Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04238390
Registration number
NCT04238390
Ethics application status
Date submitted
16/12/2019
Date registered
23/01/2020
Titles & IDs
Public title
Ceftolozane-tazobactam Versus Meropenem for ESBL and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infection
Query!
Scientific title
A Multicentre, Parallel Group Open-label Randomised Controlled Non-Inferiority Phase 3 Trial, of Ceftolozane-tazobactam Versus Meropenem for Definitive Treatment of Bloodstream Infection Due to Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
UQCCR-DP-AS-2019-001
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
MERINO III
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Bacteremia Caused by Gram-Negative Bacteria
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Blood
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other blood disorders
Query!
Infection
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other infectious diseases
Query!
Infection
0
0
0
0
Query!
Studies of infection and infectious agents
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Ceftolozane-Tazobactam
Treatment: Drugs - Meropenem
Experimental: Ceftolozane-tazobactam - Participants will receive ceftolozane-tazobactam 3 grams (comprising ceftolozane 2 grams and tazobactam 1 gram) administered, every 8 hours, three times a day, intravenously over 60 mins
Active comparator: Meropenem - Participants will receive meropenem 1 gram, every 8 hours, three times a day, intravenously over 30 mins.
Treatment: Drugs: Ceftolozane-Tazobactam
Ceftolozane-tazobactam 3 grams (comprising ceftolozane 2 grams and tazobactam 1 gram) administered, every 8 hours, three times a day, intravenously over 60 mins. Dose adjusted for renal function.
Treatment: Drugs: Meropenem
Meropenem 1 gram, every 8 hours, three times a day, intravenously over 30 mins. Dose adjusted for renal function.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Mortality rate at 30 days
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
To compare the 30-day mortality from day of randomisation of each regimen
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
30 days post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Mortality rate at 14 days
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
To compare the 14-day mortality from day of randomisation of each regimen
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
14 days post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Clinical and microbiological success
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Defined as survival PLUS resolution of fever (temperature \<38 degrees Celsius) PLUS improved SOFA score (as compared to baseline) PLUS sterilisation of blood cultures at Day 5
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
5 days post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Functional bacteraemia score (FBS)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
To compare the functional bacteraemia score of patients treated with each regimen at baseline and Day 30 (scored 0-7, higher scores equal better outcomes)
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
0 and 30 days post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Microbiological relapse
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
To compare the rates of relapse of bloodstream infection (microbiological failure) with each regimen at Day 30
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
30 days post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Rates of new bloodstream infection
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
To compare the rates of new bloodstream infection (growth of a new organism from blood cultures - not a contaminant as determined by treating clinician) with each regimen
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
30 days post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Length of in-patient hospital and ICU stay
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
To compare lengths of in-patient hospital and ICU stay with each regimen (not including in-patient rehabilitation, long term acute care or hospital in the home)
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
30 days post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Serious adverse events
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
To compare the number of treatment emergent serious adverse events with each regimen
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Day 1 to last dose plus 24 hours of treatment:
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Clostridioides difficile infection
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
To compare rates of Clostridioides difficile infection with each regimen
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
30 days post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Colonisation and/or infection with multi-resistant bacterial organisms
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
To compare rates of colonisation and/or infection with multi-resistant bacterial organisms (MROs) including those newly acquired
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
30 days post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) with partial credit
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
To compare the Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) with partial credit with each regimen (scored 0-100, higher scores equal better outcomes)
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
30 days post randomisation
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Bloodstream infection defined as presence in at least one peripheral blood culture draw demonstrating Enterobacterales with proven non-susceptibility to third generation cephalosporins or cephalosporin susceptible species known to harbour chromosomal AmpC-beta-lactamases (Enterobacter spp., Klebsiella aerogenes, Citrobacter freundii, Morganella morganii, Providencia spp. or Serratia marcescens) during hospitalisation
* Patient is aged 18 years and over (21 and over in Singapore)
* The patient or approved proxy is able to provide informed consent
* =72 hours has elapsed since the first positive qualifying (index) blood culture collection
* Expected to receive IV therapy for =5 days
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Known hypersensitivity to a cephalosporin or a carbapenem, or anaphylaxis to beta-lactam antibiotics
* Participant with significant polymicrobial bloodstream infection (i.e. not a contaminant)
* Treatment is not with the intent to cure the infection (i.e. palliative intent) or the expected survival is =4 days
* Participant is pregnant or breast-feeding (tested for in women of child-bearing age only)
* Use of concomitant antimicrobials with known activity against Gram-negative bacilli (except trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for Pneumocystis prophylaxis and when adding metronidazole for suspected IAI) in the first 5 days post-randomisation
* Participant with CrCl <15 mL/minute or on renal replacement therapy (in addition, participants will be withdrawn from the study if CrCl reaches this level)
* Previously randomised in the MERINO-3 trial or concurrently enrolled in another therapeutic antibiotic clinical trial
* Blood culture isolate with in-vitro resistance to either meropenem or ceftolozane-tazobactam (known either at time of enrolment or during the course of study treatment, in which case the participant will be withdrawn)
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Withdrawn
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/01/2022
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/12/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
0
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,VIC,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
John Hunter Hospital - Newcastle
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Royal Prince Alfred - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Westmead Hospital - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Woolongong Hospital - Wollongong
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital - Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Princess Alexandra Hospital - Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
0
0
Alfred Hospital - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [9]
0
0
Monash Medical Centre - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [10]
0
0
Dandenong Hospital - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [11]
0
0
Royal Perth Hospital - Perth
Query!
Recruitment hospital [12]
0
0
Sir Charles Gairdner - Perth
Query!
Recruitment hospital [13]
0
0
Fiona Stanley Hospital - Perth
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2305 - Newcastle
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2050 - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
2145 - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
2500 - Wollongong
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
4029 - Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
4102 - Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
0
0
3000 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
0
0
3004 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [9]
0
0
3168 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [10]
0
0
3175 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [11]
0
0
6000 - Perth
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [12]
0
0
6009 - Perth
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [13]
0
0
6150 - Perth
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Bologna
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Milan
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Pisa
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Sanremo
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
Saudi Arabia
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Dammam
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
Saudi Arabia
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Jeddah
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Saudi Arabia
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Riyadh
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
The University of Queensland
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether ceftolozane-tazobactam is as effective as meropenem with respect to 30 day mortality in the treatment of bloodstream infection due to third-generation cephalosporin non-susceptible Enterobacterales or a known chromosomal AmpC-producing Enterobacterales (Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter freundii, Morganella morganii, Providencia spp. or Serratia marcescens).
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04238390
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Stewart AG, Harris PNA, Chatfield MD, Littleford R, Paterson DL. Ceftolozane-tazobactam versus meropenem for definitive treatment of bloodstream infection due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales ("MERINO-3"): study protocol for a multicentre, open-label randomised non-inferiority trial. Trials. 2021 Apr 22;22(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05206-8.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04238390