Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04058028
Registration number
NCT04058028
Ethics application status
Date submitted
30/07/2019
Date registered
15/08/2019
Titles & IDs
Public title
Efficacy and Safety of AMG 570 in Subjects With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase 2b Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rozibafusp Alfa (AMG 570) in Subjects With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) With Inadequate Response to Standard of Care (SOC) Therapy
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
20170588
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Human Genetics and Inherited Disorders
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other human genetics and inherited disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Rozibafusp Alfa
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo for Rozibafusp Alfa
Experimental: Rozibafusp Alfa, Dose A - Investigational product solution in vial
Experimental: Rozibafusp Alfa, Dose B - Investigational product solution in vial
Experimental: Rozibafusp Alfa, Dose C - Investigational product solution in vial
Placebo comparator: Placebo for Rozibafusp Alfa - Placebo Investigational product solution in vial
Treatment: Drugs: Rozibafusp Alfa
Rozibafusp Alfa will be presented in 5 mL glass vial
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo for Rozibafusp Alfa
Placebo for Rozibafusp Alfa will be presented in 5 mL glass vial
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percent of patients achieving Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) response at week 52
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
SRI-4 response at Week 52 is defined as a greater than or equal to 4-point decrease in the hybrid Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (hSLEDAI) score, and no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 A score, no greater than 1 new BILAG B domain scores compared with baseline, and a less than 0.3-point deterioration from baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) (scale 0 to 3), and no use of more than protocol allowed therapies.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Week 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percent of patients achieving a SRI-4 response at week 24
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
SRI-4 response at Week 24 is defined as a greater than or equal to 4-point decrease in the hybrid Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (hSLEDAI) score, and no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 A score, no greater than 1 new BILAG B domain scores compared with baseline, and a less than 0.3-point deterioration from baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) (scale 0 to 3), and no use of more than protocol allowed therapies.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Percent of patients achieving Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) at week 52
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
LLDAS response at week 52 is defined as a hybrid Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (hSLEDAI) score = 4 with no activity in major organ systems (renal, central nervous system (CNS), cardiopulmonary, vasculitis, and fever) and no haemolytic anaemia or gastrointestinal activity; no new findings of lupus disease activity compared with the previous assessment; = 1-point in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) (scale 0 to 3) current prednisolone-equivalent dosage = 7.5 mg/day; and standard maintenance dosages of immunosuppressive drugs and approved biologics.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Week 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percent of patients achieving The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) index responses
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
BICLA response is defined as at least 1 gradation of improvement in baseline BILAG domain scores in all body systems with moderate or severe disease activity at entry (eg, all A \[severe disease\] domain scores falling to B \[moderate\], C \[mild\], or D \[no activity\], and all B domain scores falling to C or D); no new BILAG 2004 A domain score and no \> than 1 new BILAG 2004 B domain scores compared with baseline; no worsening of the hSLEDAI score from baseline; no = 0.3-point deterioration from baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) (scale 0 to 3); and no use of more than protocol-allowed therapies; and no initiation of non-protocol treatment for SLE.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Week 24 and Week 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
SRI-4 at week 52 with reduction of OCS to less than or equal to 7.5 mg/day by week 44 and sustained through week 52 in subjects with a baseline OCS dose = 10 mg/day
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
To evaluate the efficacy of Rozibafusp Alfa with oral corticosteroid (OCS)-tapering in subjects with SLE with inadequate response to SOC therapy.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Week 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Annualized moderate and severe flare rate
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Measured by SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
52 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Annualized severe flare rate
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Measured by SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
52 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Annualized flare rate
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Measured by BILAG score designation of "worse" or "new" resulting in a B score in = 2 organs or an A score in = 1 organ) over 52 weeks.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
52 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Total tender and swollen joint count (limited to hands and wrists): = 50% improvement from baseline at week 12, 24, 36, and 52 in subjects with = 6 tender and swollen joints in the hands and wrists at baseline
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
A joint count will be used to evaluate the effect of Rozibafusp Alfa on additional SLE efficacy endpoints.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12, 24, 36, and 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Area and Severity Index (CLASI) activity score = 50% improvement from baseline at week 12, 24, 36, and 52 in subjects with a CLASI activity score = 8 at baseline
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
To evaluate the effect of Rozibafusp Alfa on additional SLE efficacy endpoints
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12, 24, 36, and 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Fatigue Short Form 7a Instrument (PROMIS-Fatigue SF7A) score change from baseline
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
To describe the effect of treatment with Rozibafusp Alfa using patient reported outcomes
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12, 24, 36, 44 and 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Medical Outcomes Short Form 36 version 2 Questionnaire (SF-36v2) physical component score change from baseline
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
To describe the effect of treatment with Rozibafusp Alfa using patient reported outcomes
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12, 24, 36, 44 and 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Medical Outcomes Short Form 36 version 2 Questionnaire (SF-36v2) mental component score individual domains change from baseline
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
To describe the effect of treatment with Rozibafusp Alfa using patient reported outcomes
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12, 24, 36, 44 and 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Lupus Quality of Life (QoL) score and change from baseline
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
To describe the effect of treatment with Rozibafusp Alfa using patient reported outcomes
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12, 24, 36, 44 and 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) score change from baseline
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
This is an 11-point NRS with 0 indicating lowest disease and 10 highest disease activity.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12, 24, 36, 44 and 52
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Patient incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
To characterize the safety of Rozibafusp Alfa.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
52 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Patient incidence of Serious adverse events
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
To characterize the safety of Rozibafusp Alfa.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
52 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Number of patients with significant changes in laboratory values
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
To characterize the safety of Rozibafusp Alfa.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
52 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Number of patients with significant changes in vital signs
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
To characterize the safety of Rozibafusp Alfa.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
52 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Serum Rozibafusp Alfa trough concentrations
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of Rozibafusp Alfa
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
52 Weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Rozibafusp Alfa terminal elimination half-life, if possible
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of Rozibafusp Alfa
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
52 weeks
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria Screening Visit:
* Subject has provided informed consent prior to initiation of any study-specific activities/procedures.
