Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04146363
Registration number
NCT04146363
Ethics application status
Date submitted
29/10/2019
Date registered
31/10/2019
Titles & IDs
Public title
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Lebrikizumab (LY3650150) in Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (ADvocate1)
Query!
Scientific title
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lebrikizumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2019-002932-10
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
17801
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Atopic Dermatitis
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Skin
0
0
0
0
Query!
Dermatological conditions
Query!
Skin
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other skin conditions
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Other - Lebrikizumab
Other interventions - Placebo
Placebo comparator: Placebo - Induction Period (Baseline-Week 16):
Two subcutaneous (SC) injections of Placebo as a loading dose at Baseline and Week 2 followed by a single injection every 2 weeks (Q2W) from Week 4 until Week 14.
Maintenance Period (Week 16-Week 52):
Two placebo SC injections as loading dose on Week 16 and Week 18. One placebo SC injection Q2W until Week 50.
Experimental: Lebrikizumab 250 Q2W - Induction Period (Baseline-Week 16):
500 milligram (mg) Lebrikizumab (2 x 250 mg) SC injections as a loading dose at Baseline and Week 2 visits followed by a single 250 mg Lebrikizumab injection Q2W from Week 4 until Week 14.
Maintenance Period (Week 16-Week 52):
One 250 mg Lebrikizumab SC injection Q2W until Week 50.
For participants who received placebo in the Induction Period, the maintenance loading dose is:
Two 250 mg Lebrikizumab SC injections on Week 16.
Two 250 mg Lebrikizumab SC injections on Week 18.
To maintain the blind, for participants who received Lebrikizumab in the Induction Period, the maintenance loading dose is:
One 250 mg Lebrikizumab SC injection and one placebo SC injection on Week 16.
One 250 mg Lebrikizumab SC injection and one placebo SC injection on Week 18.
Experimental: Lebrikizumab 250 Q4W - Maintenance Period (Week 16-Week 52):
One 250 mg Lebrikizumab SC injection every 4 weeks (Q4W) on Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48.
One placebo SC injection Q4W on Weeks 22, 26, 30, 34, 38, 42, 46, and 50.
For participants who received placebo in the Induction Period, the maintenance loading dose is:
Two 250 mg Lebrikizumab SC injections on Week 16.
Two placebo injections on Week 18.
To maintain the blind, for participants who received Lebrikizumab in the Induction Period, the maintenance loading dose is:
One 250 mg Lebrikizumab SC injection and one placebo SC injection on Week 16.
Two placebo injections on Week 18
Experimental: Escape Arm (Lebrikizumab Q2W) - Maintenance Period (Week 16-Week 52):
Blinded loading doses based on prior treatment assignment will be administered, followed by one 250 mg Lebrikizumab SC injection Q2W until Week 50 in an open-label fashion.
For participants who received placebo in the Induction Period, the loading dose is:
Two 250 mg Lebrikizumab SC injections on Week 16.
Two 250 mg Lebrikizumab SC injections on Week 18.
To maintain the loading dose blind, for participants who received Lebrikizumab in the Induction Period, the loading dose is:
One 250 mg Lebrikizumab SC injection and one placebo SC injection on Week 16. One 250 mg Lebrikizumab SC injection and one placebo SC injection on Week 18.
For participants who do not maintain an acceptable response during the Maintenance Period and entered the Escape Arm, the loading doses will be administrated at entry and 2 weeks after entry based on the treatment assignment prior to entering escape arm.
Treatment: Other: Lebrikizumab
Subcutaneous injection
Other interventions: Placebo
Subcutaneous Injection
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Intervention code [2]
0
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a Reduction =2 Points From Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their Atopic Dermatitis (AD), based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area And Severity Index (EASI-75) (=75% Reduction in EASI Score) From Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent, i.e., percentage of skin affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI-75 score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 (none) to 72 (severe).
The EASI-75 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a = 75% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and a Reduction =2 Points From Baseline to Week 2
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline to Week 2
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and a Reduction =2 Points From Baseline to Week 4
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline to Week 4
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and a Reduction =2 Points From Baseline to Week 16 in Adults
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-90 (=90% Reduction in EASI Score) From Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent, i.e., percentage of skin affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 (none) to 72 (severe).
