Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03391466
Registration number
NCT03391466
Ethics application status
Date submitted
21/12/2017
Date registered
5/01/2018
Titles & IDs
Public title
Study of Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Compared to Standard of Care Therapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Versus Standard of Care Therapy in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (ZUMA-7)
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2017-002261-22
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
KTE-C19-107
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
ZUMA-7
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Lymphoma (non Hodgkin's lymphoma) - High grade lymphoma
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Lymphoma (non Hodgkin's lymphoma) - Low grade lymphoma
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Other - Axicabtagene Ciloleucel
Treatment: Drugs - Platinum-containing salvage chemotherapy (eg, R-ICE) followed by high dose therapy (eg, BEAM) and autologous stem cell transplant in responders.
Treatment: Drugs - Cyclophosphamide
Treatment: Drugs - Fludarabine
Experimental: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Treatment - Participants will receive cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m\^2/day intravenously (IV) and fludarabine 30 mg/m\^2/day IV conditioning chemotherapy for 3 days followed by axicabtagene ciloleucel administered as a single IV infusion at a target dose of 2 x 10\^6 anti-cluster of differentiation antigen (CD) 19 CAR transduced autologous T cells/kg on Day 0.
Active comparator: Standard of Care Therapy - Participants will receive 2 or 3 21-day cycles of second-line chemotherapy regimen; R-ICE: rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 before chemotherapy,ifosfamide 5 g/m\^2 24hour(hr) infusion on Day 2+mesna,carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 on Day 2, maximum dose 800 mg,etoposide 100 mg/ m\^2/day on Days 1-3; R-ESHAP: rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 Day 1,etoposide 40 mg/m\^2/day IV on Days 1-4,methylprednisolone 500 mg/day IV on Days 1-4 or 5,cisplatin at 25 mg/m\^2/day Days 1-4,cytarabine 2 g/m\^2 on Day 5; R-GDP: rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 Day 1(or Day 8),gemcitabine 1g/m\^2 on Days 1 and 8,dexamethasone 40 mg on Days 1-4,cisplatin 75mg/m\^2 on Day 1 or carboplatin AUC=5; or R-DHAP: Rituximab 375 mg/ m\^2 before chemotherapy,dexamethasone 40 mg/day on Days 1-4,highdose cytarabine 2 g/m\^2 every 12 hours for 2 doses on Day 2 following/platinum,cisplatin 100 mg/m\^2 24hr infusion on Day 1 or oxaliplatin 100 mg/m\^2. Participants who will respond will get high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant.
Treatment: Other: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel
A single infusion of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-transduced autologous T cells administered intravenously following a conditioning chemotherapy regimen of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide
Treatment: Drugs: Platinum-containing salvage chemotherapy (eg, R-ICE) followed by high dose therapy (eg, BEAM) and autologous stem cell transplant in responders.
Platinum-containing salvage chemotherapy (R-ICE, R-DHAP, R-ESHAP, or R-GDP as selected by treating investigator) followed by high dose therapy (eg, BEAM) and autologous stem cell transplant in responders.
