Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04093024
Registration number
NCT04093024
Ethics application status
Date submitted
16/09/2019
Date registered
17/09/2019
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study to Find Out How Nintedanib is Taken up in the Body and How Well it is Tolerated in Children and Adolescents With Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)
Query!
Scientific title
A Double Blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Dose-exposure and Safety of Nintedanib Per os on Top of Standard of Care for 24 Weeks, Followed by Open Label Treatment With Nintedanib of Variable Duration, in Children and Adolescents (6 to 17 Year-old) With Clinically Significant Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2018-004530-14
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
1199-0337
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
InPedILD®
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Lung Diseases, Interstitial
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Respiratory
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other respiratory disorders / diseases
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Nintedanib
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo
Experimental: Double-blind period (DBP) + open-label Nintedanib period (OLNP): Randomised Nintedanib - This arm shows Nintedanib randomised participants treated orally with Nintedanib in the DBP and OLNP twice daily with a dose interval of approximately 12 hours from one dose to the next dose.
Medication dosage was per administration 50 milligram (mg) \[2 capsules with strength 25 mg\],75 mg \[3 capsules with strength 25 mg\], 100 mg \[1 capsule with strength 100 mg or 4 capsules with strength 25 mg\] or 150 mg \[1 capsule with strength 150 mg or 6 capsules with strength 25 mg\] based on the participant's weight at baseline (= 0 weeks). The dosage was adjusted at subsequent visits if the participant's weight had changed.
In this arm participants received Nintedanib in both periods (DBP + OLNP). Participants in this arm do not entail participants from the 'randomised to placebo' arms.
DBP: Planned was from first randomised trial drug intake to last blinded drug intake.
OLNP: Planned was from first open-label Nintedanib intake to last open-label Nintedanib intake.
Placebo comparator: DBP+OLNP: Randomised placebo - Placebo randomised participants were treated orally with a Nintedanib matching placebo soft capsule twice daily in the double-blind period (DBP).
Participants who continued with the open-label Nintedanib period (OLNP) after the DBP switched to active Nintedanib treatment in the OLNP and were treated orally with Nintedanib twice daily.
Medication dosage was per administration 50 milligram (mg) \[2 25 mg capsules (cap)\],75 mg \[3 25 mg cap\], 100 mg \[1 100 mg or 4 25 mg cap\] or 150 mg \[1 150 mg or 6 25 mg cap\] based on the participant's weight at baseline (= 0 weeks). The dosage was adjusted at subsequent visits if the participant's weight had changed.
The dose interval was approximately 12 hours between one and the next dose.
Here participants received placebo first (DBP) and then Nintedanib (OLNP). DBP: Planned was from first to last randomised blinded drug intake. OLNP: Planned was from first to last open-label Nintedanib intake.
Treatment: Drugs: Nintedanib
Capsule
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo
Capsule
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve at Steady State (AUCt,ss) Based on Sampling at Steady State (at Week 2 and Week 26)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve at steady state (AUCt,ss) based on sampling at steady state (at Week 2 and Week 26) after multiple oral administration of Nintedanib by age group over all treatments.
Values of samples taken at Week 2 (for randomised Nintedanib participants) and at Week 26 (for randomised placebo participants) were used. Missing values at Week 2 of randomised Nintedanib participants were replaced with values taken at Week 26.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
At Week 2 and at Week 26: at 5 minutes before and at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours post administration of the morning dose
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events During the Double-blind Period
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Treatment-emergent was defined as: Adverse events with onset or worsening on or after date of treatment start until end of double-blind period (defined as the day before first intake of open-label nintedanib or last double-blind drug intake + residual effect period, whichever is earlier) were considered as treatment-emergent and were included in the analysis. Adverse events were counted under the treatment as randomized for the double-blind period.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From first drug administration until the earlier of (i) first intake of open-label nintedanib (exclusive) and (ii) last drug intake, up to 28 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-emergent Pathological Finding of Epiphyseal Growth Plate on Imaging up to Week 24, and Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Number of participants with at least one treatment-emergent pathological finding of the epiphyseal growth plate imaging (Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)s/x-rays) were analyzed cumulatively and based on central review.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Up to Week 24 (included values at Week 12 and Week 24); Up to Week 52 (included values at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Pathological Findings on Dental Examination or Imaging up to Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Number of participants with treatment-emergent pathological findings on dental examination (clinical examination) based on dentist assessment or imaging (panoramic x-ray) based on central review were analyzed. Number of participants with treatment-emergent pathological findings on dental imaging were analyzed cumulatively.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Dental examination: at Week 12 and Week 24; Dental imaging: at Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-emergent Pathological Findings on Dental Examination or Imaging up to Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Number of participants with treatment-emergent pathological findings on dental examination (clinical examination) based on dentist assessment or imaging (panoramic x-ray) based on central review were analyzed. Number of participants with treatment-emergent pathological findings on dental imaging were analyzed cumulatively.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Dental examination: at Week 12, 24, 34, and Week 52; Dental imaging: at Week 24 and at Week 52.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Over the Whole Trial
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Treatment-emergent was defined as: Adverse events with onset or worsening on or after date of treatment start until last drug intake + residual effect period was considered as treatment-emergent and was included in the analysis. Adverse events were counted under the treatment as randomized for the double-blind period.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From first drug administration until the last drug intake, up to 92 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Height at Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Absolute change from baseline in height at Week 24 was measured with a stadiometer 3 times at each time point. The average of these 3 measurements was taken per time point.
