Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04677543
Registration number
NCT04677543
Ethics application status
Date submitted
16/12/2020
Date registered
21/12/2020
Titles & IDs
Public title
Validation of Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Participants With Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Infection Caused by Mycobacterium Avium Complex
Query!
Scientific title
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Active Comparator, Multicenter Study to Validate Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Adult Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Nontuberculous Mycobacterial (NTM) Lung Infection Caused by Mycobacterium Avium Complex (MAC)
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2020-002545-42
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
INS-415
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
ARISE
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Infection
0
0
0
0
Query!
Studies of infection and infectious agents
Query!
Infection
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other infectious diseases
Query!
Infection
0
0
0
0
Query!
Sexually transmitted infections
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - ALIS
Treatment: Drugs - Azithromycin
Treatment: Drugs - Ethambutol
Treatment: Drugs - ELC
Active comparator: ALIS + Background Regimen (Azithromycin + Ethambutol) - Participants will be administered 590 mg of ALIS (amikacin liposome inhalation suspension) once daily. Participants will also be administered the background regimen of azithromycin 250 mg and ethambutol 15 mg/kg tablets orally, once daily.
Placebo comparator: ELC + Background Regimen (Azithromycin + Ethambutol) - Participants will be administered ELC (empty liposome control), a matching placebo to ALIS, once daily. Participants will also be administered the background regimen of azithromycin 250 mg and ethambutol 15 mg/kg tablets orally, once daily.
Treatment: Drugs: ALIS
Inhalation via nebulization over approximately 6 to 15 minutes.
Treatment: Drugs: Azithromycin
Oral tablet
Treatment: Drugs: Ethambutol
Oral tablet
Treatment: Drugs: ELC
Inhalation via nebulization over approximately 6 to 15 minutes.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Psychometric Cross-Sectional Validation of Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Respiratory Scale Score at Baseline
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The PGI-S respiratory symptom is a self-reported scale to measure the severity of illness based on symptoms using a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5, (1=not at all, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=very severe, 5=extremely severe). Considering different aspects of breathing symptoms like congestion, cough, mucus, wheezing, shortness of breath, participants rated their symptom severity on the PGI-S respiratory symptom scale. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Psychometric Cross-Sectional Validation of PRO: PGI-S Fatigue Scale Score at Baseline
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The PGI-S fatigue is a self-reported scale to measure the severity of illness based on symptoms using a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5, (1=not at all, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=very severe, 5=extremely severe). Participants rated the severity of their fatigue on the PGI-S fatigue scale. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue severity.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
Psychometric Cross-Sectional Validation of PRO: Quality of Life Questionnaire - Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) Respiratory Symptoms Scale Score at Baseline
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The QOL-B is a self-administered, PRO questionnaire used to assess symptoms, functioning, and health related quality of life in adults with lung conditions. The respiratory symptom domain of the QOL-B contains 9 items describing patient's self-assessment of her/his respiratory symptoms that affect daily life. For each of the 8 items (chest congestion, coughing, cough up mucus, shortness of breath with greater activity, wheezing, chest pain, shortness of breath when talking, woken up during night due to cough), scores ranged from 1 to 4 (1= lot, 2= moderate, 3= little, 4= not at all) and the sputum item based on the color ranged from 0=don't know,1=green with traces of blood/brownish dark,2=yellowish-green,3=clear to yellow,4=clear. The item scores were summed and then standardized on a 0 to 100-point scale to derive the domain score with higher scores representing fewer symptoms or better functioning and quality of life.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline
Query!
Primary outcome [4]
0
0
Psychometric Cross-Sectional Validation of PRO: Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System - Fatigue-Short Form 7a (PROMIS F-SF 7a) Score at Baseline
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
The PROMIS F-SF 7a is a self-administered questionnaire assessing a range of self-reported symptoms over the past 7 days, from mild subjective feelings of tiredness to an overwhelming, debilitating, and sustained sense of exhaustion that likely decreases one's ability to execute daily activities and function normally in family or social roles. Fatigue is divided into the experience of fatigue (frequency, duration, and intensity) and the impact of fatigue on physical, mental, and social activities over 7 items. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1=never to 5=always. Total scores range from 7 to 35 and low scores represent less fatigue interference i.e., better symptoms.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline
Query!