The EASI-90 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a = 90% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Percent Change in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable." Least Squares (LS) Mean was calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and randomization strata (region, disease severity, age) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline, Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS Score of =4-points at Baseline Who Achieve a =4-point Reduction in Pruritus NRS Score From Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS Score of =5-points at Baseline Who Achieve a =4-point Reduction in Pruritus NRS Score From Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Percent Change in EASI Score From Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease, i.e., percentage of skin affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 (none) to 72 (severe).
LS Mean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA score (IGA 3 versus 4) as fixed factors baseline value as covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline, Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The BSA affected by AD will be assessed for 4 separate body regions: head and neck, trunk (including genital region), upper extremities, and lower extremities (including the buttocks). Each body region will be assessed for disease extent ranging from 0% to 100% involvement. BSA was calculated using the participant's palm using the 1% rule, 1 palm was equivalent to 1% with estimates of the number of palms it takes to cover the affected AD area. Maximum number of palms were 10 palms for head and neck (10%), 20 palms for upper extremities (20%), 30 palms for trunk, including axilla and groin (30%), 40 palms for lower extremities, including buttocks (40%). Percent of BSA for a body region was calculated as = total number of palms in a body region \* % surface area equivalent to 1 palm. Overall percent BSA of all 4 body regions ranges from 0% to 100 % with higher values representing greater severity of AD.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline, Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-90 From Baseline to Week 4
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent, i.e., percentage of skin affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 (none) to 72 (severe).
The EASI-90 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a = 90% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline to Week 4
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The DLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of skin disease on the quality of life of an affected person. The 10 questions cover the following topics: symptoms, embarrassment, shopping and home care, clothes, social and leisure, sport, work or study, close relationships, sex, and treatment, over the previous week. Response categories include "Not at all," "A little," "A lot," and "Very much," with corresponding scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Questions 3-10 also have an additional response category of "Not relevant" which is scored as "0". Questions are scored from 0 to 3, giving a possible total score range from 0 (no impact of skin disease on quality of life) to 30 (maximum impact on quality of life). A high score is indicative of a poor quality of life.
LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline, Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving =4 Point Improvement in DLQI From Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
The DLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of skin disease on the quality of life of an affected person. The 10 questions cover the following topics: symptoms, embarrassment, shopping and home care, clothes, social and leisure, sport, work or study, close relationships, sex, and treatment, over the previous week. Response categories include "Not at all," "A little," "A lot," and "Very much," with corresponding scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Questions 3-10 also have an additional response category of "Not relevant" which is scored as "0". Questions are scored from 0 to 3, giving a possible total score range from 0 (no impact of skin disease on quality of life) to 30 (maximum impact on quality of life). A high score is indicative of a poor quality of life.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a DLQI Total Score of =4-point at Baseline Achieving =4-point Improvement in DLQI From Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
The DLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of skin disease on the quality of life of an affected person. The 10 questions cover the following topics: symptoms, embarrassment, shopping and home care, clothes, social and leisure, sport, work or study, close relationships, sex, and treatment, over the previous week. Response categories include "Not at all," "A little," "A lot," and "Very much," with corresponding scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Questions 3-10 also have an additional response category of "Not relevant" which is scored as "0". Questions are scored from 0 to 3, giving a possible total score range from 0 (no impact of skin disease on quality of life) to 30 (maximum impact on quality of life). A high score is indicative of a poor quality of life.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Percent Change in Sleep-loss Score From Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Sleep Loss due to interference of itch will be assessed by the participant. Participants rate their interference of itch on sleep based on a 5-point Likert scale \[0 (not at all) to 4 (unable to sleep at all)\]. Higher scores indicated a greater impact and worse outcome. Assessments will be recorded daily by the participant using an electronic diary. LS Mean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline, Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Sleep-loss Score at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Sleep Loss due to interference of itch will be assessed by the participant. Participants rate their interference of itch on sleep based on a 5-point Likert scale \[0 (not at all) to 4 (unable to sleep at all)\]. Higher scores indicated a greater impact and worse outcome. Assessments will be recorded daily by the participant using an electronic diary. LS Mean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Baseline, Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a Sleep-loss Score =2 Points at Baseline Who Achieve a =2 Points Reduction From Baseline at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Sleep Loss due to interference of itch will be assessed by the participant. Participants rate their interference of itch on sleep based on a 5-point Likert scale \[0 (not at all) to 4 (unable to sleep at all)\]. Higher scores indicated a greater impact and worse outcome. Assessments will be recorded daily by the participant using an electronic diary.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS Score of =4 Points at Baseline Who Achieve a =4-point Reduction From Baseline to Week 1
