Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05002088
Registration number
NCT05002088
Ethics application status
Date submitted
27/07/2021
Date registered
12/08/2021
Date last updated
9/02/2024
Titles & IDs
Public title
Portico Valve-in-Valve Retrospective Registry
Query!
Scientific title
Retrospective Assessment of the Portico Transcatheter Aortic Valve for Valve-in-Valve Use
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
ABBOTT-CIP-10414
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Condition category
Condition code
Cardiovascular
0
0
0
0
Query!
Diseases of the vasculature and circulation including the lymphatic system
Query!
Cardiovascular
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other cardiovascular diseases
Query!
Other
0
0
0
0
Query!
Research that is not of generic health relevance and not applicable to specific health categories listed above
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational [Patient Registry]
Query!
Patient registry
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Devices - Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Primary Analysis Population - The primary analysis population will include patients who have signed an Informed Consent Form, and at minimum, the Portico delivery system entered his/her vasculature for an attempted Portico ViV implant. Patients must have met the sizing requirements of the PorticoTM transthoracic aortic valve sizing specification (=19 mm and =27 mm).
Exploratory Registry Arm - The exploratory registry arm will collect data for patients that were treated for a failed surgical bioprosthetic aortic valve true inner diameter size of <19 mm or >27 mm.
Treatment: Devices: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for the treatment of a failed surgical aortic valve bioprosthesis, Valve-in-Valve (ViV), in patients who were considered to be at increased risk for redo surgical aortic valve replacement
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
The rate of all-cause mortality, disabling stroke, life-threatening bleeding requiring blood transfusion, acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring dialysis, and major vascular complication adverse events at 30-days post-procedure.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Composite of all-cause mortality, disabling stroke, life threatening bleeding requiring blood transfusion, acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring dialysis, and major vascular complications
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
30 days post index procedure
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
The rate of all-cause mortality and disabling stroke adverse events at 1-year post-procedure.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Composite of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
1 year post index procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Procedure Success (descriptive endpoint)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Defined as absence of procedural mortality AND successful access, delivery of the valve, and retrieval of the delivery system
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Evaluation of adverse event rates (descriptive endpoint)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
All-cause mortality, Cardiovascular-related mortality, All Stroke (by severity), Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIA), Myocardial infarction (MI), New pacemaker implant (PPI), Coronary obstruction, Minor, Major, and life-threatening bleeding, major vascular, access-related, or cardiac structure complication, acute kidney injury (AKI) stages 1-4
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
30 days post index procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Evaluation of adverse event rates (descriptive endpoint)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
All-cause mortality, Cardiovascular-related mortality, All Stroke (by severity), Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIA), Myocardial infarction (MI), New pacemaker implant (PPI), Coronary obstruction
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
1 year post index procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Evaluation of adverse event rates (descriptive endpoint)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
All-cause mortality, Cardiovascular-related mortality, All Stroke (by severity), TIA
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
2 years post index procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Evaluation of adverse event rates (descriptive endpoint)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
All-cause mortality, Cardiovascular-related mortality, All Stroke (by severity), TIA
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
3 years post index procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Evaluation of adverse event rates (descriptive endpoint)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
All-cause mortality, Cardiovascular-related mortality, All Stroke (by severity), TIA
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
4 years post index procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Evaluation of adverse event rates (descriptive endpoint)
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
All-cause mortality, Cardiovascular-related mortality, All Stroke (by severity), TIA
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
5 years post index procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Clinical Benefit Endpoint
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification from baseline to 30 days, 1 year, and annually through 5 years
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
30 days post index procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Clinical Benefit Endpoint
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification from baseline to 30 days, 1 year, and annually through 5 years
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
1 year post index procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Clinical Benefit Endpoint
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification from baseline to 30 days, 1 year, and annually through 5 years
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
2 years post index procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Clinical Benefit Endpoint
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification from baseline to 30 days, 1 year, and annually through 5 years
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
3 years post index procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Clinical Benefit Endpoint
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification from baseline to 30 days, 1 year, and annually through 5 years
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
4 years post index procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Clinical Benefit Endpoint
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification from baseline to 30 days, 1 year, and annually through 5 years
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
5 years post index procedure
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Subject had a degenerated surgical aortic bioprosthetic valve with severe aortic
stenosis, severe regurgitation, or a combination of at least moderate stenosis with at
least moderate regurgitation per EAPCI-ESC-EACTS standardized criteria.
