Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03638128
Registration number
NCT03638128
Ethics application status
Date submitted
21/06/2018
Date registered
20/08/2018
Titles & IDs
Public title
Open-label Extension of Study 20130173 of Denosumab in Children and Young Adults With Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Query!
Scientific title
Multicenter, Single-arm Open-label Extension Study to Assess Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Current or Prior Treatment With Denosumab in Children/Young Adults With Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2018-000550-21
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
20170534
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI)
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Human Genetics and Inherited Disorders
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other human genetics and inherited disorders
Query!
Injuries and Accidents
0
0
0
0
Query!
Fractures
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Denosumab
Treatment: Drugs - Alternative osteoporosis medications
Other: Alternative Medications / Observational - Participants who received non-denosumab alternative therapy during the study or who were not receiving any medication at baseline.
Alternative osteoporosis medication(s) were determined at the investigator's discretion and per standard of care and local guidelines.
Experimental: Denosumab 1 mg/kg Q6M - Participants who received at least 1 dose of 1 mg/kg denosumab administered once every 6 months (Q6M) by subcutaneous injection, but no Q3M denosumab during this study.
Experimental: Denosumab 1 mg/kg Q3M - Participants who received at least one dose of 1 mg/kg denosumab administered once every 3 months (Q3M) by subcutaneous injection during this study.
Treatment: Drugs: Denosumab
Solution for injection
Treatment: Drugs: Alternative osteoporosis medications
Alternative osteoporosis medication/s at the discretion of the investigator.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events of Special Interest
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
A Serious Adverse Event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria:
* Resulted in death (fatal)
* Immediately life-threatening
* Required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
* Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity
* Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect
* Other medically important serious event that may have jeopardized the participant or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed above.
Adverse events of special interest included hypocalcemia, hypersensitivity, bacterial cellulitis, osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), hypercalcemia, and typical osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) femur fractures.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From enrollment to end of study, including 24 weeks after last dose of denosumab for participants who received denosumab; the maximum time on study was 24 months.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Number of Participants With Anti-denosumab Antibodies
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Blood samples were collected (from denosumab treated participants only) for the measurement of anti-denosumab binding antibodies. Samples positive for anti-denosumab binding antibodies were further tested for neutralizing antibodies.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From enrollment to end of study, including 24 weeks after last dose of denosumab for participants who received denosumab; the maximum time on study was 24 months
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Toxicities Grade = 3
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0. The grades refer to the severity of the finding:
Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe or medically significant; Grade 4 = Life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From enrollment to end of study, including 24 weeks after last dose of denosumab for participants who received denosumab; the maximum time on study was 24 months
Query!
Primary outcome [4]
0
0
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Findings
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Vital sign measurements included systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and temperature. The investigator assessed vital sign results and determined whether any abnormal changes represented a clinically significant change from the participant's baseline values.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From enrollment to end of study, including 24 weeks after last dose of denosumab for participants who received denosumab; the maximum time on study was 24 months
Query!
Primary outcome [5]
0
0
Number of Participants With Metaphyseal Index Z-score Above Age-appropriate Normal Range
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Anteroposterior radiographs of both knees (unless prohibited by the presence of hardware such as implants) were used to calculate the metaphyseal index Z-score of each knee in participants with open growth plates; the knee selected for assessment during the study was the knee with the higher Z-score at baseline. The metaphyseal index (MI) was calculated by the central imaging vendor as the ratio of femoral width over distal femoral growth plate width, and the Z-score for each participant, relative to the participant's age as:
MI Z-score = (participant value - mean)/SD, where mean and standard deviation (SD) are the corresponding values based on a reference population for the participant's age group at the time of the assessment.
Metaphyseal index Z-score above age-appropriate normal range is defined as a MI Z-score \> 2.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline, month 12 and month 24
Query!
Primary outcome [6]
0
0
Number of Participants With Abnormal Molar Eruption of the First or Second Molar Based on Radiological Findings
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Participants underwent a visual inspection under natural light for the presence of the first and second molars. Participants were referred to a dentist to perform radiographic assessment of the unerupted molar(s) if:
* A participant was age 7 to 12 years and appeared to have an unerupted upper or lower first molar (ie, not all 4 first molars were visible/detectable).
* A participant was age 13 years or older and appeared to have an unerupted upper or lower (first or) second molar (ie, not all 4 first molars and all 4 second molars were visible/detectable).
Abnormal molar eruptions includes the number of participants 7 to 12 years of age with 1st unerupted or partially erupted molars and participants 13 years of age or older with 2nd unerupted or partially erupted molars.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline, month 12, and month 24
Query!
