Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00720941
Registration number
NCT00720941
Ethics application status
Date submitted
22/07/2008
Date registered
23/07/2008
Titles & IDs
Public title
Pazopanib Versus Sunitinib in the Treatment of Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Query!
Scientific title
Study VEG108844, A Study of Pazopanib Versus Sunitinib in the Treatment of Subjects With Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2008-002102-19
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
108844
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
COMPARZ
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Non melanoma skin cancer
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Kidney
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Pazopanib
Treatment: Drugs - Sunitinib
Active comparator: Sunitinib - Control arm
Experimental: Pazopanib - Experimental arm
Treatment: Drugs: Pazopanib
800 mg administered once daily orally continuous dosing
Treatment: Drugs: Sunitinib
50 mg sunitinib to be administered in 6-week cycles: 50mg orally daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off treatment
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
PFS is defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the earliest date of progressive disease (PD), as defined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC), or death due to any cause. The IRC defined PD per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), Version 1. Per RECIST, PD is defined as a \>=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for PFS estimates.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From randomization until the earliest date of disease progression or death (up to Study Week 191)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Overall Survival
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization until death due to any cause.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From randomization until death (up to Study Week 268)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Number of Participants in the Indicated Categories for Overall Response as Assessed by Independent Review
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The number of participants with evidence of CR (the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions), PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters \[LD\] of target lesions, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD), Stable Disease (small changes that do not meet previously given criteria), or Progressive Disease (a \>=20% increase in target lesions within the first 12 weeks of treatment) was evaluated by an independent review per RECIST, Version 1.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From randomization until the time of a confirmed best response of CR or PR (up to Study Week 167)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Time to Response
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Time to response is defined as the time from the start of treatment until the first documented evidence of CR (the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD), whichever comes first. CR and PR were evaluated by an independent review per RECIST, Version 1.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From randomization until the time of the first documented confirmed complete or partial response (up to Study Week 167)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Duration of Response (DOR)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
DOR is defined as the time from the first documented evidence of response (CR or PR) until the first documented sign of disease progression (a \>=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion) or death, if sooner. CR=the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR=at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From the time of the first documented confirmed complete or partial response until disease progression or death, if sooner (up to Study Week 167)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Number of Participants (Par.) With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)/Non-serious Adverse Events (Any Untoward Medical Occurrence in a Par. Administered a Pharmaceutical Product and Which Does Not Necessarily Have a Causal Relationship With This Treatment)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
See the SAE/AE module for a list of all SAEs/AEs. SAE=any event occurring at any dose that results in any of the following: death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience (ADE; at immediate risk of death from the experience as it occurred), inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent/significant disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or a Grade 4 laboratory abnormality. Events that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require hospitalization may be considered to be a serious ADEs when based upon appropriate medical judgment.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From the time of the first dose of study drug to approximately one month after the discontinuation of study drug (up to Study Week 268)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scale Scores at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The FACIT-F scale measures the severity and impact of fatigue on functioning and health related quality of life (HRQoL) experienced in the past seven days. The level of fatigue is measured by 13 questions assessed on a four-point scale (0=not at all fatigued; 1=a little bit fatigued; 2=somewhat fatigued; 3=quite a bit fatigued; 4=very much fatigued; possible total score of 0 to 52). A negative change from Baseline represents a worsening condition. Change from Baseline was calculated as the assessment week value minus the Baseline value.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline (predose); Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Disease-related Symptoms-physical (DRS-P) Domain Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively)