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Baseline to Week 1
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS Score of =4 Points at Baseline Who Achieve a =4-point Reduction From Baseline to Week 2
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Baseline to Week 2
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS Score of =4 Points at Baseline Who Achieve a =4-point Reduction From Baseline to Week 4
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Baseline to Week 4
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS Score of =5 Points at Baseline Who Achieve a =4-point Reduction From Baseline to Week 1
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Baseline to Week 1
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS Score of =5 Points at Baseline Who Achieve a =4-point Reduction From Baseline to Week 2
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Baseline to Week 2
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS Score of =5 Points at Baseline Who Achieve a =4-point Reduction From Baseline to Week 4
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Baseline to Week 4
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Percent Change in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Baseline to Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with VAS where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), \& subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7\*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease.
LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment group and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
Baseline, Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Average Serum Concentration of Lebrikizumab at Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
PK: Average serum concentration of lebrikizumab at the Week 52 trough timepoint. Serum concentration is a combined measure obtained from Baseline, Week 4, Week 16, Week 32, Week 52 and average measure was reported at week 52.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
Predose: Baseline, Week 4, Week 16, Week 32, Week 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Percentage of Participants From Those Re-randomized Having Achieved EASI-75 at Week 16 Who Continued to Exhibit EASI-75 at Week 52 (EASI-75 Calculated Relative to Baseline EASI Score)
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent, i.e., percentage of skin affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI-75 score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 (none) to 72 (severe).
The EASI-75 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a = 75% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
Baseline to Week 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
0
0
Percentage of Participants From Those Re-randomized Having Achieved IGA 0 or 1 and a =2-point Improvement From Baseline at Week 16 Who Continue to Exhibit and IGA 0 or 1 and a =2-point Improvement From Baseline at Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
Baseline to Week 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
0
0
Percentage of Participants From Those With a Pruritus NRS of =4-points at Baseline Re-randomized Having Achieved =4-point Reduction From Baseline at Week 16 Who Continue to Exhibit =4-point Reduction From Baseline at Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [27]
0
0
Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."
Query!
Timepoint [27]
0
0
Baseline to Week 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [28]
0
0
Percentage of Participants From Those With a Pruritus NRS of =5-points at Baseline Re-randomized Having Achieved =4-point Reduction From Baseline at Week 16 Who Continue to Exhibit =4-point Reduction From Baseline at Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [28]
0
0
Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."
Query!
Timepoint [28]
0
0
Baseline to Week 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [29]
0
0
Percent Change in SCORAD (Having Achieved EASI-75 at Week 16) From Baseline at Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [29]
0
0
The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with VAS where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), \& subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7\*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. LS mean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment group, baseline value, and stratification factors geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [29]
0
0
Baseline, Week 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [30]
0
0
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) at Week 16 - Health State Index
Query!
Assessment method [30]
0
0
The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part measurement. The first part is comprised of the following 5 participant-reported dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The responses are used to derive the health state index scores using the United Kingdom (UK) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.594 to 1, and the United States (US) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.109 to 1, with higher score indicating better health state.
LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [30]
0
0
Baseline, Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [31]
0
0
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L at Week 16 - Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Query!
