Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00604825
Registration number
NCT00604825
Ethics application status
Date submitted
17/01/2008
Date registered
30/01/2008
Date last updated
3/10/2017
Titles & IDs
Public title
Treatment Of Hot Flashes/Flushes In Postmenopausal Women (WARM Study)
Query!
Scientific title
A Parallel-group, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Active Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Two Doses of GSK232802 Administered Orally as Monotherapy for 12 Weeks in Healthy Postmenopausal Women With Moderate to Extremely Severe Vasomotor Symptoms
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
105106
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Menopausal and Female Climacteric States
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Other: Placebo
Treatment: Drugs - GSK232802
Treatment: Drugs - PREMARIN
Placebo Comparator: Placebo - Placebo
Active Comparator: GSK232802 - GSK232802
Experimental: PREMARIN - PREMARIN
Treatment: Drugs: Other: Placebo
Treatment: Drugs: GSK232802
Treatment: Drugs: PREMARIN
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Number of Participants With Mild, Moderate and Severe AE
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. For marketed medicinal products, this also includes failure to produce expected benefits (i.e., lack of efficacy), abuse or misuse. SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. The severity of AEs was assessed by the investigator as mild, moderate or severe.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Up to 21 weeks
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
SBP and DBP were measured after the participant had rested for at least 5 minutes in a sitting or supine position. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline in SBP and DBP at Week 12 are presented.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign of Heart Rate at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Heart rate was measured after the participant had rested for at least 5 minutes in a sitting or supine position. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline in heart rate at Week 12 are presented.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [4]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Serum hormone markers included TSH. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline in TSH at Week 12 are presented.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [5]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Thyroxine (T4) and Insulin at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Serum hormone markers included T4 and additional pharmacodynamics marker included insulin. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline in T4 and insulin at Week 12 are presented.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [6]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Profile at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Fasting lipids included total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholestereol direct and triglycerides. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline in fasting lipid profile at Week 12 are presented.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [7]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Bi-layer Endometrial Thickness Measured by Transvaginal Ultrasound (TVUS) or Saline Infusion Sonohysterography (SIS)
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
All participants with an intact uterus participating in this study underwent a TVUS at Baseline and at Week 12, to investigate the cause of any abnormal uterine bleeding during the study. In the event the TVUS was not well visualized or there were abnormal findings at either visit, or the bi-layer thickness exceeded 5 millimeter at Week 12, a SIS was conducted to visualize the anterior and posterior walls. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline and Week 12 in heart rate are presented.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) to Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [8]
0
0
Endometrial Biopsy Pathology
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Endometrial biopsies were conducted at Baseline and end-of-treatment (end-of-treatment values were defined as the last available post-Baseline values before treatment was stopped) for all study participants with an intact uterus. These procedures were performed by an experienced physician. Each biopsy was obtained after the TVUS was performed. Proliferative endometrium also meant hyperplasia without atypia (normal).
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) to Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [9]
0
0
Occurrence of Withdrawal Bleeding-duration of Spotting/Bleeding
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
After completion of the 12-week treatment period, participants with an intact uterus received a 14-day cycle of progestogen (10 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate [MPA]) to induce withdrawal bleeding. All participants were required to return to clinic for Follow-Up Visit. Participants were asked to record occurrence of bleeding/spotting each day, from the day MPA dosing began until Follow-up using the following criteria: None (no bleeding or spotting), Spotting: any vaginal flow requiring not more than one sanitary napkin or tampon per day (lightly stained and not soaked through) and Bleeding: any vaginal flow requiring more than one sanitary napkin or tampon per day. The following information was recorded in electronic case report form: start and stop date of MPA administration as well as dates of any spotting/bleeding. Duration of spotting or bleeding is presented.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Up to Follow-up (Day 112)
Query!
