Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00887146
Registration number
NCT00887146
Ethics application status
Date submitted
22/04/2009
Date registered
23/04/2009
Date last updated
2/08/2024
Titles & IDs
Public title
Radiation Therapy With Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide Versus Radiation Therapy With Adjuvant PCV Chemotherapy in Patients With Anaplastic Glioma or Low Grade Glioma
Query!
Scientific title
Phase III Intergroup Study of Radiotherapy With Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide Versus Radiotherapy With Adjuvant PCV Chemotherapy in Patients With 1p/19q Co-deleted Anaplastic Glioma or Low Grade Glioma
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
NCI-2011-01915
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
N0577
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Brain
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Neuroendocrine tumour (NET)
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Children's - Brain
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Prostate
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - concomitant temozolomide (TMZ)
Treatment: Drugs - procarbazine
Treatment: Drugs - adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ)
Treatment: Drugs - CCNU
Treatment: Drugs - vincristine
Experimental: Arm A (RT, procarbazine, lomustine, vincristine) - Patients undergo 3D-CRT or IMRT on days 1-5 for 5-7 weeks. Patients also receive procarbazine hydrochloride PO on days 8-21, lomustine PO on day 1 and vincristine sulfate IV on days 8 and 29 of courses 3-8. Treatment repeats every 6-7 weeks for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Experimental: Arm B (RT, temozolomide) - Patients undergo RT as in arm I and receive temozolomide PO QD on days 1-5 for 5-7 weeks. Beginning 4 weeks after completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy, patients receive adjuvant temozolomide PO QD days 1-5. Treatment with adjuvant temozolomide repeats every 4 weeks for 6-12 courses in the absence of disease progression and unacceptable toxicity.
Treatment: Drugs: concomitant temozolomide (TMZ)
75 mg/m\^2, orally daily
Treatment: Drugs: procarbazine
Days 8-21: 60 mg/m\^2 orally
Treatment: Drugs: adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ)
150 or 200 mg/m\^2 orally
Treatment: Drugs: CCNU
Day 1: 110 mg/m\^2 orally
Treatment: Drugs: vincristine
Days 8 and 29: 1.4 mg/m\^2 IV
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Progression-free survival
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The distribution of progression free survival for Arms A and B will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The hazard ratios and median progression free survival (PFS) will be estimated with their confidence intervals. The Cox proportional hazards model will be used to assess whether the distributions of progression survival times differ with respect to treatment regimen having adjusted for all stratification factors (cooperative groups, age, and performance score). Both non-inferiority and superiority will be tested in this trial for the primary goal and no multiple-comparison adjustment will be considered.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Time from study registration to time of tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to 16 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Time to progression
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed by Cox regression model adjusting all stratification factors. Correlations among baseline neurocognitive test scores and progression free survival will be analyzed using Cox proportional hazards model.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Time from study registration to the earliest evidence of clinical progression, radiographic progression or neurocognitive progression, assessed up to 16 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Time to neurocognitive progression, assessed using the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised for Free Recall, Delayed Recall, and Delayed Recognition; the Controlled Oral Word Association test; and the Trail Making Test Part A or B
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed by Cox regression model adjusting all stratification factors. For each test in the battery, a standard error of measurement will be used to derive the Reliable Change Index (RCI) which will be used to represent the 90% confidence interval for the difference in raw scores from baseline to follow-up assessment will be coded as 1 (deterioration), 2 (no change), and 3 (improved) according to the RCI.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Time from study registration to the first cognitive failure, assessed up to 16 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Overall survival
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The Cox proportional hazards model will be used to assess whether the distributions of overall survival times differ with respect to treatment regimen having adjusted for all stratification factors (cooperative groups, age, and Performance Score). The distribution of overall survival for Arm A and B will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The hazard ratios and median survivals will be estimated with their 95% confidence intervals.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Time from study registration to time of death due to any cause, assessed up to 16 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Objective tumor response defined as a complete response or partial response
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Summarized for each arm and compared between the arms using the Chi square test.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Up to 16 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Treatment-related adverse events according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
