Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03720470
Registration number
NCT03720470
Ethics application status
Date submitted
24/10/2018
Date registered
25/10/2018
Titles & IDs
Public title
Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of PF-04965842 and Dupilumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis on Background Topical Therapy
Query!
Scientific title
A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, DOUBLE-DUMMY, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PARALLEL GROUP, MULTI-CENTER STUDY INVESTIGATING THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF PF-04965842 AND DUPILUMAB IN COMPARISON WITH PLACEBO IN ADULT SUBJECTS ON BACKGROUND TOPICAL THERAPY, WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE ATOPIC DERMATITIS
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
COMPARE
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
B7451029
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
JADE Compare
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Dermatitis
0
0
Query!
Dermatitis, Atopic
0
0
Query!
Eczema
0
0
Query!
Skin Diseases
0
0
Query!
Skin Diseases, Genetic
0
0
Query!
Genetic Diseases, Inborn
0
0
Query!
Skin Diseases, Eczematous
0
0
Query!
Hypersensitivity
0
0
Query!
Hypersensitivity, Immediate
0
0
Query!
Immune System Diseases
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Skin
0
0
0
0
Query!
Dermatological conditions
Query!
Skin
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other skin conditions
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Query!
Human Genetics and Inherited Disorders
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other human genetics and inherited disorders
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Allergies
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - PF-04965842 100 mg
Treatment: Drugs - PF-04965842 200 mg
Treatment: Drugs - Dupilumab
Treatment: Drugs - Oral Placebo
Treatment: Drugs - Injectable Placebo
Experimental: PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Inj followed by PF-04965842 100mg - Once-daily oral PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo injected subcutaneously once every 2 weeks from Day 1 until Week 16 followed by once-daily oral PF-04965842 100 mg from Week 16 to Week 20
Experimental: PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Inj followed by PF-04965842 200mg - Once-daily oral PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo injected subcutaneously once every 2 weeks from Day 1 until Week 16 followed by once-daily oral PF-04965842 200 mg from Week 16 to Week 20
Active comparator: Dupilumab Injection + Oral Placebo followed by Oral Placebo - Dupilumab injected subcutaneously once every 2 weeks + once-daily oral Placebo from Day 1 until Week 16 followed by once-daily oral Placebo from Week 16 to Week 20
Placebo comparator: Oral Placebo + Placebo Inj followed by 100 mg PF-04965842 - Once-daily oral Placebo + Placebo injected subcutaneously once every 2 weeks from Day 1 until Week 16 followed by once-daily oral 100 mg PF-04965842 from Week 16 to Week 20
Placebo comparator: Oral Placebo + Placebo Inj followed by 200 mg PF-04965842 - Once-daily oral Placebo + Placebo injected subcutaneously once every 2 weeks from Day 1 until Week 16 followed by once-daily oral 200 mg PF-04965842 from Week 16 to Week 20
Treatment: Drugs: PF-04965842 100 mg
PF-04965842 100 mg, administered as two tablets to be taken orally once daily as follows:
1. In the arm "PF-04965842 100 mg + Injectable Placebo followed by PF-04965842 100 mg," PF-04965842 100 mg is taken together with Injectable Placebo from Day 1 until Week 16, then by itself from Week 16 to Week 20;
2. In the arm "Oral Placebo + Injectable Placebo followed by 100 mg PF-04965842" subjects take PF-04965842 100 mg from Week 16 to Week 20.
Treatment: Drugs: PF-04965842 200 mg
PF-04965842 200 mg, administered as two tablets to be taken orally once daily as follows:
1. In the arm "PF-04965842 200 mg + Injectable Placebo followed by PF-04965842 100 mg," PF-04965842 200 mg is taken together with Injectable Placebo from Day 1 until Week 16, then by itself from Week 16 to Week 20;
2. In the arm "Oral Placebo + Injectable Placebo followed by 200 mg PF-04965842" subjects take PF-04965842 200 mg from Week 16 to Week 20.
