Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04898673
Registration number
NCT04898673
Ethics application status
Date submitted
17/05/2021
Date registered
24/05/2021
Titles & IDs
Public title
CP1110 Sound Processor Feasibility
Query!
Scientific title
A Pre-Marketing, Prospective, Multi-Site, Open-Label, Within-Subject, Feasibility, Interventional Study of Speech Perception With Experienced Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Using the CP1110 Sound Processor and Compared With the CP1000 Sound Processor
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
CLTD5804
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Devices - CP1110
Treatment: Devices - CP1000
Experimental: CP1000 Sound Processor followed by the CP1110 Sound Processor - All study subjects were provided with a unique identifier. The ones that ended in an odd number were administered the CP1000 Sound Processor followed by the CP1110 Sound Processor.
Experimental: CP1110 Sound Processor followed by the CP1000 Sound Processor - All study subjects were provided with a unique identifier. The ones that ended in an even number were administered the CP1110 Sound Processor followed by the CP1000 Sound Processor.
Treatment: Devices: CP1110
Sound Processor
Treatment: Devices: CP1000
Sound Processor
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Speech Reception Thresholds (SRT) Assessed Via Sentence Scores in Spatially Separated Adaptive Noise
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Paired difference in dB SRT between treatment and control, with their applicable noise reduction feature enabled.
The speech recognition threshold (SRT) examines at which level the participant can repeat 50% of the speech material correctly. These scores may be negative or positive numeric values. Lower dB SRT scores indicate a better outcome.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
One day
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Correct Words Assessed by CNC (Consonant Nucleus Consonant) Monosyllabic Word Scores in Quiet
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Paired differences in percentage CNC Words correct in quiet (50 dB) between treatment and control, with various configurations of signal processing settings being enabled or disabled for each measure. Word recognition is a score of the number of words correctly repeated, expressed as a percentage. Higher percentage scores indicate a better outcome.
Secondary Endpoint 1: CNC Words correct in quiet (50 dB) with both CP1000 and CP1110 sound processors using Signal-to-Noise Ratio - Noise Reduction (SNR-NR) turned on.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
One day
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Correct Assessed by CNC (Consonant Nucleus Consonant) Monosyllabic Word Scores in Quiet
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Paired differences in percentage CNC Words correct in quiet (50 dB) between treatment and control, with various configurations of signal processing settings being enabled or disabled for each measure. Word recognition is a score of the number of words correctly repeated, expressed as a percentage. Higher percentage scores indicate a better outcome.
CNC Words in Quiet Score using both CP1110 and CP1000 sound processors Signal-to-Noise Ratio - Noise Reduction (SNR-NR) off with expander on.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
One day
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Correct Words Assessed by CNC (Consonant Nucleus Consonant) Monosyllabic Word Scores in Quiet
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Paired differences in percentage CNC Words correct in quiet (50 dB) between treatment and control, with various configurations of signal processing settings being enabled or disabled for each measure.
Word recognition is a score of the number of words correctly repeated, expressed as a percentage. Higher percentage scores indicate a better outcome.
CNC Words in Quiet Score of CP1110 sound processor ForwardFocus ON (Moderate) vs CP1000 sound processor Signal-to-Noise Ration-Noise Reduction) On.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
One Day
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Aged 18 years or older
2. Post lingually deafened
3. Implanted with the CI600 Series (CI612, CI632, CI622, CI624), CI500 Series (CI512, CI532, CI522) or Freedom Series (CI24RE(CA), CI24RE(ST), CI422)
4. At least 6 months experience with a cochlear implant.
5. At least 3 months experience with a Nucleus 6 (CP910/920), Kanso (CP950), Kanso 2 (CP1150) or Nucleus 7 (CP1000) Sound Processor
6. Able to score 30% or more at +15 SNR with CI alone on a sentence in babble test
7. Willingness to participate in and to comply with all requirements of the protocol.
8. Fluent speaker in English as determined by the investigator
9. Willing and able to provide written informed consent
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Additional disabilities that would prevent participation in evaluations.
2. Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject, regarding the possible benefits, risks and limitations that are inherent to the procedures.
3. Unable or unwilling to comply with the requirements of the clinical investigation as determined by the Investigator.
4. Investigator site personnel directly affiliated with this study and/or their immediate families; immediate family is defined as a spouse, parent, child, or sibling.
5. Cochlear employees or employees of Contract Research Organisations or contractors engaged by Cochlear for the purposes of this investigation.
6. Currently participating, or participated in another interventional clinical study/trial in the past 30 days, or (if less than 30 days) the prior investigation was Cochlear sponsored and determined by the investigator to not impact clinical findings of this investigation.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
NA
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
25/10/2021
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
16/12/2021
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
21
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Cochlear Sydney - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2109 - Sydney
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Cochlear
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Avania
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The clinical study aims to investigate the speech performance with the CP1110 Sound Processor, compared with the CP1000 Sound Processor, and inclusion of a noise reduction feature in the Automatic Scene Classifier..
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04898673
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/73/NCT04898673/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/73/NCT04898673/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04898673