Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03800914
Registration number
NCT03800914
Ethics application status
Date submitted
9/01/2019
Date registered
11/01/2019
Date last updated
19/10/2023
Titles & IDs
Public title
High Intensity Interval Training in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease
Query!
Scientific title
High Intensity Interval Training in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
LTU HIIT in ILD
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
HIIT in fILD
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Respiratory
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other respiratory disorders / diseases
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Other interventions - High intensity interval training
Other interventions - Traditional pulmonary rehabilitation
Experimental: High Intensity Interval Training - Participants will undergo a twice-weekly supervised exercise training program for eight weeks. Each session will involve 36 minutes of interval aerobic exercise on a cycle ergometer alternating every 30 seconds between 100% of peak work rate, achieved on the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), plus upper and lower resistance training.
Active comparator: Traditional pulmonary rehabilitation - Participants will undergo a twice-weekly supervised exercise training program for eight weeks. Each session will involve 30 minutes of continuous aerobic exercise on a cycle ergometer at 60% of the peak work rate achieved on the CPET, plus upper and lower resistance training.
Other interventions: High intensity interval training
36 minutes of interval exercise on cycle ergometer alternating every 30 seconds between 100% peak work rate achieved on cardiopulmonary exercise test and unloaded cycling
Other interventions: Traditional pulmonary rehabilitation
30 minutes of continuous exercise on cycle ergometer at 60% peak work rate achieved on cardiopulmonary exercise test.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Change in endurance time
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Endurance time measured during constant work rate test (CWRT) at 75% of the peak work rate achieved on a baseline cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Change in dyspnea measured using the Dyspnea-12 questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Dyspnea-12 is a uni-dimensional 12-item questionnaire divided in 2 domains: physical items (1 to 7) and affective items (8-12). Each item evaluate breathing experience and can be scored as: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2) or Severe (3). Results of this questionnaire will be reported as total score that can range from 0 to 36 and separate scores that can range from 0 to 21 for physical component and 0 to 15 for affective component. Higher scores indicate worse dyspnea.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Changes in fatigue evaluated by the Fatigue Severity Scale
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), a self reported rating scale including 9 items to measure how fatigue affects motivation, exercise, physical functioning, carrying out duties and how fatigue interferes with work, family, or social life. Each item is scored on a 7 point scale in which 1 = strongly disagree and 7= strongly agree. Total score range from 9 to 63. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue severity.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Change in health related quality of life using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis specific version (SGRQ-I)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The SGRQ-I is a disease specific HRQoL measure with similar psychometric properties to the original SGRQ that is designed to be more relevant in patients with IPF. The questionnaire is divided in 3 domains: Symptoms (frequency and severity), Activity (activities that cause or are limited by breathlessness) and Impact (social functioning and psychological disturbances resulting from airways disease). Values of each domain as well as the total score value will be reported. Each item is weighted based on empirical data. Total score and scores in each domain can range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate more limitations in quality of life.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Change in health related quality of life using the chronic respiratory disease questionnaire (CRQ)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
The CRQ consists of 20 items across 4 domains: Dyspnea (activities that cause breathlessness and are performed frequently), fatigue, emotional function and mastery ( the patient's feeling of control over their disease). Each domain includes four to seven items, and each item is scored on a 7-point Likert score. Total scores for each domain range from 4-35. Values of each domain will be reported. Lower scores indicate more limitations in quality of life.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Change in anxiety and depression measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), a scale with 14 items divided into two domains : anxiety symptoms (7 items) and depression symptoms (7 items). Each item can be scored from 0 to 3. Scores from each domain can vary from 0 to 21 and are stratified as follows: 0-7 (indicates absence of anxiety/depression symptoms); 8-10 ( presence of symptoms of anxiety and depression in moderate degree - borderline); 11 or more (significant number of anxiety/depression symptoms - confirmed cases). Score of each domain as well as number of confirmed cases will be reported.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Change in functional exercise capacity assessed by 6-minute walk distance
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Distance in meters achieved on a 6-minute walk test
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Changes in skeletal muscle size
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Change in cross-sectional area of the Quadriceps will be measured by B-mode ultrasonography
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Dyspnea related disability - measured with modified medical research council scale (MMRC)
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The MMRC rates dyspnea according to different levels activity on a 5-point scale (grade 0-4), with grade 4 representing the greatest level of dyspnea impairment.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Global rating of change
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The global rating of change will assess the participants' overall self-perceived change in health by asking the participant to rate their change as either 'worse', 'about the same' or 'better'. The extent of change ( (i.e., worsening or improvement) is then graded on a Likert scale from one to seven.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change in physical activity
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Time spent sedentary and in physical activity of various intensities will be measured by a wrist-worn, tri-axial accelerometer.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline, nine weeks and 6 months following intervention
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of fibrotic interstitial lung disease (fILD)
* Able to read and speak English
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Resting oxygen saturation (SpO2) is < 85%
* Severe pulmonary hypertension (WHO class IV)
* Attendance at Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) within last 12 months
* Comorbidities which preclude exercise training
* History of syncope on exertion
* Significant cognitive impairment
* Anticipated transplant or death within the duration of the study period
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
NA
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
17/07/2019
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/10/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
130
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Prince Charles Hospital - Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Austin Health - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Alfred Health - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2050 - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
4032 - Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
3084 - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
3004 - Melbourne
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
Monash University
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (fILD) is a group of debilitating chronic lung conditions that are characterised by scarring of lung tissue, dyspnoea on exertion and significant physical impairment. Exercise training is recommended for people with fILD in improving breathlessness and exercise tolerance. However, despite the best efforts of patients and clinicians, many of those who participate are not attaining its benefits. The current exercise training strategies of moderate intensity continuous training may not be well suited to fILD. High intensity interval training (HIIT), short bouts of high-intensity exercise regularly interspersed with periods of rest or light exercise may be an alternate exercise training option for people with fILD. The study will determine to whether HIIT is better than the current method of continuous exercise training at moderate intensity in improving exercise tolerance, breathlessness and quality of life in people with fILD. A randomised controlled, assessor blinded trial will be conducted. A total 130 people with fILD will be randomly assigned to moderate intensity continuous training or HIIT. If this trial demonstrates that HIIT is effective, it will provide an exercise training strategy that can readily be implemented in practice that will maximise the outcomes of exercise training for people with fILD.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03800914
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Dowman LM, May AK, Hill CJ, Bondarenko J, Spencer L, Morris NR, Alison JA, Walsh J, Goh NSL, Corte T, Glaspole I, Chambers DC, McDonald CF, Holland AE. High intensity interval training versus moderate intensity continuous training for people with interstitial lung disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Nov 10;21(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01704-2.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Anne Holland
Query!
Address
0
0
Monash University
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Anne Holland
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
+61 3 99030214
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03800914
Download to PDF