Absolute change from baseline in height at Week 24 in the treated set (TS) was based on a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), with fixed categorical effects of (randomised) treatment at each visit, age-group and the fixed continuous effects of baseline at each visit, and random effect for participant. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-participant measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
MMRM included measurements pre-administration at -4 weeks and at 0, 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, 76, and 88 weeks after first drug administration. MMRM values at Week 24 are reported in the table below
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Height at Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Absolute change from baseline in height at Week 52 was measured with a stadiometer 3 times at each time point. The average of these 3 measurements was taken per time point.
Absolute change from baseline in height at Week 52 in the treated set (TS) was based on a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), with fixed categorical effects of (randomised) treatment at each visit, age-group and the fixed continuous effects of baseline at each visit, and random effect for participant. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-participant measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
MMRM included measurements pre-administration at -4 weeks and at 0, 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, 76, and 88 weeks after first drug administration. MMRM values at Week 52 are reported in the table below
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Height at Week 76
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Absolute change from baseline in height at Week 76 was measured with a stadiometer 3 times at each time point. The average of these 3 measurements was taken per time point.
MMRM has been calculated but did not provide estimates for this time point due to low sample size. Thus, change in height from baseline to Week 76 was analyzed descriptively only.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Measurements were assessed at Week 0 and at Week 76
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Sitting Height at Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Absolute change from baseline in sitting height at Week 24 was measured with a stadiometer 3 times at each time point. The average of these 3 measurements was taken per time point.
Absolute change from baseline in sitting height at Week 24 in the treated set (TS) was based on a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), with fixed categorical effects of (randomised) treatment at each visit, age-group and the fixed continuous effects of baseline at each visit, and random effect for participant. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-participant measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
MMRM included measurements pre-administration at -4 weeks and at 0, 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, 76, and 88 weeks after first drug administration. MMRM values at Week 24 are reported in the table below.
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Sitting Height at Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Absolute change from baseline in sitting height at Week 52 was measured with a stadiometer 3 times at each time point. The average of these 3 measurements was taken per time point.
MMRM has been calculated but did not provide estimates for this time point due to low sample size. Thus, change in sitting height from baseline to Week 52 was analyzed descriptively only.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Measurements were assessed at Week 0 and at Week 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Sitting Height at Week 76
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Absolute change from baseline in sitting height at Week 76 was measured with a stadiometer 3 times at each time point. The average of these 3 measurements was take per time point.
MMRM has been calculated but did not provide estimates for this time point due to low sample size. Thus, change in sitting height from baseline to Week 76 was analyzed descriptively only.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Measurements were assessed at Week 0 and at Week 76
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Leg Length at Week 24 - Left
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Absolute change from baseline in left leg length at Week 24 was assessed by measuring the distance between the anterior iliac spine and the medial malleolus 3 times at each leg and each time point. The average of these 3 measurements was taken per time point.
Absolute change from baseline in left leg length at Week 24 in the treated set (TS) was based on a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), with fixed categorical effects of (randomised) treatment at each visit, age-group and the fixed continuous effects of baseline at each visit, and random effect for participant. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-participant measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
MMRM included measurements at 0, 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, and 76 weeks after first drug administration. MMRM values at Week 24 are reported in the table below
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Leg Length at Week 52 - Left
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
Absolute change from baseline in left leg length at Week 52 was assessed by measuring the distance between the anterior iliac spine and the medial malleolus 3 times at each leg and each time point. The average of these 3 measurements was taken per time point.