Primary outcome [5]
0
0
Assessment of Test-Retest Reliability (TRTR) Reported as the Intraclass Co-relation (ICC) Estimate Among Participants Reporting no Change on Respiratory PGI-S Score Applied to QOL-B Respiratory Domain Score Between Screening and Baseline
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
TRTR consists of measuring the degree to which an instrument yield reproducible score at different points in time assessed across a fixed and common time interval for all subjects. TRTR co-relations were based on the two-way mixed effect ICC coefficient estimated using the inter-rater reliability package, version 0.84.1. TRTR estimate of 0.7 and above indicated better retest reliability. TRTR was assessed among participants reporting no change on PGI-S between screening and baseline. PGI-S anchors are PRO specific, with a respiratory PGI-S (scale ranging from 1=not at all to 5=extremely severe, Higher scores=greater symptom severity) applied to the QOL-B respiratory domain (9-item scale ranging from 0 to 100, higher scores=fewer symptoms and better quality of life). As pre-specified in statistical analysis plan(SAP) for participants contributing to this outcome measure from INS-415 study,data were collected and analyzed for combined population in which ALIS and ELC groups were pooled.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From Screening to Baseline (Day -70 to Day 1)
Query!
Primary outcome [6]
0
0
Assessment of TRTR Reported as the ICC Estimate Among Participants Reporting no Change on Fatigue PGI-S Score Applied to PROMIS F-SF 7a Score Between Screening and Baseline
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
TRTR consists of measuring the degree to which an instrument yield reproducible score at different points in time assessed across a fixed and common time interval for all subjects. TRTR co-relations were based on the two-way mixed effect ICC coefficient estimated using the inter-rater reliability package, version 0.84.1. TRTR estimate of 0.7 and above indicated better retest reliability. TRTR was estimated using mean PROMIS F-SF 7a scores from participants who were stable as defined by a PGI-S-Fatigue change score of zero between screening and baseline. As pre-specified in the SAP, for participants contributing to this outcome measure from INS-415 study, data were collected and analyzed for combined population in which ALIS and ELC groups were pooled.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
From Screening to Baseline (Day -70 to Day 1)
Query!
Primary outcome [7]
0
0
Response Rate as Assessed by Within-Subject Meaningful Change (WSMC) for QOL-B Respiratory Symptoms Final Score Estimated Via Anchor-Based Methods and Validated Via Empirical Cumulative Distribution Functions (eCDFs)
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
WSMC was estimated via change scores computed between Baseline and end of study (EOS) (Month 7). The estimated WSMC threshold of 14.81 points for the QOL-B Respiratory Symptom score (9-item scale ranging from 0 to 100, higher scores=fewer symptoms and better quality of life) as derived from anchor-based methods supplemented with eCDF curves was used for analysis. The percentage of participants and confidence intervals were estimated by standardized logistic regression with treatment group and history of mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung infection as factors in the model. Missing change from baseline at Month 7 was imputed by multiple imputation. The mean of all imputed values was used to derive response according to WSMC. Response rate was expressed in terms of percentage of participants and the percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline to Month 7
Query!
