Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04169373
Registration number
NCT04169373
Ethics application status
Date submitted
18/11/2019
Date registered
19/11/2019
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Adults With Axial Spondyloarthritis
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Program to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Adult Subjects With Axial Spondyloarthritis Followed by a Remission-Withdrawal Period
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2022-501018-78-00
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
M19-944
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
SELECT-AXIS 2
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Spondyloarthritis
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Query!
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Rheumatoid arthritis
Query!
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Osteoarthritis
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Upadacitinib
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo
Experimental: Study 1: Upadacitinib 15 mg - Participants receive 15 mg upadacitinib orally once a day for 104 weeks. Participants who flare after 104 weeks will receive open-label upadacitinib once daily from the time of flare for 24 weeks (re-treatment).
Placebo comparator: Study 1: Placebo - Participants receive matching placebo for 14 weeks and then switch to receive 15 mg upadacitinib orally once a day for 90 weeks. Participants who flare after 104 weeks will receive open-label upadacitinib once daily from the time of flare for 24 weeks (re-treatment).
Experimental: Study 2: Upadacitinib 15 mg - Participants receive 15 mg upadacitinib orally once a day for 104 weeks. Participants who flare after 104 weeks will receive open-label upadacitinib once daily from the time of flare for 24 weeks (re-treatment).
Placebo comparator: Study 2: Placebo - Participants receive matching placebo for 52 weeks and then switch to receive 15 mg upadacitinib orally once a day for 52 weeks. Participants who flare after 104 weeks will receive open-label upadacitinib once daily from the time of flare for 24 weeks (re-treatment).
Treatment: Drugs: Upadacitinib
Upadacitinib tablet administered orally
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo
Placebo for upadacitinib tablet administered orally
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Study 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
ASAS40 response was defined as improvement of = 40% relative to Baseline and absolute improvement of = 2 units (on a scale from 0 to 10) in = 3 of the following 4 domains with no deterioration (defined as a net worsening of \> 0 units) in the potential remaining domain:
* Patient's global assessment of disease activity, measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no activity) to 10 (severe activity);
* Pain, measured by the total back pain NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain);
* Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on an NRS ranging from 0 (easy) to 10 (impossible);
* Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) NRS scores (items 5 \[level of stiffness\] and 6 \[duration of stiffness\]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Study 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 Response at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
ASAS40 response was defined as improvement of = 40% relative to Baseline and absolute improvement of = 2 units (on a scale from 0 to 10) in = 3 of the following 4 domains with no deterioration (defined as a net worsening of \> 0 units) in the potential remaining domain:
* Patient's global assessment of disease activity, measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no activity) to 10 (severe activity);
* Pain, measured by the total back pain NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain);
* Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on an NRS ranging from 0 (easy) to 10 (impossible);
* Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) NRS scores (items 5 \[level of stiffness\] and 6 \[duration of stiffness\]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Study 1: Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis. ASDAS combines the following 5 disease activity variables using a weighted formula:
1. Patient's assessment of total back pain (BASDAI Question 2; NRS score 0 \[none\] - 10 \[very severe\])
2. Patient global assessment of disease activity (NRS score 0 \[no activity\] - 10 \[severe activity\])
3. Peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Question 3; NRS score 0 \[none\] - 10 \[very severe\])
4. Duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Question 6; NRS score 0 \[0 hours\] - 10 \[2 or more hours\])
5. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in mg/L.
The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS include Inactive disease (ASDAS \< 1.3) and very high disease (ASDAS \> 3.5). A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement in disease activity.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Study 1: Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Score for the Spine at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
In the SPARCC MRI assessment of the spine, the entire spine was evaluated for active inflammation (bone marrow edema). Six discovertebral units (DVU) representing the 6 most abnormal DVUs were selected to calculate the MRI Spine SPARCC score. For each of the 6 DVUs, 3 consecutive sagittal slices were assessed in 4 quadrants to evaluate the extent of inflammation in all three dimensions.