Primary outcome [7]
0
0
Percent Change From Baseline in Mandibular Shaping Parameters
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Lateral cephalogram was performed to enable assessment of mandibular shaping. The lateral cephalogram is a profile X-ray of the skull and soft tissues and is used to assess the relation of the teeth in the jaws, the relation of the jaws to the skull, and the relation of the soft tissues to the teeth and jaws.
The following anatomical angles and dimensions were measured to evaluate the correct proportions of the mandible and its position relative to the skull/maxilla: Gonial angle; Sella-Nasion-A Point Angle (SNA angle); Sella-Nasion-B Point Angle (SNB angle); and A Point - Nasion-B Point Angle (ANB Angle).
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline and month 12 and month 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Z-score
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Bone densitometry assessments of the lumbar spine were performed using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean of an average person of the same age, sex, race, and weight. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean of the matched population, negative Z-scores indicate a BMD lower than the mean of the matched population, and positive Z-scores indicate a higher BMD than that of the matched population. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in lumbar spine BMD.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline and months 6, 12, and 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD Z-score
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Bone densitometry assessments of the hip were performed using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean of an average person of the same age, sex, race, and weight. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean of the matched population, negative Z-scores indicate a BMD lower than the mean of the matched population, and positive Z-scores indicate a higher BMD than that of the matched population. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in total hip BMD.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline, months 6, 12, and 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD Z-score
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Bone densitometry assessments of the femoral neck were performed using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean of an average person of the same age, sex, race, and weight. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean of the matched population, negative Z-scores indicate a BMD lower than the mean of the matched population, and positive Z-scores indicate a higher BMD than that of the matched population. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in femoral neck BMD.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline and months 6, 12, and 24
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Subject has provided informed consent/assent prior to initiation of any Study 20170534 specific activities/procedures. Subject's legally acceptable representative has provided informed consent when the subject is legally too young to provide informed consent and the subject has provided written assent based on local regulations and/or guidelines prior to any study-specific activities/procedures being initiated.
* Subject is currently/was enrolled in Study 20130173 and
* completed the 20130173 End of Study (EOS) visit (regardless of completing or ending investigational product early) OR
* did not reconsent/reassent to transition to 3-month dosing regimen on Study 20130173 OR
* early terminated from Study 20130173 as a result of meeting bone mineral density (BMD) Z-score investigational product stopping criteria.
Query!
Minimum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Treatment with any prohibited proscribed medications while receiving denosumab. Eligibility into study treatment with alternative osteoporosis medication/s of investigator's choice, follow guidelines per the specific alternative osteoporosis medication/s selected. For subjects off-treatment (observation only), no prohibited medications apply.
* Subjects currently receiving treatment in another investigational device or drug study other than Study 20130173. Other investigational procedures while participating in this study are excluded.
* For subjects expected to receive investigational product (denosumab) at study day 1: Female subject is pregnant or breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant or breastfeed during treatment and for an additional 5 months after the last dose of denosumab. Females of childbearing potential (Tanner Stage greater than or equal to 2) should only be included in the study after a negative highly sensitive urine or serum pregnancy test. For study treatment with alternative osteoporosis medication/s of investigator's choice, follow guidelines per the specific alternative osteoporosis medication/s selected. For Subjects off-treatment (observation only), no exclusion applies.
* For subjects expected to receive investigational product (denosumab) at study day 1: Female subjects of childbearing potential unwilling to practice true sexual abstinence (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use 1 highly effective method of contraception during treatment and for an additional 5 months after the last dose of investigational product (denosumab). For study treatment with alternative osteoporosis medication/s of investigator's choice, follow contraception guidelines per the specific alternative osteoporosis medication/s selected. For subjects not receiving any investigational product (observation only), no contraception required.
* History or evidence of any other clinically significant disorder, condition or disease (with the exception of those outlined above) that, in the opinion of the investigator or Amgen physician, if consulted, would pose a risk to subject safety or interfere with the study evaluation, procedures or completion.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Stopped early
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
26/07/2018
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
28/03/2022
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
75
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
The Childrens Hospital at Westmead - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Perth Childrens Hospital - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2145 - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
6909 - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Bruxelles
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Plzen
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Praha 4
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Bordeaux Cedex
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Paris Cedex 15
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Köln
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Lodz
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Cataluña
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Comunidad Valenciana
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Birmingham
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Bristol
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Glasgow
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Sheffield
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Amgen
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
To evaluate long-term safety of denosumab in children/young adults with pediatric osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) who completed the prior study 20130173 (NCT02352753).
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03638128
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
MD
Query!
Address
0
0
Amgen
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request.
Supporting document/s available: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan (SAP), Informed consent form (ICF), Clinical study report (CSR)
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.
Query!
Available to whom?
Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors. If not approved, a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel will arbitrate and make the final decision. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the URL below.
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: https://www.amgen.com/datasharing
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/28/NCT03638128/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/28/NCT03638128/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03638128