Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04982094
Registration number
NCT04982094
Ethics application status
Date submitted
21/06/2021
Date registered
29/07/2021
Date last updated
29/03/2024
Titles & IDs
Public title
Counting On U: Towards Better Mental Health
Query!
Scientific title
Counting On U: Supporting SME Advisors and Owners Towards Better Mental Health
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2020-399
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Mental Health Wellness 1
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Behaviour - Mental Health First Aid and Relationship Building Training
Behaviour - Mental Health First Aid
Experimental: Mental Health First Aid and Relationship Building Training (MHFA+RBT) - Mental Health First Aid training in conjunction with Relationship Building Training.
Active Comparator: Mental Health First Aid (MHFA only) - Mental Health First Aid training alone.
Behaviour: Mental Health First Aid and Relationship Building Training
Relationship Building Training (RBT) is a 2 hour training session conducted live over zoom, that aims to equip business advisors the communications skills they need to enhance trustworthiness and quality of the relationship with their clients.
Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) is a certified training program. It requires 5-7 hours of online course work followed by 2 x 2.5 hour live zoom sessions, that aims to enhance mental health literacy and teach the skills needed to identify the signs of mental health conditions and to have a conversation with a person who may need professional help.
Two Booster sessions are delivered 1- and 3-months after the last MHFA session that aims to give participants the opportunity to consolidate their learning and share experiences applying the knowledge/skills gained.
Participants will also invite 2-3 of their small-business entrepreneur (SME) clients to join the study and complete 3 surveys to provide feedback on the success of the program.
Behaviour: Mental Health First Aid
Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) is a certified training program. It requires 5-7 hours of online course work followed by 2 x 2.5 hour live zoom sessions in addition to online reading, that aims to enhance mental health literacy and teach the skills needed to identify the signs of mental health conditions and to have a conversation with a person who may need professional help.
MHFA online training is conducted two-weeks before the two MHFA sessions (with a 1 day break in between each MHFA). Two Booster sessions are delivered 1- and 3-months after the last MHFA session. The Booster sessions aims to give participants the opportunity to consolidate their learning and share experiences applying the knowledge/skills gained.
Participants will also invite 2-3 of their small-business entrepreneur (SME) clients to join the study and complete 3 surveys to provide feedback on the success of the program.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Behaviour
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Change in the quality of the relationship between the small-medium business owner with the business advisor.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Quality of the Relationship Questionnaire aims to measure the SME owner's satisfaction with the level of attention they are receiving from the business advisor, and the business advisor's belief about how much attention they are providing. For the business advisors, 10 items will be used, four are from the Relationship Flourishing Scale (Fowers et al. 2016) that has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.93, and six are from a newly developed tool by principal investigators (AN, GT) with factor loadings of 0.81 to 0.87. The SME's will answer the latter six items. All items are on a 7-point Likert scale (1 strongly disagree, 7 strongly agree) with a higher total score indicating a stronger relationship.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
SMEs: Baseline, 5 + 11 months post training. BAs: Baseline, 1 + 5 months post training
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Process evaluation
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The RE-AIM framework will be used to guide our evaluation of the intervention (Counting on U) (Glasgow 1999). RE-AIM stands for Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance. Field notes will be recorded, and structured interviews will be conducted with various stakeholders, including the business advisors, SME owners, trainers, and accounting/bookkeeper member bodies who will assist with the recruitment of business advisors. Process evaluation of Counting on U will help inform: 1) the future expansion and implementation of this program to various populations and 2) reveal both strengths and areas for improvement of the program strategies.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline, mid-training, 5-months post training
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Change in psychological distress
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Psychological Distress of the SME owners and business advisors will be measured using the Kessler 6 (K6) (Kessler et al 2002). This non-specific scale screens individuals for severe mental illness as defined as a K6 score =13. The K6 asks respondents, in the past four weeks how often did they feel the following: nervous, hopeless, restless or fidgety, worthless, depressed and felt that everything was an effort. For each question, a value of zero to four is assigned (0 none of the time, 4 all of the time), and a total score summed out of 24. The scale has demonstrated excellent internal consistency and reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89) (Kessler et al 2002).