Each quadrant was scored for the presence (1) or absence (0) of edema. If edema was present in at least one quadrant of a DVU slice, it was also scored for intensity and depth of the edema representing that slice: An additional score of 1 was assigned if an intense signal was seen in any quadrant on a DVU slice. Slices that included a lesion demonstrating continuous increased signal of depth = 1 cm extending from the endplate were scored as an additional 1 per slice.
The maximum (worst) overall score for all 6 DVUs is 108. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Study 1: Percentage of Participants With Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 50 Response at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The BASDAI assesses disease activity by asking the participant to answer 6 questions (each on an 11 point numeric rating scale \[NRS\]) pertaining to symptoms experienced for the past week. For Questions 1 to 5 (level of fatigue/tiredness, level of AS neck, back or hip pain, level of pain/swelling in joints, other than neck, back or hips, level of discomfort from any areas tender to touch or pressure, and level of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe); for Question 6 (duration of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (0 hours) to 10 (= 2 hours). The overall BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10. Lower scores indicate less disease activity.
A BASDAI 50 response is defined as improvement of 50% or more from Baseline in BASDAI score.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Study 1: Percentage of Participants With an ASAS20 Response at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
ASAS20 response was defined as an improvement of = 20% and an absolute improvement of = 1 unit (on a scale of 0 to 10) from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 4 domains, with no deterioration (defined as a worsening of = 20% and a net worsening of = 1 units \[on a scale of 0 to 10\]) in the remaining domain:
* Patient's global assessment of disease activity, measured on a NRS from 0 (no activity) to 10 (severe activity);
* Pain, measured by the total back pain NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain);
* Function, measured by the BASFI which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on an NRS ranging from 0 (easy) to 10 (impossible);
* Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related BASDAI NRS scores (items 5 \[level of stiffness\] and 6 \[duration of stiffness\]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Study 1: Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Inactive Disease at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis. ASDAS combines the following 5 disease activity variables using a weighted formula:
1. Patient's assessment of total back pain (BASDAI Question 2; NRS score 0 \[none\] - 10 \[very severe\])
2. Patient global assessment of disease activity (NRS score 0 \[no activity\] - 10 \[severe activity\])
3. Peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Question 3; NRS score 0 \[none\] - 10 \[very severe\])
4. Duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Question 6; NRS score 0 \[0 hours\] - 10 \[2 or more hours\])
5. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in mg/L.
The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score. ASDAS Inactive Disease is defined as an ASDAS score \< 1.3.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Study 1: Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Total Back Pain at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Participants assessed their total back pain during the last week on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents most severe pain.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Study 1: Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Nocturnal Back Pain at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Participants assessed the amount of back pain at night over the last week on a 0 to 10 NRS, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents most severe pain.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Study 1: Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Low Disease Activity at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis. ASDAS combines the following 5 disease activity variables using a weighted formula:
1. Patient's assessment of total back pain (BASDAI Question 2; NRS score 0 \[none\] - 10 \[very severe\])
2. Patient global assessment of disease activity (NRS score 0 \[no activity\] - 10 \[severe activity\])
3. Peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Question 3; NRS score 0 \[none\] - 10 \[very severe\])
4. Duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Question 6; NRS score 0 \[0 hours\] - 10 \[2 or more hours\])
5. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in mg/L.
The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score. ASDAS Low Disease Activity is defined as an ASDAS score \< 2.1.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Study 1: Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index is a validated index to determine the degree of functional limitation in patients with AS. BASFI consists of 10 questions assessing participants' ability to perform activities such as putting on socks, bending, reaching, getting up from the floor or an armless chair, standing, climbing and other physical activities. Each item is scored on a NRS ranging from 0 (easy to perform an activity) to 10 (impossible to perform an activity). The overall score is the mean of the 10 items and ranges from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating more functional limitations. A negative change from Baseline in BASFI indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Study 1: Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
ASAS partial remission (PR) is defined as an absolute score of = 2 units on a 0 to 10 scale for each of the four following domains:
* Patient's global assessment of disease activity, measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no activity) to 10 (severe activity);
* Pain, measured by the total back pain NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain);
* Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on an NRS ranging from 0 (easy) to 10 (impossible);
* Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) NRS scores (items 5 \[level of stiffness\] and 6 \[duration of stiffness\]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Study 1: Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) Score at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The ASQoL consists of 18 items related to quality of life, including the impact of pain on sleep, mood, motivation, ability to cope, activities of daily living, independence, relationships, and social life. Each item is answered as yes (scored as 1) or no (scored as 0).
