Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06279260
Registration number
NCT06279260
Ethics application status
Date submitted
19/02/2024
Date registered
28/02/2024
Date last updated
25/04/2024
Titles & IDs
Public title
National Robotics-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Database
Query!
Scientific title
National Robotics Radical Prostatectomy Database: Exploring Learning Curves and Long Term Surgical, Oncological and Patient Reported Outcomes
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2023.295RMH21343Protocol_V2.0
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Database
0
0
Query!
Prostate Cancer
0
0
Query!
Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
0
0
Query!
Surgical Outcomes
0
0
Query!
Oncological Outcomes
0
0
Query!
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
0
0
Query!
Learning Curve
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Prostate
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational [Patient Registry]
Query!
Patient registry
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
To provide a standardized framework, enabling robust evidence strengthening & analyses, trend identification, and the formulation of evidence-based guidelines for the individualized management of PCa.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Standardize notes that are the same across different hospitals conducting robotic-assisted surgeries for prostatectomy.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
At baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months post-surgery.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Patient reported quality of life outcome measures
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The first set of outcome variables will be the functional outcomes from the PROMs, using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 questionnaire
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
At baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months post-surgery.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Surgical
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The second set of outcome variables will gather detailed insights into surgical measures in In terms of operative and post-operative characteristics.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
At baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months post-surgery.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Oncological
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The third set of outcome variables will collect the oncological measures in terms of Biochemical re-occurrence and margin status.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
4 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months post-surgery.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
TTo be eligible to participate in this database, an individual must meet all of the
following criteria: (a) Individuals who consent to participate, (b) within the age range of
16 to 90 years, (c) confirmed diagnosis of localized prostate cancer (PCa) and (d) patients
receiving medical attention at hospitals engaged in collaborative efforts with the
designated database.
Query!
Minimum age
16
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
90
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Males
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Participants are not eligible to take part in the database: (a) Individuals who have not
undergone robotic surgery for prostatectomy, (b) without a diagnosis of prostate cancer or
(c) who decline to provide consent for the collection of their health information and (d)
under the age of 16 years.
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Query!
Duration
Query!
Selection
Query!
Timing
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/04/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/12/2030
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
10000
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Austin Healthcare - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
E.J Whitten Prostate Cancer Centre, Epworth Healthcare - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
St. Vincent's Private Hospital - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Royal Melbourne Hospital - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2084 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
3002 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
3050 - Melbourne
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
Melbourne Health
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Other
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [2]
0
0
Other
Query!
Name [2]
0
0
Epworth Healthcare
Query!
Address [2]
0
0
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [3]
0
0
Other
Query!
Name [3]
0
0
St Vincent's Hospital
Query!
Address [3]
0
0
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [4]
0
0
Other
Query!
Name [4]
0
0
Austin Health
Query!
Address [4]
0
0
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Surgical notes are detailed reports written by surgeons during and after surgeries. These
notes cover everything from the techniques, instruments used, any issues with the surgical
procedure and post-surgical care for the patient. This information is a treasure trove for
researchers because they can study it to understand how surgeries go, what works best, and
how certain treatments affect patients.
By looking closely at these notes, researchers can find patterns and trends, helping them in
understanding what makes surgeries successful and identify the best ways to perform them.
This information is crucial for creating guidelines based on solid evidence. Also, these
surgical notes are a goldmine for looking back at past surgeries to see how they have
affected patients in the long run.
The real power for research comes when we combine these surgical notes within the Electronic
Medical Records (EMR) and research databases. This makes it easy to collect information
systematically, making it simpler for researchers to study a large number of cases.
Unfortunately, not many people have paid attention to this idea for a long time, leading to
big gaps in the data collection.
To address this issue, we aim to create a database that collects information from surgical
notes effortlessly. This includes details about how surgeons are trained and how they
progress. It's important to make sure that doctors work aligns with research - which is the
best way to address data collection issues. This data can also help record different
technical aspects of surgery and different surgeons' learning curve, making it easier to
compare and improve training. Thus, we aim to standardise notes that are the same across
different hospitals conducting robotic-assisted surgeries for prostatectomy.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06279260
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Perera S, Fernando N, O'Brien J, Murphy D, Lawrentschuk N. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: learning curves and outcomes from an Australian perspective. Prostate Int. 2023 Mar;11(1):51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.10.002. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
Fridriksson JO, Folkvaljon Y, Lundstrom KJ, Robinson D, Carlsson S, Stattin P. Long-term adverse effects after retropubic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Nationwide, population-based study. J Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;116(4):500-506. doi: 10.1002/jso.24687. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
Tiruye T, O'Callaghan M, Moretti K, Jay A, Higgs B, Santoro K, Boyle T, Ettridge K, Beckmann K. Patient-reported functional outcome measures and treatment choice for prostate cancer. BMC Urol. 2022 Nov 5;22(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01117-1.
Chandrasekar T, Tilki D. Prostate cancer: Comparing quality of life outcomes after prostate cancer treatment. Nat Rev Urol. 2017 Jul;14(7):396-397. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2017.81. Epub 2017 Jun 13. No abstract available.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Nathan Lawrentschuk, MBBS,PhD, FRACS
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
+6193291197
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Summary Results
For IPD and results data, please see
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06279260
Download to PDF