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The FKSI-19 is a disease-specific instrument that measures disease and treatment-related symptoms specifically in renal cancer patients in 4 domains. The DRS-P domain assesses symptoms experienced in the past 7 days. Participants are asked to respond to 12 questions ("I have a lack of energy," "I feel pain," for example) by using a 5-point scale (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much; possible total domain score of 0 to 48). Higher scores represent better health. A negative change from Baseline represents a worsening of condition.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline; Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Disease Related Symptoms-emotional (DRS-E) Domain Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively)
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The FKSI-19 is a disease-specific instrument measuring disease and treatment-related symptoms specifically in renal cancer patients in 4 domains. The DRS-E domain assesses symptoms experienced in the past 7 days. Participants are asked to respond to the question of "I worry that my condition will get worse" by using a 5-point scale (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much; possible total domain score of 0 to 4). A negative change from Baseline (BL) represents a worsening of condition. Change from BL was calculated as the assessment week value minus the BL value.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline; Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Treatment Side Effects (TSE) Domain Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively)
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The FKSI-19 is a disease-specific instrument that measures disease and treatment-related symptoms specifically in renal cancer patients in 4 domains. The TSE domain assesses side effects experienced in the past 7 days. Participants are asked to respond to 3 questions ("I have nausea," "I have diarrhea," and "I am bothered by side effects of treatment") by using a 5-point scale (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much; possible total domain score of 0 to 12).Higher scores represent better health. A negative change from Baseline represents a worsening of condition.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline; Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Functional Well Being (FWB) Domain Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively)
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
The FKSI-19 is a disease-specific instrument that measures disease and treatment-related symptoms specifically in renal cancer patients in 4 domains. The FWB domain assesses well being in the past 7 days. Participants are asked to respond to 3 questions ("I am able to work," "I am able to enjoy life," and "I am content with the quality of my life now") by using a 5-point scale (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much; possible total domain score of 0 to 12). Higher scores represent better health. A negative change from Baseline represents a worsening of condition.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline; Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) Scale Total Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively)
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The FKSI-19 is a disease-specific instrument that measures disease and treatment-related symptoms specifically in renal cancer patients in 4 domains (DRS-P, DRS-E, TSE, and FWB). Participants are asked to respond to a total of 19 questions regarding symptoms, side effects, and well being by using a 5-point scale (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much; possible total score of 0 to 76). Higher scores represent better health. A negative change from Baseline represents a worsening of condition.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline; Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Supplementary Quality of Life Questions (SQLQ) Scale Worst Soreness Scores at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively)
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
The SQLQ scale consists of 5 items that assess the worst mouth and throat, hand, and foot soreness, as well as limitations due to mouth/throat and foot soreness. Participants were asked to assess their worst mouth/throat, hand, and foot soreness by answering the question of " In the past 4 weeks, what was your worst mouth/throat, hand, and foot soreness?" by using the following 4-point scale: 0, I never had any soreness; 1, I had a little bit of soreness; 2, I had quite a lot of soreness; 3, I had severe soreness. A positive mean change from Baseline represents a worsening of condition.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Baseline; Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Supplementary Quality of Life Questions (SQLQ) Limitations Due to Mouth and Throat Soreness Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively)
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
The SQLQ consists of 5 items assessing the worst mouth/throat, hand, and foot soreness, and limitations due to mouth/throat and foot soreness. Participants (par.) assessed the limitations caused by their mouth/throat soreness by answering the question of "In the past 4 weeks, how much did your worst mouth/throat soreness limit you in the following activities: swallowing/eating/drinking/talking/sleeping" by using the following 4-point scale: 0, not limited; 1, limited a little; 2, limited a lot; 3, unable to do. The overall limitation score (15=best; 0=worst), based on the individual scores for the 5 activities, is derived as follows: the actual scores were rescored by subtracting the actual score from "3" for each of the 5 categories. A high score indicates less limitation. Change from Baseline was calculated as the assessment week value minus the Baseline value. A negative mean change from Baseline represents a worsening of condition.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline; Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Supplementary Quality of Life Questions (SQLQ) Limitations Due to Foot Soreness Scores at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively)