Scores are summed to obtain the overall score which ranges from 0 to 18, where higher scores indicate a worse quality of life. A negative change from Baseline in ASQoL indicates improvement in quality of life.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Study 1: Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
The ASAS health index (HI) measures functioning and health across 17 aspects of health in patients with AS, including pain, emotional functions, sleep, sexual function, mobility, self care, and community life. Each of the 17 questions is answered by the participant as "I agree" (score = 1) or "I disagree" (score = 0). The responses to the 17 dichotomous items are summed up to give a total score ranging from 0 to 17, where a higher score indicates a worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Study 1: Change From Baseline in Linear Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI[Lin]) at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
The BASMI is a composite score based on 5 direct measurements of spinal mobility:
1. cervical rotation (measured in degrees),
2. tragus to wall distance (in centimeters \[cm\])
3. lumbar side flexion (in cm),
4. lumbar flexion (modified Schober's) (in cm) and
5. intermalleolar distance (in cm).
Each measurement is converted to a linear score between 0 and 10. The total BASMI(lin) score is the average of the 5 scores and ranges from 0 to 10; the higher the BASMI(lin) score the more severe the patient's limitation of movement due to their ankylosing spondylitis. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Study 1: Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
The MASES evaluation was conducted to assess the presence or absence of enthesitis (inflammation of the entheses, or sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone) at 13 different sites (first costochondral joint left/right, seventh costochondral joint left/right, posterior superior iliac spine left/right, anterior superior iliac spine left/right, iliac crest left/right, fifth lumbar spinous process, and proximal insertion of Achilles tendon left/right. Each site was scored for presence (1) or absence (0) of enthesitis. The MASES is the sum of the 13 site scores, and ranges from 0 to 13, with higher scores indicating more inflammation of the entheses. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Study 1: Change From Baseline in MRI SPARCC Score for Sacroiliac Joints at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
In the SPARCC MRI assessment of the sacroiliac (SI) joints 6 consecutive sacroiliac joint image coronal slices representing the largest proportion of the synovial compartment of the SI joints were assessed for edema, intensity and depth of edema.
Each SI joint (left and right) was divided into quadrants for a total of 8 SI scoring locations. Each quadrant was scored for the presence (1) or absence (0) of edema, intensity of edema (a score of 1 was assigned for each SI joint (left and right) if an intense signal was seen in any quadrant of that joint for each slice), and a lesion was graded as deep (score of 1) if there was homogeneous and unequivocal increase in signal extending over a depth of at least 1 cm from the articular surface of the SI joint in any quadrant.
The total maximum (worst) score for all SI joints across 6 slices is 72. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Study 2: Change From Baseline in ASDAS at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis. ASDAS combines the following 5 disease activity variables using a weighted formula:
1. Patient's assessment of total back pain (BASDAI Question 2; NRS score 0 \[none\] - 10 \[very severe\])
2. Patient global assessment of disease activity (NRS score 0 \[no activity\] - 10 \[severe activity\])
3. Peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Question 3; NRS score 0 \[none\] - 10 \[very severe\])
4. Duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Question 6; NRS score 0 \[0 hours\] - 10 \[2 or more hours\])
5. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in mg/L.
The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS include Inactive disease (ASDAS \< 1.3) and very high disease (ASDAS \> 3.5). A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement in disease activity.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Study 2: Change From Baseline in MRI SPARCC Score for SI Joints at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
In the SPARCC MRI assessment of the sacroiliac (SI) joints 6 consecutive sacroiliac joint image coronal slices representing the largest proportion of the synovial compartment of the SI joints were assessed for edema, intensity and depth of edema.