Primary outcome [10]
0
0
Occurrence of Withdrawal Bleeding-number of Days of Spotting, Number of Days of Bleeding, Number of Days of Spotting/Bleeding Combined
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
After completion of the 12-week treatment period, participants with an intact uterus received a 14-day cycle of progestogen (10 mg MPA) to induce withdrawal bleeding. All participants were required to return to clinic for Follow-Up Visit. Participants were asked to record occurrence of bleeding/spotting each day, from the day MPA dosing began until Follow-up using the following criteria: None (no bleeding or spotting), Spotting: any vaginal flow requiring not more than one sanitary napkin or tampon per day (lightly stained and not soaked through) and Bleeding: any vaginal flow requiring more than one sanitary napkin or tampon per day. The following information was recorded in electronic case report form: start and stop date of MPA administration as well as dates of any spotting/bleeding. Duration of spotting, bleeding and also spotting/bleeding combined is presented.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Up to Follow-up (Day 112)
Query!
Primary outcome [11]
0
0
Mean Change in Frequency of Vasomotor Symptoms (VMS) From Baseline at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Individual VMS (hot flash or night sweats) events were recorded by participants in an electronic diary (eDiary) using as Global Change Question. The frequency was assessed using the question 1 as "Since you started the study medication, how has the number of your hot flashes (including night sweats) changed?". the response was rated on a 7-point scale from +3 to -3, where +3=A great deal better, +2=Moderately better, +1=A little better, 0=No change, -1=A little worse, -2=Moderately worse and -3=A great deal worse. The score ranged from +3 to -3, where +3 implied absence of symptoms and lower score implied more severe symptoms. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. Adjusted mean is presented as least square mean.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [12]
0
0
Mean Change in Severity of VMS From Baseline at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
Individual VMS (hot flash or night sweats) events were recorded by participants in an eDiary using global change questions. VMS severity was as follows: mild=score of 1 (brief wave of heat with minimal discomfort, usually without perspiration; able to continue activity [or sleep]), moderate=score of 2(heat with some discomfort, usually with perspiration; minimal interruption of activity [or sleep]), severe=score of 3(intense heat with considerable discomfort, usually with heavy sweating; may be unable to resume activity [or sleep] right away) and extremely severe=score of 4 (unbearable heat with intense discomfort, usually with pouring sweat; may be unable to resume activity [or sleep] for quite a while). Total score ranged from 1 to 4 and is the sum of severity scores divided by total number of VMS events. Higher score indicates worst condition. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [13]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Thrombotic Marker- Fibrinogen at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Thrombotic marker included fibrinogen. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [14]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Thrombotic Marker- Tissue Plasminogen Activator (tPA) Antigen at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Thrombotic marker included tPA antigen. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [15]
0
0
Change From Baseline and Week 12 in Inflammatory Marker- High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Inflammatory marker included hs-CRP. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [16]
0
0
Change From Baseline and Week 12 in Inflammatory Marker- Endothelin-1 at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Inflammatory marker included Endothelin-1. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [17]
0
0
Change From Baseline and Week 12 in Hematology Parameter- Hematocrit at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Hematology parameter included hematocrit. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [18]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter- Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH) at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
Hematology parameter included MCH. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [19]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter- Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV) at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
Hematology parameter included MCV. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [20]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter- Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
Hematology parameter included RBC count. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [21]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters- Hemoglobin and Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
Hematology parameters included Hemoglobin and MCHC. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [22]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters- Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Platelet Count, Segmented Neutrophils, Total Neutrophils and White Blood Cell (WBC) Count at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