Treatment: Drugs: Dupilumab
Two subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg as a loading dose administered on Day 1 (for a total of 600 mg) followed by one injection once every two weeks (q2w) until Week 16.
Treatment: Drugs: Oral Placebo
Oral placebo (for PF-04965842) administered as two tablets to be taken orally once daily as follows:
1. In the arm "Dupilumab Injection + Oral Placebo followed by Oral Placebo," the Oral Placebo is taken together with Dupilumab from Day 1 until Week 16, then by itself to Week 20;
2. In the arms "Oral Placebo + Injectable Placebo followed by 100 mg PF-04965842" and "Oral Placebo + Injectable Placebo followed by 200 mg PF-04965842," subjects, take Oral Placebo from Day 1 until Week 16.
Treatment: Drugs: Injectable Placebo
Two subcutaneous injections of Placebo (for Dupilumab) administered as a loading dose on Day 1 followed by one injection every other week (q2w) until Week 16.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and a Reduction of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2 Points From Baseline at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
IGA assessed severity of atopic dermatitis (AD) on a 5 point scale (0 to 4, higher scores indicate more severity). Scores: 0= clear, no inflammatory signs of AD; 1= almost clear, AD not fully cleared- light pink residual lesions (except post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation), just perceptible erythema, papulation/induration lichenification, excoriation, and no oozing/crusting; 2= mild AD with light red lesions, slight but definite erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and no oozing/crusting; 3= moderate AD with red lesions, moderate erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and slight oozing/crusting; 4= severe AD with deep dark red lesions, severe erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and moderate to severe oozing/crusting. Assessment excluded scalp, palms and sole.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline (the last measurement prior to first dosing on Day 1), Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response >=75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline at Week 12
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
EASI evaluates severity of participants with AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With at Least 4 Points Improvement in the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Severity of Pruritus From Baseline at Day 2-15, Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Participants were asked to assess their worst pruritus/itching due to AD over the past 24 hours on an NRS scale ranged from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst possible itching), where higher scores indicated greater severity.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and a Reduction of >=2 Points From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 and 16
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
IGA assessed severity of AD on a 5 point scale (0 to 4, higher scores indicate more severity). Scores: 0= clear, no inflammatory signs of AD; 1= almost clear, AD not fully cleared- light pink residual lesions (except post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation), just perceptible erythema, papulation/induration lichenification, excoriation, and no oozing/crusting; 2= mild AD with light red lesions, slight but definite erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and no oozing/crusting; 3= moderate AD with red lesions, moderate erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and slight oozing/crusting; 4= severe AD with deep dark red lesions, severe erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and moderate to severe oozing/crusting. Assessment excluded sole, palms and scalp.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response >=75% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 and 16
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
EASI evaluates severity of participants' AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response >=50% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
EASI evaluates severity of participants' AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response >=90% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
EASI evaluates severity of participants' AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8,12 and 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response =100% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
EASI evaluates severity of participants' AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Time From Baseline to First Achieve at Least 4 Points Improvement in the Severity of Pruritus NRS
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Participants were asked to assess their worst pruritus/itching due to AD over the past 24 hours on an NRS scale ranged from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst possible itching), where higher scores indicated greater severity.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline up to Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
4 body regions were evaluated: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin) and lower limbs (including buttocks). Scalp, palms and soles were excluded. BSA was calculated using handprint method. Number of handprints (size of participant's hand with fingers in a closed position) fitting in the affected area of a body region was estimated. Maximum number of handprints were 10 for head and neck, 20 for upper limbs, 30 for trunk and 40 for lower limbs. Surface area of body region equivalent to 1 handprint: 1 handprint was equal to 10% for head and neck, 5% for upper limbs, 3.33% for trunk and 2.5% for lower limbs. Percent BSA for a body region was calculated as = total number of handprints in a body region \* % surface area equivalent to 1 handprint. Overall % BSA for an individual: arithmetic mean of % BSA of all 4 body regions, ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Percentage BSA at Week 18 and 20
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
