Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02984566
Additional trial details provided through ANZCTR are available at the end of this record.
Registration number
NCT02984566
Ethics application status
Date submitted
23/11/2016
Date registered
7/12/2016
Titles & IDs
Public title
Liver Ablative Radiotherapy Utilising Kilovoltage Intrafraction Monitoring (KIM)
Query!
Scientific title
LARK: Liver Ablative Radiotherapy Utilising Kilovoltage Intrafraction Monitoring (KIM)
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
TROG1703 LARK
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
TROG1703 LARK
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Liver Cancer
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Liver
Query!
Oral and Gastrointestinal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colon
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Devices - Kilovoltage Intrafraction Monitoring
Experimental: SABR with or without KIM - All patients will receive liver SABR. Kilovoltage Intrafraction Monitoring (KIM) tracking will be trialed during mock treatment. If KIM is successful, it will be used throughout treatment. If unsuccessful, cone beam CT will be used instead.
Treatment: Devices: Kilovoltage Intrafraction Monitoring
KIM is a novel intrafraction real-time tumour localization method. It involves a single gantry-mounted kV x-ray imager acquiring 2D projections of implanted fiducial markers. 3D positions are then reconstructed by maximum likelihood estimation of a 3D probability density function.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Difference in accumulated patient dose distribution with and without KIM
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Isodose distributions and dose volume histograms for each session will be calculated with KIM corrections as treated, and estimated without KIM corrections. The planning CT scan will be used for this assessment
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
15-60 minutes (time of individual fraction delivery)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Difference in treatment time with and without KIM
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The time taken for the KIM treatments compared with the time taken for similar treatments from previous patients, accounting for the difference in the time and number of patient images acquired and the time taken to adjust the patient's position during treatment
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
15-60 minutes (time of individual fraction delivery)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Difference in imaging dose with and without KIM
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The KIM procedure adds radiation dose with the kilovoltage images. However, there may be fewer volumetric cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans acquired. This difference in dose will be estimated and analysed
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
15-60 minutes (time of individual fraction delivery)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Difference in PTV margins with and without KIM
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin with and without KIM will be recorded and analysed.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
15-60 minutes (time of individual fraction delivery)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Difference in accumulated patient dose distribution with and without KIM based on the intra-treatment CBCT scans
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Isodose distributions and dose volume histograms for each session will be calculated with KIM corrections as treated, and estimated without KIM corrections. The intratreatment CBCT scans will be used for this assessment.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
15-60 minutes (time of individual fraction delivery)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Change in dose when using KIM with and without using MLC tracking
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Difference between dose delivered using KIM with or without MLC tracking
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
15-60 minutes (time of individual fraction delivery
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Proportion of local failures at two years for patients treated
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Proportion of local failures at two years for patients treated as assessed using modified RECIST criteria
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
The proportion of grade 3 or higher toxicities
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The proportion of grade 3 or higher toxicities, assessed using CTCAE v4.03
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Patient-reported quality of life as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life-Questionnaire-Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
To compare change in Quality of Life, as defined by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30 (Version 3)) from baseline at completion of radiation therapy and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-radiation therapy. The EORTC QLQ-C30 (Version 3) uses for the questions 1 to 28 a 4-point scale. The scale scores from 1 to 4: 1 ("Not at all"), 2 ("A little"), 3 ("Quite a bit") and 4 ("Very much"). Half points are not allowed. The range is 3. For the raw score, less points are considered to have a better outcome. The EORTC QLQ-C30 (Version 3) uses for the questions 29 and 30 a 7-points scale. The scale scores from 1 to 7: 1 ("very poor") to 7 ("excellent"). The questionnaire will be self-administered and will be given in patient's mother tongue.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Patient-reported quality of life as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life-Questionnaire-Hepatocellular Carcinoma 18 Module (EORTC QLQ-HCC18)
