Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06140758
Registration number
NCT06140758
Ethics application status
Date submitted
14/11/2023
Date registered
20/11/2023
Date last updated
29/02/2024
Titles & IDs
Public title
Evaluation of the Anticaries Efficacy of Dentifrice Formulations Using an In-situ Model
Query!
Scientific title
Evaluation of the Anticaries Efficacy of Various Dentifrice Formulations Using an In-situ Model
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2022085
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Caries
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Oral-B 1450 ppm Fluoride (1.16% sodium monofluorophosphate) Dentifrice
Treatment: Drugs - Colgate 1450 ppm Fluoride (1.16% sodium monofluorophosphate)Dentifrice
Treatment: Drugs - Toms of Maine 0 ppm Fluoride Dentifrice
Treatment: Drugs - Colgate 1450 ppm Fluoride (1.1% sodium monofluorophosphate) Dentifrice
Treatment: Drugs - 1500 ppm MFP/CaCO3 1.16% sodium monofluorophosphate) Dentifrice
Treatment: Drugs - 1100 ppm (0.454% Stannous fluoride) Dentifrice
Active comparator: Oral-B 1450 ppm Fluoride (1.16% sodium monofluorophosphate) Dentifrice -
Active comparator: Colgate 1450 ppm Fluoride (1.16% sodium monofluorophosphate)Dentifrice -
Sham comparator: Toms of Maine 0 ppm Fluoride Dentifrice -
Active comparator: Colgate 1450 ppm Fluoride (1.1% sodium monofluorophosphate) Dentifrice -
Active comparator: 1500 ppm MFP/CaCO3 1.16% sodium monofluorophosphate) Dentifrice -
Active comparator: 1100 ppm (0.454% Stannous fluoride) Dentifrice -
Treatment: Drugs: Oral-B 1450 ppm Fluoride (1.16% sodium monofluorophosphate) Dentifrice
Each subject will use this product during one of the six treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Treatment: Drugs: Colgate 1450 ppm Fluoride (1.16% sodium monofluorophosphate)Dentifrice
Each subject will use this product during one of the six treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Treatment: Drugs: Toms of Maine 0 ppm Fluoride Dentifrice
Each subject will use this product during one of the six treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Treatment: Drugs: Colgate 1450 ppm Fluoride (1.1% sodium monofluorophosphate) Dentifrice
Each subject will use this product during one of the six treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Treatment: Drugs: 1500 ppm MFP/CaCO3 1.16% sodium monofluorophosphate) Dentifrice
Each subject will use this product during one of the six treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Treatment: Drugs: 1100 ppm (0.454% Stannous fluoride) Dentifrice
Each subject will use this product during one of the six treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Mineral Density
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The percent mineral profile of each enamel/dentinel slab's demineralized control and remineralized/treated lesion, obtained from the microdensitometry analysis, will be compared with the median sound enamel percent mineral profile of the same section. A negative value indicates mineral has been lost and, therefore, the lesion has progressed, whereas a positive value indicates mineral has been gained and, therefore, the lesion has regressed.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
14 days
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
SEM imaging and SEM-EDS analysis will be conducted on TMR sections and whole sections of dentine lesions treated in situ to assess the occlusion of dentine tubules and distribution of elements within the lesions following the experiment.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
14 days
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Be 18-75 years of age.
* Provide written informed consent prior to participation and be given a signed copy of the informed consent form.
* Be in good general health based on medical/dental history and oral exam.
* Have no history of adverse or allergic reactions to tin or tin-containing products.
* Agree not to participate in any other oral study for the study duration.
* Have a reasonable functional dentition as determined by the oral examiner and sufficient teeth to support the fabricated dental appliance.
* Be willing to participate in the study, able to follow the study directions, successfully tolerate/perform all study procedures, and willing to return for all specified visits at their appointed time.
* Be willing to refrain from using non-study dentifrice, mouth rinse, chewing gum, and other non-study oral care products during the study.
* Be willing to postpone all elective dental procedures until the study has been completed.
* Be willing to refrain from using calcium chews while using the test products.
* Be willing and able to refrain from wearing a nightguard (occlusal splint) for the entire course of the study (for nightguard wearers only).
* Ability to understand, and ability to read and sign, the informed consent form.
* Have at least 22 natural teeth.
* Have a gum-stimulated whole salivary flow rate = 1.0 ml/minute and unstimulated whole salivary flow rate = 0.2 ml/minute.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
75
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
-
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
NA
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
31/07/2023
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
11/12/2023
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
12
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
University of Melbourne - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Melbourne
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Procter and Gamble
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The primary objective is to compare the remineralization and demineralization inhibition potential of early subsurface carious lesions in enamel in situ after rinsing with six different aqueous slurries of toothpaste formulations.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06140758
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06140758
Download to PDF