4 body regions were evaluated: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin) and lower limbs (including buttocks). Scalp, palms and soles were excluded. BSA was calculated using handprint method. Number of handprints (size of participant's hand with fingers in a closed position) fitting in the affected area of a body region was estimated. Maximum number of handprints were 10 for head and neck, 20 for upper limbs, 30 for trunk and 40 for lower limbs. Surface area of body region equivalent to 1 handprint: 1 handprint was equal to 10% for head and neck, 5% for upper limbs, 3.33% for trunk and 2.5% for lower limbs. Percent BSA for a body region was calculated as = total number of handprints in a body region \* % surface area equivalent to 1 handprint. Overall % BSA for an individual: arithmetic mean of % BSA of all 4 body regions, ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Week 18 and 20
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Participant responded to the following question: "Overall, how would you describe your Atopic Dermatitis right now?" on a scale: 0= clear; 1= almost clear; 2= mild; 3= moderate; and 4= severe. Higher scores indicated more severity.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 2, 12 and 16
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life. Scores from all 10 questions added up to give DLQI total score range from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of participants.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline, Week 2, 12 and 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
DLQI at Week 20
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life. Scores from all 10 questions added up to give DLQI total score range from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of participants.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Week 20
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Index Value at Week 12 and 16
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
EQ-5D-5L: standardized participant completed questionnaire consisted of 2 components: a health state profile and an optional VAS. EQ-5D health state profile had 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems. Responses to 5 dimensions comprised a health state/a single utility index value. E.g. if a participant responded "no problems" for each 5 dimensions, then health state was coded as "11111" with a predefined index value to it. Every health state (coded as combination of responses on each of 5 dimensions) had a unique predefined utility index value assigned to it, by EuroQol. US value sets (with all possible health states) was used for adults in the study, range from 1 to -0.109. Higher (positive) scores = better health state.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12 and 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12 and 16
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and an optional VAS. EQ-5D VAS was used to record a participant's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state and captured on a vertical VAS (0-100), where 0 = worst imaginable health state and 100 = best imaginable health state.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12 and 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
EQ-5D-5L- Index Value at Week 20
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
EQ-5D-5L: standardized participant completed questionnaire consisted of 2 components: a health state profile and an optional VAS. EQ-5D health state profile had 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems. Responses to 5 dimensions comprised a health state/a single utility index value. E.g. if a participant responded "no problems" for each 5 dimensions, then health state was coded as "11111" with a predefined index value to it. Every health state (coded as combination of responses on each of 5 dimensions) had a unique predefined utility index value assigned to it, by EuroQol. US value sets (with all possible health states) was used for adults in the study, range from 1 to -0.109. Higher (positive) scores = better health state.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Week 20
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
EQ-5D-5L- VAS Score at Week 20
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and an optional VAS. EQ-5D VAS was used to record a participant's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state and captured on a vertical VAS (0-100), where 0 = worst imaginable health state and 100 = best imaginable health state.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Week 20
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety Scale at Week 12 and 16
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
HADS: participant rated 14-item questionnaire. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-Anxiety (HADS-A) scale and HADS-Depression (HADS-D) scale, both of these subscales comprised of 7 items each. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, score range from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicates more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). HADS-A: sum of all 7 items resulted in score range of 0 (no presence of anxiety) to 21 (severe feeling of anxiety); higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 12 and 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Change From Baseline in HADS - Depression Scale at Week 12 and 16
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
HADS: participant rated 14-item questionnaire. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-A scale and HADS-D scale, both of these subscales comprised of 7 items each. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, score range from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicates more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). HADS-D: sum of all 7 items resulted in score range of 0 (no presence of depression) to 21 (severe feeling of depression); higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12 and 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
HADS - Anxiety Scale at Week 20
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
