Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03566823
Registration number
NCT03566823
Ethics application status
Date submitted
9/05/2018
Date registered
25/06/2018
Date last updated
11/05/2021
Titles & IDs
Public title
Efficacy and Safety Study of Ontamalimab as Induction Therapy in Participants With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease (CARMEN CD 306)
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Efficacy and Safety Study of SHP647 as Induction Therapy in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease (CARMEN CD 306)
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
SHP647-306
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
CARMEN CD 306
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Crohn's Disease
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Oral and Gastrointestinal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Inflammatory bowel disease
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Query!
Oral and Gastrointestinal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Crohn's disease
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Other - Ontamalimab
Other interventions - Placebo
Experimental: Ontamalimab 25 mg - Participants will receive 25 mg of ontamalimab subcutaneous injection using a prefilled syringe on Week 0/Day 1, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12.
Experimental: Ontamalimab 75 mg - Participants will receive 75 mg of ontamalimab subcutaneous injection using a prefilled syringe on Week 0/Day 1, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12.
Placebo comparator: Placebo - Participants will receive placebo matching with ontamalimab subcutaneous injection using a prefilled syringe on Week 0/Day 1, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12.
Treatment: Other: Ontamalimab
Subcutaneous injection of ontamalimab will be administered using a prefilled syringe.
Other interventions: Placebo
Subcutaneous injection of placebo matched with ontamalimab will be administered using a prefilled syringe.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Intervention code [2]
0
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-item Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain less than or equal to (\<=) 3 (based on 11 point numerical rating scale \[NRS\] ranging from 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst imaginable pain\]); and average daily stool frequency \<=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Participants with missing data at Week 16 or discontinuation before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical remission were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Number of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) of at least 25 percent (%) from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with endoscopic response were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of \<150. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs/symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being (subjective), and presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal, presence of abdominal mass, physical examination and hematocrit (objective). CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective and objective items which range from 0-149 points: asymptomatic remission, 150-220 points: mild to moderate active CD, 221-450 points: moderate to severe active CD, \>451 points: severely active to fulminant disease. Higher score indicating more severity. Number of participants with clinical remission as measured by CDAI were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Number of Participants With Enhanced Endoscopic Response at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Enhanced endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES-CD by matching segments of at least 50% from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered non-responders. Number of participants with enhanced endoscopic response were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-item PRO With 4-point Scale for Abdominal Pain at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average daily abdominal pain \<=1 (based on the 4 point scale, with scores ranging from 0 \[none\] to 3 \[severe\]) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency \<=3 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid). Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with enhanced endoscopic response were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Number of Participants With Clinical Response Based on 2-item PRO With 2 Criteria at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Clinical response was measured by 2-item PRO and defined as meeting at least 1 of the following 2 criteria: 1)A decrease of greater than or equal to (\>=) 30% and at least 2 points from baseline in the average daily worst abdominal pain over the 7 most recent days, with the average daily stool frequency of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) either a) not worsening from baseline and/or b) average daily stool frequency \<=2 of type 6/7 as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days; 2)A decrease of \>=30% from baseline in the average daily stool frequency of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per the BSFS over the 7 most recent days, with the average daily worst abdominal pain either a) not worsening from baseline and/or b) worst daily abdominal pain \<=3 (based on 11-point NRS) over the 7 most recent days. Participants with missing data at Week16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical response were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on 2-Item PRO With Endoscopic Response at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain \<=3 (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst imaginable pain\]) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency \<=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per BSFS ranging from type 1 (separate hard lumps-like stools) to type 7 (entirely liquid stools) over the 7 most recent days. Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES CD of at least 25% from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with clinical remission and endoscopic response were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Number of Participants With Complete Endoscopic Healing at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain \<=3 (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst imaginable pain\]) over the 7 most recent days and average daily stool frequency \<=2 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per BSFS ranging from type 1 (separate hard lumps-like stools) to type 7 (entirely liquid stools) over the 7 most recent days. Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in SES CD of at least 25% from baseline. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease. Participants with missing data at Week 16 or who discontinued before Week 16 were considered failures. Number of participants with complete endoscopic healing were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Number of Participants With Clinical Response as Measured by CDAI-100 at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Clinical response was measured by at least a 100-point reduction in the CDAI from baseline (CDAI-100 response). CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs/symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being (subjective), and presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal, presence of abdominal mass, physical examination and hematocrit (objective). CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective and objective items which range from 0-149 points: asymptomatic remission, 150-220 points: mild to moderate active CD, 221-450 points: moderate to severe active CD, \>451 points: severely active to fulminant disease. Higher score indicating more severity.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Number of Participants With Clinical Response as Measured by CDAI-70 at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Clinical response was measured by at least a 70-point reduction in the CDAI from baseline (CDAI-70 response). CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs/symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being (subjective), and presence of complications, use of antidiarrheal, presence of abdominal mass, physical examination and hematocrit (objective). CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective and objective items which range from 0-149 points: asymptomatic remission, 150-220 points: mild to moderate active CD, 221-450 points: moderate to severe active CD, \>451 points: severely active to fulminant disease. Higher score indicating more severity.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Over Time
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Clinical remission was defined by 2-item PRO subs-cores of average worst daily abdominal pain (based on 11 point NRS ranging from 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst imaginable pain\]); and average daily stool frequency of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as per BSFS over the 7 most recent days. BSFS ranges from 1 (separate hard lumps, hard to pass), 2 (sausage-shaped, but lumpy), 3 (like a sausage but with cracks on the surface), 4 (like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), 5 (soft blobs with clear-cut edges), 6 (fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid).
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Individual and Total Sign/Symptom Score Based on Participant Daily Electronic Diary (E-diary) Entries
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
CD clinical signs and symptoms includes total stool frequency, rectal bleeding frequency, rectal urgency frequency, nausea severity, vomiting frequency, and rectal incontinence frequency.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline and at Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Number of Participants With Endoscopic Healing at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Endoscopic healing was measured by SES-CD \<=4 and at least 2-point reduction versus baseline and no sub-score \>1 in any individual variable. The SES-CD considers ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum in terms of: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface and presence of narrowing. Each graded from 0-3. Scale ranges from 0-56 with a higher score indicating greater severity of disease.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
At Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total (Absolute) Score at Weeks 8, 12 and 16
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
The IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring the disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) in participants with IBD, including CD. The IBDQ consists of 32 items, which are grouped into 4 domains and scored as: bowel function (10 to 70), systemic symptoms (5 to 35), emotional status (12 to 84), and social function (5 to 35). The total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicates better HRQL. A score of at least 170 corresponds to clinical remission and an increase of at least 16 points is considered to indicate a clinically meaningful improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 8, 12 and 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) Scores at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
The SF-36, version 2 is a generic quality-of-life instrument that has been widely used to assess HRQL of participants. The SF-36 consists of 36 items that are aggregated into 8 multi-item scales (physical functioning, role - physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role - emotional, and mental health), with scores ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better HRQL.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline, Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Number of Participants Based on Incidence of All-cause Hospitalizations
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Incidence of all cause hospitalizations was planned to be assessed.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline up to Week 32
