Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03960580
Registration number
NCT03960580
Ethics application status
Date submitted
20/05/2019
Date registered
23/05/2019
Date last updated
21/12/2023
Titles & IDs
Public title
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Administration of OPN-375 in Subjects With Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without the Presence of Nasal Polyps
Query!
Scientific title
A 24-Week Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Administration of 186 and 372 µg of OPN-375 Twice a Day (BID) in Subjects With Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without the Presence of Nasal Polyps
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
OPN-FLU-CS-3206
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Chronic Rhinosinusitis
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Infection
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other infectious diseases
Query!
Respiratory
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other respiratory disorders / diseases
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - OPN-375
Active comparator: OPN-375 186 µg BID - OPN-375 186 µg BID x 24 Weeks
Active comparator: OPN-375 372 µg BID - OPN-375 372 µg BID x 24 Weeks
Placebo comparator: Placebo - Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks
Treatment: Drugs: OPN-375
OPN-375, BID
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Symptoms as Measured by a Composite Score for Each Symptom of Nasal Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) at the End of Week 4
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Change from baseline to the end of Week 4 in average total instantaneous AM scores (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) for each symptom: nasal congestion, nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior), facial pain/pressure sensation. Baseline scores are the averaged total instantaneous AM scores over the last 7 days of the single blind run in period, and the end of Week 4, scores are averaged over the 7 days from the subject diary. Range of scores for each nasal symptom is 0= none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Composite score is a sum of the 3 symptom scores and will range from 0 to 9.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
4 Weeks
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24/Early Termination (ET) in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified (APOV) in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Change from baseline to Week 24/ET in the average percent of ethmoid and maxillary sinus volume opacified as measured by CT. Percent volume opacified can range from 0% to 100%. Outcome measure is the percentage change from percent opacification at baseline to percent opacification at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%. For example, if Baseline opacification was 68.22% and Week 24 opacification was 66.11%, then the change would be reported as -2.11%.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Each of the 4 Individual Cardinal Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Symptoms (AM, Instantaneous).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The 4 individual CRS symptoms are: congestion, facial pain or pressure sensation, nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior), and sense of smell. Range of scores for each nasal symptom is 0= none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. The scores at baseline and week 4 are calculated by averaging the score reported for the individual symptom over 7 days prior to the timepoint. The value provided in the results is calculated by subtracting the score at Week 4 from the score at Baseline; therefore, scores reported here can range from -3 to 3.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline, Week 4
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Time to First Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Sinusitis
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Comparing the distribution of time to first acute exacerbation of chronic sinusitis across treatment groups. An exacerbation of chronic sinusitis is defined as a worsening of symptoms that requires escalation of treatment.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
24 Weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Defined Timepoints - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub Domains
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The SNOT-22 is a subject-completed questionnaire that consists of 22 symptoms and social/emotional consequences of their nasal disorder across several domains including: rhinologic, extra-nasal rhinologic, ear/facial pain, psychological dysfunction, and sleep dysfunction. Total scores range from 0-110. The score range for each domain are as follows: Rhinologic: 0-30; Extra-nasal rhinologic: 0-15; Ear/facial: 0-25; Psychological dysfunction: 0-35; Sleep dysfunction: 0-25. Each item is rated as follows: 0=no problem, 1=very mild problem, 2=mild or slight problem, 3=moderate problem, 4=severe problem, 5=problem as bad as it can be, and total scores are calculated by adding scores together. The values reported here are calculated by subtracting the score reported at baseline from the score reported at Week 24 and, therefore, can range from the negative maximum score value to the positive maximum score value.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
24 Weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and 12 in Composite Symptom Score (Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge) for the Total Population and Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Change from baseline in average total instantaneous AM scores (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) for each symptom: nasal congestion, nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior), facial pain/pressure sensation. Range of scores for each symptom is 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe. The composite score is the sum of the 3 symptom scores and will range from 0-9. Scores reported at each timepoint are the averaged total instantaneous AM scores over the last 7 days before the given timepoint. The values presented here are calculated by subtracting the score at Baseline from Week 8 and Week 12, respectively.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
8 weeks, 12 weeks.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Congestion Measured by Instantaneous Morning (AM) and Evening (PM) Diary Symptom Scores
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Subjects will report instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) symptoms. The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
8 Weeks; 12 Weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Subjects will report instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) scores. The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline, Week 8, Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Subjects will report instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) symptoms. The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline, Week 8, Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 12 in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by Instantaneous AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Subjects will report instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) symptoms. The sense of smell scored as 0= normal, 1=slightly impaired, 2=moderately impaired, 3=absent.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline, Week 8, Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses for Patients With and Without Previous Sinus Surgery
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Change from Baseline to Week 24/ET in the average percent of ethmoid and maxillary sinus volume opacified as measured by CT for subgroups in patients without and without previous sinus surgery. Percent volume opacified of the combined ethmoid and maxillary sinuses can range from 0% to 100%. Outcome measure is percentage change from percent opacification at baseline to percent opacification at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%. For example, if Baseline opacification was 68.22% and Week 24 opacification was 66.11%, then the change would be reported as -2.11%.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification), plus a 0-2 score for each of the left and right ostiomeatal complex (OMC). The total LM score for a CT scan ranges from 0-24.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for Each Sinus Pair
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification).