The maximum grade for each type of treatment-related adverse event will be recorded for each patient, and frequency tables for each arm will be reviewed to determine patterns. In addition, will review all adverse event data that is graded as 3, 4, or 5 and classified as either "unrelated" or "unlikely to be related" to study treatment in the event of an actual relationship developing. Adverse events and treatment-related adverse events will be evaluated using all patients. Treatment-related adverse events will be tabulated for each arm.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Up to 16 years
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Pre-Registration
* United States (US) and Canadian sites:
* This review is mandatory prior to registration to confirm eligibility; patients must be willing to submit tissue samples for mandatory central pathology review submission; it should be initiated as soon after surgery as possible
* Tissue must have been determined to have local 1p/9q co-deletion and IDH mutation prior to submission for central path review
* Tumor tissue must show co-deletion of chromosomes 1p and 19q; for eligibility, the 1p/19q analysis results will be accepted from the local site, as determined by either a locally available or reference laboratory (for US, must be Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act [CLIA] certified); acceptable methods for determination of 1p/19q loss include fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH), by genomic sequencing or methylomic analyses; US and Canadian sites must send a copy of the official report to the pathology coordinator and quality assurance specialist (QAS)
* Tumor must also show evidence of IDH mutation by immunohistochemistry or genomic analyses; this should be performed at the local site (US: performed in a CLIA certified laboratory); the site must send a copy of the official report to the pathology coordinator and QAS
Registration
* Newly diagnosed and =< 3 months from surgical diagnosis; patients are also eligible if they have had a prior surgical procedure > 3 months earlier for low grade glioma, as long as the patient has not received prior radiation or prior chemotherapy
* Histological evidence of World Health Organization (WHO) grade III anaplastic glioma or WHO grade II low grade glioma with locally diagnosed combined 1p/19q loss and the presence of an either IDH1 or IDH2, both as established by a local or referenced laboratory qualified for the study
* Note: mixed gliomas are eligible, regardless of the degree of astrocytic or oligodendrocytic predominance, as long as the tumor is also co-deleted for 1p and 19q
* Patients with codeleted low grade gliomas must also be considered "high risk" by exhibiting one or more of the following characteristics:
* Age >= 40 and any surgical therapy
* Age < 40 with prior and subtotal resection or biopsy (i.e., anything less than gross total resection)
* Documented growth following prior surgery (NOTE: patients with prior surgery cannot have received prior radiation, chemotherapy or targeted therapy)
* Intractable seizures
* Surgery (partial or gross total resection or biopsy) must be performed >= 2 weeks prior to registration; patient must have recovered adequately from the effects of surgery
* Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >= 1,500/mm^3 obtained =< 21 days prior to registration
* Platelet (PLTs) count >= 100,000/mm^3 obtained =< 21 days prior to registration
* Hemoglobin (Hgb) > 9.0 g/dL obtained =< 21 days prior to registration
* Total bilirubin =< 1.5 x institutional upper limit of normal (ULN) obtained =< 21 days prior to registration
* Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) (aspartate aminotransferase [AST]) =< 3 x ULN obtained =< 21 days prior to registration
* Creatinine =< 1.5 x ULN obtained =< 21 days prior to registration
* Negative serum or urine pregnancy test done =< 7 days prior to registration, for women of childbearing potential only
* Willingness and ability to personally complete neurocognitive testing (without assistance) and willingness to complete the QOL testing, (either personally or with assistance)
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0, 1 or 2
* Written informed consent
* Willingness to return to enrolling institution for follow-up during the active monitoring phase (that is, the active treatment and observation portion) of the study); patients who have been formally transferred to another active and approved site participating in this study would not need to return to the enrolling institution for this purpose
* Willingness to allow the provision of tissue samples for correlative research, as long as adequate tissues are available; patients will not be excluded from participation in the study, if they are willing to allow provision of tissues for the correlative research, but there are insufficient quantities of tissue for the correlative analyses (e.g., a patient otherwise eligible and willing who had biopsy only) Willingness to allow the provision of blood samples for correlative research; patients are not excluded from participation in the study, if they are willing to provide the mandatory biospecimens for translational/correlative research, but for logistical reasons the specimens(s) were not obtainable or if the volume collected was insufficient
Registration
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* The following categories are ineligible:
* Pregnant women
* Nursing women
* Men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception or contraceptive method during this study and 6 months following the completion of chemotherapy treatments
* History of prior radiation therapy or chemotherapy for glioma; note: patients who have a history of prior low grade glioma (with or without a distant history of prior surgery for that glioma), but who have never received prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy for the glioma are eligible for the study
