Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00752791
Registration number
NCT00752791
Ethics application status
Date submitted
11/09/2008
Date registered
15/09/2008
Date last updated
15/08/2012
Titles & IDs
Public title
Efficacy and Safety of Peginesatide Injection for the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Peritoneal Dialysis Participants Previously Treated With Epoetin.
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase 2 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Hematide Injection for the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Peritoneal Dialysis Subjects Previously Treated With Epoetin
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2008-003458-13
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
AFX01_201
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Anemia
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Blood
0
0
0
0
Query!
Anaemia
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Peginesatide
Experimental: Peginesatide -
Treatment: Drugs: Peginesatide
Peginesatide 0.04 to 0.16 mg/kg, subcutaneous injection, once every 4 weeks for up to 25 weeks. Initial dose based on patient's previous total weekly Epoetin dose, and thereafter could be adjusted to maintain hemoglobin values in the target range of 10 to 12 g/dL and ±1.5 g/dL from Baseline.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Mean Change in Hemoglobin Between Baseline and the Evaluation Period
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in Hemoglobin between Baseline (the mean of the 4 most recent hemoglobin values prior to Enrollment and the hemoglobin on the day of Enrollment) and the Evaluation Period (mean hemoglobin from Weeks 20 to 25).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline and Week 20 to Week 25.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Within the Target Range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL During the Evaluation Period
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Mean hemoglobin was calculated from measurements taken during the Evaluation Period (Week 20 to Week 25). The target hemoglobin range was 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL.
The 95% confidence interval was calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Week 20 to Week 25.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a Change in Hemoglobin From Baseline to the Evaluation Period Within 1 g/dL
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a mean change in Hemoglobin between Baseline (the mean of the 4 most recent hemoglobin values prior to enrollment and the hemoglobin on the day of enrollment) and the Evaluation Period (mean hemoglobin from measured at Weeks 20 to 25) of less than or equal ± 1 g/dL. The 95% confidence interval was calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline and Week 20 to Week 25.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusions
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The percentage of participants who received one or more red blood cell transfusions, including packed red blood cells and whole blood transfusions, during the Titration Period (Weeks 1 - 19) and Evaluation Period (Weeks 20 -25). 95% Confidence Intervals were calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction. One patient had the last study visit during the titration period and the transfusion after the titration period. This patient is excluded from the summary of evaluation period.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Up to 25 weeks.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Mean Hemoglobin During 4-week Intervals
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Hemoglobin was measured every 2 weeks during the Titration Period (Weeks 1-19) and weekly during the Evaluation Period (Weeks 20-25). One patient did not have central lab hemoglobin value during a regularly scheduled visit during weeks 2-5.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Up to 25 weeks.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Target Hemoglobin of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL by 4-week Intervals
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Percentage of participants with mean hemoglobin levels falling between the target level of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL during 4-week study intervals. Hemoglobin was measured every 2 weeks during the Titration Period (Weeks 1-19) and weekly during the Evaluation Period (Weeks 20-25). 95% Confidence Intervals were calculated from the normal approximation with continuity correction.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Up to 25 weeks.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Dose Adjustments During the Study
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The peginesatide dose was adjusted to maintain hemoglobin values in the target range of 10 to 12 g/dL and ±1.5 g/dL from Baseline during the Titration Period (Weeks 1-19) and Evaluation Period (Weeks 20-25). A dose was classified as adjusted if it was not within 20% of the previous dose. A dose was classified as increased or decreased if it was \>20% higher or \>20% lower respectively, than the previous dose.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
From Week 4 to Week 25
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. The patient was a man or woman and 18 to 90 years of age, inclusive.
2. The patient had CKD and had been on peritoneal dialysis for =3 months before enrollment.
3. The patient was on stable SC epoetin (alfa or beta) maintenance therapy continuously prescribed for a minimum of 8 weeks prior to enrollment.
4. The patient had 4 consecutive Hb values with a mean =10.0 and =12.0 g/dL during the screening period, with the difference between the mean of the first confirmed (2 consecutive) Hb values and the mean of the last confirmed (2 consecutive) Hb values being =1.0 g/dL.
5. The patient had 1 ferritin level =100 ng/mL within 4 weeks before enrollment.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
90
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. The patient had known bleeding or coagulation disorder.
2. The patient had known hematologic disease or cause of anemia other than renal disease (e.g., pure red cell aplasia, homozygous sickle-cell disease, thalassemia, multiple myeloma, hemolytic anemia, and myelodysplastic syndrome).
3. The patient had received a recent course of intensive iron replacement (i.e., more than 500 mg IV in the 28 days before enrollment).
4. The patient had advanced chronic congestive heart failure defined by New York Heart Association Class III or IV.
5. The patient had a known history of seizure disorder or received antiepileptic medication for a seizure disorder within 6 months before enrollment.
6. The patient had a scheduled kidney transplant. (Note: patients who were currently on a transplant waiting list were not excluded unless there was an identified donor).
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
NA
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 2
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/10/2008
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/05/2010
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
59
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
- New Lambtom
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- New Lambtom
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Kansas
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Mississippi
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Modena
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Dunedin
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
England
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Takeda
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Affymax
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of peginesatide injection for maintenance treatment of anemia in participants on peritoneal dialysis.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00752791
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Medical Director
Query!
Address
0
0
Takeda
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00752791
Download to PDF