Each sinus pair (left and right side) listed below can achieve a total score of 0-4 (sum of 0-2 for each side). The values reported below are calculated by subtracting the total score at baseline from the total score at Visit 6 (week 24).
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Maxillary Sinus, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
Percent volume opacified of the worst maxillary sinus can range from 0% to 100%. The outcome measure is the percentage change from percent opacification of the worst maxillary sinus at baseline to the percent opacification of the same maxillary sinus at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Ethmoid Sinus, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Percent volume opacified of the worst ethmoid sinus can range from 0% to 100%. The outcome measure is the percentage change from percent opacification of the worst ethmoid sinus at baseline to the percent opacification of the same ethmoid sinus at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
24 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses, as Measured by CT Scan Assessment.
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Percent volume opacified of the worst sinus can range from 0% to 100%. The outcome measure is the percentage change from percent opacification of the worst sinus at baseline to the percent opacification of the same sinus at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
24 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Scores for the Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification), plus a 0-2 score for each of the left and right ostiomeatal complex (OMC).
The values reported for this outcome are the change in total opacification of the left an dright maxillary and ethmoid sinuses (Visit 6 \[Wk 24\] score minus Baseline score). Each visit score can range from a total of 0-12 (sum of 0-2 score assigned for each of left and right maxillary, left and right anterior ethmoid, and left and right posterior ethmoid).
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
24 Weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Zinreich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100% for each each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal). Total score ranges from 0 to 50.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs.
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Zinreich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System:
Zinreich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100%. Each of the following sinus pairs can achieve a total score of 0-10 (sum of score on each left and right side): anterior ethmoids, posterior ethmoids, maxillary sinuses, frontal sinuses, sphenoid sinuses.
The values reported for this outcome are calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at Visit 6 (Wk 24).
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
Zinreich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System:
Zinreich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions with "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0=0%, 1=1%-25%, 2=26%-50%, 3=51%-75%, 4=76%-99%, and 5=100%. The total score for the combined ethmoids and maxillary sinuses can range from 0-30 (0-5 for each left and right of the anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, and maxillary sinuses). The outcome values presented in the results were determined by subtracting the total score at Baseline from the total score at Week 24.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
24 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zinreich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses Among Patient Populations
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
Zinreich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System:
Zinreich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions with "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0=0%, 1=1%-25%, 2=26%-50%, 3=51%-75%, 4=76%-99%, and 5=100%.
Data provided for full population and with and without prior sinus surgery subgroups. Number of participants analyzed in the subgroups will be less than the total overall, as these are only portions of the total population.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
24 Weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Change in Sleep Quality as Measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
The PSQI is a validated, self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. Nineteen individual items generate 7 "component" scores (each ranging between 0 and 3): subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sum of scores for these 7 components yields 1 global score ranging between 0 and 21. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
12 Weeks, 24 Weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Change in Overall Health From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 24/ET as Measured by the Percent of Subjects Improved as Indicated by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
Global impression of change will be assessed using a subject-completed PGIC scale range: 1 - Very much improved, 2 - Much improved, 3 - Minimally improved, 4 - No change, 5 - Minimally worse, 6 - Much worse, 7 - Very much worse. Values provided for this outcome measure are the percentage of subjects reporting a score of 1 - Very much improved, 2 - Much improved, or 3 - Minimally improved at each timepoint.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Week 4, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, 36-item subject-completed validated questionnaire that measures 8 domains of health: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health (RP), bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. The SF-36v2 survey with a 4-week recall will be used. It yields scale scores for each of these 8 health domains , each of which is scored from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a better health status, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning possible.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