Hematology parameters included basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelet count, segmented neutrophils, total neutrophils and WBC count. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline and Week 12 in basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelet count, segmented neutrophils, total neutrophils and WBC count are presented.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [23]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters- Albumin and Total Protein at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
Clinical chemistry parameters included albumin and total protein. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [24]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters- Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin and Uric Acid at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
Clinical chemistry parameters included creatinine, direct bilirubin, total bilirubin and uric acid. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [25]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters- Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST) at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
Clinical chemistry parameters included ALT, ALP and AST. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [26]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters- Calcium, Carbon Dioxide (C02) Content, Chloride, Phosphorous, Inorganic, Potassium, Sodium and Urea at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
Clinical chemistry parameters included calcium, C02 content, chloride, phosphorous, inorganic, potassium, sodium and urea. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Mean Change in Frequency of VMS From Baseline to Weeks 4 and 8
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Individual VMS (hot flash or night sweats) events were recorded by participants in an eDiary using as Global Change Question. The frequency was assessed using the question 1 as "Since you started the study medication, how has the number of your hot flashes (including night sweats) changed?". the response was rated on a 7-point scale from +3 to -3, where +3=A great deal better, +2=Moderately better, +1=A little better, 0=No change, -1=A little worse, -2=Moderately worse and -3=A great deal worse. The score ranged from +3 to -3, where +3 implied absence of symptoms and lower score implied more severe symptoms. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Mean Change in Severity of VMS From Baseline to Weeks 4 and 8
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Individual VMS (hot flash or night sweats) events were recorded by participants in an eDiary using global change questions. The VMS severity was as follows: mild=score of 1 (brief wave of heat with minimal discomfort, usually without perspiration; able to continue activity [or sleep]), moderate=score of 2(heat with some discomfort, usually with perspiration; minimal interruption of activity [or sleep]), severe=score of 3(intense heat with considerable discomfort, usually with heavy sweating; may be unable to resume activity [or sleep] right away) and extremely severe=score of 4 (unbearable heat with intense discomfort, usually with pouring sweat; may be unable to resume activity [or sleep] for quite a while). Total score ranged from 1 to 4 and is the sum of severity scores divided by total number of VMS events. Higher score indicates worst condition. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Number of Participants With VMS Percent Change From Baseline Responders With a Reduction in Frequency at Week 12 of at Least 50%, at Least 75%, and 100%
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Individual VMS (hot flash or night sweats) events were recorded by participants in an eDiary using global change question. The severity of VMS events were calculated using self-reported participants assessments recorded and transmitted by eDiary. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. Percent change was calculated by multiplying the change from baseline value with 100. Number of participants with VMS percent change from Baseline responders with a reduction in frequency at Week 12 of at least 50%, at least 75%, and 100% are presented.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Number of Participants With VMS Percent Change From Baseline Responders With a Reduction in Severity at Week 12 of at Least 50%, at Least 75%, and 100%
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Individual VMS (hot flash or night sweats) events were recorded by participants in an eDiary using global change questions. The VMS severity was as follows: mild (brief wave of heat with minimal discomfort, usually without perspiration; able to continue activity [or sleep]), moderate (heat with some discomfort, usually with perspiration; minimal interruption of activity [or sleep]), severe (intense heat with considerable discomfort, usually with heavy sweating; may be unable to resume activity [or sleep] right away) and extremely severe (unbearable heat with intense discomfort, usually with pouring sweat; may be unable to resume activity [or sleep] for quite a while). The severity of VMS events were calculated using self-reported participants assessments recorded and transmitted by eDiary. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. Percent change was calculated by multiplying change from Baseline value with 100.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Change in Menopause Quality of Life (MENQoL) Score From Baseline to Visits 6 (Week 4) and Visit 8 (Week 12)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