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Number of Participants Based on Total Inpatient Days
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Total inpatient days were planned to be assessed.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Baseline up to Week 32
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Number of Participants Based on Incidence of CD-related Surgeries and Other Surgical Procedures
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Incidence of CD-related surgeries and other surgical procedures were planned to be recorded.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline up to Week 32
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Participants must be between greater than or equal to (> =) 16 and less than or equal to (<=) 80 years of age; participants less than (<) 18 years of age must weigh >=40 kg and must have body mass index >=16.5 kilogram per meter square (kg/m^2)
* Participants must have active moderate to severe ileal (terminal ileum), ileocolic, or colonic CD at baseline (Visit 2) as defined by:
1. CDAI score between 220 and 450 (inclusive) AND
2. Meeting the following subscores in the 2 item PRO:
i. Abdominal pain subscore >= 5 (average worst daily pain on the 11 point NRS) and abdominal pain subscore >= 2 (average daily pain on the 4-point abdominal pain variable of CDAI) over the 7 most recent days out of the 10 days before colonoscopy preparation (may or may not be contiguous) AND/OR ii. Average of the daily stool frequency subscore >=4 of type 6/7 (very soft stools/liquid stools) as shown in the BSFS over the 7 most recent days out of the 10 days before colonoscopy preparation (may or may not be contiguous) c. Presence of ulcerations that are characteristic to CD, as determined by a colonoscopy performed during screening, and as defined by the SES-CD >6 (SES CD >=4 for isolated ileitis) Note that the participant must be confirmed as meeting the CDAI score and PRO subscore requirements before a colonoscopy is done
* Participants must have a documented diagnosis (endoscopic with histology) of CD for >=3 months before screening. Documented diagnosis is defined as:
1. A biopsy report in which the description of the histological findings is consistent with the CD diagnosis AND
2. A report documenting disease duration based upon prior colonoscopy Note: If a biopsy report is not available in the source document at the time of screening, a biopsy must be performed during the screening colonoscopy and the histology report should be consistent with the CD diagnosis. If the histology description does not support the CD diagnosis at this time point, the participant should not be randomized
* Participants must be willing and able to undergo a colonoscopy during screening after all other inclusion criteria have been met
* Participants must have had an inadequate response to, or lost response to, or had an intolerance to at least 1 conventional treatment such as sulfasalazine or mesalamine (5-aminosalicylic acid [5-ASA]), glucocorticoids, or immunosuppressants (azathioprine [AZA], 6-mercaptopurine [6-MP] or methotrexate [MTX]) or anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF). Participants who have had an inadequate response to sulfasalazine or mesalamine should have also failed at least 1 other conventional treatment such as glucocorticoids
* Participants receiving any treatment(s) for CD are eligible provided they have been, and are anticipated to be, on a stable dose for the designated period of time
* Participants are males or nonpregnant, nonlactating females who, if sexually active, agree to comply with the contraceptive requirements of the protocol, or females of nonchildbearing potential. Males and females of reproductive potential who are sexually active must agree to use appropriate contraception (ie, highly effective methods for female and medically appropriate methods for male study participants, for the duration of the study
Query!
Minimum age
16
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
80
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria:
* Participants with indeterminate colitis, microscopic colitis, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced colitis, ischemic colitis, infectious colitis, or clinical/histologic findings suggestive of UC
* Participants with colonic dysplasia or neoplasia. (Participants with prior history of adenomatous polyps will be eligible if the polyps have been completely removed)
* Participants with past medical history or presence of toxic megacolon
* Participants with presence of enterovesical (ie, between the bowel and urinary bladder) or enterovaginal fistulae
* Participants with current symptomatic diverticulitis or diverticulosis
* Participants with clinically significant obstructive colonic stricture, or who have a history of bowel surgery within 6 months before screening, or who are likely to require surgery for CD during the treatment period. Participants who have undergone previous colonic resection or ileocolectomy more than 6 months before screening must have at least 25 cm of colon remaining
* Participants with past medical history of multiple small bowel resections resulting in clinically significant short bowel syndrome
* Participants requiring total parenteral nutrition
* Participants with past medical history of bowel surgery resulting in an existing or current stoma. Participants who had a j-pouch are excluded as a j-pouch could result in a stoma
* Participants have had prior treatment with ontamalimab (formerly PF-00547659; SHP647)
* Participants with known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the investigational product(s), closely related compounds, or any of the stated ingredients
* Participants have received any nonbiologic treatment with immunomodulatory properties (other than AZA, 6-MP, or MTX) or continuous antibiotics (>2 weeks) for the treatment of CD within 30 days before baseline (Visit 2)
* Participants have received anti-TNF treatment within 60 days before baseline (Visit 2)
* Participants have received any biologic with immunomodulatory properties (other than anti-TNFs) within 90 days before baseline (Visit 2)
