Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00735709
Registration number
NCT00735709
Ethics application status
Date submitted
14/08/2008
Date registered
15/08/2008
Date last updated
18/12/2013
Titles & IDs
Public title
Efficacy Study of Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder
Query!
Scientific title
A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Fixed-Dose Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of 3 Doses of Lu AA21004 in Acute Treatment of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2008-001580-11
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
LuAA21004_305
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Major Depressive Disorder
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Mental Health
0
0
0
0
Query!
Depression
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Vortioxetine
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo
Experimental: Vortioxetine 1 mg - Vortioxetine 1 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
Experimental: Vortioxetine 5 mg - Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
Experimental: Vortioxetine 10 mg - Vortioxetine 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up 8 weeks.
Placebo comparator: Placebo - Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
Treatment: Drugs: Vortioxetine
Encapsulated immediate-release vortioxetine tablets
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the 24-item Hamilton Depression Scale Total Score At Week 8
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The 24-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D24) is a clinician-rated 24-item scale for assessing the severity of depression symptoms. The scores for each item range from 0 to 4 or 0 to 2, where 0 represents no symptoms. The rating is based on the past 7 days prior to the time of assessment. The total score range is from 0 to 74 where a higher score indicates a greater depressive state. Least squares (LS) means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline to Week 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Week 8
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The Sheehan Disability Scale assesses functional impairment in 3 domains: work/school, social life or leisure activities, and home life or family responsibilities. The participant rates the extent to which each aspect is impaired on a 10-point visual analog scale, from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). The 3 scores are added together to calculate the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating more impairment. LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline to Week 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Clinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Week 8
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement scale assesses the participant's improvement (or worsening) as assessed by the clinician relative to Baseline on a 7-point scale: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse. LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline to Week 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Responders in HAM-D24 Total Score at Week 8
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
A responder is defined as a participant with a =50% decrease from Baseline in HAM-D24 total score. The HAM-D24 is a clinician-rated 24-item scale for assessing the severity of depression symptoms. The scores for each item range from 0 to 4 or 0 to 2, where 0 represents no symptoms. The rating is based on the past 7 days prior to the time of assessment. The total score ranges from 0 to 74, where a higher score indicates a greater depressive state.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline and Week 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Change From Baseline in HAM-D24 Total Score at Week 8 in Participants With Baseline HAM-A Score =20
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
The HAM-D24 is a clinician-rated 24-item scale for assessing the severity of depression symptoms. The scores for each item range from 0 to 4 or 0 to 2, where 0 represents no symptoms. The rating is based on the past 7 days prior to the time of assessment. The total score ranges from 0 to 74 where a higher score indicates a greater depressive state. The Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to 56 (severe symptoms). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline to Week 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Percentage of Participants in MADRS Remission at Week 8
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Remission is defined as a participant with a Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score =10. The MADRS is a depression rating scale consisting of 10 items, each rated 0 to 6. The 10 items represent the core symptoms of depressive illness. The overall score ranges from 0 (symptoms absent) to 60 (severe depression). Decrease in the total score or on individual items indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Week 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the 24-item Hamilton Depression Scale Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The HAM-D24 is a clinician-rated 24-item scale for assessing the severity of depression symptoms. The scores for each item range from 0 to 4 or 0 to 2, where 0 represents no symptoms. The rating is based on the past 7 days prior to the time of assessment. The total score range is from 0 to 74 where a higher score indicates a greater depressive state. LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The Sheehan Disability Scale assesses functional impairment in 3 domains: work/school, social life or leisure activities, and home life or family responsibilities. The participant rates the extent to which each aspect is impaired on a 10-point visual analog scale, from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). The 3 scores are added together to calculate the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating more impairment. LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2 and 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Clinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Other Weeks Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The Clinical Global Impression - global improvement assesses the participant's improvement (or worsening) as assessed by the clinician relative to Baseline on a 7-point scale: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse. LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Percentage of Responders in HAM-D24 Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
A responder is defined as a participant with a =50% decrease from Baseline in HAM-D24 total score. The HAM-D24 is a clinician-rated 24-item scale for assessing the severity of depression symptoms. The scores for each item range from 0 to 4 or 0 to 2, where 0 represents no symptoms. The rating is based on the past 7 days prior to the time of assessment. The total score ranges from 0 to 74, where a higher score indicates a greater depressive state.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change From Baseline in HAM-D24 Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed in Participants With a Baseline HAM-A Score =20
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
The HAM-D24 is a clinician-rated 24-item scale for assessing the severity of depression symptoms. The scores for each item range from 0 to 4 or 0 to 2, where 0 represents no symptoms. The rating is based on the past 7 days prior to the time of assessment. The total score range from 0 to 74 where a higher score indicates a greater depressive state. The Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to 56 (symptoms severe). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Percentage of Participants in MADRS Remission at Other Weeks Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Remission is defined as a participant with a Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score =10. The MADRS is a depression rating scale consisting of 10 items, each rated 0 to 6. The 10 items represent the core symptoms of depressive illness. The overall score ranges from 0 (symptoms absent) to 60 (severe depression). Decrease in the total score or on individual items indicates improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Response in HAM-D24 Total Score
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
A sustained response is defined as a =20% decrease from Baseline in HAM-D24 total score obtained at Week 1 and sustained through Week 7 and at least 50% decrease from Baseline at Week 8.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
From Baseline through Week 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Each Week
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
The MADRS is a depression rating scale consisting of 10 items, each rated 0 to 6. The 10 items represent the core symptoms of depressive illness. The overall score ranges from 0 (symptoms absent) to 60 (severe depression). A decrease in the total score or on individual items indicates improvement. LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Each Week Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 to 56, where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Total scores above 30 are rare, but indicate very severe anxiety. LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
The Clinical Global Impression - Severity scale (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the participant's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, a patient is assessed on severity of mental illness on the following scale: 1, normal, not at all ill; 2, borderline mentally ill; 3, mildly ill; 4, moderately ill; 5, markedly ill; 6, severely ill; or 7, extremely ill. LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scales at Each Week Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
The HAD scale is completed by the participant and comprises two subscales, one measuring depression (focusing on the state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response) and one measuring anxiety (including anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). Each subscale is made up of 7 items that are assessed on a scale of 0 = no anxiety/depression to 3 = severe feeling of anxiety/depression. Participants are required to indicate the response which most accurately reflects the way they have felt over the last few days. Scores for the depression and anxiety subscales are summed separately and not combined, with each score ranging from 0 to 21 (maximal severity). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, and 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The physical functioning subscale assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Baseline and Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Physical Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The role-physical subscale assesses limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Baseline and Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The bodily pain sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Baseline and Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) General Health Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The general health sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Baseline and Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Vitality Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The vitality sub-score assesses energy and fatigue, and ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Baseline and Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Social Functioning Subscore at Other Weeks Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The social functioning subscale assesses limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Baseline and Weeks 2 and 4
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Emotional Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The role-emotional subscale assesses limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
Baseline and Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Health Subscore at All Weeks Assessed
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The mental health sub-score assesses general mental health (psychological distress and well-being) and ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means are from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week, and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
Baseline and Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Healthcare Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment Questionnaire.
