Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03855137
Registration number
NCT03855137
Ethics application status
Date submitted
25/02/2019
Date registered
26/02/2019
Titles & IDs
Public title
Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Atogepant for the Prevention of Chronic Migraine
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Atogepant for the Prevention of Chronic Migraine (Progress)
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2018-004337-32
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
3101-303-002
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Chronic Migraine
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Neurological
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Atogepant 30 mg
Treatment: Drugs - Atogepant 60 mg
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo
Placebo comparator: Placebo - Participants received atogepant-matching placebo tablets, orally, twice daily (BID) for 12 weeks in a double-blind (DB) treatment period.
Active comparator: Atogepant 30 mg BID - Participants received atogepant 30 mg tablet, orally, BID and atogepant-matching placebo tablets orally, BID for up to 12 weeks in a DB treatment period.
Active comparator: Atogepant 60 mg QD - Participants received atogepant 60 mg, orally, once daily (QD) along with atogepant-matching placebo 30 mg as morning dose followed by atogepant-matching placebo 30 mg and 60 mg as evening doses for up to 12 weeks in a DB treatment period.
Treatment: Drugs: Atogepant 30 mg
Tablets containing 30 mg atogepant
Treatment: Drugs: Atogepant 60 mg
Tablets containing 60 mg atogepant
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo
30 mg/60 mg tablets containing atogepant-matching placebo
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Mean Monthly Migraine Days Across 12-Week Treatment Period in mITT Population
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Participants recorded daily duration of migraine in a diary. A migraine day was any calendar day on which the participant experienced a migraine headache. The monthly (4-week) migraine days were defined as the total number of reported migraine days in diary divided by total number of days with diary records during each 4-week period and multiplied by 28. Each 4-week period was averaged. Baseline is defined as the number of migraine days during the last 28 days prior to the randomization date. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A contrast from Mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used to obtain the average treatment effects across the 12-week treatment period.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline to Week 12
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Mean Monthly Migraine Days Across 12-Week Treatment Period in Off-Treatment Hypothetical Estimand Population
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Participants recorded daily duration of migraine in a diary. A migraine day was any calendar day on which the participant experienced a migraine headache. The monthly (4-week) migraine days were defined as the total number of reported migraine days in diary divided by total number of days with diary records during each 4-week period and multiplied by 28. Each 4-week period was averaged. Baseline is defined as the number of migraine days during the last 28 days prior to the randomization date. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A contrast from Mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used to obtain the average treatment effects across the 12-week treatment period.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline to Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Mean Monthly Headache Days Across 12-Week Treatment Period in mITT Population
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Participants recorded daily total duration of a headache in a diary. A headache day is any calendar day on which the participant experienced a headache pain lasting 2 hours or longer unless an acute headache medication was used after the start of the headache. The monthly (4-week) headache days were defined as the total number of reported headache days in the diary divided by the total number of days with diary records during each 4-week period and multiplied by 28. Each 4-week period was averaged. Baseline is defined as the number of headache days during the last 28 days prior to the randomization date. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A contrast from MMRM was used to obtain the average treatment effects across the 12-week treatment period.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline to Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Mean Monthly Headache Days Across 12-Week Treatment Period in Off-Treatment Hypothetical Estimand Population
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Participants recorded daily total duration of a headache in a diary. A headache day is any calendar day on which the participant experienced a headache pain lasting 2 hours or longer unless an acute headache medication was used after the start of the headache. The monthly (4-week) headache days were defined as the total number of reported headache days in the diary divided by the total number of days with diary records during each 4-week period and multiplied by 28. Each 4-week period was averaged. Baseline is defined as the number of headache days during the last 28 days prior to the randomization date. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A contrast from MMRM was used to obtain the average treatment effects across the 12-week treatment period.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline to Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Mean Monthly Acute Medication Use Days Across 12-Week Treatment Period in mITT Population
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
An acute medication use day is defined as any day on which a participant reports, per eDiary, the intake of allowed medication(s) to treat an acute migraine. The monthly (4-week) acute medication use days were defined as the total number of reported acute medication use days in the diary divided by the total number of days with diary records during each 4-week period and multiplied by 28. Each 4-week period was averaged. Baseline is defined as the number of migraine days during the last 28 days prior to the randomization date. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A contrast from MMRM was used to obtain the average treatment effects across the 12-week treatment period.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline to Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Mean Monthly Acute Medication Use Days Across 12-Week Treatment Period in Off-treatment Hypothetical Estimand Population
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
An acute medication use day is defined as any day on which a participant reports, per eDiary, the intake of allowed medication(s) to treat an acute migraine. The monthly (4-week) acute medication use days were defined as the total number of reported acute medication use days in the diary divided by the total number of days with diary records during each 4-week period and multiplied by 28. Each 4-week period was averaged. Baseline is defined as the number of migraine days during the last 28 days prior to the randomization date. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A contrast from MMRM was used to obtain the average treatment effects across the 12-week treatment period.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline to Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction in 3-Month Average of Monthly Migraine Days in mITT Population