HADS: participant rated 14-item questionnaire. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-A scale and HADS-D scale, both of these subscales comprised of 7 items each. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, score range from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicates more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). HADS-A: sum of all 7 items resulted in score range of 0 (no presence of anxiety) to 21 (severe feeling of anxiety); higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Week 20
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
HADS - Depression Scale at Week 20
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
HADS: participant rated 14-item questionnaire. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-A scale and HADS-D scale, both of these subscales comprised of 7 items each. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, score range from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicates more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). HADS-D: sum of all 7 items resulted in score range of 0 (no presence of depression) to 21 (severe feeling of depression); higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Week 20
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 12 and 16
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
POEM is a 7-item participant reported outcome (PRO) measure used to assess the impact of AD (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) over the past week. Each item is scored as following: "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28, where higher score indicated greater severity.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12 and 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
POEM at Week 20
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
POEM is a 7-item participant reported outcome (PRO) measure used to assess the impact of AD (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) over the past week. Each item is scored as following: "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28, where higher score indicated greater severity.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Week 20
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) Total Score Week 1 to Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
PSAAD is a daily participant reported symptom electronic diary. Participants rated their symptoms of AD over the past 24 hours, using 11 items (itchy skin, painful skin, dry skin, flaky skin, cracked skin, bumpy skin, red skin, discolored skin \[lighter or darker\], bleeding from skin, seeping or oozing fluid from skin \[other than blood\], and skin swelling). Participant had to think about all the areas of their body affected by their skin condition and chose the number that best described their experience for each of the 11 items, from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extreme symptoms), higher scores signified worse skin condition. Total PSAAD score = arithmetic mean of 11 items, 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extreme symptoms), where higher score = worse skin condition.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
Baseline, Week 1 to Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
PSAAD Total Score at Week 18 and 20
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
PSAAD is a daily participant reported symptom electronic diary. Participants rated their symptoms of AD over the past 24 hours, using 11 items (itchy skin, painful skin, dry skin, flaky skin, cracked skin, bumpy skin, red skin, discolored skin \[lighter or darker\], bleeding from skin, seeping or oozing fluid from skin \[other than blood\], and skin swelling). Participant had to think about all the areas of their body affected by their skin condition and chose the number that best described their experience for each of the 11 items, from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extreme symptoms), higher scores signified worse skin condition. Total PSAAD score = arithmetic mean of 11 items, 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extreme symptoms), where higher score = worse skin condition.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
Week 18 and 20
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response >=50% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent, severity, subjective symptoms. Extent (A): rule of 9 was used to calculate BSA affected by AD as a % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; 1% for genitals. The score for each body region was added to determine A (0-100). Severity (B): severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none=0, mild=1, moderate=2,severe=3. The severity scores were summed to give B (0-18). Subjective symptoms (C): pruritus and sleep, each of these 2 were scored by participant/caregiver using visual analogue scale (VAS) where "0" = no itch/no sleeplessness and "10" = the worst imaginable itch/sleeplessness, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleeplessness were added to give 'C' (0-20). The SCORAD for an individual was calculated: A/5 + 7\*B/2 + C; range from 0 to 103; higher values of SCORAD=worse outcome.
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 12 and 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With SCORAD Response >=75% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 12 and 16
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent, severity, subjective symptoms. Extent (A): rule of 9 was used to calculate BSA affected by AD as a % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; 1% for genitals. The score for each body region was added to determine A (0-100). Severity (B): severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none=0, mild=1, moderate=2,severe=3. The severity scores were summed to give B (0-18). Subjective symptoms (C): pruritus and sleep, each of these 2 were scored by participant/caregiver using visual analogue scale (VAS) where "0" = no itch/no sleeplessness and "10" = the worst imaginable itch/sleeplessness, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleeplessness were added to give 'C' (0-20). The SCORAD for an individual was calculated: A/5 + 7\*B/2 + C; range from 0 to 103; higher values of SCORAD=worse outcome.
