Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03481634
Registration number
NCT03481634
Ethics application status
Date submitted
13/03/2018
Date registered
29/03/2018
Titles & IDs
Public title
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab vs. Aflibercept in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Edema
Query!
Scientific title
A Two-year, Three-arm, Randomized, Double-masked, Multicenter, Phase III Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab Versus Aflibercept in Adult Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Edema
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2017-004742-23
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
CRTH258B2301
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
KESTREL
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Diabetic Macular Edema
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Eye
0
0
0
0
Query!
Diseases / disorders of the eye
Query!
Cardiovascular
0
0
0
0
Query!
Diseases of the vasculature and circulation including the lymphatic system
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Brolucizumab
Treatment: Drugs - Aflibercept
Experimental: Brolucizumab 3 mg - Brolucizumab 3 mg/0.05 mL, 5 loading doses, with subsequent doses per protocol-specified maintenance schedule.
To fulfil the double-masking requirement, each investigational site had masked and unmasked staff. The investigator who performed the injection was unmasked to the treatments as were any other site personnel who had been delegated responsibility for working with the Investigational Product (IP).
Experimental: Brolucizumab 6 mg - Brolucizumab 6 mg/0.05 mL, 5 loading doses, with subsequent doses per protocol-specified maintenance schedule.
To fulfil the double-masking requirement, each investigational site had masked and unmasked staff. The investigator who performed the injection was unmasked to the treatments as were any other site personnel who had been delegated responsibility for working with the Investigational Product (IP).
Active comparator: Aflibercept 2 mg - Aflibercept 2 mg/0.05 mL, as labeled, 5 loading doses, with subsequent doses every 8 weeks.
To fulfil the double-masking requirement, each investigational site had masked and unmasked staff. The investigator who performed the injection was unmasked to the treatments as were any other site personnel who had been delegated responsibility for working with the Investigational Product (IP).
Treatment: Drugs: Brolucizumab
Intravitreal injection
Treatment: Drugs: Aflibercept
Intravitreal injection
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts.
Visual Function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of 78 to 23 (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/32 to 20/320) in the study eye were included.
Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better visual functioning.
This endpoint was analyzed via the pairwise ANOVA method where the 2 dose groups of Brolucizumab are compared to Aflibercept.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline, Week 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Average Change From Baseline in BCVA Over the Period Week 40 Through Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
BCVA will be assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts.
Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of 78 to 23 (per the inclusion criteria) (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/32 to 20/320) in the study eye were included.
Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better visual functioning.
This endpoint was analyzed via the pairwise ANOVA method where the 2 dose groups of Brolucizumab are compared to Aflibercept.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline and Week 40 through Week 52 (average)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Patients Maintained at q12w - Probability of Maintaining on q12w
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Positive treatment status is defined as intravitreal (IVT) injections per planned dosing regimen \[every 12 weeks (q12w)\]. This outcome measure is pre-specified for brolucizumab treatment arms only.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 32, 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Patients Maintained at q12w (for Those Patients Who Qualified for q12w at Week 36) - Probability of Maintaining on q12w
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Positive treatment status is defined as intravitreal (IVT) injections per planned dosing regimen \[every 8 weeks (q8w)\]. This outcome measure is pre-specified for brolucizumab treatment arms only.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Weeks 36 and 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Change From Baseline in BCVA at Each Visit up to Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts.
Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of 78 to 23 (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/32 to 20/320) in the study eye were included.
Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better visual functioning.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
BCVA (Letters Read): ANOVA Results for Average Change From Baseline Over the Period Week 88 Through Week 100 for the Study Eye (FAS - LOCF)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Visual acuity was assessed at every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction (BCVA). BCVA measurements were taken in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts.
LS Mean estimates are reported, comparing the 2 Brolucizumab arms to Aflibercept. Results do not apply to the Brolucizumab 6 mg arm when Brolucizumab 3mg is compared to Aflibercept. Likewise, results do not apply to the Brolucizumab 3 mg arm when Brolucizumab 6 mg is compared to Aflibercept.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline, and Week 88 through Week 100 (average)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Patients Maintained at q12w up to Week 64 (After Three q12w- Treatment Intervals) and Week 100 - Probability of Maintaining on q12w
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
This outcome measure is pre-specified for brolucizumab treatment arms only
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 32, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Secondary: Patients Maintained at q12w up to Week 64 (After Three q12w- Treatment Intervals) and Week 100, Within Those Patients That Qualified for q12w at Week 36 - Probability of Maintaining on q12w
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
This outcome measure is pre-specified for brolucizumab treatment arms only
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 32, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) at Each Visit up to Week 52 - Pairwise ANOVA Results
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Central Subfield Thickness Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center.