* Participants have ever received anti-integrin/adhesion molecule treatment (eg, natalizumab,vedolizumab, efalizumab, etrolizumab, or any other investigational anti-integrin/adhesion molecule)
* Participants have received lymphocytes apheresis or selective monocyte granulocytes apheresis within 60 days before baseline (Visit 2)
* Participants have received enteral nutrition treatment within 30 days before baseline (Visit 2)
* Participants have received parenteral or rectal glucocorticoids or rectal 5-ASA within 14 days before screening colonoscopy
* Participants have taken >20 milligram per day(mg/day) of prednisone, >9 mg/day of budesonide, or equivalent oral systemic corticosteroid dose within 14 days before baseline (Visit 2) or have taken >=40 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent oral systemic corticosteroid dose within 6 weeks before baseline (Visit 2)
* Participants have participated in other investigational studies within either 30 days or 5 half-lives of investigational product used in the study (whichever is longer) before screening (Visit 1)
* Participants have received a live (attenuated) vaccine within 30 days before the baseline visit (Visit 2)
* Participants with active enteric infections (positive stool culture and sensitivity), Clostridium difficile infection or pseudomembranous colitis (subjects with C. difficile infection at screening may be allowed retest after treatment), evidence of active cytomegalovirus infection or Listeria monocytogenes, known active invasive fungal infections such as histoplasmosis or parasitic infections, clinically significant underlying disease that could predispose the subjects to infections, or a history of serious infection (requiring parenteral antibiotic and/or hospitalization) within 4 weeks before the baseline visit (Visit 2)
* Participants with abnormal chest x-ray or other imaging findings at screening (Visit 1), such as presence of active tuberculosis (TB), general infections, heart failure, or malignancy (A chest x-ray, computed tomography scan, etc, performed up to 12 weeks before study entry [screening, Visit 1] may be used if available; documentation of the official reading must be located and available in the source documentation)
* Participants with evidence of active or latent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) or participants with this history who have not completed a generally accepted full course of treatment before baseline (Visit 2) are excluded all other participants must have either the Mantoux (purified protein derivative [PPD]) tuberculin skin test or interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) performed
Participants who have no history of previously diagnosed active or latent TB are excluded if they have a positive Mantoux (PPD) tuberculin skin test (ie >= 5 millimeter [mm] induration) or a positive IGRA (the latter to be tested at the site's local laboratory) during screening or within 12 weeks before screening If the IGRA cannot be performed locally, a central laboratory may be used, with prior agreement from the sponsor:
1. An IGRA is strongly recommended for participants with a prior Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination but may be used for any participant Documentation of IGRA product used and the test result must be in the participant's source documentation if performed locally Acceptable IGRA products include QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus In-Tube Test
2. If the results of the IGRA are indeterminate, the test may be repeated, and if a negative result is obtained, enrollment may proceed In participants with no history of treated active or latent TB, a positive test on repeat will exclude the participantParticipants with a history of active or latent TB infection must follow instructions for "Participants with a prior diagnosis of active or latent TB are excluded unless both of the following criteria are met" in this criterion
3. Participants with repeat indeterminate IGRA results, with no prior TB history, may be enrolled after consultation with a pulmonary or infectious disease specialist who determines low risk of infection (ie, participant would be acceptable for immunosuppressant [eg, anti-TNF] treatment without additional action) This consultation must be included in source documentation Results from a chest x-ray, taken within the 12 weeks before or during screening (Visit 1)must show no abnormalities suggestive of active TB infection as determined by a qualified medical specialist
* Participants with a pre-existing demyelinating disorder such as multiple sclerosis or new onset seizures, unexplained sensory motor, or cognitive behavioral, neurological deficits, or significant abnormalities noted during screening
* Participants with any unexplained symptoms suggestive of PML based on the targeted neurological assessment during the screening period
* Participants with a transplanted organ. Skin grafts to treat pyoderma gangrenosum are allowed
* Participants with a significant concurrent medical condition at the time of screening (Visit 1) or baseline (Visit 2), including, but not limited to, the following:
a. Any major illness/condition or evidence of an unstable clinical condition (eg, renal, hepatic, hematologic, GI [except disease under study], endocrine, cardiovascular, pulmonary, immunologic [eg, Felty's syndrome], or local active infection/infectious illness) that, in the investigator's judgment will substantially increase the risk to the subject if he or she participates in the study b. Cancer or history of cancer or lymphoproliferative disease within the previous 5 years (other than resected cutaneous basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence) c. Presence of acute coronary syndrome (eg, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris) within 24 weeks before screening (Visit 1) d. History of significant cerebrovascular disease within 24 weeks before screening (Visit 1)
* Participants who have had significant trauma or major surgery within 4 weeks before the screening (Visit 1), or with any major elective surgery scheduled to occur during the study.