Absolute change from baseline in left leg length at Week 52 in the treated set (TS) was based on a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), with fixed categorical effects of (randomised) treatment at each visit, age-group and the fixed continuous effects of baseline at each visit, and random effect for participant. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-participant measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
MMRM included measurements at 0, 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, and 76 weeks after first drug administration. MMRM values at Week 52 are reported in the table below
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Leg Length at Week 76 - Left
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Absolute change from baseline in left leg length at Week 76 was assessed by measuring the distance between the anterior iliac spine and the medial malleolus 3 times at each leg and each time point. The average of these 3 measurements was taken per time point.
Absolute change from baseline in left leg length at Week 76 in the treated set (TS) was based on a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), with fixed categorical effects of (randomised) treatment at each visit, age-group and the fixed continuous effects of baseline at each visit, and random effect for participant. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-participant measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
MMRM included measurements at 0, 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, and 76 weeks after first drug administration. MMRM values at Week 76 are reported in the table below
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Leg Length at Week 24 - Right
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Absolute change from baseline in right leg length at Week 24 was assessed by measuring the distance between the anterior iliac spine and the medial malleolus 3 times at each leg and each time point. The average of these 3 measurements was taken per time point.
Absolute change from baseline in right leg length at Week 24 in the treated set (TS) was based on a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), with fixed categorical effects of (randomised) treatment at each visit, age-group and the fixed continuous effects of baseline at each visit, and random effect for participant. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-participant measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
MMRM included measurements at 0, 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, and 76 weeks after first drug administration. MMRM values at Week 24 are reported in the table below
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Leg Length at Week 52 - Right
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Absolute change from baseline in right leg length at Week 52 was assessed by measuring the distance between the anterior iliac spine and the medial malleolus 3 times at each leg and each time point. The average of these 3 measurements was taken per time point.
Absolute change from baseline in right leg length at Week 52 in the treated set (TS) was based on a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), with fixed categorical effects of (randomised) treatment at each visit, age-group and the fixed continuous effects of baseline at each visit, and random effect for participant. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-participant measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
MMRM included measurements at 0, 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, and 76 weeks after first drug administration. MMRM values at Week 52 are reported in the table below
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Leg Length at Week 76 - Right
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Absolute change from baseline in right leg length at Week 76 was assessed by measuring the distance between the anterior iliac spine and the medial malleolus 3 times at each leg and each time point. The average of these 3 measurements was taken per time point.
Absolute change from baseline in right leg length at Week 76 in the treated set (TS) was based on a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), with fixed categorical effects of (randomised) treatment at each visit, age-group and the fixed continuous effects of baseline at each visit, and random effect for participant. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-participant measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
MMRM included measurements at 0, 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, and 76 weeks after first drug administration. MMRM values at Week 76 are reported in the table below
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) % Predicted at Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) is the volume of air (measured in milliliter) which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. The predicted values were calculated according to the Global Lungs Initiative (GLI) 2012 equations.
Absolute change from baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) % predicted at Week 24 in the treated set(TS) was based on a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), with fixed categorical effects of (randomised) treatment at each visit, age-group and the fixed continuous effects of baseline at each visit, and random effect for participant. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-participant measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
MMRM included measurements pre-administration at -4 weeks and at 0, 2, 6, 12, 24, 26, 36, and 52 weeks after first drug administration. MMRM values at Week 24 are reported in the table below
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) % Predicted at Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) is the volume of air (measured in milliliter) which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. The predicted values were calculated according to the Global Lungs Initiative (GLI) 2012 equations.
Absolute change from baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) % predicted at Week 52 in the treated set(TS) was based on a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), with fixed categorical effects of (randomised) treatment at each visit, age-group and the fixed continuous effects of baseline at each visit, and random effect for participant. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-participant measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
MMRM included measurements pre-administration at -4 weeks and at 0, 2, 6, 12, 24, 26, 36, and 52 weeks after first drug administration. MMRM values at Week 52 are reported in the table below
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire™(PedsQL™) at Week 24 - Parent Report
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
The PedsQL™ questionnaires consists of 23 items (i) and 4 dimensions: physical (8i), emotional (5i), social (5i) and school (5i) functioning. A 5-point Likert response scale (0 = never (worst outcome) to 4=almost always (best outcome)) was used except for the Young Child Report, where a 3-point scale (0=not at all (worst outcome) to 4=a lot (best outcome)) was used. Items were reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale (0 = 100 to 4 = 0). Higher scores indicated better health-related quality of life. To create total scores, the mean was computed.