Each SI joint (left and right) was divided into quadrants for a total of 8 SI scoring locations. Each quadrant was scored for the presence (1) or absence (0) of edema, intensity of edema (a score of 1 was assigned for each SI joint (left and right) if an intense signal was seen in any quadrant of that joint for each slice), and a lesion was graded as deep (score of 1) if there was homogeneous and unequivocal increase in signal extending over a depth of at least 1 cm from the articular surface of the SI joint in any quadrant.
The total maximum (worst) score for all SI joints across 6 slices is 72. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Study 2: Percentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Response at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
The BASDAI assesses disease activity by asking the participant to answer 6 questions (each on an 11 point numeric rating scale \[NRS\]) pertaining to symptoms experienced for the past week. For Questions 1 to 5 (level of fatigue/tiredness, level of AS neck, back or hip pain, level of pain/swelling in joints, other than neck, back or hips, level of discomfort from any areas tender to touch or pressure, and level of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe); for Question 6 (duration of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (0 hours) to 10 (= 2 hours). The overall BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10. Lower scores indicate less disease activity.
A BASDAI 50 response is defined as improvement of 50% or more from Baseline in BASDAI score.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Study 2: Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Inactive Disease at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis. ASDAS combines the following 5 disease activity variables using a weighted formula:
1. Patient's assessment of total back pain (BASDAI Question 2; NRS score 0 \[none\] - 10 \[very severe\])
2. Patient global assessment of disease activity (NRS score 0 \[no activity\] - 10 \[severe activity\])
3. Peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Question 3; NRS score 0 \[none\] - 10 \[very severe\])
4. Duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Question 6; NRS score 0 \[0 hours\] - 10 \[2 or more hours\])
5. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in mg/L.
The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score. ASDAS Inactive Disease is defined as an ASDAS score \< 1.3.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Study 2: Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Total Back Pain at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
Participants assessed their total back pain during the last week on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale (NRS), where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents most severe pain.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Study 2: Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Nocturnal Back Pain at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
Participants assessed the amount of back pain at night over the last week on a 0 to 10 NRS, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents most severe pain.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Study 2: Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Low Disease Activity at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis. ASDAS combines the following 5 disease activity variables using a weighted formula:
1. Patient's assessment of total back pain (BASDAI Question 2; NRS score 0 \[none\] - 10 \[very severe\])
2. Patient global assessment of disease activity (NRS score 0 \[no activity\] - 10 \[severe activity\])
3. Peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Question 3; NRS score 0 \[none\] - 10 \[very severe\])
4. Duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Question 6; NRS score 0 \[0 hours\] - 10 \[2 or more hours\])
5. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in mg/L.
The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score. ASDAS Low Disease Activity is defined as an ASDAS score \< 2.1.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Study 2: Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
ASAS partial remission (PR) is defined as an absolute score of = 2 units on a 0 to 10 scale for each of the four following domains:
* Patient's global assessment of disease activity, measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no activity) to 10 (severe activity);
* Pain, measured by the total back pain NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain);
* Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on an NRS ranging from 0 (easy) to 10 (impossible);
* Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) NRS scores (items 5 \[level of stiffness\] and 6 \[duration of stiffness\]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Study 2: Change From Baseline in BASFI at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index is a validated index to determine the degree of functional limitation in patients with AS. BASFI consists of 10 questions assessing participants' ability to perform activities such as putting on socks, bending, reaching, getting up from the floor or an armless chair, standing, climbing and other physical activities. Each item is scored on a NRS ranging from 0 (easy to perform an activity) to 10 (impossible to perform an activity). The overall score is the mean of the 10 items and ranges from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating more functional limitations. A negative change from Baseline in BASFI indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Study 2: Change From Baseline in ASQoL at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
The ASQoL consists of 18 items related to quality of life, including the impact of pain on sleep, mood, motivation, ability to cope, activities of daily living, independence, relationships, and social life. Each item is answered as yes (scored as 1) or no (scored as 0).
Scores are summed to obtain the overall score which ranges from 0 to 18, where higher scores indicate a worse quality of life. A negative change from Baseline in ASQoL indicates improvement in quality of life.