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
The SQLQ consists of 5 items assessing the worst mouth/throat, hand, and foot soreness, and limitations due to mouth/throat and foot soreness. Par. assessed the limitations caused by their foot soreness by answering the question of "In the past 4 weeks, how much did your worst foot soreness limit you in each of the following activities: standing/walking/climbing stairs/sleeping/ability to do usual activities" by using the following 4-point scale: 0, not limited; 1, limited a little; 2, limited a lot; 3, unable to do. The overall limitation score (15=best; 0=worst), based on the individual scores for the 5 activities, is derived as follows: the actual scores were rescored by subtracting the actual score from "3" for each of the 5 categories. A high score indicates less limitation. Change from Baseline was calculated as the assessment week value minus the Baseline value. A negative mean change from Baseline represents a worsening of condition.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline; Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Summary of Analysis for the Cancer Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) Score at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively)
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
The CTSQ assesses 3 domains related to the participant's satisfaction with cancer therapy: Expectations of Therapy (ET), Feelings about Side Effects (FSE), and Satisfaction with Therapy (SWT). Participants shared their thoughts on their cancer therapy (9 questions), their satisfaction with their most recently administered cancer therapy (6 questions), and if they would take the same cancer therapy if given the choice to do so again. All questions were assessed on a 5-point scale; 1, never; 5, always. Scores were averaged and transformed to a 0-100 scale; higher scores represent better health.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Medical Resource Utilization (MRU): Assessed as the Mean Number of Non-study Medical Visits, Telephone Consultations, Hospital Days, and Emergency Room (ER) Visits Per 30 Days Through Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Non-study medical visits were defined as the sum of primary care physician visits, nurse practitioner/physician's assistant/nurse visits, and medical or surgical specialist visits. Days hospitalized were defined as the sum of days in the general ward and days in intensive care. The number of telephone consultations and ER visits was assessed via individual questions on the electronic Case Report Form. The endpoint was totaled through Week 24, divided by the number of days on treatment for each participant, then multiplied by 30 days to get the number of visits per 30 days.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
From Day 1 up to Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
MRU: The Mean Number of Laboratory Visits, Radiology Visits, Home Healthcare Visits, and Medical Procedures for Cycles 1-4. MRU Data Collected at Day 28 of Cycles 1-4 (Average of Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22, Respectively)
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
The number of non-study laboratory visits (NSLVs), non-study radiology visits (NSRVs), and home healthcare visits (HHVs) were each collected as a single question on the eCRF. The number of non-study medical or surgical procedures (MSPs) was defined as the sum of procedures performed at outpatient or physician clinics, as well as those performed during any inpatient hospitalization.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Weeks 4, 10, 16, and 22
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Written informed consent
* Diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma with clear-cell component histology.
* Received no prior systemic therapy (interleukin-2, interferon-alpha, chemotherapy, bevacizumab, mTOR inhibitor, sunitinib, sorafenib or other VEGF TKI) for advanced or metastatic RCC
* Locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma
* Measurable disease by CT or MRI
* Karnofsky performance scale status of >=70
* Age >=18 years
* A female is eligible to enter and participate in this study if she is of: non-childbearing or agrees to use adequate contraception.
* Adequate organ system function
* Total serum calcium concentration <12.0mg/dL
* Left ventricular ejection fraction >= lower limit of institutional normal.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Pregnant or lactating female (unless agrees to refrain from nursing throughout the treatment period and for 14 days following the last dose of study)
* History of another malignancy (unless have been disease-free for 3 years)
* History or clinical evidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases (unless have previously-treated CNS metastases and meet all 3 of the following criteria are: are asymptomatic, have had no evidence of active CNS metastases for >=6 months prior to enrolment, and have no requirement for steroids or enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants)
* Clinically significant gastrointestinal abnormalities including, but not limited to: malabsorption syndrome, major resection of the stomach or small bowel that could affect the absorption of study drug, active peptic ulcer disease, known intraluminal metastatic lesion/s with suspected bleeding, Inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, or other gastrointestinal conditions with increased risk of perforation, history of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra abdominal abscess within 28 days prior to beginning study treatment.
* Presence of uncontrolled infection.