MENQOL instrument is a 32-item, validated questionnaire designed to measure symptoms that participants experience due to menopause and degree to which these symptoms bother them. Each item references a symptom and is composed of two-part question; a yes/no confirmation that the participant has symptom followed by a question asking how bothersome the symptom is, if present. The MENQOL items are designed to be grouped into domains that address vasomotor (items 1-3), psychosocial(items 4-10), physical (items 11-26, 30-32) and sexual symptoms (items 27-29). Each domain is given a separate score; there is no overall score. The domain score is sum of individual item scores divided by number of items in that domain. Since domain subscales are not comprised of an equivalent number of items, mean of subscale is used as overall subscale score. Each domain score ranges from 1 to 8. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) to Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Change in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Score From Baseline to Visits 6 (Week 4) and Visit 8 (Week 12)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The MOS Sleep Scale is a validated questionnaire designed to measure a participant sleep quality via 12 questions. Items are designed to be grouped into domains that include sleep disturbance (items 1, 3, 7, 8), sleep adequacy (items 4, 12), daytime somnolence (items 6, 9, 11), sleep quantity (2), 6-Item Sleep Scale (items 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12) and 9-Item Sleep Scale (items 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12). Each domain is given a separate score. The domain score is calculated as the sum of the individual item scores in that domain. Transformed scores were calculated for the domains only. This transformation converts the raw domain score to a 0 to 100 scale following the formula: Transformed score = ([Raw score - Lowest possible score]/Possible score range)*100. Lowest score 0 indicates best sleep quality and higher score 100 indicates worst sleep quality. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) to Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Changes in Vulvar Vaginal Atrophy (VVA) Symptom Score From Baseline to Visit 8 (Week 12)
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The VVA Symptoms Scale questionnaire is an 18-item instrument that captures symptoms related to VVA, asks participant to identify symptom that bothers them the most and contains items to assess degree of bother participants experience from each symptom and impact that most bothersome symptom has on their daily life. Items 1 to 8 had responses and scores of none=0, mild=1, moderate=2 and severe=3. Items 9 to 18 had responses and scores of not at all=0, a little=1, moderately=2 and a lot=3. Severity item and bothersome item respectively were as follows: vaginal dryness:1 and 9; Vaginal itching:2 and 10; Vaginal irritation:3 and 11; Painful urination:4 and 12; Difficulty urinating:5 and 13; Vaginal pain associated with sexual activity:6 and 14; Vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity:7 and 15. Total score ranged from 0 to 3; higher score indicated most bothersome. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) to Visit 8 (Week 12)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Score From Visit 2 to Visit 7
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The BFI is a validated questionnaire designed to measure a participant's fatigue via nine questions that are summated to create a total score. Items 1-3 request a rating on a scale ranging from 0 - 10 with 0 representing 'No Fatigue' and 10 representing 'As bad as you can imagine'. Five items 4A-4F request an interference score on a scale ranging from 0 - 10 with 0 representing 'Does not interfere' and 10 representing 'Completely Interferes'. The values of the scales for all items was used in scoring the response to each item. The following groupings of items was used to create domain scores. The total score is calculated by taking the sum of all 9 rating scales for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 90. Higher score indicates more severe fatigue. Visit 2 was Day -21. Change from Visit 2 was calculated by subtracting Visit 2 values from post-Visit 2 values.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Visit 2 (Day -21) to Visit 7 (Week 8)
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change in the Centers for Epidemiologic Studies in Depression (CES-D) Score From Visit 2 to Visit 7
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The CES-D is a questionnaire designed to measure depressive symptoms via 20 items that are summed to create a total score. Depressive symptoms are fairly common in postmenopausal women, and it's possible that stimulation of estrogen receptors via a selective estrogen receptor modulator may improve depressive symptoms. Questions 4, 8, 12 and 16 are weighted negatively (the scores are flipped prior to creating total score). If 3 or more items are missing then total score is missing. If fewer than 3 items are missing then missing item is set to group mean of that item for appropriate randomized treatment group. These means are only calculated if more than half of the participants used for calculation have responded to item. The items are summed to give total score ranging from 0 to 60. Lower score 0=no depression, higher score 60=higher degree of depression severity. Visit 2 was Day -21. Change from Visit 2 was calculated by subtracting Visit 2 values from post-Visit 2 values.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Visit 2 (Day -21) to Visit 7 (Week 8)
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Score From Visit 2 to Visit 7
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