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Data is reported for 50% responders averaged at each 4-week period. 50% responders are participants with at least a 50 percent reduction from baseline in 3-month average of monthly migraine days. Participants recorded daily duration of migraine in a diary. A migraine day was any calendar day on which the participant experienced a migraine headache. The monthly (4-week) migraine days is equal to total number of reported migraine days in diary divided by total number of days with diary records in each 4-week period multiplied by 28. The values are rounded off to the first decimal value.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline to Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction in 3-Month Average of Monthly Migraine Days in Off-Treatment Hypothetical Estimand Population
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Data is reported for 50% responders averaged at each 4-week period. 50% responders are participants with at least a 50 percent reduction from baseline in 3-month average of monthly migraine days. Participants recorded daily duration of migraine in a diary. A migraine day was any calendar day on which the participant experienced a migraine headache. The monthly (4-week) migraine days is equal to total number of reported migraine days in diary divided by total number of days with diary records in each 4-week period multiplied by 28. The values are rounded off to the first decimal value.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline to Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, Version 2.1 (MSQ v2.1) Role Function-Restrictive Domain Score at Week 12 in Off-Treatment Hypothetical Estimand Population
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The MSQ v2.1 is a 14-item questionnaire designed to measure health-related quality of life impairments attributed to migraine in the past 4 weeks. It is divided into 3 domains: Role Function Restrictive (question numbers 1-7, score ranges 7 to 42) assesses how migraines limit one's daily social and work-related activities; Role Function Preventive (question numbers 8-11, score ranges 4 to 24) assesses how migraines prevent these activities; and the Emotional Function (question numbers 12-14, score ranges 3 to 18) domain assesses the emotions associated with migraines. Participants respond to items using a 6-point scale ranging from none of the time to all of the time. Raw dimension scores are computed as a sum of item responses and rescaled to a 0 to 100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A contrast from MMRM was used to obtain the average treatment effects across the 12-week treatment period.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
At Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Mean Monthly Performance of Daily Activities Domain Score of the AIM-D Across 12-Week Treatment Period in mITT Population
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The AIM-D is a 11-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure that assesses the impact of migraine on the performance of daily activities which include, 7 items: difficulty with household chores, errands, leisure activities at home, leisure or social activities outside the home, strenuous physical activities, concentrating, and thinking clearly and physical impairment; 4 items: difficulty walking, moving body, bending forward, moving head using a 6-point rating scale where 0=not difficult at all, 1=a little difficult, 2=somewhat difficult, 3=very difficult, 4=extremely difficult, and 5=I could not do it at all. The raw performance of daily activities domain scores were transformed to 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater impact of migraine (higher disease burden). A contrast from MMRM was used to obtain the average treatment effects across the 12-week treatment period.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline to Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Mean Monthly Physical Impairment Domain Score of the AIM-D Across 12-Week Treatment Period in mITT Population
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The AIM-D is a 11-item PRO measure that assesses the impact of migraine on the performance of daily activities which includes 7 items: difficulty with household chores, errands, leisure activities at home, leisure or social activities outside the home, strenuous physical activities, concentrating, and thinking clearly and physical impairment; 4 items: difficulty walking, moving body, bending forward, moving head using a 6-point rating scale where 0=not difficult at all, 1=a little difficult, 2=somewhat difficult, 3=very difficult, 4=extremely difficult, and 5=I could not do it at all. The raw physical impairment domain scores were transformed to 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater impact of migraine (higher disease burden). A contrast from MMRM was used to obtain the average treatment effects across the 12-week treatment period.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline to Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) Total Score at Week 12 in Off-Treatment Hypothetical Estimand Population
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
HIT-6 is a 6-question assessment used to measure the impact headaches have on a participant's ability to function on the job, at school, at home, and in social situations. It assesses the effect that headaches have on normal daily life and the participant's ability to function. Responses are based on frequency using a 5-point scale ranging from "never" to "always." The HIT-6 total score, which ranges from 36 to 78, is the sum of the responses - each of which is assigned a score ranging from 6 points (never) to 13 points (always). MMRM was used for the analyses.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
At Week 12
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* At least a 1-year history of chronic migraine (CM) consistent with a diagnosis according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd Edition (ICHD-3), 2018
* Age of the participant at the time of migraine onset < 50 years
* Confirmation of headache/migraine headache day frequency as follows:
* History of, on average, = 15 headache days per month in the 3 months prior to Visit 1 in the opinion of the investigator AND
* >=15 headache days during the 4-week screening/baseline period per the electronic diary (eDiary) AND
* >=8 days during the 4-week screening/baseline period that qualify as being a migraine day per the eDiary
* Participants must be using a medically acceptable and effective method of birth control during the course of the entire study
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
80
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Has a history of migraine, accompanied by diplopia or decreased level of consciousness, or retinal migraine
* Has a current diagnosis of new persistent daily headache, trigeminal autonomic cephalgia (eg, cluster headache), or painful cranial neuropathy
* History of an inadequate response to > 4 medications (2 of which have different mechanisms of action) prescribed for the prevention of migraine
* Woman is pregnant, planning to become pregnant during the course of the study, or currently lactating. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Visit 1 and Visit 2.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
11/03/2019
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
20/01/2022
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
778
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Royal North Shore Hospital /ID# 237008 - St Leonards
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
The Royal Melbourne Hospital /ID# 236859 - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2065 - St Leonards
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