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
0
0
Study 2: Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
The ASAS HI measures functioning and health across 17 aspects of health in patients with AS, including pain, emotional functions, sleep, sexual function, mobility, self care, and community life. Each of the 17 questions is answered by the participant as "I agree" (score = 1) or "I disagree" (score = 0). The responses to the 17 dichotomous items are summed up to give a total score ranging from 0 to 17, where a higher score indicates a worse health status. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
0
0
Study 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [27]
0
0
ASAS20 response was defined as an improvement of = 20% and an absolute improvement of = 1 unit (on a scale of 0 to 10) from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 4 domains, with no deterioration (defined as a worsening of = 20% and a net worsening of = 1 units \[on a scale of 0 to 10\]) in the remaining domain:
* Patient's global assessment of disease activity, measured on a NRS from 0 (no activity) to 10 (severe activity);
* Pain, measured by the total back pain NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain);
* Function, measured by the BASFI which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on an NRS ranging from 0 (easy) to 10 (impossible);
* Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related BASDAI NRS scores (items 5 \[level of stiffness\] and 6 \[duration of stiffness\]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).
Query!
Timepoint [27]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [28]
0
0
Study 2: Change From Baseline in BASMI(Lin) at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [28]
0
0
The BASMI is a composite score based on 5 direct measurements of spinal mobility:
1. cervical rotation (measured in degrees),
2. tragus to wall distance (in centimeters \[cm\])
3. lumbar side flexion (in cm),
4. lumbar flexion (modified Schober's) (in cm) and
5. intermalleolar distance (in cm).
Each measurement is converted to a linear score between 0 and 10. The total BASMI(lin) score is the average of the 5 scores and ranges from 0 to 10; the higher the BASMI(lin) score the more severe the patient's limitation of movement due to their ankylosing spondylitis. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [28]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [29]
0
0
Study 2: Change From Baseline in MASES at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [29]
0
0
The MASES evaluation was conducted to assess the presence or absence of enthesitis (inflammation of the entheses, or sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone) at 13 different sites (first costochondral joint left/right, seventh costochondral joint left/right, posterior superior iliac spine left/right, anterior superior iliac spine left/right, iliac crest left/right, fifth lumbar spinous process, and proximal insertion of Achilles tendon left/right. Each site was scored for presence (1) or absence (0) of enthesitis. The MASES is the sum of the 13 site scores, and ranges from 0 to 13, with higher scores indicating more inflammation of the entheses. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [29]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [30]
0
0
Study 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 Response at Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [30]
0
0
ASAS40 response was defined as improvement of = 40% relative to Baseline and absolute improvement of = 2 units (on a scale from 0 to 10) in = 3 of the following 4 domains with no deterioration (defined as a net worsening of \> 0 units) in the potential remaining domain:
* Patient's global assessment of disease activity, measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no activity) to 10 (severe activity);
* Pain, measured by the total back pain NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain);
* Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on an NRS ranging from 0 (easy) to 10 (impossible);
* Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) NRS scores (items 5 \[level of stiffness\] and 6 \[duration of stiffness\]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).
Query!
Timepoint [30]
0
0
Baseline and Week 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [31]
0
0
Study 2: Change From Baseline in MRI SPARCC Score for the Spine at Week 14
Query!
Assessment method [31]
0
0
In the SPARCC MRI assessment of the spine, the entire spine is evaluated for active inflammation (bone marrow edema). Six discovertebral units (DVU) representing the 6 most abnormal DVUs were selected to calculate the MRI Spine SPARCC score. For each of the 6 DVUs, 3 consecutive sagittal slices were assessed in 4 quadrants to evaluate the extent of inflammation in all three dimensions.
Each quadrant was scored for the presence (1) or absence (0) of edema. If edema was present in at least one quadrant of a DVU slice, it was also scored for intensity and depth of the edema representing that slice: An additional score of 1 was assigned if an intense signal was seen in any quadrant on a DVU slice. Slices that included a lesion demonstrating continuous increased signal of depth = 1 cm extending from the endplate were scored as an additional 1 per slice.