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 12 and 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
0
0
Change From Baseline in SCORAD Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Itch and Sleep Loss at Week 2, 4, 8 12 and 16
Query!
Assessment method [27]
0
0
SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent, severity, subjective symptoms. Extent (A): rule of 9 was used to calculate BSA affected by AD as a % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; 1% for genitals. The score for each body region was added to determine A (0-100). Severity (B): severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none=0, mild=1, moderate=2,severe=3. The severity scores were summed to give B (0-18). Subjective symptoms (C): pruritus and sleep, each of these 2 were scored by participant/caregiver using visual analogue scale (VAS) where "0" = no itch/no sleeplessness and "10" = the worst imaginable itch/sleeplessness, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleeplessness were added to give 'C' (0-20). The SCORAD for an individual was calculated: A/5 + 7\*B/2 + C; range from 0 to 103; higher values of SCORAD=worse outcome.
Query!
Timepoint [27]
0
0
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 12 and 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [28]
0
0
SCORAD VAS of Itch and Sleep Loss at Week 18 and 20
Query!
Assessment method [28]
0
0
SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent, severity, subjective symptoms. Extent (A): rule of 9 was used to calculate BSA affected by AD as a % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; 1% for genitals. The score for each body region was added to determine A (0-100). Severity (B): severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none=0, mild=1, moderate=2,severe=3. The severity scores were summed to give B (0-18). Subjective symptoms (C): pruritus and sleep, each of these 2 were scored by participant/caregiver using visual analogue scale (VAS) where "0" = no itch/no sleeplessness and "10" = the worst imaginable itch/sleeplessness, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleeplessness were added to give 'C' (0-20). The SCORAD for an individual was calculated: A/5 + 7\*B/2 + C; range from 0 to 103; higher values of SCORAD=worse outcome.
Query!
Timepoint [28]
0
0
Week 18 and 20
Query!
Secondary outcome [29]
0
0
Least Square Mean of Number of Steroid-free Days From Baseline up to Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [29]
0
0
Number of days when a corticosteroid as a concomitant medication was not used up to Week 16 is reported as Least square mean in this outcome measure.
Query!
Timepoint [29]
0
0
Baseline up to Week 16
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Male or female subjects aged 18 years or older at the time of informed consent
* Diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD) for at least 1 year and current status of moderate to severe disease (>= the following scores: BSA 10%, IGA 3, EASI 16, Pruritus NRS severity 4)
* Documented recent history (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to treatment with medicated topical therapy for AD for at least 4 weeks, or who have required systemic therapies for control of their disease.
* Must be willing and able to comply with standardized background topical therapy, as per protocol guidelines throughout the study
* Female subjects who are of childbearing potential must not be intending to become pregnant, currently pregnant, or lactating. The following conditions apply:
1. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a confirmed negative pregnancy test prior to randomization;
2. Female subjects of childbearing potential must agree to use a highly effective method of contraception for the duration of the active treatment period and for at least 28 days after the last dose of investigational product.
* Female subjects of non-childbearing potential must meet at least 1 of the following criteria:
* Have undergone a documented hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy;
* Have medically confirmed ovarian failure; or
* Achieved postmenopausal status, defined as follows: cessation of regular menses for at least 12 consecutive months with no alternative pathological or physiological cause and have a serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level confirming the postmenopausal state.
All other female subjects (including female subjects with tubal ligations) are considered to be of childbearing potential.
