Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00494234
Registration number
NCT00494234
Ethics application status
Date submitted
27/06/2007
Date registered
29/06/2007
Titles & IDs
Public title
Study to Assess The Efficacy and Safety of a PARP Inhibitor For The Treatment of BRCA-positive Advanced Breast Cancer
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase II, Open-label, Non-comparative, International, Multicentre Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of KU-0059436 Given Orally Twice Daily in Patients With Advanced BRCA1- or BRCA2-associated Breast Cancer.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
D0810C00008
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
KU36-44
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
ICEBERG 1
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Breast Neoplasms
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Breast
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Olaparib
Experimental: Olaparib 100 mg - Participants will receive two 50 mg capsules in the morning and two 50 mg capsules in the evening in 28-days cycle until confirmed disease progression, continuous treatment interruption, unacceptable toxicity or any other discontinuation criterion is met.
Experimental: Olaparib 400 mg - Participants will receive eight 50 mg capsules in the morning and eight 50 mg capsules in the evening in 28-days cycle until confirmed disease progression, continuous treatment interruption, unacceptable toxicity or any other discontinuation criterion is met.
Treatment: Drugs: Olaparib
Participants will receive capsules of olaparib orally as stated in arm description.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Criteria
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The ORR is the percentage of participants whose best tumor response is either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), according to the RECIST v1.0 criteria. The CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions (TLs). The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters (LD) taking as reference the baseline sum of LD. Percentage of participants with ORR is reported.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline (Days -28 to 0), Day 1 of Cycle 3, thereafter every alternate cycles until study termination or withdrawal (approximately up to 2 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Duration of Response (DoR) to Olaparib
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Duration of response is defined as the date of progression per RECIST criteria - the date when CR or PR \[whichever is earliest\] is confirmed + 1. The CR is defined as disappearance of all TLs. The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD taking as reference the baseline sum of LD. Duration of response was analyzed for those participants who had OR.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline (Days -28 to 0), Day 1 of Cycle 3, thereafter every alternate cycles until study termination or withdrawal (approximately up to 2 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The CBR is defined as the percentage of participants with a RECIST tumor response of confirmed CR, PR or stable disease (SD) for = 8 weeks +/- 1 week visit window. The CR is defined as disappearance of all TLs. The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD taking as reference the baseline sum of LD. Stable disease is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as references the smallest sum of LD since the treatment started.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From Day 1 of Cycle 3 through study withdrawal (approximately up to 2 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Best Percentage Change in Tumor Size
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The tumor size is defined as the sum of the longest diameters as measured among all target lesions. At each assessment, the percentage change in tumor size is defined as 100 × 1 - (sum of all target lesion diameters at visit/sum of all target lesion diameters at baseline).
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline (Days -28 to 0) through study withdrawal (approximately up to 2 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
PFS is defined as the time from first dose to the earlier date of radiologic progression (as per RECIST criteria) or death by any cause in the absence of objective progression. Those participants who were withdrawn from the study without disease progression were regarded as censored at their last evaluable RECIST assessment. Where participants had not progressed at the termination of the study, they were also regarded as censored at their last evaluable RECIST assessment. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimate.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline (Days -28 to 0), Day 1 of Cycle 3, thereafter every alternate cycles until study termination or withdrawal (approximately up to 2 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Total Score From Baseline
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
ECOG performance status is used by researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing. The scores are: 0=Fully Active, able to carry out work without restrictions; 1=Restricted activity and able to carry out light work or sedentary nature; 2=capable of self-care but unable to carry out work activities; 3=Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4=Completely Disabled, and totally confined to bed or chair; 5=Dead. Change in ECOG performance status was defined as improved (less than the baseline value), no change (same as at baseline), worsened (greater than the baseline value) or missing (score is missing or was not recorded at baseline). If no measurement was recorded at Cycle 1 Day 1, the change was calculated in relation to the last recorded ECOG value prior to Day 1.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Screening (Days -7 to 0), Day 1 Cycle 7 (ie, after completing 6 cycles of treatment) and study withdrawal (approximately up to 2 years).
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The TEAEs are defined as events present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of study drug or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of study drug.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Day 1 through Day 480 (maximum observed duration)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs From Baseline
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Number of participants with clinically significant changes in vital signs are reported. Vital sign parameters included body temperature, blood pressure, and pulse rate.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Day 1 through Day 480 (maximum observed duration)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Number of Participants With at Least 2-Grade Change From Baseline to Worst Toxicity Grade in Clinical Laboratory Parameters
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Number of participants with at least 2-grade change from baseline to worst toxicity grade in clinical laboratory parameters are reported. Laboratory parameters included hematology, clinical chemistry, and urinalysis.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Day 1 through Day 480 (maximum observed duration)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Advanced breast cancer with positive BRCA1 or BRCA2 status
* Failed at least one prior chemotherapy
* In investigators opinion, no curative standard therapy exists
* Measurable disease
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
130
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Brain metastases
* Less than 28 days since last treatment used to treat the disease
* Considered a poor medical risk due to a serious uncontrolled disorder
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 2
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
15/06/2007
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
21/12/2022
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
54
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Research Site - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Research Site - Randwick
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
3000 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2031 - Randwick
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
CA
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Kiel
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Köln
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
München
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Tel-Aviv
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Hospitalet deLlobregat
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Lund
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Cambridge
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Edinburgh
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Fulham
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Manchester
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
AstraZeneca
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
KuDOS Pharmaceuticals Limited
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to see if the drug KU-0059436 (olaparib) is effective and well tolerated in treating participants with measurable breast cancer gene (BRCA)1- or BRCA2-positive advanced breast cancer and for whom no curative therapeutic option exists.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00494234
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Tutt A, Robson M, Garber JE, Domchek SM, Audeh MW, Weitzel JN, Friedlander M, Arun B, Loman N, Schmutzler RK, Wardley A, Mitchell G, Earl H, Wickens M, Carmichael J. Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: a proof-of-concept trial. Lancet. 2010 Jul 24;376(9737):235-44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60892-6. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
James Carmichael, BSc, MBChB, MD, FRCP
Query!
Address
0
0
KuDOS Pharmaceuticals Limited
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.
Supporting document/s available: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan (SAP)
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA Pharma Data Sharing Principles. For details of our timelines, please rerefer to our disclosure commitment at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure
Query!
Available to whom?
When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the de-identified individual patient-level data in an approved sponsored tool . Signed Data Sharing Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information. Additionally, all users will need to accept the terms and conditions of the SAS MSE to gain access. For additional details, please review the Disclosure Statements at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: https://astrazenecagroup-dt.pharmacm.com/DT/Home
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00494234