24 Weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Mental Component Score (MCS).
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
Change from baseline to Week 24/ET on the MCS of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2). The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire. The scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability. Result values are calculated by subtracting the score reported at Week 24 from the score reported at Baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
24 Weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Change in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Score (PCS)
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
Change from baseline to Week 24/ET on the PCS of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2). The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire. The scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability. Result values are calculated by subtracting the score reported at Week 24 from the score reported at Baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
24 Weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Change in Depressive Symptoms From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by Change in the Severity of Depression as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
The 16-item QIDS (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS is available in a self-rated version and assesses all the criterion symptom domains designated by the American Psychiatry Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th edition to diagnose a major depressive episode. The 7-day period prior to assessment is the usual time frame for assessing symptom severity. Scores range from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
24 Weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
0
0
Severity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
The 16-item QIDS (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS is available in a self-rated version and assesses all the criterion symptom domains designated by the American Psychiatry Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th edition to diagnose a major depressive episode. The 7-day period prior to assessment is the usual time frame for assessing symptom severity. Scores range from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicate a worse outcome. Results reported for this outcome measure are the
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
24 Weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
0
0
Change in Olfactory Impairment From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Smell Identification Test (SIT)™
Query!
Assessment method [27]
0
0
The SIT is a test comprised of 4 booklets each containing 10 microencapsulated (scratch and sniff) odors. Forced choice response alternatives accompany each test item. Each correct response is assigned a score of 1 and incorrect responses are assigned a score of 0. The total score is calculated by summing the scores of each individual odor for a total possible score ranging from 0-40. The higher the score, the better the individual's sense of smell. The test provides an absolute indication of smell loss (anosmia; mild, moderate or sever hyposmia) as well as an index to detect malingering.
Query!
Timepoint [27]
0
0
24 Weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [28]
0
0
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Euroqol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) Instrument
Query!
Assessment method [28]
0
0
The EQ-5D consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The outcome measured for this study was the EQ VAS, which records the subject's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled "The best health you can imagine" and "The worst health you can imagine". The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the subject's own judgement. VAS scores range from 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine).
Query!
Timepoint [28]
0
0
24 Weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [29]
0
0
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 6-Dimension (SF-6D) Instrument
Query!
Assessment method [29]
0
0
The SF-6D is a single health state index derived from the 11 items from the SF-36v2. SF-6D scores range from 0 (worst health state) to 1 (best health state). The values provided in the outcome data are calculated by subtracting the score reported at baseline from the score reported at Visit 6 (Week 24).
Query!
Timepoint [29]
0
0
24 Weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [30]
0
0
Percentage of Subjects Indicating That They Are Willing to Consider Sinus Surgery at Baseline and Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [30]
0
0
Percentage of subjects indicating that they are willing to consider Sinus Surgery. This is a comparison of health economic measures and data was obtained by direct questioning of the subjects during study visits.
Query!
Timepoint [30]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [31]
0
0
Percentage of Subjects Who Meet the Minimal Objective Criteria for Surgical Intervention at Baseline and Week 24.
Query!
Assessment method [31]
0
0
Percentage of subjects who meet the minimal objective criteria for surgical intervention based on completion of a surgical intervention assessment questionnaire for the investigator.
Query!
Timepoint [31]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [32]
0
0
Percentage of Subjects Approved for Surgery Who no Longer Elect to Undergo a Surgery
Query!
Assessment method [32]
0
0
Outcome value presented here is the percent of subjects who are approved for surgery but no longer elect to undergo a surgery. Number of participants analyzed indicates the total number of participants for whom this analysis was completed.
Query!