The WPAI is a questionnaire that measured workplace productivity and absenteeism via 6 items/questions, adapted to participants experiencing menopausal symptoms. Item 1 asks about current employment with a yes/no response. Items 2- 4 ask for continuous response in hours. Item 5 asks for response on rating scale related to WP ranging from 0:Menopausal symptoms had no effect on work to 10:Couldn't work at all. Item 6 asks for response on rating scale related to daily activities ranging from 0:no effect on daily activities to 10:Couldn't perform any daily activities. The score calculation- Effect on work: (Item 5 score÷10); Absenteeism: (Item 2÷Item 2+Item 4); Overall work impairment ([Item 2÷Item 2+Item 4]+ [1- {Item 2÷Item 2+Item 4}]*[ Item 5 score÷10]); Activity impairment: (Item 6 score÷10). Total score range from 0 to 10 where higher score indicates worst condition. Visit 2 was Day -21. Change from Visit 2 was calculated by subtracting Visit 2 values from post-Visit 2 values.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Visit 2 (Day -21) to Visit 7 (Week 8)
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Change From Visit 2 to Visit 8 in Vaginal pH
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Vaginal pH was measured at Visit 2 and Visit 8 using standard pH indicator strips available at the participating site clinic. The pH indicator strip was inserted to the upper portion of the proximal one third of the vaginal vault, placed in contact with the lateral vaginal mucosal wall for approximately 1 minute, and evaluated according to the instructions provided in the package labeling. pH is calculated on a scale of 0 to 14, such that, the lower the number, more acidic the vagina and higher the number, more alkaline the vagina with 7 being neutral. Change from Visit 2 to Visit 8 was calculated by subtracting Visit 2 values from Visit 8 values.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Visit 2 (Day -21) to Visit 8 (Week 12)
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Change From Visit 2 to Visit 8 in Percentage of Superficial Cells to Determine the Vaginal Maturation Index (VMI)
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
A lateral vaginal wall specimen was collected at Visit 2 (Day -21) and Visit 8 (Week 12) and was sent to Central Pathology for analysis. Parabasal, intermediate, and superficial squamous cells were counted and percentages calculated. The VMI (also referred to as Maturation Value [MV]) of the vaginal mucosa was calculated according to the following equation:
VMI (MV)= (% Intermediate Cells x 0.5) + (% Superficial cells). Visit 2 was Day -21 and Visit 8 was Week 12. Change from Visit 2 to Visit 8 was calculated by subtracting Visit 2 values from Visit 8 values.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Visit 2 (Day -21) to Visit 8 (Week 12)
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Glucose at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Pharmacodynamic marker included glucose. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Change From Baseline at Week 12 in Serum Hormone Levels- Estradiol
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Serum hormone included Estradiol. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline at Week 12 in estradiol are presented.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Change From Baseline at Week 12 in Serum Hormone Levels- Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) and Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Serum hormones included FSH and LH. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Change From Baseline at Week 12 in Serum Hormone Levels- Testosterone
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Serum hormones included testosterone. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values. Mean change from Baseline at Week 12 in testosterone are presented.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Change From Baseline at Week 12 in Waist Circumference
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
To measure waist circumference, clothing was lifted from around the waist to ensure correct positioning of the measuring tape. Participants were instructed to stand erect with abdomen relaxed, arms at side, feet together, and weight equally divided over both legs. The non-stretchable tape was placed at the waist midway between the palpated iliac crest and the palpated lowest rib margin in the left and right mid-axillary lines. The tape was even, parallel to the floor not twisted with the measurement scale facing outward. The assessor was instructed to ensure that the tape was just touching the skin but not compressing the soft tissue. The measurement was made at the end of a normal expiration. The waist was measured at least twice or more if necessary, until two measurements were within 1 centimeter and the confirmatory reading recorded to one decimal place. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Change From Baseline at Week 12 in Hip Circumference
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
For hip circumference, the participant was instructed to stand erect with arms at sides and feet together. The measurement was taken at the point yielding the maximum circumference over the buttocks (widest part of the greater trochanters) with nonstretchable tape. The tape was even, not twisted with the measurement scale facing outward. The assessor was instructed to ensure that the tape was just touching the skin but not compressing the soft tissue. The hip should be measured at least twice until two measurements are within 1 centimeter and the last reading recorded. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Change From Baseline at Week 12 in Weight
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
