Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03410992
Registration number
NCT03410992
Ethics application status
Date submitted
19/01/2018
Date registered
25/01/2018
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study With a Initial Treatment Period Followed by a Randomized-withdrawal Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study With an Initial Treatment Period Followed by a Randomized-Withdrawal Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2016-003426-16
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
PS0013
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
BE READY
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
0
0
Query!
Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
0
0
Query!
Psoriatic Arthritis
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Query!
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Skin
0
0
0
0
Query!
Dermatological conditions
Query!
Skin
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other skin conditions
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Bimekizumab
Other interventions - Placebo
Experimental: Bimekizumab cohort - Subjects will receive bimekizumab for 16 Weeks. Subjects who achieve certain predefined response criteria will be re-randomized to either receive bimekizumab or placebo until Week 56. Subjects who do not achieve predefined response criteria will enter the bimekizumab escape arm.
Placebo comparator: Placebo - Subjects will receive placebo for 16 Weeks. Subjects who achieve certain predefined response criteria will proceed with placebo until Week 56. Subjects who do not achieve certain predefined response criteria will enter the bimekizumab escape arm.
Experimental: Bimekizumab Escape arm - Subjects who do not achieve certain predefined response criteria at Week 16 or later will enter the bimekizumab escape arm and will receive open-label bimekizumab for 12 weeks.
Treatment: Drugs: Bimekizumab
Bimekizumab will be provided at pre-specified time intervals.
Other interventions: Placebo
Subjects will receive Placebo at pre-specified time points to maintain the blinding of the Investigational Medicinal Products.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Intervention code [2]
0
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
A PASI90 responder was defined as a participant that achieved 90% reduction from Baseline in the PASI score. Body divided into 4 areas: head/arms/trunk to groin/legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear)-4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0-6 scale. Final PASI=average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The min possible PASI score is 0=no disease, the max score is 72=maximal disease. Study participants with missing score at Week 16 were counted as nonresponders (NRI).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-Inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as Clear or Almost Clear with at least a 2-category improvement relative to Baseline. Study participants with missing score at Week 16 were counted as nonresponders (NRI).
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a PASI100 Response at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
A PASI100 responder was defined as a participant that achieved 100% reduction from Baseline in the PASI score. Body divided into 4 areas: head/arms/trunk to groin/legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear)-4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0-6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The min possible PASI score is 0=no disease, the max score is 72=maximal disease. Study participants with missing score at Week 16 were counted as nonresponders (NRI).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a IGA Clear Response at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions. IGA response was defined as Clear with at least \>= 2 category improvement relative to Baseline. Study participants with missing score at Week 16 were counted as nonresponders (NRI).
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response at Week 4
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
A PASI75 responder was defined as a participant that achieved 75% reduction from Baseline in the PASI score. Body divided into 4 areas: head/arms/trunk to groin/legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear)-4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0-6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The min possible PASI score is 0=no disease, the max score is 72=maximal disease. Study participants with missing score at a given week were counted as nonresponders.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
At Week 4
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Pain at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
As PRO measure, the PSD (further published as P-SIM) was used to assess key symptoms relevant to patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Site staff trained participants on the use of the electronic device used to collect ePRO diary data at Screening, device was then dispensed to the participant for home use until Week 16 Visit. The ePRO diary was completed on daily basis from Screening to Week 16 Visit.
PSD pain item was assessed daily on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (very severe pain). PSD score for pain at a given visit was an average of daily values over the week prior to the visit. The response was defined as an improvement (decrease) in pain score higher than the prespecified 1.98 response threshold at Week 16. The endpoint was characterized as percentage of participants with PSD pain response.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Itch at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
A PRO measure, the PSD (further published as P-SIM) was used to assess key symptoms relevant to patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Site staff trained participants on the use of the electronic device used to collect ePRO diary data at Screening, device was then dispensed to participant for home use until Week 16 Visit. The ePRO diary was completed on daily basis from Screening to Week 16 Visit.
PSD itch item was assessed daily on a NRS from 0 (no itch) to 10 (very severe itch). PSD score for itch was an average of daily values over the week prior to the visit. The response was defined as an improvement (decrease) in itch score higher than the prespecified 2.39 response threshold at Week 16. The endpoint was characterized as percentage of participants with a PSD itch response.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a Patient Symptom Diary Response for Scaling at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
As PRO measure, the PSD (further published as P-SIM) was used to assess key symptoms relevant to patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Site staff trained participants on the use of the electronic device used to collect ePRO diary data at Screening, device was then dispensed to the participant for home use until Week 16 Visit. The ePRO diary was completed on daily basis from Screening to Week 16 Visit. PSD scaling item was assessed daily on a NRS from 0 (no scaling) to 10 (very severe scaling). PSD score for scaling was an average of daily values over the week prior to the visit. The response was defined as an improvement (decrease) in scaling score higher than the prespecified 2.86 response threshold at Week 16. The endpoint was characterized as percentage of participants with a PSD scaling response.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Scalp IGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) at Week 16 for Participants With Scalp Psoriasis (PSO) at Baseline
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Only participants with scalp involvement at Baseline completed the scalp IGA. Participants with scalp involvement at Baseline were defined as those with a scalp IGA score \>0 at Baseline. Scalp lesions were assessed in terms of clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness using a 5-point scale (0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4= Severe). Scalp IGA 0/1 response at Week 16 was defined as clear (0) or almost clear (1) with at least a 2-category improvement from Baseline to Week 16.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 56 Among Week 16 PASI90 Responders
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
A PASI90 responder was defined as a participant that achieved 90% reduction from Baseline in the PASI score. Study participants with missing score at Week 56 or who met the criterion for relapse were counted as nonresponders (NRI).