Absolute change from baseline in PedsQL™ reported by parents was based on a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), with fixed categorical effects of (randomised) treatment at each visit, age-group and the fixed continuous effects of baseline at each visit, and random effect for participant. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-participant measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
MMRM included measurements at 0, 24, and 52 weeks after first drug administration. MMRM values at Week 24 are reported in the table below
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire™(PedsQL™) at Week 52 - Parent Report
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
The PedsQL™ questionnaires consists of 23 items (i) and 4 dimensions: physical (8i), emotional (5i), social (5i) and school (5i) functioning. A 5-point Likert response scale (0 = never (worst outcome) to 4=almost always (best outcome)) was used except for the Young Child Report, where a 3-point scale (0=not at all (worst outcome) to 4=a lot (best outcome)) was used. Items were reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale (0 = 100 to 4 = 0). Higher scores indicated better health-related quality of life. To create total scores, the mean was computed.
Absolute change from baseline in PedsQL™ reported by parents was based on a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), with fixed categorical effects of (randomised) treatment at each visit, age-group and the fixed continuous effects of baseline at each visit, and random effect for participant. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-participant measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
MMRM included measurements at 0, 24, and 52 weeks after first drug administration. MMRM values at Week 52 are reported in the table below
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire™(PedsQL™) at Week 24 - Participant Report
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
The PedsQL™ questionnaires consists of 23 items (i) and 4 dimensions: physical (8i), emotional (5i), social (5i) and school (5i) functioning. A 5-point Likert response scale (0 = never (worst outcome) to 4=almost always (best outcome)) was used except for the Young Child Report, where a 3-point scale (0=not at all (worst outcome) to 4=a lot (best outcome)) was used. Items were reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale (0 = 100 to 4 = 0). Higher scores indicated better health-related quality of life. To create total scores, the mean was computed.
Absolute change from baseline in PedsQL™ was based on a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), with fixed categorical effects of (randomised) treatment at each visit, age-group and the fixed continuous effects of baseline at each visit, and random effect for participant. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-participant measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
MMRM included measurements at 0, 24, and 52 weeks after first drug administration. MMRM values at Week 24 are reported in the table below
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire™(PedsQL™) at Week 52 - Participant Report
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
The PedsQL™ questionnaires consists of 23 items (i) and 4 dimensions: physical (8i), emotional (5i), social (5i) and school (5i) functioning. A 5-point Likert response scale (0 = never (worst outcome) to 4=almost always (best outcome)) was used except for the Young Child Report, where a 3-point scale (0=not at all (worst outcome) to 4=a lot (best outcome)) was used. Items were reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale (0 = 100 to 4 = 0). Higher scores indicated better health-related quality of life. To create total scores, the mean was computed.
Absolute change from baseline in PedsQL™ was based on a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), with fixed categorical effects of (randomised) treatment at each visit, age-group and the fixed continuous effects of baseline at each visit, and random effect for participant. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-participant measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
MMRM included measurements at 0, 24, and 52 weeks after first drug administration. MMRM values at Week 52 are reported in the table below
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) on Room Air at Rest at Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
Oxygen saturation (SpO2) was measured after minimum 5 minutes on room air by standard pulse oximetry at rest.
Absolute change from baseline in SpO2 at Week 24 in the treated set(TS) was based on a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), with fixed categorical effects of (randomised) treatment at each visit, age-group and the fixed continuous effects of baseline at each visit, and random effect for participant. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-participant measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
MMRM included measurements pre-administration at -4 weeks and at 0, 2, 6, 12, 24, 26, 36, and 52 weeks after first drug administration. MMRM values at Week 24 are reported in the table below
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) on Room Air at Rest at Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
Oxygen saturation (SpO2) was measured after minimum 5 minutes on room air by standard pulse oximetry at rest.