Treatment: Drugs: Cyclophosphamide
Administered intravenously
Treatment: Drugs: Fludarabine
Administered intravenously
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Intervention code [2]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Event Free Survival (EFS) Per Blinded Central Assessment
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
EFS:Time from randomization to disease progression (PD), best response of SD up to and including Day 150, commencement of subsequent new anti-lymphoma therapy including stem cell transplant, or death from any cause. PD=score 4 (uptake moderately\>liver)/5 (uptake markedly \>liver and/or new lesions) with an increase in intensity of uptake from baseline;new fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim/EOT assessment, rather than another etiology or in bone marrow;an individual node/lesion must be abnormal with LDi \>1.5 cm, increase by =50% from cross-product of LDi and perpendicular diameter nadir, increase in LDi or shortest axis perpendicular to LDi from nadir, splenic length must increase by \>50% of extent of its prior increase beyond Baseline. If no prior splenomegaly, increase must be =2 cm from baseline;new/recurrent splenomegaly;new/clear progression of pre-existing NMLs;new lesion;new/recurrent bone marrow involvement. KM estimates was used for analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From randomization date up to a median follow-up: 24.9 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Blinded Central Assessment
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
ORR: Percentage of participants with CR \[CMR;CRR\] or PR \[partial metabolic response (PMR); partial radiologic response (PRR)\].CMR: PET 5PS scores of 1 (no uptake above background, 2(uptake=mediastinum), 3(uptake\>mediastinum but=liver) with/without a residual mass;no new lesions; no evidence of FDG-avid disease in BM. CRR:target nodes/nodal masses regressed to = 1.5 cm in LDi;no extralymphatic sites of disease;absent non-measured lesions (NMLs);organ enlargement regress to normal;no new sites;bone marrow morphology normal. PMR:scores 4 (uptake moderately\>liver),5(uptake markedly \> liver, new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass;no new lesions;responding disease at interim/residual disease at end of treatment (EOT).PRR: =50% decrease in sum of the product of perpendicular diameters (SPD) of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extra-nodal sites;absent/normal, regressed, but no increase of NMLs;spleen regressed by \>50% in length beyond normal;no new sites.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From randomization date up to a median follow-up: 24.9 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates was used for analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From randomization date up to a median follow-up: 47.2 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Duration of Response (DOR) Per Blinded Central Assessments
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
DOR is defined only for participants who experience an objective response after axicabtagene ciloleucel infusion and is the time from the first objective response per Lugano classification to disease progression or death from any cause. Objective response is defined in outcome measure 2 and disease progression is defined in outcome measure 1. KM estimates were used for analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From the date of first confirmed objective response (CR or PR) to disease progression or death regardless of cause (Up to 37.8 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Modified Event Free Survival (mEFS) Per Blinded Central Assessment
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Modified event free survival is defined the same way as EFS, except that a best response of SD up to and including Day 150 assessment post randomization was not considered an event. KM estimates were used for analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From randomization date up to a median follow-up: 24.9 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Event Free Survival Per Investigator Disease Assessments
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
EFS was defined as the time from randomization to the earliest date of disease progression per the IWG Lugano Classification, best response of stable disease (SD) up to and including Day 150, commencement of new lymphoma therapy, or death from any cause. Disease progression is defined in outcome measure 1.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From randomization date up to a median follow-up: 47.2 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Investigator Disease Assessments
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
PFS is defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of disease progression per Lugano classification or death from any cause. Disease progression is defined in outcome measure 1. KM estimates was used for analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
From randomization date up to a median follow-up: 47.2 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Modified Event Free Survival (mEFS) Per Investigator Assessment
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Modified event free survival is defined the same way as EFS, except that a best response of SD up to and including Day 150 assessment post randomization was not considered an event. KM estimates were used for analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
From randomization date up to a median follow-up: 47.2 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Scores
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Global health status was measured using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality Life Questionnaire (QLQ) C-30. This health related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire was comprised of 15 questions on functional scales, 13 questions on symptom scales and 2 on global health status scale. Global Health Status used a 7 point Likert-type scale of 1 (Very poor) to 7 (Excellent). All scores were transformed to 0-100. Higher scores for Global Health Status indicated better HRQoL.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline, Days 50, 100, and 150; Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Score
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is composed of global health status/QoL scale; five functional domains (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social); three symptom domains (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain); and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties).