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
SMEs: Baseline, 5 + 11 months post training. BAs: Baseline, 1 + 5 months post training
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Change in MHFA knowledge
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Knowledge about mental health problems will be assessed using 18 questions adapted by Jorm et al (2010) that reviews information taught on day 1 and 2 of the Mental Health First Aid course. Questions consist of statements rated as Agree, Disagree or Unsure. The total score will be the number of questions answered correctly. An examples question is: "Half of all people who experience a mental illness have their first episode by age 18".
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
BAs: Baseline, 1 + 5 months post training
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Change in confidence to provide MHFA
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Provision of Mental Health First Aid questions will include whether the business advisor had talked to a SME owner about their mental health problems over the past month using a 4-point Likert scale (1 never, 4 many times) (Jorm et al 2010). If they have talked with a SME owner client, they will be asked to indicate how many out of 12 actions they had taken. A score of 1 will be allocated to any action they have taken A Few or Many Times and summing these scores.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
BAs: Baseline, 1 + 5 months post training
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Change in stigmatisation
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Stigmatising attitude of the business advisors will be measured using six statements that queries their opinion of a person described in a vignette (personal stigma) (Reavley 2011). The modified vignette (Yap et al 2015) portrays a 35-year-old business owner who is showing signs of depression. An example of a personal stigma item is: "A problem like John's is a sign of personal weakness". Each item is scored on 5-point Likert scale (1 strongly agree, 5 strongly disagree) and the total score will be the number of items answered Agree or Strongly Agree.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
BAs: Baseline, 1 + 5 months post training
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Change in health seeking behaviour
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Actual Health Seeking Behaviour questions will assess the SME owners and business advisor's behaviour of actively seeking assistance for mental health problems (Rickwood et al. 2005). The scale covers the informal, formal as well as physical and emotional aspect of help-seeking behaviour. The participant is asked to select from a list of people they have gone to for advice or help in the past two weeks.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
SMEs: Baseline, 5 + 11 months post training. BAs: Baseline, 1 + 5 months post training
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Change in health, comfort, and happiness experienced by the individual (Quality of life).
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Quality of Life questions will measure the general health of the business advisors and SME owners. The Short Form-12 questionnaire (SF-12) produces two summary scores - a mental component score (MCS-12) and a physical component score (PCS-12). This questionnaire has a test re-test reliability of 0.76 to 0.89 for the mental (MCS-12) and physical (PCS-12) health components (Ware 1996). Both components can discriminate among groups known to differ in their physical and mental conditions, yielding relative validities of 0.63 to 1.07 (Ware 1996). The answers are weighted, and the results are presented in reference to the United States population profile at the time of the original publication in 1994. A higher score for MCS and PCS indicates a better health state.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
SMEs: Baseline, 5 + 11 months post training. BAs: Baseline, 1 + 5 months post training
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change in financial wellbeing of small-medium enterprise (SME) owners
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Financial Wellbeing Questionnaire (Prawitz 2006) consists of 8 items designed to gather information on how positively the SME owners view their financial situation. Each answer is scored from 1 to 10, and the total is summed and divided by 8. A higher score indicates no financial distress/ high financial well-being. The internal reliability of the scale is robust with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.956 indicating that the items contributing to the measurement of financial well-being, consistently yielded similar results. Factor loadings ranged from 0.83 to 0.93, indicating the measurement of only one latent construct.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
SMEs: Baseline, 5 and 11 month post-training.
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change in the degree of trust the small-medium business owner has in their business advisor
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Trust in Business Advisor Questionnaire measures the three elements of trust defined by Cherry et al. (2018): confidence, acting proactively and not exploiting vulnerabilities. In addition, the SME owner's confidence in the services (i.e., beyond compliance services) offered by the business advisor will be measured. Eleven questions will assess trust on a 5-point Likert scale (1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree) with a higher total score indicating a more trusting relationship. Factor loading for the items range from 0.43 to 0.95 and shows good reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.931 to 0.937.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
SMEs: Baseline, 5 + 11 months post training.