LS Mean estimates are reported, comparing the 2 Brolucizumab arms to Aflibercept. Results do not apply to the Brolucizumab 6 mg arm when Brolucizumab 3mg is compared to Aflibercept. Likewise, results do not apply to the Brolucizumab 3 mg arm when Brolucizumab 6 mg is compared to Aflibercept.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline up to week 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) (Micrometers): ANOVA Results for Average Change From Baseline Over the Period Week 88 Through Week 100 for the Study Eye (Full Analysis Set - LOCF)
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Central subfield thickness (average thickness of circular 1mm area centered around fovea measured from RPE to ILM, inclusively). Assessed with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts.
LS Mean estimates are reported, comparing the 2 Brolucizumab arms to Aflibercept. Results do not apply to the Brolucizumab 6 mg arm when Brolucizumab 3mg is compared to Aflibercept. Likewise, results do not apply to the Brolucizumab 3 mg arm when Brolucizumab 6 mg is compared to Aflibercept.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline, and Week 88 through Week 100 (average)
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Number of Patients With Presence of Subretinal Fluid (SRF) at Each Assessment Visit
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Subretinal Fluid (SRF) status in the central subfield: proportion of subjects with presence of SRF in the study eye by visit
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline up to Week 52 and Week 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Number of Patients With Presence of Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) at Each Assessment Visit
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) status in the central subfield: proportion of subjects with presence of IRF in the study eye by visit
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline, up to Week 52 and Week 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Number of Patients With Presence of SRF and/or IRF in the Study Eye by Visit
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
Subretinal Fluid (SRF) and Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) status in the central subfield: proportion of subjects with presence of SRF and/or IRF in the study eye by visit
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Baseline, up to Week 52 and Week 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Number of Patients With Presence of Leakage on Fluorescein Angiography (FA) at Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Assessed by angiography.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Week 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Number of Patients With Presence of Leakage on Fluorescein Angiography (FA) at Week 100
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Assessed by angiography.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Week 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number of Subjects With >=2-step Improvement From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye - Number of Subjects
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center (CRC) based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR). A lower score represents better visual functioning.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 28, 52, 76, 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Proportion of Subjects With >=2-step Improvement From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye - Percentage Estimates
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center (CRC) based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR). A lower score represents better visual functioning.
* estimates are reported, comparing the 2 Brolucizumab arms to Aflibercept. Results do not apply to the Brolucizumab 6 mg arm when Brolucizumab 3mg is compared to Aflibercept. Likewise, results do not apply to the Brolucizumab 3 mg arm when Brolucizumab 6 mg is compared to Aflibercept.
* estimates represent the % of participants who were estimated to have a "\>=2-step Improvement From Baseline in the DRSS Score" from pairwise logistic regression models adjusting for baseline DRSS score categories (\<=4, =5), age categories (\<65, =65 years) and treatment as fixed effect factors.
Abbreviation: Proportion Estimates = P.E.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 28, 52, 76, 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number of Subjects With >=3-step Improvement From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye - Number of Subjects
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center (CRC) based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR). A lower score represents better visual functioning.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 28, 52, 76, 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Proportion of Subjects With >=3-step Improvement From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye - Percentage Estimates
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center (CRC) based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR). A lower score represents better visual functioning.
* estimates are reported, comparing the 2 Brolucizumab arms to Aflibercept. Results do not apply to the Brolucizumab 6 mg arm when Brolucizumab 3mg is compared to Aflibercept. Likewise, results do not apply to the Brolucizumab 3 mg arm when Brolucizumab 6 mg is compared to Aflibercept.
* estimates represent the % of participants who were estimated to have a "\>=3-step Improvement From Baseline in the DRSS Score" from pairwise logistic regression models adjusting for baseline DRSS score categories (\<=4, =5), age categories (\<65, =65 years) and treatment as fixed effect factors.
Abbreviation: Proportion Estimates = P.E.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 28, 52, 76, 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) Total Scores up to Week 52 and Week 100 - Composite Score
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains.
The NEI VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better visual functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. A composite score is derived based on the average of the 11 subscales.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 28, 52, 76, 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) Total Scores up to Week 52 and Week 100 - General Vision
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains.
The NEI VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better visual functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. A composite score is derived based on the average of the 11 subscales.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 28, 52, 76, 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) Total Scores up to Week 52 and Week 100 - Ocular Pain
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains.
The NEI VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better visual functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. A composite score is derived based on the average of the 11 subscales.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 28, 52, 76, 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) Total Scores up to Week 52 and Week 100 - Near Activities
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains.
The NEI VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better visual functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. A composite score is derived based on the average of the 11 subscales.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 28, 52, 76, 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) Total Scores up to Week 52 and Week 100 - Distance Activities
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains.