Absolute change from baseline in SpO2 at Week 52 in the treated set(TS) was based on a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), with fixed categorical effects of (randomised) treatment at each visit, age-group and the fixed continuous effects of baseline at each visit, and random effect for participant. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-participant measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
MMRM included measurements pre-administration at -4 weeks and at 0, 2, 6, 12, 24, 26, 36, and 52 weeks after first drug administration. MMRM values at Week 52 are reported in the table below
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in 6 Minutes (Min) Walk Distance at Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
Absolute change from baseline in 6 minutes (min) walk distance at Week 24 in the treated set (TS) was based on a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), with fixed categorical effects of (randomised) treatment at each visit, age-group and the fixed continuous effects of baseline at each visit, and random effect for participant. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-participant measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
MMRM included measurements at 0, 24, and 52 weeks after first drug administration. MMRM values at Week 24 are reported in the table below
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
0
0
Absolute Change From Baseline in 6 Minutes (Min) Walk Distance at Week 52
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
Absolute change from baseline in 6 minutes (min) walk distance at Week 52 in the treated set(TS) was based on a Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), with fixed categorical effects of (randomised) treatment at each visit, age-group and the fixed continuous effects of baseline at each visit, and random effect for participant. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-participant measurements.
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
MMRM included measurements at 0, 24, and 52 weeks after first drug administration. MMRM values at Week 52 are reported in the table below
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
0
0
Participants Acceptability Based on the Size of Capsules at Week 24 - Patient Question
Query!
Assessment method [27]
0
0
Acceptability is defined as the overall ability and willingness of the participant to use the medicinal product as intended.
Acceptability based on the capsule size was assessed by a acceptability questionnaire (1 item with 3 categories as shown below) for participants. In case the participant was considered not old enough as per investigator judgment the caregiver could assist with the completion.
In addition to the commercially available 100 milligram (mg) soft capsules (oblong shape, 6 millimeter (mm) diameter and 16 mm length) and 150 mg soft capsules (oblong shape, 7 mm diameter and 18 mm length), 25 mg Nintedanib soft capsules of smaller size (oval shape, 5 mm diameter and 8 mm length) were provided in this trial for participants who were assigned to a dose smaller than 100 mg or were unable to swallow the larger 100 mg or 150 mg capsules.
Query!
Timepoint [27]
0
0
Acceptability was assessed at Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [28]
0
0
Participants Acceptability Based on the Size of Capsules at Week 24 - Investigator Question
Query!
Assessment method [28]
0
0
Acceptability is defined as the overall ability and willingness of the participant to use the medicinal product as intended.
Acceptability based on the capsule size was assessed by a acceptability questionnaire (1 item with 3 categories as shown below) for investigators.
In addition to the commercially available 100 milligram (mg) soft capsules (oblong shape, 6 millimeter (mm) diameter and 16 mm length) and 150 mg soft capsules (oblong shape, 7 mm diameter and 18 mm length), 25 mg Nintedanib soft capsules of smaller size (oval shape, 5 mm diameter and 8 mm length) were provided in this trial for participants who were assigned to a dose smaller than 100 mg or were unable to swallow the larger 100 mg or 150 mg capsules.
Query!
Timepoint [28]
0
0
Acceptability was assessed at Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [29]
0
0
Participants Acceptability Based on the Number of Capsules at Week 24 - Patient Question
Query!
Assessment method [29]
0
0
Acceptability is defined as the overall ability and willingness of the participant to use the medicinal product as intended.
Acceptability based on the number of capsule was assessed by a acceptability questionnaire (1 item with 3 categories as shown below) for participants. In case the participant was considered not old enough as per investigator judgment the caregiver could assist with the completion.
In addition to the commercially available 100 milligram (mg) soft capsules (oblong shape, 6 millimeter (mm) diameter and 16 mm length) and 150 mg soft capsules (oblong shape, 7 mm diameter and 18 mm length), 25 mg Nintedanib soft capsules of smaller size (oval shape, 5 mm diameter and 8 mm length) were provided in this trial for participants who were assigned to a dose smaller than 100 mg or were unable to swallow the larger 100 mg or 150 mg capsules. Medication dosage was based on the participant's body weight and number of capsules per administration ranged from 2 to \>6 capsules.
Query!
Timepoint [29]
0
0
Acceptability was assessed at Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [30]
0
0
Number of Participants With Occurrence of First Respiratory-related Hospitalization Over the Whole Trial
Query!
Assessment method [30]
0
0
Number of participants with occurrence of first respiratory-related hospitalization over the whole trial.