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change in financial pressure
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Perceived Financial Wellbeing questions developed by Netemeyer et al 2018, asks the SME owners to consider how much they agree with 5 statements such as "I am behind with my finances". Their answers will be scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 strongly agree, 5 strongly disagree) and a lower total mean score will indicate a more positive outlook. Perceived financial wellbeing is a strong predictor of overall well-being and has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.86 to 0.94 (Netemeyer et al. 2018).
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
SMEs: Baseline, 5 + 11 months post training.
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Autonomy
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Autonomy will be measured using a 3-item scale that asks how much control the business advisor feels they have over their work and scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree) (Bakker et al, 2004, Karasek 1985). A mean score will be generated and a higher score indicating greater autonomy. The Cronbach's alpha is 0.68.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
BAs: Baseline + 5 months post training
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Emotional
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
Emotional Demands on the business advisors will be measured using the second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (Pejtersen et al, 2010). There are four items exploring how emotionally demanding they find their work, two items are measured on one 5-point Likert scale (1 never, hardly, 5 always) and two on a different 5-point Likert scale (1 to a very small extent, 5 to a large extent). The Cronbach's alpha is 0.87.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
BAs: Baseline, + 5 months post training
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Workload
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Workload of the business advisors will be measuring using 3 items on a 5-point scale (1, not at all, 5 to a great extent) (Albrecht 2015, Karasek 1979). They will be asked their thoughts on statements such as "to what extent is there not enough time for you to do your job?" A mean score will be generated, and a higher score indicates a more demanding workload. The Cronbach's alpha is: 0.85 to 0.88.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
BAs: Baseline + 5 months post training
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Confidence and resilience
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Psychological Capital Short Form (PCQ-12) questionnaire measures wellbeing as a function of four emotions, two of which will be measured in the SME owners and business advisors: resilience and self-efficacy (Kamei et al 2018). Participants will respond to six statements on a 6-point Likert scale (1 strongly disagree, 6 strongly agree). PCQ-12 is designed for working adults and both resilience and self-efficacy statements are significantly correlated with measures of satisfaction with life, happiness and perceived stress (-0.36 to 0.50). The factor loadings of the questions range from 0.30 to 0.87.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
SMEs: Baseline, 5 + 11 months post training. BAs: 1 + 5 months post training
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Social support
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Social Support questions assess the extent of emotional social support the participant receives from clients, family and friends, or colleagues and peers (Totterdal et al. 2006). The business advisors and SME owners will be asked two questions about each source: how easy is to talk to the people concerned and are the people concerned willing to listen to your problems. Responses are recorded on a 5-point Likert scale (1 not at all, 5 a great deal). The higher the score, the higher the social support. The Cronbach's alpha is 0.81.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
SMEs: Baseline, 5 + 11 months post training. BAs: Baseline + 5 months post training
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- Any qualified business advisor from Australia or New Zealand who provides business
advice to a small-medium enterprise client (SME). Business advice refers to the
information, guidance and/or assistance provided by an external adviser that either
directly or indirectly helps to prevent/reduce the financial pressures experienced by
SME owner-clients.
- The SME client must be the owner-manager/operator with 1-199 employees, including the
owner-manager themselves.
- The business advisor must be in contact with their SME client at least 3 times a year.
Query!
Minimum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Exclusion Criteria
- Any business advisor who has completed Mental Health First Aid within the last two
years.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/03/2021
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/09/2023
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
1599
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Deakin University - Burwood
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
3125 - Burwood
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
Leanne Saxon
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Other
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Institute of Public Accountants
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [2]
0
0
Other
Query!
Name [2]
0
0
Beyond Blue
Query!
Address [2]
0
0
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [3]
0
0
Other
Query!
Name [3]
0
0
WorkSafe Victoria
Query!
Address [3]
0
0
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [4]
0
0
Other
Query!
Name [4]
0
0
Mental Health First Aid Australia
Query!