* Participant with evidence of cirrhosis with or without decompensation (ie, esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, portal hypertension, ascites)
* Participant with primary sclerosing cholangitis
* Participant with evidence of positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) Note: if a subject tests negative for HBsAg, but positive for HBcAb, the subject would be considered eligible if no presence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA is confirmed by HBV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reflex testing performed in the central laboratory
* Participant with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) (positive HCV antibody [HCVAb] and HCV RNA) Note: Participant who are HCVAb positive without evidence of HCV RNA may be considered eligible (spontaneous viral clearance or previously treated and cured [defined as no evidence of HCV RNA at least 12 weeks prior to baseline])
* Participant with any of the following abnormalities in hematology and/or serum chemistry profiles during screening (Visit 1) Note: Screening laboratory tests, if the results are considered by the investigator to be transient and inconsistent with the subject's clinical condition, may be repeated once during the screening period for confirmation results must be reviewed for eligibility prior to the screening colonoscopy procedure
1. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels >=3.0 × the upper limit of normal (ULN)
2. Total bilirubin level >=1.5 × ULN or >2.0 × ULN if the subject has a known documented history of Gilbert's syndrome
3. Hemoglobin level less than or equal to(<=80) gram per liter(g/L) (8.0 g/deciliter[dL])
4. Platelet count <=100× 10^9/L (100,000 cells/mm^3) or >=1000 × 10^9/L (1,000,000 cells/mm^3)*
5. White blood cell count <=3.5 × 10^9/L (3500 cells/mm^3)
6. Absolute neutrophil count <2 × 10^9/L (2000 cells/mm^3)
7. Serum creatinine level >1.5 × ULN or estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 millilter per minute (mL/min)/173 meter square (m^2) based on the abbreviated Modification of Diet in RenalDisease Study Equation Note: if platelet count is <150,000 cells/mm3, a further evaluation should be performed to rule out cirrhosis, unless another etiology has already been identified
* Participant with known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection based on documented history with positive serological test, or positive HIV serologic test at screening, tested at the site's local laboratory in accordance with country requirements or tested at the central laboratory Note: A documented negative HIV test within 6 months of screening is acceptable and does not need to be repeated
* With known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection based on documented history with positive serological test, or positive HIV serologic test at screening, tested at the site's local laboratory in accordance with country requirements or tested at the central laboratory.
* Participants who have, or who have a history of (within 2 years before screening), serious psychiatric disease, alcohol dependency, or substance/drug abuse or dependency of any kind including abuse of medicinal marijuana (cannabis)
NOTE: The above Inclusion/Exclusion criteria are NOT exhaustive and other Inclusion/ Exclusion criteria as defined in the protocol may apply.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Stopped early
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
17/07/2018
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
18/08/2020
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
34
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Kansas
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Kentucky
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Nevada
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Córdoba
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Oost-Vlaanderen
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
West-Vlaanderen
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Mouscron
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Banja Luka
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Sofia-Grad
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Plovdiv
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Sofia
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Varna
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Colombia
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Valle Del Cauca
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Estonia
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Parnu
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Estonia
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Tallinn
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Attiki
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Heraklion
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Paliao Faliro
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Patras
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Thessaloniki
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Békéscsaba
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Debrecen
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Mohacs
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Szekszard
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Székesfehérvár
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Ireland
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Dublin
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Hokkaidô
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Hyôgo
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Asahikawa
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Osaka-shi
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Osaka
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Sakura
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Shimotsuga-gun
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Tokyo
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Ôita
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Gyeonggido
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Busan
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Daegu
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Incheon
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Wonju-si, Gangwon-do
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Lebanon
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Beirut
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Lebanon
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Saida
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Distrito Federal
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Jalisco
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Morelos
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Nuevo León
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Yucatán
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Durango
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
South Island
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Wellington
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Hamilton
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Lisboa
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Guimarães
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Portimão
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Nitra
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Presov
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Córdoba
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Madrid, Communidad Delaware
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Pontevedra
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Huelva
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Istanbul
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Mersin
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Chernivets'ka Oblast
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Kharkivs'ka Oblast
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Kyïv
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Dnipro
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Kharkiv
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Kherson
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Kyiv
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Lviv
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Vinnytsia
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Zaporizhzhia
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Shire
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ontamalimab in inducing clinical remission and endoscopic response in participants with moderate to severe Crohn's Disease.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03566823
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Study Director
Query!
Address
0
0
Shire
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/23/NCT03566823/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/23/NCT03566823/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03566823
Download to PDF