Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04380142
Registration number
NCT04380142
Ethics application status
Date submitted
6/05/2020
Date registered
8/05/2020
Date last updated
18/11/2022
Titles & IDs
Public title
Study Comparing Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion Of ABBV-951 With Oral Carbidopa/Levodopa Tablets For Treatment Of Motor Fluctuations In Adult Participants With Advanced Parkinson's Disease
Query!
Scientific title
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Controlled Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ABBV-951 to Oral Carbidopa/Levodopa in Advanced Parkinson's Disease Patients
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2019-003930-18
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
M15-736
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Parkinson's Disease (PD)
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Neurological
0
0
0
0
Query!
Parkinson's disease
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - ABBV-951
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo for Levodopa/Carbidopa (LD/CD)
Treatment: Drugs - Levodopa/Carbidopa (LD/CD)
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo for ABBV-951
Experimental: ABBV-951 + Placebo for Levodopa/Carbidopa (LD/CD) - After an open-label LD/CD Stabilization Period, participants will receive double-blind ABBV-951 by continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI) and oral placebo for LD/CD for 12 weeks
Active Comparator: Levodopa/Carbidopa (LD/CD) + Placebo for ABBV-951 - After an open-label LD/CD Stabilization Period, participants will receive double-blind oral LD/CD and CSCI of placebo for ABBV-951 for 12 weeks
Treatment: Drugs: ABBV-951
Solution for continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI)
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo for Levodopa/Carbidopa (LD/CD)
Oral capsule
Treatment: Drugs: Levodopa/Carbidopa (LD/CD)
Oral encapsulated tablet
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo for ABBV-951
Solution for continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI)
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Average Daily Normalized "On" Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
"On" time is defined as periods of good motor symptom control, and was assessed by the Parkinson's Disease (PD) diary. The normalized "On" time without troublesome dyskinesia is the sum of the normalized "On" time without dyskinesia and the normalized "On" time with non-troublesome dyskinesia. "On" time without dyskinesia plus "On" time with non-troublesome dyskinesia are based on the PD Diary (normalized to a 16-hour waking day averaged over 3 consecutive days). Baseline value is defined as the average of normalized "On" time without troublesome dyskinesia collected over the 3 PD Diary days before randomization.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Average Daily Normalized "Off" Time (Hours)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
"Off" time is defined as periods of poor mobility, tremor, slowness, and stiffness and was assessed by the PD Diary.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part II Score
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The Part II MDS-UPDRS is an investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of PD. MDS-UPDRS is multimodal scale assessing impairment and disability. Part II assesses the participant's motor experiences of daily living with 13 questions. (The numeric score for each question is between 0-4; 0=Normal,1=Slight,2=Mild,3=Moderate,4=Severe). Part II scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms of PD.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Early Morning "Off" Status (Morning Akinesia) at Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Early morning "Off" status is assessed by the PD Diary as percentage of participants with early morning "Off" upon waking up at Week 12, based on the first morning symptom upon awakening on the last valid PD Diary day at Week 12.
"Off" time is defined as periods of poor mobility, tremor, slowness, and stiffness and was assessed by the PD Diary.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Average Daily Normalized "On" Time Without Dyskinesia (Hours)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
"On" time is defined as periods of good motor symptom control, and was assessed by the PD diary. The normalized "On" time without dyskinesia is defined as the hours of average daily normalized "On" time without dyskinesia as assessed by the PD Diary (normalized to a 16-hour waking day averaged over 3 consecutive days).