Address [4]
0
0
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The financial state of a business and the mental health of the business owner are closely
related. Thus, the devastating impact of COVID-19 on businesses means small-medium
enterprises (SMEs) owners are particularly vulnerable to experiencing depression, anxiety and
other mental health conditions (MHC). However, there is a tendency for SME owners to seek
help about their financial concerns, rather than their mental wellbeing. For this reason,
trusted business advisors (accountants, bookkeepers, coaches) who engage with their SME
clients on a regular basis, are well-placed to provide advice about both the financial and
mental health concerns of their SME clients.
To provide business advisors with the skills they need to have a conversation with their
clients about their mental wellbeing and to encourage help-seeking where appropriate, mental
health first aid (MHFA) training will be offered. And to help the business advisor forge a
more trusting relationship with their client and provide higher quality advice that may
alleviate their financial stresses, Relationship Building Training (RBT) will also be
provided. Thus, the aim of this randomised control trial is to assess the additional benefit
of combining RBT with MHFA compared with MHFA alone on the financial wellbeing of SME clients
and the quality of their relationship with their business advisor.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04982094
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Prawitz AD, Garman T, Sorhaindo B, O'Neill B, Kim J, Drentea P InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being Scale: Development, Administration, and Score Interpretation
Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. and Schoorman, F.D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 2005. 20(3): 709-734.
Cherry M, McGrath D, Baumann C.Client intimacy & performance advice: Determinants of trust in the public accountant SME client relationship.Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal. 2018; 12(1): 3-32
Coulter K, Coulter R. Determinants of trust in a service provider: the moderating role of length of relationship. Journal of Services Marketing. 2002; 16(1): 35-50.
Fowers BJ, Laurenceau JP, Penfield RD, Cohen LM, Lang SF, Owenz MB, Pasipandoya E. Enhancing relationship quality measurement: The development of the Relationship Flourishing Scale. J Fam Psychol. 2016 Dec;30(8):997-1007. doi: 10.1037/fam0000263.
Jorm AF, Kitchener BA, Fischer JA, Cvetkovski S. Mental health first aid training by e-learning: a randomized controlled trial. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;44(12):1072-81. doi: 10.3109/00048674.2010.516426.
Netemeyer RG, Warmath D, Fernandes D, Lynch GJ Jr. How Am I Doing? Perceived Financial Well-Being, Its Potential Antecedents, and Its Relation to Overall Well-Being Journal of Consumer Research. 2018; 45(1) 68-89,
Totterdell P, Wood S, Wall T. An intra-individual test of the demands-control model: A weekly diary study of psychological strain in portfolio workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2006;79, 63-84
Landells EM, Albrecht SL. Perceived Organizational Politics, Engagement, and Stress: The Mediating Influence of Meaningful Work. Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 10;10:1612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01612. eCollection 2019.
Albrecht SL. Job resources and employee engagement in a Chinese context: the mediating role of job meaningfulness, felt obligation and positive mood. International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets. January 2012
Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Verbeke W. Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance. Human Resource Management. Spring 2004; 43(1):83-104
Pejtersen JH, Kristensen TS, Borg V, Bjorner JB. The second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Scand J Public Health. 2010 Feb;38(3 Suppl):8-24. doi: 10.1177/1403494809349858.
Albrecht SL. Challenge Demands, Hindrance Demands, and Psychological Need Satisfaction Their Influence on Employee Engagement and Emotional Exhaustion. Journal of Personnel Psychology 2015; 14(2):70-79
Karasek RA. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1979: 24: 285-308.
Cocker F, Martin A, Scott J, Venn A, Sanderson K. Psychological distress, related work attendance, and productivity loss in small-to-medium enterprise owner/managers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Oct 15;10(10):5062-82. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10105062.
Morgan AJ, Ross A, Reavley NJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of Mental Health First Aid training: Effects on knowledge, stigma, and helping behaviour. PLoS One. 2018 May 31;13(5):e0197102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197102. eCollection 2018.
Martin A, Sanderson K, Scott J, Brough P. Promoting mental health in small-medium enterprises: an evaluation of the "Business in Mind" program. BMC Public Health. 2009 Jul 15;9:239. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-239.