-If receiving concomitant medications for any reason other than AD, must be on a stable regimen prior to Day 1 and through the duration of the study
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Other acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition including recent (within the past year) or active suicidal ideation or behavior or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the subject inappropriate for entry into this study
* Medical history including thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy or platelet dysfunction, Q wave interval abnormalities, current or history of certain infections, cancer, lymphoproliferative disorders and other medical conditions at the discretion of the investigator
* Unwilling to discontinue current AD medications prior to the study or require treatment with prohibited medications during the study
* Other active nonAD inflammatory skin diseases or conditions affecting skin
* Prior treatment with JAK inhibitors
* Previous treatment with dupilumab
* Unwilling to discontinue current AD medications prior to the study or require treatment with prohibited medications during the study
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
29/10/2018
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
6/03/2020
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
838
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,QLD,SA,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Woden Dermatology - Phillip
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Australian Clinical Research Network - Maroubra
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
The Skin Centre - Benowa
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Veracity Clinical Research Pty Ltd - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
North Eastern Health Specialists - Hectorville
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Box Hill Hospital - Box Hill
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
Emeritus Research - Camberwell
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
0
0
Skin and Cancer Foundation Inc - Carlton
Query!
Recruitment hospital [9]
0
0
Sinclair Dermatology - East Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [10]
0
0
Royal Melbourne Hospital - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2606 - Phillip
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2035 - Maroubra
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
4217 - Benowa
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
4102 - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
5073 - Hectorville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
3128 - Box Hill
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
0
0
3124 - Camberwell
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
0
0
3053 - Carlton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [9]
0
0
3002 - East Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [10]
0
0
3050 - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Idaho
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Kentucky
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
South Dakota
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Sofia
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Stara Zagora
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Varna
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Manitoba
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Saskatchewan
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Chile
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Region Metropolitana
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Chile
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Región Metropolitana
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Nachod
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Ostrava
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Pardubice
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Praha 1
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Praha 2
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Praha 3
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Augsburg
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Bad Bentheim
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Bielefeld
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Bonn
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Dresden
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Frankfurt
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Halle
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Kiel
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Langenau
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Leipzig
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Luebeck
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Mahlow
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Marburg
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Muenster
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Debrecen
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Gyula
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Püspökladány
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Veszprem
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
RM
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Modena
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Chiba
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Hokkaido
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Hyogo
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Kumamoto
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Osaka
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Tokyo
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Fukuoka
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Saitama
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Gyeonggi-do
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Daejeon
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Incheon
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Latvia
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Riga
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Latvia
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Ventspils
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Mexico CITY
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Nuevo LEON
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Queretaro
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Bialystok
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Chorzow
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Czestochowa
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Gdansk
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Gdynia
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Grodzisk Mazowiecki
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Katowice
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Kielce
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Krakow
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Ksawerow
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Lodz
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Lublin
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Ostrowiec Swietokrzyski
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Poznan
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Rybnik
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Rzeszow
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
Szczecin
Query!
Country [95]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [95]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [96]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [96]
0
0
Wroclaw
Query!
Country [97]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [97]
0
0
Bratislava
Query!
Country [98]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [98]
0
0
Kosice-Saca
Query!
Country [99]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [99]
0
0
Kosice
Query!
Country [100]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [100]
0
0
Nove Zamky
Query!
Country [101]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [101]
0
0
Svidnik
Query!
Country [102]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [102]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [103]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [103]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [104]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [104]
0
0
Valencia
Query!
Country [105]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [105]
0
0
Taiwan (r.o.c)
Query!
Country [106]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [106]
0
0
Taichung City
Query!
Country [107]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [107]
0
0
Taichung
Query!
Country [108]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [108]
0
0
Tainan
Query!
Country [109]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [109]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Country [110]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [110]
0
0
Berkshire
Query!
Country [111]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [111]
0
0
Devon
Query!
Country [112]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [112]
0
0
Essex
Query!
Country [113]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [113]
0
0
Greater London
Query!
Country [114]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [114]
0
0
Kent
Query!
Country [115]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [115]
0
0
Middlesex
Query!
Country [116]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [116]
0
0
Peterborough
Query!
Country [117]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [117]
0
0
Warwickshire
Query!
Country [118]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [118]
0
0
WEST Yorkshire
Query!
Country [119]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [119]
0
0
Corby
Query!