The maximum (worst) overall score for all 6 DVUs is 108. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [31]
0
0
Baseline and Week 14
Query!
Secondary outcome [32]
0
0
Study 2: Percentage of Participants Who Initiated Rescue Treatment Between Week 24 and Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [32]
0
0
Participants who did not achieve an ASAS20 response at any 2 consecutive scheduled visits from Week 24 through Week 52 were to be rescued with standard of care treatment as described in the protocol.
Query!
Timepoint [32]
0
0
Week 24, Week 32, Week 40, and Week 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [33]
0
0
Study 2: Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Major Improvement at Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [33]
0
0
ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis. ASDAS combines the following 5 disease activity variables using a weighted formula:
1. Patient's assessment of total back pain (BASDAI Question 2; NRS score 0 \[none\] - 10 \[very severe\])
2. Patient global assessment of disease activity (NRS score 0 \[no activity\] - 10 \[severe activity\])
3. Peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Question 3; NRS score 0 \[none\] - 10 \[very severe\])
4. Duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Question 6; NRS score 0 \[0 hours\] - 10 \[2 or more hours\])
5. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in mg/L.
The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS include Inactive disease (ASDAS \< 1.3) and very high disease (ASDAS \> 3.5). Major Improvement is defined as a change from Baseline of = -2.0.
Query!
Timepoint [33]
0
0
Baseline and Week 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [34]
0
0
Study 2: Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Inactive Disease at Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [34]
0
0
ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis. ASDAS combines the following 5 disease activity variables using a weighted formula:
1. Patient's assessment of total back pain (BASDAI Question 2; NRS score 0 \[none\] - 10 \[very severe\])
2. Patient global assessment of disease activity (NRS score 0 \[no activity\] - 10 \[severe activity\])
3. Peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Question 3; NRS score 0 \[none\] - 10 \[very severe\])
4. Duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Question 6; NRS score 0 \[0 hours\] - 10 \[2 or more hours\])
5. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in mg/L.
The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score. ASDAS Inactive Disease is defined as an ASDAS score \< 1.3.
Query!
Timepoint [34]
0
0
Week 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [35]
0
0
Study 2: Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Low Disease Activity at Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [35]
0
0
ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis. ASDAS combines the following 5 disease activity variables using a weighted formula:
1. Patient's assessment of total back pain (BASDAI Question 2; NRS score 0 \[none\] - 10 \[very severe\])
2. Patient global assessment of disease activity (NRS score 0 \[no activity\] - 10 \[severe activity\])
3. Peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Question 3; NRS score 0 \[none\] - 10 \[very severe\])
4. Duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Question 6; NRS score 0 \[0 hours\] - 10 \[2 or more hours\])
5. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in mg/L.
The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score. ASDAS Low Disease Activity is defined as an ASDAS score \< 2.1.
Query!
Timepoint [35]
0
0
Week 52
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Study 1:
* Must have a clinical diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and meet the modified New York Criteria for AS,
* Must not have total spinal ankylosis
* Must have been previously exposed to 1 or 2 bDMARDs (at least 1 tumor necrosis factor [TNF] inhibitor or 1 interleukin [IL]-17 inhibitor [IL-17i]), and must have discontinued the bDMARD therapy due to either lack of efficacy (after at least 12 weeks of treatment with a bDMARD at an adequate dose) or intolerance (irrespective of treatment duration). Prior exposure to two bDMARDs was allowed for no more than 30% of patients; among patients with prior exposure to two bDMARDs, a lack of efficacy to one bDMARD and intolerance to another was permitted, but a patient could not have a lack of efficacy to two bDMARDs
* Study 2:
* Must have a clinical diagnosis of nr-axSpA fulfilling the 2009 Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axSpA but not meeting the radiologic criterion of the modified New York criteria for AS
* Must have objective signs of active inflammation consistent with axSpA on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of sacroiliac (SI) joints or based on high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) > the upper limit of normal (ULN).