The Physical Functioning domain includes 5 questions in which participants were asked to rate their overall health and overall quality of life as it relates to physical functioning during the past week on a scale from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). The 5 scores were transformed to a scale from 0 to 100, where a high score indicated better QoL. A positive change from baseline indicates better QoL.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline, Days 50, 100, 150, Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Changes From Baseline in the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Five Levels Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
The Euro-QOL, Five Dimensions, Five Levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire is a generic measure of health status that provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value. The EQ-5D-5L comprises 2 components: a questionnaire covering 5 dimensions and a tariff of values based upon direct valuations of health states using a visual analog scale (VAS). The total score for EQ-5D-5L index- is presented on a range from 0 to 1 where higher scores indicate better outcome. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline, Days 50, 100, 150; Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS Scale Score
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The EQ-5D-5L VAS is a 20-cm VAS for recording self-rated current HRQoL state and is used to describe the participants' health status on the day of the assessment. The EQ-5D-5L VAS score is recorded by each participant for his or her current HRQoL state and scored 0 ("the worst health you can imagine") to 100 ("the best health you can imagine"). The value 100 indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline, Days 50, 100, 150; Months 9, 12, 18, 21 and 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Number of Participants With Anti-Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Antibodies
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
From first dose of axicabtagene up to a median follow-up: 24 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
A TEAE is defined as any AE that begins on or after the first dose of study treatment (axicabtagene ciloleucel infusion or SOC), excluding bridging therapy. Participant incidence rates of TEAEs, including all, serious, fatal, CTCAE Grade 3 or higher, and treatment related AEs reported will be tabulated by preferred term and system organ class coded with the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA).
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Up to 5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Values Reported as Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Grading categories were determined by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe or medically significant, Grade 4: life-threatening.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Up to 5 years
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Key
* Histologically proven large B-cell lymphoma including the following types defined by World Health Organization (WHO) 2016.
* Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified activated B-cell/ germinal center B-cell (ABC/GCB).
* High-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) with or without myelocytomatosis oncogene (MYC) and B-cell lymphoma (BCL) 2 and/or BCL6 rearrangement.
* DLBCL arising from follicular lymphoma (FL).
* T-cell/histiocyte rich large B-cell lymphoma.
* DLBCL associated with chronic inflammation.
* Primary cutaneous DLBCL, leg type.
* Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) + DLBCL.
* Relapsed or refractory disease after first-line chemoimmunotherapy.
* Refractory disease defined as no complete remission to first-line therapy; individuals who are intolerant to first-line therapy are excluded.
* Progressive disease (PD) as best response to first-line therapy.
* Stable disease (SD) as best response after at least 4 cycles of first-line therapy (eg, 4 cycles of R-CHOP).
* Partial response (PR) as best response after at least 6 cycles and biopsy-proven residual disease or disease progression = 12 months of therapy.
* Relapsed disease defined as complete remission to first-line therapy followed by biopsy-proven relapse = 12 months of first-line therapy.
* Individuals must have received adequate first-line therapy including at a minimum:
* Anti-Cluster of Differentiation antigen (CD) 20 monoclonal antibody unless investigator determines that tumor is CD20 negative, and
* An anthracycline containing chemotherapy regimen.
* No known history or suspicion of central nervous system involvement by lymphoma.
* Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
* Adequate bone marrow function as evidenced by:
* Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) = 1000/uL
* Platelet = 75,000/uL
* Absolute lymphocyte count = 100/uL
* Adequate renal, hepatic, cardiac, and pulmonary function as evidenced by:
* Creatinine clearance (Cockcroft Gault) = 60 mL/min.
* Serum Alanine aminotransferase/Aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST) = 2.5 Upper limit of normal (ULN).
* Total bilirubin = 1.5 mg/dl
* Cardiac ejection fraction = 50%, no evidence of pericardial effusion as determined by an Echocardiogram (ECHO), and no clinically significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) findings.
* No clinically significant pleural effusion.
* Baseline oxygen saturation > 92% on room air.
Key
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* History of malignancy other than nonmelanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ (eg cervix, bladder, breast) unless disease free for at least 3 years.
* Received more than one line of therapy for DLBCL.
* History of autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplant.
* Presence of fungal, bacterial, viral, or other infection that is uncontrolled or requiring intravenous antimicrobials for management.