2. Surgical bioprosthesis true inner diameter (true ID) was = 19 mm and = 27 mm and was
confirmed by either CT or confirmed by the Valve in Valve Aortic App. Refer to the PCR
website
https://www.pcronline.com/PCR-Publications/PCR-mobile-apps/Valve-in-Valve-Aortic-app
Note: if CT was contraindicated and/or not possible to be obtained, a transesophageal
echocardiogram (TEE) will be accepted for sizing.
3. Prior to Portico ViV procedure, the patient was deemed at increased risk for surgery
to replace the surgical aortic bioprosthetic valve.
4. Subject provided written informed consent prior to performing data collection for
study specific visits. For patients that are deceased at the time of enrollment, all
institutional/local legal and regulatory requirements for consent must be met prior to
enrollment and data collection.
5. Subject is = 18 years of age or legal age in host country at the time of consent.
6. Prior to the Portico ViV index procedure, the subject had New York Heart Association
(NYHA) class II, III, or IV.
7. Subject had a minimum vessel diameter of 6.0 mm for Portico™ delivery system access or
a minimum of 5.0 mm for the FlexNav™ delivery system.
8. Subject had the Portico or FlexNav delivery system enter their vasculature
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Subject had evidence of an acute MI, percutaneous intervention, or a peripheral
intervention =30 days prior to Portico ViV index procedure (MI defined as: ST Segment
Elevation as evidenced on 12 Lead ECG).
2. Subject had uncontrolled blood dyscrasias defined as: leukopenia (WBC<3,000 mm3),
acute anemia (Hb <9 g/dL), or thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50,000 cells/mm³).
3. Subject was considered hemodynamically unstable at the time of the ViV procedure
(requiring inotropic support or mechanical heart assistance)
4. Subject had severe ventricular dysfunction with left ventricular ejection fraction
(LVEF) <20% as measured by resting echocardiogram.
5. Subject had imaging evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
6. Subject had an active peptic ulcer or has/had upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding =3
months prior to ViV index procedure.
7. Subject had a documented history of a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or a transient
ischemic attack (TIA) =6 months prior to index procedure.
8. Subject had renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >3.0 mg/dL (265.5µmol/L)) and/or end
stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis.
9. Subject had active bacterial endocarditis or ongoing sepsis = 6 months prior to the
index procedure.
10. Surgical aortic bioprosthetic valve was unstable or rocking.
11. Subject had a vascular condition (i.e. stenosis, tortuosity, or severe calcification)
that made insertion and endovascular access to the aortic valve impossible.
12. Subject was unable to tolerate antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Query!
Duration
Query!
Selection
Query!
Timing
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
21/10/2021
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
29/12/2023
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
71
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
GenesisCare - St Andrew's Hospital & GenesisCare Leabrook - Satellite Site of GenesisCare - Wesley Hospital - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
GenesisCare - Wesley Hospital - Auchenflower
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
QLD 4066 - Auchenflower
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Copenhagen
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Bad Nauheim
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Rostock
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Morriston
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name
Abbott Medical Devices
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The objective of this data-collection study is to retrospectively evaluate the safety and clinical performance of the Portico transthoracic aortic valve for Valve-in-Valve treatment of a failed aortic surgical bioprosthetic valve in patients who are considered at increased surgical risk for a redo surgical aortic valve replacement.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05002088
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Vinny Podichetty
Query!
Address
0
0
Abbott
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05002088
Download to PDF