Assessment method [31]
0
0
The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part measurement. The second part is assessed using a VAS that ranged from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm), where 0 is the worst health you can imagine and 100 is the best health you can imagine. LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [31]
0
0
Baseline, Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [32]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [32]
0
0
POEM is a 7-item, validated, questionnaire used by the participant to assess disease symptoms over the last week. The participant is asked to respond to 7 questions on skin dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping. All 7 answers carry equal weight with a total possible score from 0 to 28 (answers scored as: No days=0; 1# 2 days = 1; 3-4 days = 2; 5#6 days = 3; everyday = 4). A high score is indicative of a poor quality of life. POEM responses will be captured using an electronic diary and transferred into the clinical database. LS Mean was calculated using MMRM model using treatment, baseline value, visit, the interaction of the baseline value-by-visit, the interaction of treatment by-visit as covariates, geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed.
Query!
Timepoint [32]
0
0
Baseline, Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [33]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety at Week 16 - Adolescents
Query!
Assessment method [33]
0
0
PROMIS® is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. Participants =17 years will complete pediatric versions for the duration of the study. PROMIS anxiety has 8 questions on Emotion Distress-Anxiety (or Pediatric Anxiety Symptom). Each question has 5 response options with values from 1 to 5. Total raw scores were converted to T-Scores (mean = 50 and a standard deviation = 10) with higher scores representing greater anxiety. LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [33]
0
0
Baseline, Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [34]
0
0
Change From Baseline in PROMIS Depression at Week 16 - Adolescents
Query!
Assessment method [34]
0
0
PROMIS® is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. Participants =17 years will complete pediatric versions for the duration of the study. PROMIS depression has 8 questions on Emotion Distress-Depression (or Pediatric Depressive Symptom). Each question has 5 response options with values from 1 to 5. Total raw scores were converted to T-Scores (mean = 50 and a standard deviation = 10) with higher scores representing greater depression. LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [34]
0
0
Baseline, Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [35]
0
0
Change From Baseline in PROMIS Anxiety at Week 16 - Adults
Query!
Assessment method [35]
0
0
PROMIS is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. The PROMIS measures will be completed by the participant in the study clinic. PROMIS anxiety has 8 questions on Emotion Distress-Anxiety (or Pediatric Anxiety Symptom). Each question has 5 response options with values from 1 to 5. Total raw scores were converted to T-Scores (mean = 50 and a standard deviation = 10) with higher scores representing greater anxiety. LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [35]
0
0
Baseline, Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [36]
0
0
Change From Baseline in PROMIS Depression at Week 16 - Adults
Query!
Assessment method [36]
0
0
PROMIS is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. The PROMIS measures will be completed by the participant in the study clinic. PROMIS depression has 8 questions on Emotion Distress-Depression (or Pediatric Depressive Symptom). Each question has 5 response options with values from 1 to 5. Total raw scores were converted to T-Scores (mean = 50 and a standard deviation = 10) with higher scores representing greater depression. LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [36]
0
0
Baseline, Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [37]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) Score at Week 16 in Participants Who Have Self-Reported Comorbid Asthma
Query!
Assessment method [37]
0
0
The ACQ-5 is a five-item, self-completed questionnaire, which is used as a measure of asthma control of a participant. The five questions (concerning nocturnal awakening, waking in the morning, activity limitation, shortness of breath and wheeze) enquire about the frequency and/or severity of symptoms over the previous week. The response options for all these questions range from zero (no impairment/limitation) to six (total impairment/ limitation) scale. The ACQ-5 score is the average of the individual item scores and ranges from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher scores indicate lower asthma control.
LS Mean was calculated using ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [37]
0
0
Baseline, Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [38]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) at Week 16 - Adolescents
Query!
Assessment method [38]
0
0
The CDLQI questionnaire is designed for use in children (4 to 16 years of age). It consists of 10 items that are grouped into 6 domains: symptoms \& feelings, leisure, school or holidays, personal relationships, sleep, \& treatment. The scoring of each question is: Very much =3; Quite a lot = 2; Only a little = 1; Not at all = 0. CDLQI total score is calculated by summing all 10 items responses and has a range of 0 to 30 (higher scores are indicative of greater impairment).
LS Mean was calculated using MMRM model which includes treatment, baseline value, visit, the interaction of the baseline value-by-visit as covariates, the interaction of treatment by-visit, geographic region, age group, and baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.
Query!