Primary outcome [8]
0
0
Response Rate as Assessed by WSMC for PROMIS Fatigue Final Score Estimated Via Anchor-Based Methods and Validated Via eCDFs
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
WSMC was estimated via change scores computed between Baseline and EOS (Month 7). The percentage of participants and confidence intervals were estimated by standardized logistic regression with treatment group and history of MAC lung infection as factors in the model. Missing change from baseline at Month 7 was imputed by multiple imputation. The mean of all imputed values was used to derive response according to WSMC. The estimated WSMC threshold of -4.00 points for the PROMIS Fatigue score as derived from anchor-based methods supplemented with eCDF curves was used for analysis. Response rate was expressed in terms of percentage of participants and the percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline to Month 7
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving Culture Conversion by Month 6
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Culture conversion by Month 6 was defined as no MAC growth on agar media and broth media in all sputum cultures at 2 consecutive visits up to Month 6. Percentage of participants and confidence intervals were estimated by standardized logistic regression with treatment group and history of MAC lung infection as factors in the model. For the purpose of the estimation missing conversion status by Month 6 was imputed by multiple imputation. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline to Month 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Change From Baseline in QOL-B Respiratory Symptom Score at Month 7
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The QOL-B is a self-administered, PRO questionnaire used to assess symptoms, functioning, and health related quality of life in adults with lung conditions. The respiratory symptom domain of the QOL-B contains 9 items describing patient's self-assessment of her/his respiratory symptoms that affect daily life. For each of the 8 items (chest congestion, coughing, cough up mucus, shortness of breath with greater activity, wheezing, chest pain, shortness of breath when talking, woken up during night due to cough), scores ranged from 1 to 4 (1= lot, 2= moderate, 3= little, 4= not at all) and the sputum item based on the color ranged from 0=don't know,1=green with traces of blood/brownish dark,2=yellowish-green,3=clear to yellow,4=clear. The item scores were summed and then standardized on a 0 to 100-point scale to derive the domain score with higher scores representing fewer symptoms or better functioning and quality of life. Positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline to Month 7
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Change From Baseline in PROMIS F-SF 7a Score at Month 7
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The PROMIS F-SF 7a is a self-administered questionnaire assessing a range of self-reported symptoms over the past 7 days, from mild subjective feelings of tiredness to an overwhelming, debilitating, and sustained sense of exhaustion that likely decreases one's ability to execute daily activities and function normally in family or social roles. Fatigue is divided into the experience of fatigue (frequency, duration, and intensity) and the impact of fatigue on physical, mental, and social activities over 7 items. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1=never to 5=always. Total scores range from 7 to 35 and low scores represent less fatigue interference i.e., better symptoms.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline to Month 7
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Time to First Culture Conversion
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Time to first culture conversion was the number of months between first study drug intake and date of the first negative culture at or before Month 6 after adjustment for non-productivity. Participants without conversion at or before Month 6 are considered censored at the last visit with available culture assessment at or before Month 6.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline to Month 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Time to First Negative Culture
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Time to first negative culture was the number of months from the date of first dose of study drug(s) to the date of first MAC culture negative post-baseline. Participants without negative culture were considered censored at the last visit with available culture assessment or at Month 7 whichever occurred first.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline to Month 7
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Develop a MAC Isolate With Amikacin Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) = 128 Micrograms Per Millliliter (µg/mL) at More Than 1 Visit
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Up to Month 7
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Recurrence of MAC (Relapse) Assessed as Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Culture Conversion With a Subsequent at Least One MAC Positive Culture in Agar Media or Broth Media in at Least 2 Consecutive Visits
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Culture conversion for this outcome measure was defined as MAC culture negative at 2 consecutive visits before or at Month 5 during the treatment period. The positive culture was defined as at least 1 MAC positive culture in agar media or positive cultures in broth media in at least 2 consecutive visits. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline to Month 7
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Recurrence of MAC (New Infection) Assessed as Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Culture Conversion With a Subsequent at Least One MAC Positive Culture in Agar Media or Broth Media in at Least 2 Consecutive Visits
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Culture conversion for this outcome measure was defined as MAC culture negative at 2 consecutive visits before or at Month 5 during the treatment period. The positive culture was defined as at least 1 MAC positive culture in agar media or positive cultures in broth media in at least 2 consecutive visits. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline to Month 7
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Number of Participants Who Experience Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. TEAEs are AEs that occurred on or after the date of first dose of study drugs and within 28 days after the end of treatment.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline to Month 7
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Male or female, = 18 years of age (19 years or older in South Korea)
* Current diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium Complex (MAC) lung infection
* Positive sputum culture for MAC within 6 months prior to screening
* A chest computed tomography (CT) scan, read locally, within 6 months prior to Screening to determine presence and size of pulmonary cavities. Participants who do not have a chest CT scan within 6 months prior to Screening will be required to obtain a chest CT scan, read locally, during Screening