* Prior treatment with at most one bDMARD (either TNF inhibitor or IL-17i) is allowed for at least 20% but no more than 35% of enrolled patients who had to discontinue the prior bDMARD due to either lack of efficacy (after = 12 weeks at an adequate dose) or intolerance (regardless of treatment duration).
* Must have a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score = 4 at the Screening and Baseline Visits.
* Must have a Total Back Pain score = 4 based on a 0 - 10 numerical rating scale at the Screening and Baseline Visits.
* Has had an inadequate response to at least 2 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) over an at least 4-week period in total at maximum recommended or tolerated doses, or has an intolerance to or contraindication for NSAIDs as defined by the Investigator.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Must not have been exposed to any Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (including but not limited to upadacitinib [Rinvoq®], tofacitinib [Xeljanz®], baricitinib [Olumiant®], filgotinib, ruxolitinib [Jakafi®], abrocitinib [PF-04965842], and peficitinib [Smyraf®]).
* Prior bDMARD therapy must be washed out.
* Participant must not have a history of an allergic reaction or significant sensitivity to constituents of the study drug.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Active, not recruiting
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
26/11/2019
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/05/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
734
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Emeritus Research Sydney /ID# 215507 - Botany
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
BJC Health /ID# 215510 - Paramatta
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Emeritus Research /ID# 215506 - Camberwell
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Monash Medical Centre /ID# 215509 - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Barwon Rheumatology Services /ID# 215508 - Geelong
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2019 - Botany
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2150 - Paramatta
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
3124 - Camberwell
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
3168 - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
3220 - Geelong
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
West Virginia
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Ciuadad Autonoma De Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Santa Fe
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Tucuman
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Cordoba
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
San Miguel de Tucuman
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Oost-Vlaanderen
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Vlaams-Brabant
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Genk
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Minas Gerais
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Parana
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Rio Grande Do Sul
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Sao Paulo
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Plovdiv
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Ruse
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Sofia
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Anhui
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Beijing
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Guangdong
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Hunan
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Inner Mongolia
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Jiangsu
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Shanghai
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Kunming
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Brno
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Ostrava
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Pardubice
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Praha
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Uherske Hradiste
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Occitanie
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Bordeaux
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Boulogne Billancourt
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Bayern
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Cottbus
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Dresden
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Erlangen
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Hannover
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Planegg
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Hajdu-Bihar
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Veszprem
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Zala
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Gyula
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Heviz
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Kistarcsa
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Szekesfehervar
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Tel-Aviv
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Haifa
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Kfar Saba
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Aichi
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Ehime
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Hokkaido
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Hyogo
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Mie
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Nagasaki
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Okayama
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Okinawa
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Osaka
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Tokyo
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Gyeonggido
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Seoul Teugbyeolsi
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Incheon
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Ciudad De Mexico
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Auckland
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Waikato
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Dolnoslaskie
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Kujawsko-pomorskie
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Lubelskie
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Podlaskie
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
Warminsko-mazurskie
Query!
Country [95]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [95]
0
0
Wielkopolskie
Query!
Country [96]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [96]
0
0
Chelyabinskaya Oblast
Query!
Country [97]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [97]
0
0
Kaliningradskaya Oblast
Query!
Country [98]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [98]
0
0
Moskva
Query!
Country [99]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [99]
0
0
Novosibirskaya Oblast
Query!
Country [100]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [100]
0
0
Sankt-Peterburg
Query!
Country [101]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [101]
0
0
Stavropol Skiy Kray
Query!
Country [102]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [102]
0
0
Sverdlovskaya Oblast
Query!
Country [103]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [103]
0
0
Tatarstan, Respublika
Query!
Country [104]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [104]
0
0
Udmurtskaya Respublika
Query!
Country [105]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [105]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [106]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [106]
0
0
Omsk
Query!
Country [107]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [107]
0
0
Orenburg
Query!
Country [108]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [108]
0
0
Ryazan
Query!
Country [109]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [109]
0
0
Saratov
Query!
Country [110]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [110]
0
0
St. Petersburg
Query!
Country [111]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [111]
0
0
Ulyanovsk
Query!
Country [112]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [112]
0
0
Bratislava
Query!