Baseline value is defined as the average of normalized "On" time without dyskinesia collected over the 3 PD Diary days before randomization.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-2 (PDSS-2) Total Score
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
The PDSS-2 addresses PD-specific sleep disturbances such as restless leg syndrome (RLS), morning akinesia, pain, and sleep apnea. The frequency is assessed for the 15 sleep problems based on a 5-point Likert-type scale (ranging from 0 [never] to 4 [very often]). Scores are calculated for each of the 3 domains (motor symptoms at night, PD symptoms at night, and disturbed sleep) as well as a total score. The PDSS-2 domain scores range from 0 to 20 and the total score is a sum of the 3 domains and ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate higher frequency and more severe impact of PD on sleep.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Quality of Life Assessed by Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 Item (PDQ-39) Summary Index Score
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The PDQ-39 is a disease-specific instrument designed to measure aspects of health that are relevant to participants with PD, and which may not be included in general health status questionnaires. It evaluates the 8 dimensions of mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognition, and communication. Data from the PDQ-39 can be presented in either domain scores or as a summary index score. The full range of the PDQ-39 Summary Index score is from 0 (no patient-related symptoms/quality of life unaffected) to 100 (highest patient-related symptoms/low quality of life).
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Quality of Life Assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Summary Index
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self -care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) to describe the subject's current health state. Each dimension comprises 5 levels with corresponding numeric scores, where 1 indicates no problems, and 5 indicates extreme problems. The health status is converted to an index value using the country-specific weighted scoring algorithm for the United States (US). The summary index value for the US ranges from a worst score of -0.109 to a best score of 1. An increase in the EQ-5D-5L total score indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Median Bradykinesia Score (BK50) as Assessed by the Parkinson's KinetiGraph/Personal KinetiGraph (PKG) Wearable Device
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The PKG wearable device is an innovative mobile health technology that provides continuous, objective, ambulatory assessment of the symptoms of PD including tremor, bradykinesia, dyskinesia, and daytime somnolence. For each participant, the PKG watch collected data continuously and an algorithm calculated a bradykinesia score every 2 minutes between 9am-6pm across multiple days. Among these scores for this participant at this visit, the median of all the score values is defined as BK50. A higher score indicates worse bradykinesia (there is no prespecified range of scores). The BK50 scores for all participants across all visits were then analyzed with mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) and the LS mean (model-based mean) was obtained from the model.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Interquartile Range of Bradykinesia Score (BK75-BK25) as Assessed by the PKG Wearable Device
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The PKG wearable device is an innovative mobile health technology that provides continuous, objective, ambulatory assessment of the symptoms of PD including tremor, bradykinesia, dyskinesia, and daytime somnolence. For each participant, the PKG watch collected data continuously and an algorithm calculated a bradykinesia score every 2 minutes between 9am-6pm across multiple days. Among these scores for this participant at this visit, the median of all the score values is defined as BK50 (there is no prespecified range of scores). BK75-BK25 is the difference between the third quartile (BK75) and first quartile (BK25) bradykinesia scores, and this interquartile range is a measure of variability of bradykinesia. A higher score indicates a higher degree of variability in bradykinesia scores. The BK75 and BK 25 scores for all participants across all visits were then analyzed with mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) and the LS mean (model-based mean) was obtained from the model.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Median Dyskinesia Score (DK50) as Assessed by the PKG Wearable Device
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
The PKG wearable device is an innovative mobile health technology that provides continuous, objective, ambulatory assessment of the symptoms of PD including tremor, bradykinesia, dyskinesia, and daytime somnolence. For each participant, the PKG watch collected data continuously and an algorithm calculated a dyskinesia score every 2 minutes between 9am-6pm across multiple days. Among these scores for this participant at this visit, the median of all the score values is defined as DK50. A higher score indicates worse dyskinesia (there is no prespecified range of scores). The DK50 scores for all participants across all visits were then analyzed with mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) and the LS mean (model-based mean) was obtained from the model.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Treatment Period in Interquartile Range of Dyskinesia Score (DK75-DK25) as Assessed by the PKG Wearable Device