The number of participants with first respiratory-related hospitalization is reported instead of a metric summarizing the time-to-event data with unit of time, as the numbers resulting from the Kaplan-Meier-analysis were even below the first quartile.
Query!
Timepoint [30]
0
0
From first drug administration until the last drug intake + 28 days residual effect period (REP), up to 92.6 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [31]
0
0
Number of Participants With Occurrence of First Acute Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Exacerbation or Death Over the Whole Trial
Query!
Assessment method [31]
0
0
Number of participants with occurrence of first acute Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) exacerbation or death over the whole trial. The number of participants with first acute ILD exacerbation is reported instead of a metric summarizing the time-to-event data with unit of time, as the numbers resulting from the Kaplan-Meier-analysis were even below the first quartile.
Query!
Timepoint [31]
0
0
From first drug administration until the last drug intake + 28 days REP, up to 92.6 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [32]
0
0
Number of Participants With Occurrence of Death Over the Whole Trial
Query!
Assessment method [32]
0
0
Number of participants with occurrence of death over the whole trial over the whole trial was computed. The number of participants with occurrence of death is reported instead of a metric summarizing the time-to-event data with unit of time, as the numbers resulting from the Kaplan-Meier-analysis were even below the first quartile.
Query!
Timepoint [32]
0
0
From first drug administration until the last drug intake + 28 days REP, up to 92.6 weeks
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Children and adolescents 6 to 17 years old at Visit 2.
* Signed and dated written informed consent and assent, where applicable, in accordance with International Conference on Harmonisation-Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) and local legislation prior to admission to the trial.
* Male or female patients. Female of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must confirm that sexual abstinence is standard practice and will be continued until 3 months after last drug intake, or be ready and able to use a highly effective method of birth control per International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) M3 (R2) that results in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly, in combination with one barrier method, from 28 days prior to initiation of study treatment, during treatment and until 3 months after last drug intake. Sexual abstinence is defined as abstinence from any sexual act that may result in pregnancy. A list of contraception methods meeting these criteria is provided in the parental information.
* Patients with evidence of fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) on High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) within 12 months of Visit 1 as assessed by the investigator and confirmed by central review.
* Patients with Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)% predicted =25% at Visit 2. [Note: Predicted normal values will be calculated according to GLI (Global Lung Initiative)]
* Patients with clinically significant disease at Visit 2, as assessed by the investigator based on any of the following:
* Fan score =3, or
* Documented evidence of clinical progression over time based on either
* a 5-10% relative decline in FVC% predicted accompanied by worsening symptoms, or
* a =10% relative decline in FVC % predicted, or
* increased fibrosis on HRCT, or
* other measures of clinical worsening attributed to progressive lung disease (e.g. increased oxygen requirement, decreased diffusion capacity).
Query!
Minimum age
6
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
17
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and/or Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)>1.5 x Upper Level of Normal (ULN) at Visit 1.
* Bilirubin >1.5 x ULN at Visit 1.
* Creatinine clearance <30 mL/min calculated by Schwartz formula at Visit 1. [Note: Laboratory parameters from Visit 1 have to satisfy the laboratory threshold values as shown above. Visit 2 laboratory results will be available only after randomization. In case at Visit 2 the results do no longer satisfy the entry criteria, the Investigator has to decide whether it is justified that the patient remains on study drug. The justification for decision needs to be documented. Laboratory parameters that are found to be abnormal at Visit 1 are allowed to be re-tested (once) if it is thought to be a measurement error (i.e. there was no abnormal result of this test in the recent history of the patient and there is no related clinical sign) or the result of a temporary and reversible medical condition, once that condition is resolved.]
* Patients with underlying chronic liver disease (Child Pugh A, B or C hepatic impairment) at Visit 1.
* Previous treatment with nintedanib.
* Other investigational therapy received within 1 month or 5 half-lives (whichever is shorter but =1 week) prior to Visit 2.
* Significant pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) defined by any of the following:
* Previous clinical or echocardiographic evidence of significant right heart failure
* History of right heart catheterization showing a cardiac index =2 l/min/m²
* PAH requiring parenteral therapy with epoprostenol/treprostinil
* In the opinion of the Investigator, other clinically significant pulmonary abnormalities.
