Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05146206
Registration number
NCT05146206
Ethics application status
Date submitted
10/11/2021
Date registered
6/12/2021
Titles & IDs
Public title
Patient Satisfaction and Sensory Attributes Allergic Rhinitis Nasal Spray
Query!
Scientific title
Patient Satisfaction and Sensory Attributes of Nasal Spray Treatments for Allergic Rhinitis
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
20210902_2
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Allergic Rhinitis
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Allergies
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Query!
Respiratory
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other respiratory disorders / diseases
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Other interventions - Observational
Patients on RYALTRIS - Patients who are currently using RYALTRIS nasal spray.
Patients on DYMISTA - Patients who are currently using DYMISTA nasal spray.
Other interventions: Observational
In this observational study, participants initated on RYALTRIS/DYMISTA nasal spray will complete a cross-sectional online survey that includes a Best-Worst Scaling task to capture their satisfaction and importance of various treatment attributes.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Overall Best-Worst Scaling Task Index Score (Treatment Satisfaction Index Score)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The primary study endpoint is the overall index score from the Best Worst Scaling exercise, to reflect satisfaction and importance of treatment attributes of the RYALTRIS® and DYMISTA® nasal spray.
Index scores from the Best Worst Scaling exercise range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction of treatment attributes.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Cross-sectional - through study completion, an average of 3 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Rescaled Scores From Best-Worst Scaling Task
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Secondary study endpoints were the rescaled Best Worst Scaling domain scores from the Best Worst Scaling exercise (i.e., scores for each of the domains on satisfaction and importance).
Rescaled Best-Worst Scaling domain scores range from 0 to 10 and represent the satisfaction and importance of each domain. Higher satisfaction rescaled scores indicate higher satisfaction on a treatment attribute. Higher importance rescaled scores indicate higher importance of the treatment attribute. Higher rescaled satisfaction and importance scores suggest a better outcome since participants are satisfied and more likely to adhere to their current treatment.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Cross-sectional - through study completion, an average of 3 months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Allergic Rhinitis patients (moderate-to-severe Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis or Perennial Allergic Rhinitis) with or without conjunctivitis who meet the following criteria will be offered the opportunity to participate in the study:
* Patients above 18 years old
* Fluent in English
* Patients initiated on RYALTRIS® or DYMISTA® nasal spray in the last 12 months and currently using treatment
* Willing and able to provide consent to participate
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Have reported a loss of taste and/or smell related to COVID-19 (or other medical condition)
* Are employed by a pharmaceutical company (to avoid conflict of interest)
* Are employed by a vaccine company (to avoid conflict of interest)
* Do not have access to the internet (to ensure validity of the data)
* Are unable to read and understand English (to ensure validity of the data)
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Query!
Duration
Query!
Selection
Query!
Timing
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
8/11/2021
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
27/02/2022
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
426
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Community and Patient Preference Research Pty Ltd - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2000 - Sydney
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Community and Patient Preference Research Pty Ltd
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Seqirus
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [2]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [2]
0
0
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals S.A.
Query!
Address [2]
0
0
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The study seeks to understand patients' satisfaction and importance of treatment attributes for Allergic Rhinitis nasal sprays from two brands (RYALTRIS® vs. DYMISTA®).
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05146206
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2019. Allergic rhinitis ('hay fever'). Cat. no. PHE 257. Canberra: AIHW. Viewed 01 May 2020, https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/chronic-respiratory-conditions/allergic-rhinitis-hay-fever/contents/allergic-rhinitis Meltzer EO, Bardelas J, Goldsobel A, Kaiser H. A preference evaluation study comparing the sensory attributes of mometasone furoate and fluticasone propionate nasal sprays by patients with allergic rhinitis. Treat Respir Med. 2005;4(4):289-96. doi: 10.2165/00151829-200504040-00007. Meltzer EO, Garadi R, Laforce C, Chadwick SJ, Berger WE, Gross G, Edwards MR, Crenshaw K, Wall GM. Comparative study of sensory attributes of two antihistamine nasal sprays: olopatadine 0.6% and azelastine 0.1%. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2008 Nov-Dec;29(6):659-68. doi: 10.2500/aap.2008.29.3181. Epub 2008 Dec 6. Meltzer EO, Hadley J, Blaiss M, Benninger M, Kimel M, Kleinman L, Dupclay L, Garcia J, Leahy M, Georges G. Development of questionnaires to measure patient preferences for intranasal corticosteroids in patients with allergic rhinitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Feb;132(2):197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.10.010. Price D, Klimek L, Galffy G, Emmeluth M, Koltun A, Kopietz F, Nguyen DT, van Weissenbruch R, Pohl W, Kuhl HC, Scadding G, Mullol J. Allergic rhinitis and asthma symptoms in a real-life study of MP-AzeFlu to treat multimorbid allergic rhinitis and asthma. Clin Mol Allergy. 2020 Aug 6;18:15. doi: 10.1186/s12948-020-00130-9. eCollection 2020. Louviere, J., Flynn, T., Marley, A., 2015. References. In Best-Worst Scaling: Theory, Methods and Applications Cambridge University, Cambridge, pp. 316-331 Muhlbacher AC, Kaczynski A, Zweifel P, Johnson FR. Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview. Health Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;6(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13561-015-0079-x. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Simon Fifer, PhD
Query!
Address
0
0
Community and Patient Preference Research Pty Ltd
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/06/NCT05146206/Prot_SAP_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/06/NCT05146206/Prot_SAP_000.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05146206