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The PKG wearable device is an innovative mobile health technology that provides continuous, objective, ambulatory assessment of the symptoms of PD including tremor, bradykinesia, dyskinesia, and daytime somnolence. For each participant, the PKG watch collected data continuously and an algorithm calculated a dyskinesia score every 2 minutes between 9am-6pm across multiple days. Among these scores for this participant at this visit, the median of all the score values is defined as DK50 (there is no prespecified range of scores). DK75-DK25 is the difference between the third quartile (DK75) and first quartile (DK25) dyskinesia scores, and this interquartile range is a measure of variability of dyskinesia. A higher score indicates a higher degree of variability in dyskinesia scores. The DK75 and DK25 scores for all participants across all visits were then analyzed with mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) and the LS mean (model-based mean) was obtained from the model.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Number of Participants With Irritation Grade Numeric Grade >= 5 or Letter Grade >= D on the Infusion Site Irritation Scale Across All Study Post-Baseline Visits
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
The investigator or qualified designee evaluated the infusion site area (abdomen). A 2-part (numeric and letter grading) evaluation scale was used to assess irritation. Irritation - Numeric Grades: 0 = No evidence of irritation; 1 = Minimal erythema, barely perceptible; 2 = Moderate erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema, or minimal papular response; 3 = Erythema and papules; 4 = Definite edema; 5 = Erythema, edema, and papules; 6 = Vesicular eruption; 7 = Strong reaction spreading beyond the test site. Irritation - Letter Grades: A = No finding; B = Slight glazed appearance; C = Marked glazing; D = Glazing with peeling and cracking; E = Glazing with fissures; F = Film of dried serous exudates covering all or portion of the patch site; G = Small petechial erosions and/or scabs.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Day 2 up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period plus 30 days
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Oral LD/CD Stabilization Period
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. An AE, whether associated with study drug or not, meeting any of the following criteria is considered a serious AE (SAE): results in death; is life-threatening; results in hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is an important medical event requiring medical or surgical intervention to prevent a serious outcome. The severity of each AE is rated as mild, moderate, or severe, and having either a reasonable possibility or no reasonable possibility of relationship to study drug. Events were considered treatment emergent if they arose after the first dose of study drug.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
From first dose of stabilization period treatment up to the first dose of the double-blind treatment period
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Number of Participants With TEAEs During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. An AE, whether associated with study drug or not, meeting any of the following criteria is considered an SAE: results in death; is life-threatening; results in hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is an important medical event requiring medical or surgical intervention to prevent a serious outcome. The severity of each AE is rated as mild, moderate, or severe, and having either a reasonable possibility or no reasonable possibility of relationship to study drug. Adverse events of special interest include polyneuropathy, weight loss, somnolence, hallucinations/psychosis. Events were considered treatment emergent if they arose after the first dose of study drug.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
From first dose of double-blind treatment up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period plus 30 days
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Hematology, Chemistry, Urinalysis, Special Laboratory Parameters, Vital Signs, and Electrocardiograms (ECGs)
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Measures analyzed for prespecified potentially clinically significant criteria: hematology (hematocrit, hemoglobin, red blood cells, white blood cells, neutrophils, bands, lymphocytes, monocytes, basophils, eosinophils, platelets, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume concentration, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time), laboratory (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, creatine phosphokinase, bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorus, uric acid, total protein, albumin, glucose, sodium bicarbonate, chloride, triglycerides, cholesterol, magnesium), special lab criteria (vitamin B12, vitamin B6, folate, homocysteine, methylmalonic acid), vital signs (diastolic and systolic blood pressure, pulse rate), ECG (heart rate, PR, and QTcF interval), urinalysis (specific gravity, ketones, pH, protein, glucose, blood, bilirubin).