Country [120]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [120]
0
0
Glasgow
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Pfizer
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
B7451029 is a Phase 3 study to investigate PF-04965842 in adult patients who have moderate to severe atopic dermatitis and use background topical therapy. The efficacy of two dosage strengths of PF-04965842, 100 mg and 200 mg taken orally once daily will be evaluated relative to placebo over 12 weeks. The efficacy of the two dosage strengths of PF-04965842 will be compared with dupilumab in terms of pruritus relief at 2 weeks. The two dosage strengths of PF-04965842 and dupilumab 300 mg injected subcutaneously once every two weeks (with a loading dose of 600 mg injected on the first day) will also be evaluated relative to placebo over 16 weeks. The safety of the investigational products will be evaluated over the duration of the study. Subjects will use non-medicated emollient at least twice a day and medicated topical therapy such as corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors or PDE4 inhibitors, as per protocol guidance, to treat active lesions during the study. Subjects who are randomized to receive one of the two dosage strengths of PF-04965842 will also receive placebo injectable study drug every two weeks until Week 16 and then will continue on receiving only the oral study drug for 4 weeks. Subjects who are randomized to receive dupilumab injections every two weeks will also receive oral placebo to be taken once daily until Week 16 and will then continue to receive only the oral placebo for 4 weeks. Subjects who are randomized to the placebo arms, will receive both daily oral placebo and injectable placebo every two weeks until Week 16, after which they will receive either 100 mg or 200 mg of PF-04965842 taken orally once daily for 4 weeks, dependent upon which arm they have been allocated to. Eligible subjects will have an option to enter a long-term extension study after completing 20 weeks of treatment.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03720470
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Reich K, Lio PA, Bissonnette R, Alexis AF, Lebwohl MG, Pink AE, Kabashima K, Boguniewicz M, Nowicki RJ, Valdez H, Zhang F, DiBonaventura M, Cameron MC, Clibborn C. Magnitude and Time Course of Response to Abrocitinib for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Dec;10(12):3228-3237.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.08.042. Epub 2022 Sep 13. Alexis A, de Bruin-Weller M, Weidinger S, Soong W, Barbarot S, Ionita I, Zhang F, Valdez H, Clibborn C, Yin N. Rapidity of Improvement in Signs/Symptoms of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis by Body Region with Abrocitinib in the Phase 3 JADE COMPARE Study. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Mar;12(3):771-785. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00694-1. Epub 2022 Mar 17. Bieber T, Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, Thaci D, Paul C, Pink AE, Kataoka Y, Chu CY, DiBonaventura M, Rojo R, Antinew J, Ionita I, Sinclair R, Forman S, Zdybski J, Biswas P, Malhotra B, Zhang F, Valdez H. Comparing abrocitinib and dupilumab in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a plain language summary. Immunotherapy. 2022 Jan;14(1):5-14. doi: 10.2217/imt-2021-0224. Epub 2021 Nov 15. Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, Nosbaum A, Winthrop KL, Guttman-Yassky E, Hoffmeister KM, Egeberg A, Valdez H, Zhang M, Farooqui SA, Romero W, Thorpe AJ, Rojo R, Johnson S. Integrated Safety Analysis of Abrocitinib for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis From the Phase II and Phase III Clinical Trial Program. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 Sep;22(5):693-707. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00618-3. Epub 2021 Aug 18. Erratum In: Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 Nov;22(6):905. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00638-z. Bieber T, Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, Thaci D, Paul C, Pink AE, Kataoka Y, Chu CY, DiBonaventura M, Rojo R, Antinew J, Ionita I, Sinclair R, Forman S, Zdybski J, Biswas P, Malhotra B, Zhang F, Valdez H; JADE COMPARE Investigators. Abrocitinib versus Placebo or Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 25;384(12):1101-1112. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2019380.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Query!
Address
0
0
Pfizer
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Query!
Available to whom?
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/70/NCT03720470/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/70/NCT03720470/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03720470