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
To compare change in Quality of Life related to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as defined by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Hepatocellular Carcinoma 18 Module (EORTC QLQ-HCC) from baseline at completion of radiation therapy and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-radiation therapy. The questionnaire will be self-administered and will be given to patients proficient in English. EORTC-QLQ-HCC18: includes HCC-specific symptoms or problems. Questions used 4-point Likert scale from 1 to 4: 1 ("Not at all"), 2 ("A little"), 3 ("Quite a bit") and 4 ("Very much"). Scores averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale. High score for functional scale=high/healthy level of functioning. High score for single item=high level of symptomatology/problems.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
18 months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* ECOG performance status 0-1
* Life expectancy >6 months
* Number of lesions: = 3
* Lesion size : < 10 cm for a single lesion (and up to 10 cm cumulative diameter for multiple lesions)
* Child-Pugh A or B7 within 6 weeks prior to study entry
* Unsuitable for RFA or resection or transplant
* Distance from GTV to luminal structures (i.e., oesophagus, stomach, duodenum, small or large bowel) = 10mm
* All blood work obtained within 6 weeks prior to study entry with adequate organ function
* May have had previous surgery, RFA or ethanol injection
* Patient must have been discussed at multidisciplinary tumour board with consensus opinion for SBRT
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
85
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* HCC/cholangiocarcinoma with evidence of metastatic disease including nodal or distant metastases
* Metastatic disease with complete liver disease response to first-line chemotherapy (i.e. no target for SBRT)
* Previous radiation to the liver (including SIRTEX)
* Untreated HIV or active hepatitis B/C
* On systemic antineoplastic drug therapy within 7 days before inclusion
* Pregnant or lactating women
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
NA
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
NA
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Active, not recruiting
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
14/01/2020
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/12/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
32
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Nepean Hospital - Penrith
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Westmead Hospital - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Princess Alexandra Hospital - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2750 - Penrith
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2049 - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
4102 - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
3000 - Melbourne
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
University of Sydney
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Primary and secondary liver cancer patients will receive liver SABR with or without KIM intervention.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02984566
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Lee YYD, Nguyen DT, Moodie T, O'Brien R, McMaster A, Hickey A, Pritchard N, Poulsen P, Tabaksblat EM, Weber B, Worm E, Pryor D, Chu J, Hardcastle N, Booth J, Gebski V, Wang T, Keall P. Study protocol of the LARK (TROG 17.03) clinical trial: a phase II trial investigating the dosimetric impact of Liver Ablative Radiotherapy using Kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring. BMC Cancer. 2021 May 3;21(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08184-x.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Tim Wang, Dr
Query!
Address
0
0
Westmead Hospital
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Anonymised data will be made available to researchers upon request, once evidence of ethical approval has been provided.
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Query!
Available to whom?
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02984566
Additional trial details provided through ANZCTR
Accrual to date
Recruiting in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor
University
Primary sponsor name
University of Sydney
Primary sponsor address
Commercial Developments & Industry Partnerships,
F23 Administration Building,
Corner of Eastbourne and City Road,
The University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
Primary sponsor country
Australia
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Public notes
Contacts
Principal investigator
Title
49
0
Dr
Query!
Name
49
0
Tim Wang
Query!
Address
49
0
Western Sydney Local Health District Cnr of Hawkesbury & Darcy Rd Westmead NSW 2145
Query!
Country
49
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
49
0
+61 2 9845 9636
Query!
Fax
49
0
Query!
Email
49
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Title
50
0
Ms
Query!
Name
50
0
Shona Silvester
Query!
Address
50
0
ACRF Image X Institute Room 214, Biomedical Building - C81 The University of Sydney NSW 2006
Query!
Country
50
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
50
0
+61 2 8627 1185
Query!
Fax
50
0
Query!
Email
50
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Title
51
0
Prof
Query!
Name
51
0
Paul Keall
Query!
Address
51
0
ACRF Image X Institute Suite 201, Biomedical Building - C81 The University of Sydney NSW 2006
Query!
Country
51
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
51
0
+61 2 8627 1159
Query!
Fax
51
0
Query!
Email
51
0
[email protected]
Query!