Timepoint [38]
0
0
Baseline, Week 16
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Male or female adults and adolescents (=12 years and =40 kg)
* Chronic atopic dermatitis (according to American Academy of Dermatology Consensus Criteria) that has been present for =1 year before the screening visit
* Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score =16 at the baseline visit
* Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score =3 (scale of 0 to 4) at the baseline visit
* =10% body surface area (BSA) of atopic dermatitis involvement at the baseline visit
* History of inadequate response to treatment with topical medications; or determination that topical treatments are otherwise medically inadvisable
Query!
Minimum age
12
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Prior treatment with dupilumab or tralokinumab
* Treatment with topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors or phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors such as crisaborole within 1 week prior to the baseline visit
* Treatment with any of the following agents within 4 weeks prior to the baseline visit:
* Immunosuppressive/immunomodulating drugs (e.g., systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, mycophenolate-mofetil, IFN-?, Janus kinase inhibitors, azathioprine, methotrexate, etc.)
* Phototherapy and photochemotherapy (PUVA) for AD
* Treatment with the following prior to the baseline visit:
* An investigational drug within 8 weeks or within 5 half-lives (if known) of baseline, whichever is longer
* Cell-depleting biologics, including to rituximab, within 6 months of baseline
* Other biologics within 5 half-lives (if known) or 16 weeks of baseline, whichever is longer
* Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 12 weeks of the baseline visit or planned during the study
* Uncontrolled chronic disease that might require bursts of oral corticosteroids, e.g., co-morbid severe uncontrolled asthma
* Evidence of active acute or chronic hepatitis
* History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or positive HIV serology
* History of malignancy, including mycosis fungoides, within 5 years before the screening visit, except completely treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix, completely treated and resolved non-metastatic squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women planning to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
24/09/2019
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
3/05/2022
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
424
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,VIC,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
The St. George Hospital - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Holdsworth House Medical Practice - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Skin & Cancer Foundation Australia - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
The Skin Centre - Benowa
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Veracity Clinical Research Pty Ltd - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Eastern Clinical Research Unit - Box Hill
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
Emeritus Research - Camberwell
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
0
0
Skin Health Institute Inc. - Carlton
Query!
Recruitment hospital [9]
0
0
Sinclair Dermatology - East Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [10]
0
0
Fremantle Dermatology - Fremantle
Query!
Recruitment hospital [11]
0
0
Burswood Dermatology - Victoria Park
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2217 - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2010 - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
2145 - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
4217 - Benowa
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
4102 - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
3128 - Box Hill
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
0
0
3124 - Camberwell
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
0
0
3053 - Carlton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [9]
0
0
3002 - East Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [10]
0
0
6160 - Fremantle
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [11]
0
0
06100 - Victoria Park
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arkansas
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Kentucky
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Nevada
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
New Hampshire
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Rhode Island
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Estonia
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Tartu
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Cedex 10
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Bordeaux Cedex
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Dijon Cedex
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Martigues
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Toulouse cedex 9
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Gyeonggi-do
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Korea
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Kyung Gi-Do, Korea
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Yongsan-gu
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Incheon
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Latvia
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Riga
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Latvia
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Talsi
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Lithuania
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Kaunas
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Lithuania
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Vilnius
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Malopolska
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Malopolskie
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Mazowieckie
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Slaskie
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
West Pomeranian
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Wojewodztwo Podkarpackie
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Katowice
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Krakow
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Lublin
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Poznan
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Wroclaw
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Vizcaya
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Alicante
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Badalona
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Eli Lilly and Company
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Dermira, Inc.
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study which is 52 weeks in duration. The study is designed to confirm the safety and efficacy of lebrikizumab as monotherapy for treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis utilizing a 16-week induction treatment period and a 36-week long-term maintenance treatment period.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04146363
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST)
Query!
Address
0
0
Eli Lilly and Company
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.
Supporting document/s available: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan (SAP), Clinical study report (CSR)
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Data are available 6 months after the primary publication and approval of the indication studied in the US and EU, whichever is later. Data will be indefinitely available for requesting.
Query!
Available to whom?
A research proposal must be approved by an independent review panel and researchers must sign a data sharing agreement.
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: https://vivli.org/
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/63/NCT04146363/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/63/NCT04146363/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04146363