Participants were weighed on a calibrated balance beam or digital scale. Participants were instructed to be dressed in light indoor clothing without shoes and also to have empty pockets and to void before weighing. It was strongly recommended that participants were weighed in the morning at the beginning of the clinic visit. Weight was measured at least twice or more if necessary, until two measurements were within 0.5 kilograms. The last (confirmed) reading was recorded in the electronic case report form. Weight was recorded in kilograms to the nearest tenth. When the weight was measured in pounds, it was converted into kilograms using the conversion factor: pounds/ 2.2 = kilograms. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Change From Baseline at Week 12 in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
BMI was calculated from height (taken at Screening Visit 1 [Day -35]) and weight at Week 12 using the formula: BMI = [weight in kilograms divided by (height in meters)^2]. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Change From Baseline at Week 12 in Abdomen Body Circumference, Abdomen Saggital Diameter and Thigh Circumference
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
Thigh circumference was measured on the left leg directly below the gluteal fold; with the participant standing with both arms at the side, feet together, and with equal weight on both feet when this measurement was taken. The thigh was measured at least twice until two measurements were within 1 centimeter, and the last reading recorded. Abdomen body circumference and abdomen saggital diameter was measured in centimeter to once decimal place by Computerized tomography (CT) scan with the participant in supine position. CT scan of the abdomen was conducted at the Lumbar 4 vertebrae level. Scans were performed with 120 kilovolts, 5 millimeter slice thickness and 48 centimeter scan field of view. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Change From Baseline at Week 12 in Abdomen Visceral Adipose Tissue (AVAT), Abdomen Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (ASAT), Thigh Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (TSAT) and Thigh Intermuscular Adipose Tissue (TIAT)
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
AVAT, ASAT, TSAT and TIAT was measured in centimeter to once decimal place by CT scan. A CT scan of the abdomen was conducted at the Lumbar 4 vertebrae level. A CT scan of the right thigh was performed at half the distance between the knee joint and greater trochanter femoralis. Scans were performed with 120 kilovolts, 5 millimeter slice thickness (thigh scan 3 millimeter slice thickness) and 48 centimeter scan field of view. Baseline was Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
A subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if all of the following
criteria apply:
- Postmenopausal women aged 40 to 65 years old; postmenopausal defined as:
i.Amenorrheic for at least 12 consecutive months* OR ii.At least 6 weeks post-surgical
bilateral oophorectomy†with or without hysterectomy.
*Note: Although duration of amenorrhea is initially determined by subject history at
the time of the screening visit (Visit 1), menopausal status must be confirmed by
demonstrating levels of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) >40 mIU/mL (SI: >40 IU/L)
and estradiol <35pg/mL (SI: <128pmol/L) at entry. Screening reports provided by the
Central Laboratory must be carefully reviewed to determine menopause eligibility prior
to conducting Visit 2 assessments. In the event a subject's menopause status has been
clearly established (for example, the subject indicates she has been amenorrheic for
10 years), but FSH and/or estradiol levels are not consistent with a post-menopausal
condition, determination of subject eligibility should be discussed with the study
medical monitor.
†For women who are surgically menopausal, a copy of the pathology report or a
statement on letterhead from the subject's physician documenting both ovaries have
been removed or biochemical evidence of post-menopausal status as noted above is
required prior to conducting Visit 2 assessments.
- A minimum average frequency of seven daily moderate to extremely severe hot flashes or
episodes of night sweats sufficient to cause the patient to seek treatment (these
episodes must be documented during the baseline period and the subject must have
recorded frequency and severity of symptoms for a minimum of eight days in order to be
eligible for randomization). This average frequency will be calculated by summing the
number of moderate, severe, and extremely severe VMS events during the baseline period
and dividing by the total number of non-missing days during this period, with details
related to the definition of non-missing days described in Section 6.3.1.
- BMI within the range 19 to 35 kg/m2, inclusive.
- Subject has provided signed and dated written informed consent before admission to the
study.
- Subject is able to understand and comply with the protocol requirements, instructions,
and protocol-stated restrictions.
Query!
Minimum age
40
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
65
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria
apply:
- Investigator considers subject unfit for the study as a result of medical history,
physical examination, or screening tests.
- Use of prescription or non-prescription drugs including:
i.Hormone therapy (estrogen or estrogen/progestin combination or related products)
within the following time period prior to conduct of Visit 1 assessments:
- 4 weeks for prior vaginal hormonal products (rings, creams, gels) or transdermal
estrogen or estrogen/progestin products.
- 4 weeks for oral estradiol (e.g., micronized estradiol) or SERM products (e.g.,
raloxifene).
- 8 weeks for prior oral conjugated (equine or synthetic) estrogen or estrogen/progestin
products or for prior intrauterine progestin therapy.
- 3 months for prior progestin implants or injectable estrogen.