* Prolongation of corrected QT interval (QTc) > 480 milliseconds
* History of any one or more of the following cardiovascular conditions within the past 12 months: cardiac angioplasty or stenting, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary artery by-pass graft surgery, symptomatic peripheral vascular disease, Class III or IV congestive heart failure, as defined by the New York Heart Association
* History of cerebrovascular accident including transient ischemic attack within the past 12 months
* History of pulmonary embolism or untreated deep venous thrombosis (DVT) within the past 6 months (unless had recent DVT and have been treated with therapeutic anti-coagulating agents for at least 6 weeks)
* Poorly controlled hypertension (defined as systolic blood pressure of >=150mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of >=90mmHg). Initiation or adjustment of antihypertensive medication(s) is permitted prior to study entry
* Prior major surgery or trauma within 28 days prior to first dose of study drug and/or presence of any non-healing wound, fracture, or ulcer.
* Evidence of active bleeding or bleeding susceptibility
* Spitting/coughing up blood within 6 weeks of first dose of study drug
* Known endobronchial lesions and/or lesions infiltrating major pulmonary vessels
* Any serious and/or unstable pre-existing medical, psychiatric, or other conditions that could interfere with patient's safety, obtaining informed consent or compliance to the study.
* Use any prohibited medications within 14 days of the first dose of study medication.
* Use of an investigational agent, including an investigational anti-cancer agent, within 28 days or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to the first dose of study drug.
* Prior use of an investigational or licensed drug that targets VEGF or VEGF receptors (eg. bevacizumab, sunitinib, sorafenib, etc), or are mTOR inhibitors (eg. temsirolimus, everolimus, etc).
* Is now undergoing and/or has undergone in the 14 days immediately prior to first dose of study drug, any cancer therapy (surgery, tumor embolization, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, biological therapy, or hormonal therapy)
* Any ongoing toxicity from prior anti-cancer therapy that is >Grade 1 and/or that is progressing in severity.
* Known immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reaction or idiosyncrasy to drugs chemically related to pazopanib or sunitinib.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
14/08/2008
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
24/03/2021
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
927
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,SA,TAS,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Randwick
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Waratah
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Bedford Park
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Hobart
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment hospital [9]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Wodonga
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2050 - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2217 - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
2031 - Randwick
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
2298 - Waratah
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
2145 - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
5042 - Bedford Park
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
0
0
7000 - Hobart
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
0
0
3084 - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [9]
0
0
3690 - Wodonga
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Arkansas
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
District of Columbia
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Iowa
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Kentucky
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Mississippi
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Nebraska
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Nevada
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
New Hampshire
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Manitoba
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
New Brunswick
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Guangdong
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Jiangsu
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Beijing
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Shanghai
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Tianjin
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Baden-Wuerttemberg
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Bayern
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Hessen
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Niedersachsen
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Nordrhein-Westfalen
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Saarland
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Sachsen-Anhalt
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Sachsen
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Ireland
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Dublin
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Ireland
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Galway
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Ireland
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Tallaght, Dublin
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Campania
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Emilia-Romagna
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Friuli-Venezia-Giulia
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Lazio
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Lombardia
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Toscana
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Ehime
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Fukuoka
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Hokkaido
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Ibaraki
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Iwate
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Kanagawa
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Kyoto
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Okayama
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Osaka
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Shizuoka
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Tokyo
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Yamagata
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Daegu
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Daejeon
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-Do
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Alkmaar
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Amsterdam
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Breda
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Den Haag
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Groningen
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Sittard-geleen
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Tilburg
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Utrecht
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Badalona
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Barakaldo (Vizcaya)
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Gerona
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Pamplona
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
Lund
Query!
Country [95]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [95]
0
0
Stockholm
Query!
Country [96]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [96]
0
0
Uppsala
Query!
Country [97]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [97]
0
0
Kaohsiung Hsien
Query!