The NEI VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better visual functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. A composite score is derived based on the average of the 11 subscales.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 28, 52, 76, 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) Total Scores up to Week 52 and Week 100 - Social Functioning
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains.
The NEI VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better visual functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. A composite score is derived based on the average of the 11 subscales.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 28, 52, 76, 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) Total Scores up to Week 52 and Week 100 - Mental Health
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains.
The NEI VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better visual functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. A composite score is derived based on the average of the 11 subscales.
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 28, 52, 76, 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) Total Scores up to Week 52 and Week 100 - Role Difficulties
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains.
The NEI VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better visual functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. A composite score is derived based on the average of the 11 subscales.
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 28, 52, 76, 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) Total Scores up to Week 52 and Week 100 - Dependency
Query!
Assessment method [27]
0
0
The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains.
The NEI VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better visual functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. A composite score is derived based on the average of the 11 subscales.
Query!
Timepoint [27]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 28, 52, 76, 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [28]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) Total Scores up to Week 52 and Week 100 - Driving
Query!
Assessment method [28]
0
0
The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains.
The NEI VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better visual functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. A composite score is derived based on the average of the 11 subscales.
Query!
Timepoint [28]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 28, 52, 76, 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [29]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) Total Scores up to Week 52 and Week 100 - Color Vision
Query!
Assessment method [29]
0
0
The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains.
The NEI VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better visual functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. A composite score is derived based on the average of the 11 subscales.
Query!
Timepoint [29]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 28, 52, 76, 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [30]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) Total Scores up to Week 52 and Week 100 - Peripheral Vision
Query!
Assessment method [30]
0
0
The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains.
The NEI VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better visual functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. A composite score is derived based on the average of the 11 subscales.
Query!
Timepoint [30]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 28, 52, 76, 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [31]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) Total Scores up to Week 52 and Week 100 - General Health Rating
Query!
Assessment method [31]
0
0
The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains.
The NEI VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better visual functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. A composite score is derived based on the average of the 11 subscales.
Query!
Timepoint [31]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 28, 52, 76, 100
Query!
Secondary outcome [32]
0
0
Ocular Adverse Events (AEs) (>=2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye
Query!
Assessment method [32]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [32]
0
0
Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until Week 96, plus 30 days post treatment, up to a maximum duration of 100 weeks.
Query!
Secondary outcome [33]
0
0
Number of Subjects With Non-ocular Adverse Events (AEs) (>=2% in Any Treatment Arm)
Query!
Assessment method [33]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [33]
0
0
Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until Week 96, plus 30 days post treatment, up to a maximum duration of 100 weeks.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Written informed consent before any assessment
* Patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus and HbA1c of =10% at screening
* Medication for the management of diabetes stable within 3 months prior to randomization and is expected to remain stable during the course of the study
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Active proliferative diabetic retinopathy in the study eye
* Active intraocular or periocular infection or active intraocular inflammation in study eye
* Uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) > 25 millimeters mercury (mmHg)
* Previous treatment with anti-VEGF drugs or investigational drugs in the study eye
* Stroke or myocardial infarction during the 6-month period prior to baseline
* Uncontrolled blood pressure defined as a systolic value =160 mmHg or diastolic value =100 mmHg
Other protocol-specified inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
23/07/2018
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
18/10/2021
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
566
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,SA,VIC,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Liverpool
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Parramatta
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2170 - Liverpool
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2150 - Parramatta
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
2000 - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
2145 - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
5000 - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
3168 - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
0
0
3002 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
0
0
6009 - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Hawaii
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Kansas
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Kentucky
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Nevada
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Wisconsin
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Provincia De Santa Fe
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Caba
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Cordoba
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Graz
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Innsbruck
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Vienna
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Colombia
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Antioquia
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Colombia
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Bogota
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Haifa
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Jerusalem
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Kfar Saba
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Petach Tikva
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Rehovot
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Tel Aviv
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
CH
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
CT
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
MI
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
PD
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
RM
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Aichi
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Fukuoka
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Hyogo
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Ibaragi
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Ibaraki
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Kagoshima
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Nagano
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Saitama
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Tochigi
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Tokyo
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Kumamoto
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Osaka
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Amsterdam
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Rotterdam
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Tilburg
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Coimbra
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Leiria
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Porto
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Santa Maria da Feira
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Vila Franca de Xira
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Puerto Rico
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Arecibo
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Castilla Y Leon
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Catalunya
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Comunidad Valenciana
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Zaragoza
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Surrey
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Birmingham
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Hull
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Nottingham
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in treatment of patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema (DME).
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03481634
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Query!
Address
0
0
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Query!
Available to whom?
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/34/NCT03481634/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/34/NCT03481634/SAP_002.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03481634