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
Healthcare resource utilization was assessed by the Health Economic Assessment (HEA) questionnaire, which monitors the participants' absenteeism from work, as well as resource use such as visits to a general practitioner, outpatient and inpatient services, hospitalization, medications, and other relevant services over the past 8 weeks.
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
Baseline and Week 8
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Has a primary diagnosis of major depressive episode according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria.
* The reported duration of the current major depressive episode is at least 3 months.
* Has a Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score =26.
* A male or a female of childbearing potential who is sexually active agrees to use adequate contraception from Screening throughout the duration of the study and for 1 month after the last dose of study medication.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
75
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Has 1 or more the following:
* Any current psychiatric disorder other than major depressive disorder as defined in the DSM-IV-TR.
* Current or past history of: manic or hypomanic episode, schizophrenia or any other psychotic disorder, including major depression with psychotic features, mental retardation, organic mental disorders, or mental disorders due to a general medical condition as defined in the DSM-IV-TR.
* Any substance disorder (except nicotine and caffeine) within the previous 6 months as defined in the DSM-IV-TR. (must have negative urine drug screen prior to Baseline).
* Presence or history of a clinically significant neurological disorder (including epilepsy).
* Neurodegenerative disorder (Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease, multiple sclerosis, Huntington disease, etc).
* Has a significant risk of suicide according to the investigator's opinion or has a score =5 on item 10 (suicidal thoughts) of the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, or has made a suicide attempt in the previous 6 months.
* Currently receiving formal cognitive or behavioral therapy, systematic psychotherapy, or plans to initiate such therapy during the study.
* Has a clinically significant unstable illness.
* Has previously failed to respond to adequate treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and/or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors.
* Has received electroconvulsive therapy within 6 months prior to Screening.
* Has an alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, or total bilirubin level > 1.5 times the upper limit of normal.
* Has a serum creatinine of > 1.5 × upper limit of normal.
* Has a previous history of cancer that had been in remission for less than 5 years.
* Has thyroid stimulating hormone value outside the normal range.
* Has an abnormal electrocardiogram.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/08/2008
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/08/2009
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
560
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
- Elizabeth Vale
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
- Southport
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Elizabeth Vale
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
- Southport
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
Czech Republic
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Litomerice
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Czech Republic
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Lnare
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Czech Republic
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Prague
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
Czech Republic
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Praha
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Bully les Mines
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Marseille
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Strasbourg
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Bochum
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Chemnitz
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Dillingen
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Huettenberg
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Leipzig
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Munchen
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
München
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Nuernberg
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Osnabrueck
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Rodgau
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Westerstede
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Bucheon-si
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Namdong-gu
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Latvia
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Leipaja
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Latvia
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Riga
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Latvia
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Sigulda
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Latvia
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Strenci
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Lithuania
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Vilnius
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Kuala Lumpur
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Wildervank
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Bialystok
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Leszno
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Skórzewo
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Torun
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Tuszyn
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Novgorod
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
St. Petersburg
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Stavropol
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Tomsk
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Durban
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Noordheuwel
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Pretoria
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Lin-Yan District
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Dnepropetrovsk
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Kharkiv
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Lugansk
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Simferopol
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Bath
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Bolton
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Takeda
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
H. Lundbeck A/S
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness and safety of vortioxetine, once daily (QD), in patients with Major Depressive Disorder.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00735709
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Henigsberg N, Mahableshwarkar AR, Jacobsen P, Chen Y, Thase ME. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 8-week trial of the efficacy and tolerability of multiple doses of Lu AA21004 in adults with major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;73(7):953-9. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07470. McIntyre RS, Florea I, Tonnoir B, Loft H, Lam RW, Christensen MC. Efficacy of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Functioning in Working Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;78(1):115-121. doi: 10.4088/JCP.16m10744.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Medical Director Clinical Science
Query!
Address
0
0
Takeda
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00735709
Download to PDF