Country [113]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [113]
0
0
Nove Mesto nad Vahom
Query!
Country [114]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [114]
0
0
Piestany
Query!
Country [115]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [115]
0
0
Poprad
Query!
Country [116]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [116]
0
0
Zvolen
Query!
Country [117]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [117]
0
0
Alicante
Query!
Country [118]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [118]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [119]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [119]
0
0
Cantabria
Query!
Country [120]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [120]
0
0
Pontevedra
Query!
Country [121]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [121]
0
0
Cordoba
Query!
Country [122]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [122]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [123]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [123]
0
0
Valencia
Query!
Country [124]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [124]
0
0
Taichung
Query!
Country [125]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [125]
0
0
New Taipei City
Query!
Country [126]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [126]
0
0
Taichung City
Query!
Country [127]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [127]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Country [128]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [128]
0
0
Ankara
Query!
Country [129]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [129]
0
0
Cerrahpasa
Query!
Country [130]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [130]
0
0
Mugla
Query!
Country [131]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [131]
0
0
Chernihiv
Query!
Country [132]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [132]
0
0
Kharkiv
Query!
Country [133]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [133]
0
0
Khmelnytskyi
Query!
Country [134]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [134]
0
0
Kryvyi Rih
Query!
Country [135]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [135]
0
0
Kyiv
Query!
Country [136]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [136]
0
0
Odesa
Query!
Country [137]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [137]
0
0
Poltava
Query!
Country [138]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [138]
0
0
Ternopil
Query!
Country [139]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [139]
0
0
Vinnytsia
Query!
Country [140]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [140]
0
0
Lancashire
Query!
Country [141]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [141]
0
0
Norfolk
Query!
Country [142]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [142]
0
0
Suffolk
Query!
Country [143]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [143]
0
0
Armthorpe Road
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
AbbVie
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This protocol includes 2 standalone studies with randomization, data collection, analysis and reporting conducted independently. The main objectives of this protocol are: * To evaluate the efficacy of upadacitinib compared with placebo on reduction of signs and symptoms in adults with active axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) including biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug inadequate responders (bDMARD-IR) ankylosing spondylitis (AS) (Study 1) and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) (Study 2). * To assess the safety and tolerability of upadacitinib in adults with active axSpA including bDMARD-IR AS (Study 1) and nr-axSpA (Study 2). * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of upadacitinib in extended treatment in adult participants with active axSpA including bDMARD-IR AS who have completed the Double-Blind Period (Study 1) and nr-axSpA who have completed the Double-Blind Period (Study 2). * To evaluate the maintenance of disease control after withdrawal of upadacitinib.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04169373
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Deodhar A, Van den Bosch F, Poddubnyy D, Maksymowych WP, van der Heijde D, Kim TH, Kishimoto M, Blanco R, Duan Y, Li Y, Pangan AL, Wung P, Song IH. Upadacitinib for the treatment of active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (SELECT-AXIS 2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022 Jul 30;400(10349):369-379. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01212-0. van der Heijde D, Baraliakos X, Sieper J, Deodhar A, Inman RD, Kameda H, Zeng X, Sui Y, Bu X, Pangan AL, Wung P, Song IH. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib for active ankylosing spondylitis refractory to biological therapy: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Nov;81(11):1515-1523. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-222608. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
ABBVIE INC.
Query!
Address
0
0
AbbVie
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols, analyses plans, clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.
Supporting document/s available: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan (SAP), Clinical study report (CSR)
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
For details on when studies are available for sharing visit https://vivli.org/ourmember/abbvie/
Query!
Available to whom?
Access to this clinical trial data can be requested by any qualified researchers who engage in rigorous independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and statistical analysis plan and execution of a data sharing statement. Data requests can be submitted at any time after approval in the US and/or EU and a primary manuscript is accepted for publication. For more information on the process, or to submit a request, visit the following link https://www.abbvieclinicaltrials.com/hcp/data-sharing/
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: https://vivli.org/ourmember/abbvie/
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/73/NCT04169373/Prot_003.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/73/NCT04169373/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04169373