* Known history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis B (HBsAg positive) or hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV positive). If there is a positive history of treated hepatitis B or hepatitis C, the viral load must be undetectable per quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and/or nucleic acid testing.
* Individuals with detectable cerebrospinal fluid malignant cells or known brain metastases, or with a history of cerebrospinal fluid malignant cells or brain metastases.
* History or presence of non-malignant central nervous system (CNS) disorder such as seizure disorder, cerebrovascular ischemia/hemorrhage, dementia, cerebellar disease, or any autoimmune disease with CNS involvement.
* Presence of any indwelling line or drain. Dedicated central venous access catheter such as a Port-a-Cath or Hickman catheter are permitted.
* History of myocardial infarction, cardiac angioplasty or stenting, unstable angina, New York Heart Association Class II or greater congestive heart failure, or other clinically significant cardiac diseases within 12 months of enrollment.
* History of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism within 6 months of enrollment.
* History of autoimmune disease, requiring systemic immunosuppression and/or systemic disease modifying agents within the last 2 years.
* History of anti-CD19 or CAR-T therapy or history of prior randomization in ZUMA-7.
Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Active, not recruiting
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
25/01/2018
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/10/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
359
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Peter MacCallum Cancer Center - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
3000 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Iowa
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Kansas
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Graz
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Innsbruck
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Brussels
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Leuven
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Manitoba
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Halifax
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Montréal
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Ottawa
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Québec
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Lille cedex
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Pierre Benite
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Rennes
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Dresden
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Göttingen
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Heidelberg
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Würzburg
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Tel Aviv
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Bologna
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Milano
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Amsterdam
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Groningen
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Rotterdam
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Utrecht
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Pamplona
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Salamanca
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Uppsala
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Bellinzona
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Zürich
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Birmingham
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Manchester
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Sutton
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Kite, A Gilead Company
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The goal of this clinical study is to assess whether axicabtagene ciloleucel therapy improves the clinical outcome compared with standard of care second-line therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03391466
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, Cavalli F, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, Lister TA; Alliance, Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Consortium; Italian Lymphoma Foundation; European Organisation for Research; Treatment of Cancer/Dutch Hemato-Oncology Group; Grupo Espanol de Medula Osea; German High-Grade Lymphoma Study Group; German Hodgkin's Study Group; Japanese Lymphorra Study Group; Lymphoma Study Association; NCIC Clinical Trials Group; Nordic Lymphoma Study Group; Southwest Oncology Group; United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):3059-68. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8800. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Pileri SA, Harris NL, Stein H, Siebert R, Advani R, Ghielmini M, Salles GA, Zelenetz AD, Jaffe ES. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Blood. 2016 May 19;127(20):2375-90. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-643569. Epub 2016 Mar 15. Elsawy M, Chavez JC, Avivi I, Larouche JF, Wannesson L, Cwynarski K, Osman K, Davison K, Rudzki JD, Dahiya S, Dorritie K, Jaglowski S, Radford J, Morschhauser F, Cunningham D, Martin Garcia-Sancho A, Tzachanis D, Ulrickson ML, Karmali R, Kekre N, Thieblemont C, Enblad G, Dreger P, Malladi R, Joshi N, Wang WJ, Solem CT, Snider JT, Cheng P, To C, Kersten MJ. Patient-reported outcomes in ZUMA-7, a phase 3 study of axicabtagene ciloleucel in second-line large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2022 Nov 24;140(21):2248-2260. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022015478. Kersten MJ, Qiao Y, Shah R, Solem C, Snider JT, To C, Cheng P, Spooner C, Perales MA. Quality-Adjusted Time without Symptoms or Toxicity: Analysis of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Standard of Care in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma. Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 May;29(5):335.e1-335.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.01.008. Epub 2023 Jan 14. Locke FL, Miklos DB, Jacobson CA, Perales MA, Kersten MJ, Oluwole OO, Ghobadi A, Rapoport AP, McGuirk J, Pagel JM, Munoz J, Farooq U, van Meerten T, Reagan PM, Sureda A, Flinn IW, Vandenberghe P, Song KW, Dickinson M, Minnema MC, Riedell PA, Leslie LA, Chaganti S, Yang Y, Filosto S, Shah J, Schupp M, To C, Cheng P, Gordon LI, Westin JR; All ZUMA-7 Investigators and Contributing Kite Members. Axicabtagene Ciloleucel as Second-Line Therapy for Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 17;386(7):640-654. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2116133. Epub 2021 Dec 11. Westin JR, Locke FL, Dickinson M, Ghobadi A, Elsawy M, van Meerten T, Miklos DB, Ulrickson ML, Perales MA, Farooq U, Wannesson L, Leslie L, Kersten MJ, Jacobson CA, Pagel JM, Wulf G, Johnston P, Rapoport AP, Du L, Vardhanabhuti S, Filosto S, Shah J, Snider JT, Cheng P, To C, Oluwole OO, Sureda A. Safety and Efficacy of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Standard of Care in Patients 65 Years of Age or Older with Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2023 May 15;29(10):1894-1905. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-3136. Westin JR, Oluwole OO, Kersten MJ, Miklos DB, Perales MA, Ghobadi A, Rapoport AP, Sureda A, Jacobson CA, Farooq U, van Meerten T, Ulrickson M, Elsawy M, Leslie LA, Chaganti S, Dickinson M, Dorritie K, Reagan PM, McGuirk J, Song KW, Riedell PA, Minnema MC, Yang Y, Vardhanabhuti S, Filosto S, Cheng P, Shahani SA, Schupp M, To C, Locke FL; ZUMA-7 Investigators; Kite Members. Survival with Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2023 Jul 13;389(2):148-157. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2301665. Epub 2023 Jun 5. Filosto S, Vardhanabhuti S, Canales M, Poiré X, Lekakis LJ, de Vos S, et al. Product attributes of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) that associate differentially with efficacy and toxicity in second-line large B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Res. 2022;82(12_Supplement):CT004. Ghobadi A, Munoz J, Westin J, Locke FL, Miklos DB, Rapoport AP, et al. Outcomes of Subsequent Anti-Lymphoma Therapies in Patients (Pts) with Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL) Treated with Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel) or Standard of Care (SOC) in the Second-Line (2L) ZUMA-7 Study. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):1595-1597. Locke FL, Oluwole OO, Kuruvilla J, Thieblemont C, Morschhauser F, Salles G, et al. Association of Metabolic Tumor Volume (MTV) and Clinical Outcomes in Second-Line (2L) Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL) Following Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel) Versus Standard-of-Care (SOC) Therapy in ZUMA-7. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):638-640. The Lancet Haematology. The role of conferences in tackling inequalities. Lancet Haematol. 2022 Feb;9(2):e81. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00008-4. No abstract available. Del Pozo Martin Y. 2021 ASH annual meeting. Lancet Haematol. 2022 Feb;9(2):e92-e93. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00384-7. Epub 2021 Dec 16. No abstract available. Ernst M, Oeser A, Besiroglu B, Caro-Valenzuela J, Abd El Aziz M, Monsef I, Borchmann P, Estcourt LJ, Skoetz N, Goldkuhle M. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for people with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 13;9(9):CD013365. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013365.pub2. Kambhampati S, Hunter B, Varnavski A, Fakhri B, Kaplan L, Ai WZ, Pampaloni M, Huang CY, Martin T 3rd, Damon L, Andreadis CB. Ofatumumab, Etoposide, and Cytarabine Intensive Mobilization Regimen in Patients with High-risk Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 Apr;21(4):246-256.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Kite Study Director
Query!
Address
0
0
Kite, A Gilead Company
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/66/NCT03391466/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/66/NCT03391466/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03391466