* Co-morbid systemic illnesses or other severe concurrent disease which, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study or interfere significantly with the proper assessment of safety and toxicity of the prescribed regimens
* Concomitant serious immunocompromised status (other than that related to concomitant steroids) that would compromise the safety of the patient on the study
* Patients known to be human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive and currently receiving retroviral therapy are not eligible; note: patients known to be HIV positive, but without clinical evidence of an immunocompromised state, are eligible for the study
* Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
* Receiving any other investigational agent that would be considered as a treatment for the primary neoplasm
* Other active malignancy within 5 years of registration; exceptions: non-melanotic skin cancer or carcinoma-in-situ of the cervix; note: if there is a history of prior malignancy, the patient is not eligible if they are receiving other specific treatment (with the exclusion of hormonal therapy or Her-2 inhibitors) for their cancer or if they have received prior total body irradiation which included the brain
* History of myocardial infarction =< 6 months, or congestive heart failure requiring use of ongoing maintenance therapy for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias
* Recent history of hepatitis infection or if the treating physician determined that the patient would be at significant risk of reactivation of hepatitis
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Active, not recruiting
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/09/2009
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/10/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
305
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Sutton
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Alaska
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
District of Columbia
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Idaho
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Iowa
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Kansas
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Kentucky
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Maine
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Montana
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Nebraska
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Nevada
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
New Hampshire
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
New Mexico
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
North Dakota
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
South Dakota
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Vermont
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
West Virginia
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Wisconsin
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Vienna
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Antwerpen
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Manitoba
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Saskatchewan
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Lyon
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Nice
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Villejuif
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Amsterdam
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Groningen
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Maastricht
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Rotterdam
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Whitchurch
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Wirral
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [2]
0
0
Other
Query!
Name [2]
0
0
European Organisation for Research and Treatment Center (EORTC)
Query!
Address [2]
0
0
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [3]
0
0
Other
Query!
Name [3]
0
0
Canadian Cancer Trials Group
Query!
Address [3]
0
0
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as temozolomide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known whether giving radiation with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiation with adjuvant PCV is more effective in treating anaplastic glioma or low grade glioma.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00887146
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Cerhan JH, Anderson SK, Butts AM, Porter AB, Jaeckle K, Galanis E, Brown PD. Examiner accuracy in cognitive testing in multisite brain-tumor clinical trials: an analysis from the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Neurooncol Pract. 2019 Jul;6(4):283-288. doi: 10.1093/nop/npy048. Epub 2018 Nov 24. Drappatz J, Lieberman F. Chemotherapy of Oligodendrogliomas. Prog Neurol Surg. 2018;31:152-161. doi: 10.1159/000467376. Epub 2018 Jan 25. Lorente D, Llacer C, Lozano R, de Velasco G, Romero-Laorden N, Rodrigo M, Sanchez-Iglesias A, di Capua C, Castro E, Ferrer C, Sanchez-Hernandez A, Olmos D. Prognostic Score and Benefit from Abiraterone in First-line Metastatic, Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2021 Nov;80(5):641-649. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.07.014. Epub 2021 Aug 6. Miller K, Carles J, Gschwend JE, Van Poppel H, Diels J, Brookman-May SD. The Phase 3 COU-AA-302 Study of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone in Men with Chemotherapy-naive Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Stratified Analysis Based on Pain, Prostate-specific Antigen, and Gleason Score. Eur Urol. 2018 Jul;74(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.035. Epub 2017 Sep 20. de Bono JS, Smith MR, Saad F, Rathkopf DE, Mulders PFA, Small EJ, Shore ND, Fizazi K, De Porre P, Kheoh T, Li J, Todd MB, Ryan CJ, Flaig TW. Subsequent Chemotherapy and Treatment Patterns After Abiraterone Acetate in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of COU-AA-302. Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):656-664. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.033. Epub 2016 Jul 9. Fizazi K, Flaig TW, Stockle M, Scher HI, de Bono JS, Rathkopf DE, Ryan CJ, Kheoh T, Li J, Todd MB, Griffin TW, Molina A, Ohlmann CH. Does Gleason score at initial diagnosis predict efficacy of abiraterone acetate therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer? An analysis of abiraterone acetate phase III trials. Ann Oncol. 2016 Apr;27(4):699-705. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv545. Epub 2015 Nov 25. Saad F, Shore N, Van Poppel H, Rathkopf DE, Smith MR, de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, de Souza P, Fizazi K, Mulders PF, Mainwaring P, Hainsworth JD, Beer TM, North S, Fradet Y, Griffin TA, De Porre P, Londhe A, Kheoh T, Small EJ, Scher HI, Molina A, Ryan CJ. Impact of bone-targeted therapies in chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate: post hoc analysis of study COU-AA-302. Eur Urol. 2015 Oct;68(4):570-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.032. Epub 2015 May 16. Xu XS, Ryan CJ, Stuyckens K, Smith MR, Saad F, Griffin TW, Park YC, Yu MK, Vermeulen A, Poggesi I, Nandy P. Correlation between Prostate-Specific Antigen Kinetics and Overall Survival in Abiraterone Acetate-Treated Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Jul 15;21(14):3170-7. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1549. Epub 2015 Mar 31. Morris MJ, Molina A, Small EJ, de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Fizazi K, de Souza P, Kantoff PW, Higano CS, Li J, Kheoh T, Larson SM, Matheny SL, Naini V, Burzykowski T, Griffin TW, Scher HI, Ryan CJ. Radiographic progression-free survival as a response biomarker in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: COU-AA-302 results. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 20;33(12):1356-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.3875. Epub 2015 Jan 26. Ryan CJ, Smith MR, Fizazi K, Saad F, Mulders PF, Sternberg CN, Miller K, Logothetis CJ, Shore ND, Small EJ, Carles J, Flaig TW, Taplin ME, Higano CS, de Souza P, de Bono JS, Griffin TW, De Porre P, Yu MK, Park YC, Li J, Kheoh T, Naini V, Molina A, Rathkopf DE; COU-AA-302 Investigators. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone versus placebo plus prednisone in chemotherapy-naive men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (COU-AA-302): final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):152-60. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71205-7. Epub 2015 Jan 16. Attard G, de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Fizazi K, Mukherjee SD, Joshua AM, Schrijvers D, van den Eertwegh AJ, Li W, Molina A, Griffin TW, Kheoh T, Ricci DS, Zelinsky K, Rathkopf DE, Scher HI, Ryan CJ. Improvements in Radiographic Progression-Free Survival Stratified by ERG Gene Status in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Abiraterone Acetate. Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Apr 1;21(7):1621-7. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1961. Epub 2015 Jan 15. Aggarwal R, Harris A, Formaker C, Small EJ, Molina A, Griffin TW, Ryan CJ. Response to subsequent docetaxel in a patient cohort with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after abiraterone acetate treatment. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2014 Oct;12(5):e167-72. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Mar 28. Rathkopf DE, Smith MR, de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Shore ND, de Souza P, Fizazi K, Mulders PF, Mainwaring P, Hainsworth JD, Beer TM, North S, Fradet Y, Van Poppel H, Carles J, Flaig TW, Efstathiou E, Yu EY, Higano CS, Taplin ME, Griffin TW, Todd MB, Yu MK, Park YC, Kheoh T, Small EJ, Scher HI, Molina A, Ryan CJ, Saad F. Updated interim efficacy analysis and long-term safety of abiraterone acetate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients without prior chemotherapy (COU-AA-302). Eur Urol. 2014 Nov;66(5):815-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.056. Epub 2014 Mar 6. Basch E, Autio K, Ryan CJ, Mulders P, Shore N, Kheoh T, Fizazi K, Logothetis CJ, Rathkopf D, Smith MR, Mainwaring PN, Hao Y, Griffin T, Li S, Meyers ML, Molina A, Cleeland C. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in chemotherapy-naive men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: patient-reported outcome results of a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Nov;14(12):1193-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70424-8. Epub 2013 Sep 25. Ryan CJ, Smith MR, de Bono JS, Molina A, Logothetis CJ, de Souza P, Fizazi K, Mainwaring P, Piulats JM, Ng S, Carles J, Mulders PF, Basch E, Small EJ, Saad F, Schrijvers D, Van Poppel H, Mukherjee SD, Suttmann H, Gerritsen WR, Flaig TW, George DJ, Yu EY, Efstathiou E, Pantuck A, Winquist E, Higano CS, Taplin ME, Park Y, Kheoh T, Griffin T, Scher HI, Rathkopf DE; COU-AA-302 Investigators. Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 10;368(2):138-48. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209096. Epub 2012 Dec 10. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 7;368(6):584.
Query!
Public notes
This record is viewable in the ANZCTR as it had previously listed Australia and/or New Zealand as a recruitment site, however these sites have since been removed
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Kurt Jaeckle, MD
Query!
Address
0
0
Mayo Clinic
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Kurt Jaeckle, MD
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
904-953-7102
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00887146
Download to PDF