Timepoint [32]
0
0
Week 24
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. men or women aged 18 years and older at baseline visit
2. women of child bearing potential must be abstinent, or if sexually active,
1. be practicing an effective method of birth control (eg, prescription oral contraceptives, contraceptive injections, contraceptive patch, intrauterine device, double-barrier method [eg, condoms, diaphragm, or cervical cap with spermicidal foam, cream, or gel], or male partner sterilization) before entry and throughout the study, or
2. be surgically sterile (have had a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, tubal ligation, or otherwise be incapable of pregnancy), or
3. be postmenopausal (amenorrhea for at least 1 year)
3. women of child-bearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Visit 1 (Screening)
4. must have a history of chronic sinusitis and be currently experiencing 2 or more of the following symptoms, 1 of which has to be either nasal congestion or nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior nasal discharge) for equal to or greater than 12 weeks:
* nasal congestion
* nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior nasal discharge)
* facial pain or pressure
* reduction or loss of smell
5. endoscopic evidence of nasal mucosal disease, with edema or purulent discharge; or polyps/polypoid tissue <Grade 1 in middle meatus, bilaterally
6. must have confirmatory evidence via a computed tomography(CT) scan of bilateral sinus disease (have at least 1 sinus on each side of nose with a Lund-Mackay score of =1)
7. baseline CT scan must show a combined =25% opacification of the ethmoid sinuses and =25% opacification of at least 1 maxillary sinus
8. must have at least moderate symptoms (as defined in protocol) of nasal congestion as reported by the subject, on average, for the 7-day period preceding Visit 1 (Screening) run-in
9. must have an average morning score of at least 1.5 for congestion on the Nasal Symptom Scale (as defined in protocol) recorded on the subject diary over a 7-day period during the first 14 days of the single-blind run-in period
10. must demonstrate an ability to correctly complete the daily diary during the run-in period to be eligible for randomization
11. Subjects with comorbid asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) must be stable with no exacerbations (eg, no emergency room visits, hospitalizations, or oral or parenteral steroid use) within the 3 months before Visit 1 (Screening). Inhaled corticosteroid use must be limited to stable doses of no more than 1,000 µg/day of beclomethasone (or equivalent) for at least 3 months before Visit 1 (Screening) with plans to continue use throughout the study.
12. Subjects with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, who have undergone aspirin desensitization and are receiving daily aspirin therapy, must be receiving therapy for at least 6 months prior to Visit 1.
13. must be able to cease treatment with intranasal steroids, inhaled corticosteroids (except permitted doses listed above for asthma and COPD) at the screening visit.
14. must be able to cease treatment with oral and nasal decongestants and antihistamines at Visit 1 (Screening)
15. must be able to use the exhalation delivery system correctly; all subjects will be required to demonstrate correct use with the practice exhalation delivery system (EDS) at Visit 1 (Screening).
16. must be capable, in the opinion of the investigator, of providing informed consent to participate in the study. Subjects must sign an informed consent document indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. women who are pregnant or lactating
2. inability to have each nasal cavity examined for any reason, including nasal septum deviation
3. inability to achieve bilateral nasal airflow
4. is currently taking XHANCE®
5. have previously used XHANCE® for more than 1 month and did not achieve an adequate symptomatic response
6. the nasal/sinus anatomy prevents the accurate assessment of sinus volume via CT scan
7. history of sinus or nasal surgery within 6 months before Visit 1 or has not healed from a prior sinus or nasal surgery
8. have current evidence of odontogenic sinusitis, sinus mucocele (the affected sinus is completely opacified and either the margins are expanded and/or thinned OR there are areas of complete bone resorption resulting in bony defect and extension of the "mass" into adjacent tissues), evidence of allergic fungal sinusitis, or evidence of complicated sinus disease (including, but not limited to, extension of inflammation outside of the sinuses and nasal cavity)
9. have a paranasal sinus or nasal tumor
10. have polyp grade =1 (polyp that is free on 5 sides and has a stalk) on either side of the nose as determined by the nasoendoscopy at screening
11. have a nasal septum perforation
12. have had more than 1 episode of epistaxis with frank bleeding in the month before Visit 1 (Screening)
13. have evidence of significant mucosal injury, ulceration (eg, exposed cartilage) on Visit 1 (Screening) nasal examination/nasoendoscopy
14. have current, ongoing rhinitis medicamentosa (rebound rhinitis)
15. have significant oral structural abnormalities (eg, a cleft palate)
16. have a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis
17. history of Churg-Strauss syndrome or dyskinetic ciliary syndromes
18. symptom resolution or last dose of antibiotics for purulent nasal infection, acute sinusitis, or upper respiratory tract infection has not occurred before Visit 1 or was less than 4 weeks before the CT scan. Potential subjects presenting with any of these infections may be rescreened 4 weeks after symptom resolution.
