorectomy or tubal ligation, complete hysterectomy) are eligible. Female subjects with childbearing potential must not be pregnant as confirmed by a negative pregnancy test at screening and randomization, must not be lactating and must be using a medically acceptable form of contraception, for the duration of the study and for one month following discontinuation of the study drug. Medically acceptable contraception is defined here as oral contraception pill with at least 50 micrograms ethinylestradiol per intake, contraceptive injections and implants, or intrauterine device in place for at least three months.
7. Subjects who are able and willing to follow investigational study procedures, maintain a seizure diary, and report AEs.
8. Subjects who are able and willing to give written informed consent.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
Subjects who meet any of the following exclusion criteria will not be eligible for the study:
1. Subjects have a history of clinical investigations, including EEG data, that are suggestive of idiopathic generalised epilepsy as defined by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE).
2. Subjects with a history of absence, myoclonic, clonic, tonic, or atonic seizures.
3. Subjects have a history of status epilepticus, and/or non-epileptic seizures (e.g., metabolic, pseudo-seizures).
4. Subjects have experienced seizures relating to drugs, alcohol, acute medical illness, mental retardation, or subjects with situation-related seizures.
5. Subjects have progressive encephalopathy or findings consistent with progressive CNS disease or lesion (e.g. infection, demyelination, or tumour).
6. Subjects have a history of a significant or currently uncontrolled disease that will interfere with the conduct of this study or the assessment of safety and efficacy of the study drug.
7. Subjects have been previously treated with carbamazepine or zonisamide.
8. Subjects have received an investigational drug or device in the three months prior to the Screening Visit.
9. Subjects have a known hypersensitivity to sulfonamides, dibenzazepine derivatives, or tricyclic antidepressants.
10. Subjects have a history of bone marrow depression, low platelet count or other blood dyscrasia.
11. Subjects have a history of acute intermittent porphyria.
12. Subjects have a history of renal disorder (serum creatinine level of > 135 ìmol / l (1.5 mg/dL at the Screening Visit), hepatic disorder or clinically significant abnormal liver function tests; aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >2 times the upper normal limit.
13. Subjects have a body weight of less than 40 kg.
14. Subjects have a history of progressive malignancy within the previous 5 years (excluding a history of non-metastasized and adequately treated cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma).
15. Subjects have a history of psychiatric illness or mood disorder requiring electro-convulsive or drug therapy within the previous 6 months which is considered uncontrolled; a history of suicide attempt; alcohol or drug abuse; chronic treatment with benzodiazepines or barbiturates.
16. Subjects are currently taking carbonic anhydrase inhibitors.
17. Subjects have a history of pancreatitis, nephrolithiasis or hypercalcuria, clinically significant laboratory or electro-cardiographic abnormalities, or uncontrolled hypertension.
18. Subjects are currently taking mono-amine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) or any other excluded medications.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
75
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/05/2007
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/01/2011
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
583
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
- Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
- Clayton
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
- Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
- Flinders
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
- Heidelberg West
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
- Parkville
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
- Queensland
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
0
0
- Wellington
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
- Clayton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
- Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
- Flinders
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
- Heidelberg West
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
- Parkville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
0
0
- Queensland
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
0
0
- Wellington
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Aalborg
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Bethune cedex
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Dijon
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
St. Etienne
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Bochum
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Duesseldorf
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Munich
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Schwerin
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Westerstede
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Athens
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Thessaloniki
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Debrecen
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Gyula
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Hodmezovasarhely
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Nyregyhaza
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Zalaegerszeg-Pozva
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Bangalore
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Hyderabad
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Koturpuram
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Madurai
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
New Delhi
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Pune
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Milan
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Monza
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Orbassano
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Rome
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Anyang
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Seol
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Wonju
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Gdansk
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Katowice
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Krakow
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Lodz
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Lublin
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Poznan
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Sosnowiec
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Szcecin
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Kaliningrad
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Kazan
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Saint Petersburg
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Yaroslavl
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Serbia
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Belgrade
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Serbia
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Nis
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Serbia
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Novi Sad
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Serbia
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Subotica
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Bratislava
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Bratslava
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Brezno
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Nove Zamky
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Vranov nad Toplou
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Zilina
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Sandton
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Alicante
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Bacelona
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Malaga
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Oviedo
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Goteborg
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Lund
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Changhua
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Yong Kang
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Bristol
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Liverpool
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Treliske
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Eisai Inc.
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This is a two-arm, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study using a flexible dosing regime to allow optimal zonisamide or carbamazepine therapy for individual subjects. Assessment of eligibility will take place at the Screening Visit. The subjects will be randomized to either the carbamazepine or zonisamide arm at the Randomization Visit (T1). T1 must occur as soon as possible (and at least within 14 days) of the Screening Visit in order to optimize subject care.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00477295
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Baulac M, Brodie MJ, Patten A, Segieth J, Giorgi L. Efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide versus controlled-release carbamazepine for newly diagnosed partial epilepsy: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Neurol. 2012 Jul;11(7):579-88. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70105-9. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Joanna Segieth
Query!
Address
0
0
Eisai Limited
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00477295
Download to PDF