Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03588845
Registration number
NCT03588845
Ethics application status
Date submitted
10/05/2018
Date registered
17/07/2018
Date last updated
17/10/2019
Titles & IDs
Public title
The Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth Study Pilot
Query!
Scientific title
Pragmatic, Multicenter, Cluster, Cohort Randomized Controlled Treat-to-target Trial for Treatment of SIBO in SSc Pilot
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
CODIM-MBM-16-282
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
SIBO
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Systemic Sclerosis
0
0
Query!
Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Autoimmune diseases
Query!
Skin
0
0
0
0
Query!
Dermatological conditions
Query!
Skin
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other skin conditions
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Other interventions - Treatment Protocol
Other interventions - Standard of Care
Other: Protocol Treatment - If a score on the GSS is \> 5, the computer will send an automatic notice to the office of the doctor and to the doctor him/herself telling them of this.
Upon receipt of the notice, the protocol doctors will be expected to make an appointment within the timeframe outline in the protocol. Upon receipt of this notice the secretaries or clerks at the site will be asked to insert a treatment sheet in the doctor's chart. This sheet will be used to assess the timeliness of the first visit after notification, about the adherence of protocol doctors to protocol treatment.
Other: Standard of Care - Standard care doctors, who will not know the details of this protocol, will decide on their own if and when to see the patient. Upon receipt of this notice the secretaries or clerks at the site will be asked to insert a treatment sheet in the doctor's chart. This sheet will be used to assess types of medications and general pattern of treatment of the standard of care doctors.
Other interventions: Treatment Protocol
Protocol treatment sites will be expected to see the patient within a pre-specified window of time. The doctors at that site will apply the treatment algorithm and will make decisions about response to treatment based on the algorithm and on specific patient answers to questionnaires. The treatment protocol will only be made available to IRBs, not to any site personnel before randomization. This was derived from a survey of rheumatologists in many countries and gastroenterologists, mostly in North America, who were asked multiple questions about how they would treat and follow up patients with suspected SIBO. Successful treatment is a response on GSS of no diarrhea plus a total GSS of \< 5.
Other interventions: Standard of Care
Physicians randomly assigned to standard of care will also be informed of their patients who met eligibility criteria. They will not be aware of the detailed treatment protocol but will be informed of which medications are in the protocol eg antibiotics, prokinetics etc. They will be free to contact the patients at their convenience and to treat them in any way they deem suitable, preferably using these medications but at doses and frequencies according to their own wishes.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Determine if protocol treatment is effective
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The primary outcome is the total Gastrointestinal Symptom Scale score. Each symptom carries a score from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe). The maximum overall score is 33. An improvement in the score, ie a lower score, indicates an improvement in GI symptoms.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
3 years
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Clinical diagnosis of Scleroderma
* Internet access
* An email address
* Adequate computer literacy in order to fill out the online questionnaires.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Allergy to protocol drugs
* Concomitant disease that would make it unlikely that they will survive for one year
* Use of substances known to cause diarrhea
* History of antibiotics in the 12 weeks prior to inclusion
* History of intestinal pseudo-obstruction
* Inability to complete the symptom questionnaires
* No functional level of written & spoken languages
* Previous C. Dificile infection
* Previous gastrointestinal surgery
* Prolonged QT interval
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Diagnosis
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
NA
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
UNKNOWN
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
15/02/2019
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/09/2021
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
500
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Saint Vincent's - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
Canadian Scleroderma Research Group
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This is a pragmatic study in which will compare a detailed treat-to-target (T2T) treatment algorithm to standard care for SSc SIBO at multiple sites around the world. The treatment algorithm was developed from the results of a survey of SIBO treatment preferences of rheumatologists and gastroenterologists. Although the drugs in the algorithm are already used in SSc, there is no uniform way of doing this and assessing the patient response. A very standardized protocol was created with details of how to use the medications, the duration of use and the timing of different drugs. In addition, symptoms of SIBO will be dectected by having patients complete a validated screening questionnaire, the global symptomatic score (GSS), online every 3 months for the duration of the study. A score \> 5 is very strongly related to bacterial overgrowth. In other studies, about 40% of unselected patients score at this level. This same questionnaire will be used in the T2T doctors' offices to decide if response is adequate and will also be used to assess outcome in the algorithm group versus standard care group. The primary outcome is the change in symptoms based on the total GSS. Secondary outcomes will include examination of all GSS subscales. HRQoL will be assessed by the social scale of the newly developed UCLA SSc GIT 2.0 questionnaire, which has become the standard GI questionnaire in SSc trials. ???RN. # 00296313
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03588845
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Murray Baron, MD
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
514 340 8222
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/45/NCT03588845/Prot_000.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03588845
Download to PDF