- 6 months for prior estrogen pellet therapy or injectable progestin. ii.Use of putative
therapies for VMS relief (e.g., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs],
serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs], clonidine, gabapentin, tibolone,
methyldopa, and the phytoestrogens black cohosh and red clover) within the past 30
days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to conduct of Visit 1 assessments
(note: half-lives will be provided in the SPM). Use of non-medication treatments for
VMS, such as acupuncture and biofeedback, and other complementary or alternative
therapies for VMS relief (with the exception of black cohosh and red clover which
require a specified washout previously noted) must be discontinued at Visit 1.
iii.Use of weight loss drugs (e.g., phentermine, sibutramine, orlistat, rimonabant) within
3 months of the first dose of investigational product. Other complementary or alternative
therapies for weight reduction must be discontinued at Visit 1. See SPM for listing.
iv.Use of pravastatin [Pravachol/Lipostat], rosuvastatin [Crestor], or pitavastatin
[Livalo] within the past 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) of the first dose of
investigational product (note: half-lives will be provided in the SPM. Uses of other
statins, for example simvastatin [Zocor], atorvastatin [Lipitor], fluvastatin [Lescol],
lovastatin [Mevacor] is allowed).
v.Use of bupropion, orphenadrine [Norflex], cyclophosphamide, efavirenz, ifosfamide, or
methadone (because of the potential for GSK232802 to inhibit CYP2B6), or use of paclitaxel,
torsemide, amodiaquine, repaglinide, rosiglitazone, or pioglitazone (because of the
potential for GSK232802 to inhibit CYP2C8) within the past 30 days or 5 half-lives
(whichever is longer) of the first dose of investigational product (note: half-lives will
be provided in the SPM).
Please note: Regardless of the reason for prescribing, use of the medications and therapies
defined within Exclusion 2 above is prohibited. Concurrent administration of
anti-depressants, anti-hypertensives, lipid-lowering therapies, etc. not specifically
excluded above is allowed. See SPM for detailed listings and relevant half lives.
- Use of investigational drug within the past 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer)
before the first dose of investigational product.
- Uterine disease or medical condition including:
- Bi-layer endometrial thickness greater than 5mm as determined by TVUS, or for women
with a non-informative TVUS, a single layer thickness of greater than 3 mm determined
by SIS; presence of fibroids that obscure evaluation of endometrium by TVUS;
- History of uterine cancer; evidence of endometrial hyperplasia or cancer as assessed
by a screening endometrial biopsy. (Note: if a subject has insufficient tissue for
diagnosis at screening, but bi-layer endometrial thickness by TVUS is =5mm or single
wall thickness by SIS is =3mm, she may still be eligible for study entry if she meets
the remaining inclusion/exclusion criteria);
- Evidence of an endometrial polyp with hyperplastic or malignant epithelium;
- Unexplained or unusual endometrial bleeding; or uterine surgery (other than
hysterectomy*) within the past 6 months; *Note: hysterectomy must have been conducted
at least 6 weeks prior to screening Visit 1. See also Inclusion criterion 1.
- Abnormal cervical Pap smear with evidence of cervical dysplasia greater than or equal
to low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) or with a diagnosis of atypical
squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) that is HPV High Risk positive, or
glandular lesions including but not limited to atypical glandular cells of
undetermined significance (AGUS), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or malignancy
- History of breast or ovarian cancer. Any clinically significant findings on
mammography suspicious of breast malignancy that would require additional clinical
testing to rule out breast cancer (note: simple cysts confirmed by ultrasound are
allowed).
Note: A screening mammogram is required unless the subject has had a mammogram performed
within the last 12 months. If local mammography or medical management guidelines restrict
the frequency with which mammograms can be performed, or impose age restrictions on the use
of mammography, such that a subject may be unable to undergo the study-required screening
mammogram, then these subjects must not be enrolled in the study. See Section 6.2.7.
- Cardiovascular conditions including: i. Systolic blood pressure (BP) outside the range 80
to 150 mmHg, diastolic BP outside the range 50 to 90 mmHg, and/or heart rate outside the
range 40 to 100 bpm. Subjects with mild to moderate hypertension who are controlled on a
stable antihypertension regimen may be enrolled if they meet the inclusion/exclusion
criteria.
ii. Symptomatic or asymptomatic arrhythmia of any clinical significance. iii. Any
clinically significant abnormality identified on the screening 12-lead ECG. Subjects with
QTc prolongation (QTc interval >450msec) will be excluded.
iv. Has a documented history (within the last year) of myocardial infarction, angina, or
has undergone coronary artery bypass surgery and/or percutaneous transluminal coronary
angioplasty (PTCA).
v. History of venous or arterial thromboembolic disease (e.g., deep vein thrombosis,
pulmonary embolism, stroke), history of known coagulopathy or abnormal coagulation factors;
increased thrombotic risk as evidenced by positive APC resistance (APCR) evaluated at
screening.