* Age = 18 years to = 75 years at screening visit.
* Fulfills classification criteria for SLE according to the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for SLE (Aringer et al, 2019), with antinuclear antibody = 1:80 by immunofluorescence on Hep-2 cells being present at screening.
* Hybrid SLEDAI score = 6 points with a "Clinical" hSLEDAI score = 4 points. The "Clinical" hSLEDAI is the hSLEDAI assessment score without the inclusion of points attributable to laboratory results, including urine or immunologic parameters.
* Additional protocol-specific rules are applied at screening and throughout the study, as follows:
* Arthritis: Arthritis (at least 3 tender and swollen joints) must involve joints in the hands or wrists for the hSLEDAI scoring.
* Alopecia: Subjects should have hair loss without scarring; should neither have alopecia areata nor androgenic alopecia; and should have a CLASI activity score for alopecia = 2.
* Oral ulcers: Ulcers location and appearance must be documented by the investigator.
* Scleritis and Episcleritis: the presence of stable SLE-related scleritis and episcleritis must be documented by an ophthalmologist and other causes excluded.
* Renal: subjects with urine protein/creatinine ratio < 3000 mg/g (or equivalent method) in a clear catch spot urine sample can enroll and be scored in the hSLEDAI, provided the subject has a clinical hSLEDAI = 4 and did not receive induction treatment for nephritis within the last year.
* Pleurisy and Pericarditis: symptoms of pleurisy and pericarditis must be accompanied by objective findings to be scored in the hSLEDAI.
* Unless there is a documented intolerance, subjects must be taking:
* Only 1 of the following SLE treatments: anti-malarial (hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, or quinacrine), azathioprine, methotrexate, leflunomide, mycophenolate mofetil/acid mycophenolic, or dapsone.
OR
• 2 of the above-mentioned SLE treatments in which 1 must be anti-malarial (hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, or quinacrine).
* Treatment should be taken for = 12 weeks prior to screening and must be a stable dose for = 8 weeks prior to screening.
* For subjects taking OCS, dose must be = 20 mg/day of prednisone or OCS equivalent, and the dose must be stable at baseline visit for = 2 weeks prior to screening visit.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
75
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Exclusion Criteria Screening Visit
Subjects are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply:
Disease Related
* Urine protein creatinine ratio = 3000 mg/g (or equivalent) at screening or induction therapy for lupus nephritis within 1 year prior to screening visit.
* Active CNS lupus within 1 year prior to screening including, but not limited to, aseptic meningitis, ataxia, CNS vasculitis, cranial neuropathy, demyelinating syndrome, optic neuritis, psychosis, seizures, or transverse myelitis.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 2
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
19/02/2020
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
25/07/2023
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
244
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,SA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Holdsworth House Medical Practice - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital - Woodville South
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2010 - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
5011 - Woodville South
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Distrito Federal
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Tucuman
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
San Juan
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Plovdiv
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Sofia
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Stara Zagora
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Manitoba
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Praha 2
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Bordeaux
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Caen Cedex 9
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Dijon Cedex
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Lille cedex 01
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Reims Cedex
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Strasbourg
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Toulouse Cedex 9
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Toulouse
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Bad Kreuznach
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Leipzig
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Athens
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Heraklion
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Patra
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
New Territories
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Debrecen
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Gyula
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Szekesfehervar
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Milano
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Pisa
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Rozzano MI
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Chiba
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Fukuoka
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Gifu
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Hokkaido
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Hyogo
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Ishikawa
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Miyagi
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Nagano
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Nagasaki
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Okayama
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Shizuoka
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Tokyo
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Daegu
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Baja California Norte
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Guanajuato
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Jalisco
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Yucatán
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Ciudad de Mexico
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Gdansk
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Gdynia
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Katowice
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Krakow
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Lodz
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Lublin
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Poznan
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Stalowa Wola
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Wroclaw
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Almada
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Lisboa
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Porto
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Ekaterinburg
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Kazan
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Kemerovo
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Novosibirsk
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Saint Petersburg
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Andalucía
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Cataluña
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Galicia
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Amgen
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if Rozibafusp Alfa could be a useful therapeutic agent in the current treatment landscape where subjects with SLE have ongoing disease activity despite treatment with standard of care therapies.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04058028
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Garces S, Karis E, Merrill JT, Askanase AD, Kalunian K, Mo M, Milmont CE. Improving resource utilisation in SLE drug development through innovative trial design. Lupus Sci Med. 2023 Jul;10(2):e000890. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2022-000890. Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
MD
Query!
Address
0
0
Amgen
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request
Supporting document/s available: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan (SAP), Informed consent form (ICF), Clinical study report (CSR)
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.
Query!
Available to whom?
Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors, and if not approved, may be further arbitrated by a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the link below.
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: http://www.amgen.com/datasharing
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04058028