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
At Week 56
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The number of TEAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provides an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the adverse event (AE) being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
From Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period (up to Week 16)
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
The number of SAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provides an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
From Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period (up to Week 16)
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment During the Initial Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The number of TEAEs leading to discontinuation adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provides an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
From Baseline to end of Initial Treatment Period (up to Week 16)
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment During the Randomized-Withdrawal Period
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
The number of TEAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provides an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the adverse event (AE) being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
From end of Initial Treatment Period (Week 16) until the Safety Follow-Up (up to 56 weeks duration)
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment During the Randomized-Withdrawal Period
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
The number of SAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provides an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
From end of Initial Treatment Period (Week 16) until the Safety Follow-Up (up to 56 weeks duration)
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment During the Randomized-Withdrawal Period
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
The number of TEAEs leading to discontinuation adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provides an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
From end of Initial Treatment Period (Week 16) until the Safety Follow-Up (up to 56 weeks duration)
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment During the Escape Treatment
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
The number of TEAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provides an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the adverse event (AE) being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
From Escape Baseline (Week 0) until Safety Follow-Up (up to 28 weeks duration)
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment During the Escape Treatment
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
The number of SAEs adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provides an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
From Escape Baseline (Week 0) until Safety Follow-Up (up to 28 weeks duration)
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Number of TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal Adjusted by Duration of Participant Exposure to Study Treatment During the Escape Treatment
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
The number of TEAEs leading to discontinuation adjusted by duration of exposure to study treatment was scaled such that it provides an incidence rate per 100 patient-years. If a participant had multiple events, the time of exposure was calculated to the first occurrence of the AE being considered. If a participant had no events, the total time at risk was used.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
From Escape Baseline (Week 0) until Safety Follow-Up (up to 28 weeks duration)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Must be at least 18 years of age
* Chronic plaque psoriasis (PSO) for at least 6 months prior to the Screening Visit
* Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) >=12 and body surface area (BSA) affected by PSO >=10% and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score >=3 on a 5-point scale
* Subject is a candidate for systemic PSO therapy and/or phototherapy
* Female subject of child bearing potential must be willing to use highly effective method of contraception
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Subject has an active infection (except common cold), a recent serious infection, or a history of opportunistic, recurrent, or chronic infections
* Subject has concurrent acute or chronic viral hepatitis B or C or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
* Subject has known tuberculosis (TB) infection, is at high risk of acquiring TB infection, or has current or history of nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTMB) infection
* Subject has any other condition, including medical or psychiatric, which, in the Investigator's judgment, would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study
* Presence of active suicidal ideation or positive suicide behavior
* Presence of moderately severe major depression or severe major depression
* Subject has any active malignancy or history of malignancy within 5 years prior to the Screening Visit EXCEPT treated and considered cured cutaneous squamous or basal cell carcinoma, or in situ cervical cancer
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
5/02/2018
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
7/01/2020
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
435
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Ps0013 003 - Carlton
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Ps0013 008 - East Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Ps0013 006 - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Carlton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
- East Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
- Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Kentucky
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
New Hampshire
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Rhode Island
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Ajax
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Edmonton
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Hamilton
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Markham
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Mississauga
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Montréal
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
North Bay
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Ottawa
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Québec
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Surrey
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Waterloo
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Münster
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Schwerin
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Witten
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Miskolc
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Orosháza
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Szeged
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Szolnok
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Veszprém
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Busan
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Seongnam-si
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Bialystok
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Gdansk
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Katowice
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Kielce
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Kraków
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Lublin
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Poznan
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Szczecin
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Warsaw
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Wroclaw
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Lódz
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Saint Petersburg
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Saratov
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Yaroslavl
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Manchester
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Reading
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Salford
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
UCB Biopharma SRL
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Phase 3 study to compare the efficacy of bimekizumab versus placebo in the treatment of subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03410992
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Gordon KB, Langley RG, Warren RB, Okubo Y, Stein Gold L, Merola JF, Peterson L, Wixted K, Cross N, Deherder D, Thaci D. Bimekizumab Safety in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Pooled Results From Phase 2 and Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Jul 1;158(7):735-744. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.1185. Gordon KB, Langley RG, Warren RB, Okubo Y, Rosmarin D, Lebwohl M, Peterson L, Madden C, de Cuyper D, Davies O, Thaci D. Bimekizumab safety in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: pooled data from up to 3 years of treatment in randomized phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2024 Mar 15;190(4):477-485. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad429. Warren RB, Gottlieb AB, Merola JF, Garcia L, Cioffi C, Peterson L, Pelligra C, Ciaravino V. Psychometric Validation of the Psoriasis Symptoms and Impacts Measure (P-SIM), a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Patients with Plaque Psoriasis, Using Data from the BE VIVID and BE READY Phase 3 Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Oct;11(5):1551-1569. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00570-4. Epub 2021 Jul 14. Gordon KB, Foley P, Krueger JG, Pinter A, Reich K, Vender R, Vanvoorden V, Madden C, White K, Cioffi C, Blauvelt A. Bimekizumab efficacy and safety in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (BE READY): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised withdrawal phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021 Feb 6;397(10273):475-486. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00126-4. Erratum In: Lancet. 2021 Mar 27;397(10280):1182. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00669-3.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
UCB Cares
Query!
Address
0
0
001 844 599 2273 (UCB)
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/92/NCT03410992/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/92/NCT03410992/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
Type
Citations or Other Details
Journal
Gordon KB, Langley RG, Warren RB, Okubo Y, Stein G...
[
More Details
]
Journal
Gordon KB, Langley RG, Warren RB, Okubo Y, Rosmari...
[
More Details
]
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03410992