Bovopoulos N, LaMontagne AD, Martin A, Jorm A. Exploring the role of mental health first aid officers in workplaces: A qualitative study using case study methodology. Int J Workplace Health Manag. 2018;11(6):366-81
Tetrick LE, Slack KJ, Da Silva N, Sinclair RR. A comparison of the stress-strain process for business owners and nonowners: differences in job demands, emotional exhaustion, satisfaction, and social support. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000 Oct;5(4):464-76. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.5.4.464.
Bond KS, Chalmers KJ, Jorm AF, Kitchener BA, Reavley NJ. Assisting Australians with mental health problems and financial difficulties: a Delphi study to develop guidelines for financial counsellors, financial institution staff, mental health professionals and carers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun 3;15:218. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0868-2.
LaMontagne AD, Martin A, Page KM, Reavley NJ, Noblet AJ, Milner AJ, Keegel T, Smith PM. Workplace mental health: developing an integrated intervention approach. BMC Psychiatry. 2014 May 9;14:131. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-131.
LaMontagne AD, Milner AJ, Allisey AF, Page KM, Reavley NJ, Martin A, Tchernitskaia I, Noblet AJ, Purnell LJ, Witt K, Keegel TG, Smith PM. An integrated workplace mental health intervention in a policing context: Protocol for a cluster randomised control trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 27;16:49. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0741-9.
Noblet A, Lamontagne AD. The role of workplace health promotion in addressing job stress. Health Promot Int. 2006 Dec;21(4):346-53. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dal029. Epub 2006 Jul 31.
Tennant C. Work-related stress and depressive disorders. J Psychosom Res. 2001 Nov;51(5):697-704. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00255-0.
Stansfeld S, Candy B. Psychosocial work environment and mental health--a meta-analytic review. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006 Dec;32(6):443-62. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1050.
IPA-Deakin SME Research Centre. Australian Small Business White Paper. Melbourne: 2018.
Storey DJ. Understanding the small business sector: Routledge; 2016.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (February 2021). 8165.0 Counts of Australian Businesses, including Entries and Exits. Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/industry/industry-overview/australian-industry/latest-release#data-download Accessed 20th February 2021.
Ramsden M, Bennett R. The benefits of external support to SMEs: "Hard" versus "soft" outcomes and satisfaction levels. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 2005;12(2):227-43.
icare and Everymind. White Paper: Can digital interventions help to improve mental health and reduce mental ill-health in small business? . NSW, Australia: 2017.
Report Department for Industry, Science, Energy and Resources. "Small business and mental health: supporting small business when they are facing challenges". July 2020.
Blackburn R, Carey P, Tanewski G. Business advice by accountants to SMEs: relationships and trust. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management. 2018.
Maister DH. The Trusted Advisor, Simon and Schuster, New York, 2001.
Yap MB, Reavley NJ, Jorm AF. Is the use of accurate psychiatric labels associated with intentions and beliefs about responses to mental illness in a friend? Findings from two national surveys of Australian youth. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2015 Feb;24(1):54-68. doi: 10.1017/S2045796013000607. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322.
Reavley NJ, Jorm AF. Stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental disorders: findings from an Australian National Survey of Mental Health Literacy and Stigma. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;45(12):1086-93. doi: 10.3109/00048674.2011.621061. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
Kamei H, Ferreira MC, Valentini F, Peres MFP, Kamei PT, Damásio BF. Psychological Capital Questionnaire - Short Version (PCQ-12): evidence of Validity of The Brazilian Psico-USF, Bragança Paulista. 2018 23(2): 203-214
Karasek R. Job content instrument: Questionnaire and user's guide, revision 1.1. Los Angeles: University of Southern California. 1985
Karasek RA. Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1979; 24, 285-308.
Albrecht SL, Su MJ. Job resources and employee engagement in a Chinese context: the mediating role of job meaningfulness, felt obligation and positive mood. Int. J. Business and Emerging Market. 2012; 4(4).
Noblet AJ, LaMontagne AD. The challenges of planning, implementing and evaluating interventions. In: Cartwright S, Cooper CL, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Well-Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009: 466-96.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Andew Noblet, PhD
Query!
Address
0
0
Deakin University
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Summary Results
For IPD and results data, please see
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04982094
Download to PDF