3050 - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Arkansas
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
District of Columbia
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Kansas
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Mississippi
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Nevada
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
New Hampshire
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
New Mexico
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Beijing
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Guangdong
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Hebei
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Henan
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Jiangsu
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Jilin
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Shanghai
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Shanxi
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Zhejiang
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Suzhou
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Tianjin
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Wuhan
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Hradec Kralove
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Kladno
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Ostrava
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Prague 10
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Prague 4
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Prague
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Praha
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Zlin
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Hovedstaden
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Bouches-du-Rhone
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Haute-Savoie
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Bron
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Clermont Ferrand
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Essen
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Kassel
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Kiel
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
München
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Bari
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Florence
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Milan
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Napoli
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Pavia
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Rome
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Ehime
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Fukui
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Hokkaido
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Hyogo
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Kagoshima
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Kanagawa
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Kochi
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Miyagi
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Saitama
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Shizuoka
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Tochigi
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Tokyo
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Yamanashi
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Hiroshima
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Kyoto
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Osaka
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Gyeonggido
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Seoul Teugbyeolsi
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Busan
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Kujawsko-pomorskie
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Lubelskie
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Malopolskie
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Pomorskie
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Slaskie
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Wielkopolskie
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Zachodniopomorskie
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
Tatarstan, Respublika
Query!
Country [95]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [95]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [96]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [96]
0
0
A Coruna
Query!
Country [97]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [97]
0
0
Navarra
Query!
Country [98]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [98]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [99]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [99]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [100]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [100]
0
0
Valencia
Query!
Country [101]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [101]
0
0
Valladolid
Query!
Country [102]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [102]
0
0
Zaragoza
Query!
Country [103]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [103]
0
0
Helsingborg
Query!
Country [104]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [104]
0
0
Taichung City
Query!
Country [105]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [105]
0
0
Tainan City
Query!
Country [106]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [106]
0
0
Tainan
Query!
Country [107]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [107]
0
0
Taipei City
Query!
Country [108]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [108]
0
0
Liverpool
Query!
Country [109]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [109]
0
0
London
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Allergan
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of atogepant in participants with chronic migraine. This study included a 12-week treatment period.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03855137
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Boinpally R, McNamee B, Yao L, Butler M, McGeeney D, Borbridge L, Periclou A. A Single Supratherapeutic Dose of Atogepant Does Not Affect Cardiac Repolarization in Healthy Adults: Results From a Randomized, Single-Dose, Phase 1 Crossover Trial. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2021 Sep;10(9):1099-1107. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.940. Epub 2021 May 4. Min KC, Kraft WK, Bondiskey P, Colon-Gonzalez F, Liu W, Xu J, Panebianco D, Mixson L, Dockendorf MF, Matthews CZ, Boinpally R. Atogepant Is Not Associated With Clinically Meaningful Alanine Aminotransferase Elevations in Healthy Adults. Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Mar;14(2):599-605. doi: 10.1111/cts.12917. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
ALLERGAN INC.
Query!
Address
0
0
Allergan
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols, analyses plans, clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.
Supporting document/s available: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan (SAP), Clinical study report (CSR)
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
For details on when studies are available for sharing visit, please refer to the link below.
Query!
Available to whom?
Access to this clinical trial data can be requested by any qualified researchers who engage in rigorous independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Use Agreement (DUA). For more information on the process, or to submit a request, visit the following link.
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: https://vivli.org/ourmember/abbvie/
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/37/NCT03855137/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/37/NCT03855137/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03855137