Country [98]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [98]
0
0
Taichung
Query!
Country [99]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [99]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Country [100]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [100]
0
0
Taoyuan
Query!
Country [101]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [101]
0
0
Gloucestershire
Query!
Country [102]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [102]
0
0
Middlesex
Query!
Country [103]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [103]
0
0
Bebington, Wirral
Query!
Country [104]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [104]
0
0
Birmingham
Query!
Country [105]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [105]
0
0
Cambridge
Query!
Country [106]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [106]
0
0
Glasgow
Query!
Country [107]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [107]
0
0
Leeds
Query!
Country [108]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [108]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [109]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [109]
0
0
Manchester
Query!
Country [110]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [110]
0
0
Nottingham
Query!
Country [111]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [111]
0
0
Sheffield
Query!
Country [112]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [112]
0
0
Swansea
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study is being conducted to provide a direct comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability for pazopanib and sunitinib (SUTENT)
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00720941
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Sheng X, Jin J, He Z, Huang Y, Zhou A, Wang J, Ren X, Ye D, Zhang X, Qin S, Zhou F, Wang B, Guo J. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: pooled subgroup analysis from the randomized, COMPARZ studies. BMC Cancer. 2020 Mar 14;20(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6708-8. Sternberg CN, Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Choueiri TK, Kollmannsberger C, Bjarnason GA, Paul Nathan, Porta C, Grunwald V, Dezzani L, Han J, Tannir NM. COMPARZ Post Hoc Analysis: Characterizing Pazopanib Responders With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Dec;17(6):425-435.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Feb 6. Guo J, Jin J, Oya M, Uemura H, Takahashi S, Tatsugami K, Rha SY, Lee JL, Chung J, Lim HY, Wu HC, Chang YH, Azad A, Davis ID, Carrasco-Alfonso MJ, Nanua B, Han J, Ahmad Q, Motzer R. Safety of pazopanib and sunitinib in treatment-naive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Asian versus non-Asian subgroup analysis of the COMPARZ trial. J Hematol Oncol. 2018 May 22;11(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0617-1. Grunwald V, Dietrich M, Pond GR. Early tumor shrinkage is independently associated with improved overall survival among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a validation study using the COMPARZ cohort. World J Urol. 2018 Sep;36(9):1423-1429. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2297-4. Epub 2018 Apr 13. Beaumont JL, Salsman JM, Diaz J, Deen KC, McCann L, Powles T, Hackshaw MD, Motzer RJ, Cella D. Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity analysis of pazopanib versus sunitinib in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2016 Apr 1;122(7):1108-15. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29888. Epub 2016 Jan 27. Goldstein D, Rosenberg JE, Figlin RA, Townsend RR, McCann L, Carpenter C, Pandite L. Is change in blood pressure a biomarker of pazopanib and sunitinib efficacy in advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma? Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jan;53:96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Dec 15. Sorich MJ, Kichenadasse G, Rowland A, Woodman RJ, Mangoni AA. Angiotensin system inhibitors and survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with VEGF-targeted therapy: A pooled secondary analysis of clinical trials. Int J Cancer. 2016 May 1;138(9):2293-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29972. Epub 2016 Jan 6. Lai JS, Beaumont JL, Diaz J, Khan S, Cella D. Validation of a short questionnaire to measure symptoms and functional limitations associated with hand-foot syndrome and mucositis in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2016 Jan 15;122(2):287-95. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29655. Epub 2015 Oct 12. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Cella D, Reeves J, Hawkins R, Guo J, Nathan P, Staehler M, de Souza P, Merchan JR, Boleti E, Fife K, Jin J, Jones R, Uemura H, De Giorgi U, Harmenberg U, Wang J, Sternberg CN, Deen K, McCann L, Hackshaw MD, Crescenzo R, Pandite LN, Choueiri TK. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 22;369(8):722-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303989.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Query!
Address
0
0
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.
This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Query!
Available to whom?
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00720941