* Willingness and ability to adhere to prescribed study treatment during the study
* Ability to produce (spontaneously or with induction) approximately 2 mL of sputum for mycobacteriology at Screening
* Women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) (ie, fertile following menarche and until becoming post-menopausal unless permanently sterile) and fertile men (ie, all men after puberty unless permanently sterile by bilateral orchidectomy) agree to practice a highly effective method of birth control from Day 1 to at least 90 days after the last dose. Examples of such birth controls are:
* true abstinence (refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire study),
* copper intrauterine device (IUD),
* hormonal methods (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, progestogen implant, combined oral contraceptive pill [combined with barrier method]),
* exclusive homosexual relationship, or
* sole male partner who has undergone surgical sterilization with confirmation of azoospermia at least 3 months post procedure while participating in the study
* Provide signed informed consent prior to administration of study drugs or performing any study related procedure
* Be able to comply with study drugs use, study visits, and study procedures as defined by the protocol
* Men with partners who are WOCBP (pregnant or non-pregnant) agree to use condoms and non-pregnant partners should practice a highly effective method of birth control
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF)
* History of more than 3 MAC lung infections
* Received any mycobacterial antibiotic treatment for current MAC lung infection
* Refractory MAC lung infection, defined as having positive MAC cultures while being treated with a multidrug mycobacterial antibiotic treatment regimen for a minimum of 6 consecutive months and no documented successful treatment, defined as negative sputum culture for MAC and cessation of treatment
* Relapse of prior MAC lung infection, defined as positive sputum culture for MAC = 6 months of cessation of prior successful treatment
* Evidence of any pulmonary cavity = 2 cm in diameter, as determined by chest CT scan, read locally, within 6 months prior to Screening
* Radiographic finding of new lobar consolidation, atelectasis, significant pleural effusion, or pneumothorax during routine clinical care within 2 months prior to Screening
* Active pulmonary malignancy (primary or metastatic) or any malignancy requiring chemotherapy or radiation therapy within 1 year prior to Screening or anticipated during the study
* Acute pulmonary exacerbation (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] or bronchiectasis) requiring treatment with antibiotics, or corticosteroids (intravenous [IV] or oral), within 4 weeks prior to and during Screening
* Current smoker
* History of lung transplantation
* Prior exposure to amikacin liposome inhalation suspension (ALIS) (including clinical study)
* Known hypersensitivity or contraindications to use to ALIS, aminoglycosides, or any of their excipients
* Disseminated MAC infection
* Positive pregnancy test or lactation at Screening. All WOCBP will be tested. Women not of childbearing potential are defined as postmenopausal (ie, amenorrheic for 12 months without an alternative medical cause or confirmed by more than one follicle stimulating hormone [FSH] measurement), or naturally or surgically sterile through bilateral oophorectomy, hysterectomy, or bilateral salpingectomy. For women under the age of 45 years, confirmatory testing with FSH should be considered
* Administration of any investigational drug within 8 weeks prior to Screening
* Known or suspected acquired immunodeficiency syndromes (HIV-positive, regardless of CD4 counts). Other immunodeficiency syndromes that may interfere with study participation in the opinion of the Investigator.
* Current alcohol, medication, or illicit drug abuse
* Known and active COVID-19 infection
* MAC isolate with MIC for clarithromycin = 32 µg/mL at Screening
* Known hypersensitivity or contraindications to use to ethambutol, azithromycin (including other macrolides or ketolides), or any of their excipients per local labeling guidance.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Other
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
22/12/2020
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
9/05/2023
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
99
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD,SA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
AUS010 - Chermside
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
AUS011 - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
AUS008 - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
4032 - Chermside
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
4102 - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
5000 - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
District of Columbia
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Kansas
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Córdoba
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Linz
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Zeeland
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Aalborg
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Aarhus
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Bayern
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Hessen
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Niedersachsen
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Nordrhein-Westfalen
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Dresden
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Ashkelon
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Haifa
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Petah Tikva
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Ramat Gan
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Emilia-Romagna
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Lazio
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Toscana
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Milan
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Seongnam
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Hawkes's Bay
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Waikato
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Christchurch
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Girona
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Chiayi
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Kaohsiung
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Taipei city
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Insmed Incorporated
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The primary objective of this study is to generate evidence demonstrating the domain specification (via modern psychometric methods), reliability, validity, and responsiveness (within-subject meaningful change) of the Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) endpoints.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04677543
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/43/NCT04677543/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/43/NCT04677543/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04677543