- Has a documented history of hepatobiliary disease or hepatic enzyme elevation including
any one of the following: i.ALT or direct (conjugated) bilirubin values 1.5-fold higher
than the ULN at screening.
ii.Fasting triglycerides >400mg/dL (SI: >4.52mmol/L) at screening. If a subject is
receiving a lipid-lowering therapy, then she must be on a stable dose for at least 1 month
before screening.
- Has an abnormal thyroid function test assessed by TSH at screening (TSH <0.1uU/mL or
>10uU/mL [SI: <0.1mU/L or >10mU/L] ).
Note: If the TSH is mildly out of range at screening (TSH < 15U/mL), the subject may have
her dose adjusted (if already on exogenous therapy) or have therapy initiated as deemed
appropriate by the subject's physician, followed by a 3-4 week period to allow adequate
equilibration. The TSH may then be re-assayed for eligibility purposes after this
stabilization period has been completed. The subject should not progress through subsequent
V2 assessments until re-assay demonstrates the TSH is within acceptable protocol-defined
limits. Subjects with suppressed levels of TSH, <0.1U/mL, may have dose adjustment if free
T4 is in normal range, and they are on exogenous thyroxine therapy.
- Has either a previous disease or current medical condition, which as judged by the
investigator, may affect the interpretation of efficacy or safety data or which
otherwise contraindicates participation in a clinical study with a new chemical
entity. These diseases include, but are not limited to, cardiovascular disease,
malignancy*, complex ovarian pathology, hepatic disease, renal disease, hematological
disease, neurological disease, or endocrine disease. A subject with diabetes may be
included if her diabetes is well controlled (i.e., HbA1c level is less than 8% at
screening).
*Note: Any history of malignancy within the past 5 years is exclusionary with the
exception of basal cell (excluded if within the prior 2 years) or squamous cell
(excluded if within the prior one year) carcinoma of the skin. Subjects with a prior
malignancy who have had no evidence of disease for at least the past 5 years are
eligible. Note that this timeframe does not apply to uterine, breast, and ovarian
cancers which are defined in Exclusions 4 and 5 above.
- History of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence in the 12 months before screening
as determined by the investigator.
- Positive results for hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis C antibodies as
evaluated at screening Visit 1. Known history of HIV.
- Donation of blood in excess of 500mL within a 56-day period before screening.
- History or presence of allergy to the investigational product or drugs of this class
(e.g., raloxifene), or history of drug or other allergy that, in the opinion of the
physician responsible, contraindicates their participation.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 2
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
17/07/2007
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
23/07/2008
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
356
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD,SA,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
GSK Investigational Site - Auchenflower
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
GSK Investigational Site - Kippa Ring
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
GSK Investigational Site - Dulwich
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
GSK Investigational Site - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
GSK Investigational Site - Subiaco
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
4066 - Auchenflower
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
4021 - Kippa Ring
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
5065 - Dulwich
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
6009 - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
6008 - Subiaco
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
District of Columbia
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Kansas
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Kentucky
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Montana
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Nevada
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
New Mexico
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Mendoza
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Hessen
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Niedersachsen
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Nordrhein-Westfalen
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Sachsen-Anhalt
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Sachsen
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Thueringen
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Campania
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Emilia-Romagna
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Toscana
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Auckland
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Christchurch
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Wellington
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Lugo
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Oviedo
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Santiago de Compostela
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Göteborg
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Kungsbacka
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Uddevalla
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Cambridgeshire
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Lancashire
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Middlesex
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Oxfordshire
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Waterloo, Liverpool
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name
GlaxoSmithKline
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether GSK232802 is safe and effective in reducing
the frequency and severity of hot flashes associated with menopause.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00604825
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
GSK Clinical Trials
Query!
Address
0
0
GlaxoSmithKline
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Summary Results
For IPD and results data, please see
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00604825
Download to PDF