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Screening up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Number of Participants With Affirmative Responses on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Across All Study Post-Baseline Visits During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
The C-SSRS is a systematically administered instrument developed to track suicidal adverse events across a treatment study. The instrument is designed to assess suicidal behavior and ideation, track and assess all suicidal events, as well as the lethality of attempts. Suicidal ideation categories include the following: wish to be dead; nonspecific active suicidal thoughts; active suicidal ideation without intent to act; active suicidal ideation with some intent to act but no plan; active suicidal ideation with plan and intent. Suicidal behavior categories include the following: actual attempt; interrupted attempt; aborted attempt; preparatory acts or behavior; suicidal behavior; completed suicide.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Screening up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Number of Participants With a Subscore > 5 For Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease - Ration Scale (QUIP-RS) at Any Time During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
The QUIP-RS measures the severity of symptoms and support a diagnosis of impulse control disorders and related disorders in PD. QUIP-RS subscores include gambling (score 0 to 16), sex (score 0 to 16), buying (score 0 to 16), eating (score 0 to 16), hobbyism-punding (score 0 to 32), and PD medication use (score 0 to 16). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (PD) that is levodopa-responsive.
- Participant must be taking a minimum of 400 milligrams/day (mg/day) of Levodopa (LD)
equivalents and be judged by the investigator to have motor symptoms inadequately
controlled by current therapy, have a recognizable/identifiable "Off" and "On" states
(motor fluctuations), and have an average "Off" time of at least 2.5 hours/day over 3
consecutive PD Diary days with a minimum of 2 hours each day.
- Participant or caregiver, if applicable, demonstrates the understanding and correct
use of the delivery system, including the insertion of the cannula into the
participant's abdomen, as assessed by the investigator or designee during the
Screening period.
Query!
Minimum age
30
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
- Clinically significant, unstable medical conditions or any other reason that the
investigator determines would interfere with the participant's participation in this
study or would make the participant an unsuitable candidate to receive study drug.
- History of allergic reaction or significant sensitivity to LD or constituents of the
study drug (and its excipients) and/or other products in the same class.
- Participant has not received deep brain stimulation, CD/LD enteral suspension, or any
other PD medication as continuous daily infusion, whether commercially available or
investigational. Previous exposure to ABBV-951 is not allowed.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
19/10/2020
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
29/09/2021
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
174
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,SA,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Liverpool Hospital /ID# 218681 - Liverpool
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Westmead Hospital /ID# 216535 - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Gold coast University Hospital /ID# 218373 - SouthPort
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Royal Adelaide Hospital /ID# 216533 - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Kingston Centre /ID# 216537 - Cheltenham
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
The Royal Melbourne Hospital /ID# 216536 - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2170 - Liverpool
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2145 - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
4215 - SouthPort
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
5000 - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
3192 - Cheltenham
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
3050 - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Arkansas
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Delaware
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
District of Columbia
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Kansas
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Wisconsin
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name
AbbVie
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurological condition, which affects the brain. PD gets worse
over time, but how quickly it progresses varies a lot from person to person. Some symptoms of
PD are tremors, stiffness, and slowness of movement. This study measures the efficacy,
safety, and tolerability of ABBV-951 versus oral Levodopa (LD)/Carbidopa (CD) [LD/CD] in
advanced PD participants to achieve reduction in motor fluctuations.
ABBV-951 is an investigational (unapproved) drug containing Levodopa Phosphate/Carbidopa
Phosphate (LDP/CDP) given subcutaneously (under the skin) for the treatment of Parkinson's
Disease. Adult participants with advanced PD will be enrolled. Approximately 130 participants
will be enrolled in the study in approximately 80 sites across the world.
In one arm, participants will receive ABBV-951 solution as a continuous infusion under the
skin plus oral placebo capsules for LD/CD. In the second arm, participants will receive
placebo solution for ABBV-951 as a continuous infusion under the skin plus oral capsules
containing LD/CD tablets. The treatment duration is 12 weeks.
There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their
standard of care. Participants will attend regular visits during the course of the study at a
hospital or clinic. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, blood
tests, checking for side effects, and completing questionnaires.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04380142
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
ABBVIE INC.
Query!
Address
0
0
AbbVie
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Summary Results
For IPD and results data, please see
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04380142
Download to PDF