19. planned sinonasal surgery during the period of the study
20. allergy, hypersensitivity, or contraindication to corticosteroids or steroids
21. has used oral steroids in the past for treatment of chronic sinusitis and did not experience any relief of symptoms
22. has a steroid eluting sinus stent still in place within 30 days of Visit 1
23. allergy or hypersensitivity to any excipients in study drug
24. exposure to any glucocorticoid treatment with potential for systemic effects (eg, oral, parenteral, intraarticular, or epidural steroids, high dose topical steroids) within 1 month before Visit 1 (Screening); except as noted in inclusion criteria for subjects with comorbid asthma or COPD
25. have nasal candidiasis
26. history or current diagnosis of any form of glaucoma or ocular hypertension
27. history of intraocular pressure elevation on any form of steroid therapy
28. history or current diagnosis of the presence (in either eye) of a subcapsular cataract
29. history of immunodeficiency
30. any serious or unstable concurrent disease, psychiatric disorder, or any significant condition that, in the opinion of the investigator could confound the results of the study or could interfere with the subject's participation or compliance in the study
31. have a positive drug screen or a recent (within 1 year of Visit 1 [Screening]) history of drug or alcohol abuse, or dependence that, in the opinion of the investigator could interfere with the subject's participation or compliance in the study
32. have participated in an investigational drug clinical trial within 30 days of Visit 1 (Screening)
33. have received mepolizumab (Nucala®), reslizumab (Cinquair®), dupilumab (Dupixent®), omalizumab (Xolair®), or benralizumab (Fasenra™) within 6 months of Visit 1 (Screening)
34. is using strong cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors (eg, ritonavir, atazanavir, clarithromycin, indinavir, itraconazole, nefazodone, nelfinavir, saquinavir, ketoconazole, telithromycin, conivaptan, lopinavir, voriconazole)
35. is an employee of the investigator or study center, with direct involvement in the proposed study or other studies under the direction of that investigator or study center, or is a family member of the employee or the investigator.
36. patients who report unexplained worsening of vision within the past 3 months (e.g. difficulty reading or seeing traffic signs from a distance). A diagnosis of presbyopia established by an eye care professional is not exclusionary.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
6/06/2019
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
4/05/2022
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
223
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,VIC,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Otopure Pty Ltd - Bella Vista
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Vale Medical Practice - Brookvale
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Australian Clinical Research Network - Maroubra
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Browns Plains Family Practice - Browns Plains
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Casey Superclinic - Berwick
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Camberwell Road Medical Practice - Hawthorn East
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
Mirrabooka Medical Centre - Mirrabooka
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
0
0
Latitude Clinical Research - Spearwood
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2153 - Bella Vista
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2100 - Brookvale
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
2035 - Maroubra
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
4118 - Browns Plains
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
3806 - Berwick
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
3123 - Hawthorn East
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
0
0
6061 - Mirrabooka
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
0
0
6163 - Spearwood
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Idaho
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Wisconsin
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Plovdiv
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Sofia
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Stara Zagora
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Varna
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Benesov
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Hradec Králové
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Mladá Boleslav
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Olomouc
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Pardubice
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Prague
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Praha
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Tbilisi
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Bay Of Plenty
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Auckland
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Hamilton
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Wellington
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Kujawsko-Pomorskie
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Malopolskie
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Bialystok
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Bydgoszcz
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Gdynia
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Katowice
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Lancut
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Lublin
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Strzelce Opolskie
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Swidnik
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Tarnowskie Góry
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Wroclaw
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Swietochlowice
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Brasov
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Bucharest
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Cluj-Napoca
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Iasi
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Cadiz
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
L'Hospitalet De Llobregat
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Santiago De Compostela
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Seville
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Valencia
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Nottinghamshire
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Optinose US Inc.
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This is a 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intranasal administration of 186 and 372 µg twice daily (BID) of OPN-375 in subjects with chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) without nasal polyps
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03960580
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Jennifer Carothers
Query!
Address
0
0
Optinose US Inc.
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/80/NCT03960580/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/80/NCT03960580/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03960580
Download to PDF