* Cardiovascular diseases, any of the following:
* Severe hypertension, uncontrolled under treatment, within 6 months of Visit 1. Uncontrolled hypertension is defined as
* In children 6 to =12 years old: =95th percentile + 12 mm Hg or =140/90 mm Hg (whichever is lower) (systolic or diastolic blood pressure equal to or greater than the calculated target value)
* In adolescents 13 to 17 years old: systolic blood pressure =140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure =90 mm Hg
* Myocardial infarction within 6 months of Visit 1
* Unstable cardiac angina within 6 months of Visit 1
* Bleeding risk, any of the following:
* Known genetic predisposition to bleeding
* Patients who require
* Fibrinolysis, full-dose therapeutic anticoagulation (e.g. vitamin K antagonists, direct thrombin inhibitors, heparin, hirudin)
* High dose antiplatelet therapy [Note: Prophylactic low dose heparin or heparin flush as needed for maintenance of an indwelling intravenous device (e.g. enoxaparin 4000 I.U. s.c. per day), as well as prophylactic use of antiplatelet therapy (e.g. acetyl salicylic acid up to 325 mg/day, or clopidogrel at 75 mg/day, or equivalent doses of other antiplatelet therapy) are not prohibited.]
* History of haemorrhagic central nervous system (CNS) event within 12 months of Visit 1
* Any of the following within 3 months of Visit 1:
* Haemoptysis or haematuria
* Active gastro-intestinal (GI) bleeding or GI - ulcers
* Major injury or surgery (investigator's judgment)
* Any of the following coagulation parameters at Visit 1:
* International normalized ratio (INR) >2
* Prolongation of prothrombin time (PT) by >1.5 x ULN
* Prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) by >1.5 x ULN
* History of thrombotic event (including stroke and transient ischemic attack) within 12 months of Visit 1.
* Known hypersensitivity to the trial medication or its components (i.e. soya lecithin).
* Patients with documented allergy to peanut or soya.
* Other disease that may interfere with testing procedures or in the judgment of the investigator may interfere with trial participation or may put the patient at risk when participating in this trial.
* Life expectancy for any concomitant disease other than Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)<2.5 years (investigator assessment).
* Female patients who are pregnant, nursing, or who plan to become pregnant while in the trial.
* Patients not able or willing to adhere to trial procedures, including intake of study medication.
* Patients with any diagnosed growth disorder such as growth hormone deficiency or any genetic disorder that is associated with short stature (e.g. Turner Syndrome, Noonan Syndrome, Russell-Silver Syndrome) and/or treatment with growth hormone therapy within 6 months before Visit 2. Patients with short stature considered by the investigator to be due to glucocorticoid therapy may be included.
* Patients <13.5 kg of weight at Visit 1 (same threshold to be used for male and female patients).
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
3/12/2019
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
24/05/2022
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
39
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
SA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Women's and Children's Hospital - North Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
5006 - North Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Caba
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Mendoza
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Bruxelles
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Barra Mansa
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Sao Paulo
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Praha 5
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Aarhus N
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Finland
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Tampere
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Créteil
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Thessaloniki
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Firenze
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Padova
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Tlalnepantla
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Norway
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Oslo
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Warsaw
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Lisboa
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Novosibirsk
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
St. Petersburg
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Kharkiv
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Kyiv
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Zaporizhya
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Birmingham
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
London
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Boehringer Ingelheim
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The main objective of the study is to evaluate dose-exposure and safety of nintedanib in children and adolescents with fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD).
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04093024
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Deterding R, Griese M, Deutsch G, Warburton D, DeBoer EM, Cunningham S, Clement A, Schwerk N, Flaherty KR, Brown KK, Voss F, Schmid U, Schlenker-Herceg R, Verri D, Dumistracel M, Schiwek M, Stowasser S, Tetzlaff K, Clerisme-Beaty E, Young LR. Study design of a randomised, placebo-controlled trial of nintedanib in children and adolescents with fibrosing interstitial lung disease. ERJ Open Res. 2021 Jun 21;7(2):00805-2020. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00805-2020. eCollection 2021 Apr.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Clinical studies sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim, phases I to IV, interventional and non-interventional, are in scope for sharing of the raw clinical study data and clinical study documents. Exceptions might apply, e.g. studies in products where Boehringer Ingelheim is not the license holder; studies regarding pharmaceutical formulations and associated analytical methods, and studies pertinent to pharmacokinetics using human biomaterials; studies conducted in a single center or targeting rare diseases (in case of low number of patients and therefore limitations with anonymization).
For more details refer to: https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datatransparency
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/24/NCT04093024/Prot_002.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/24/NCT04093024/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04093024