Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00847379
Registration number
NCT00847379
Ethics application status
Date submitted
16/02/2009
Date registered
19/02/2009
Date last updated
15/07/2020
Titles & IDs
Public title
Phase 2B Extension Study of Ataluren (PTC124) in Duchenne/Becker Muscular Dystrophy (DMD/BMD)
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase 2B Extension Study of PTC124 in Subjects With Nonsense-Mutation-Mediated Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophy
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
PTC124-GD-007e-DMD
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
0
0
Query!
Becker Muscular Dystrophy
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Human Genetics and Inherited Disorders
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other human genetics and inherited disorders
Query!
Neurological
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Ataluren
Experimental: Overall Participants: High-Dose Ataluren - All participants will receive ataluren suspension orally three times a day (TID), 20 mg/kg at morning, 20 mg/kg at midday, and 40 mg/kg at evening (total daily dose 80 mg/kg) for up to 96 weeks in this study. Any participant who was receiving a reduced dose of ataluren at the end of treatment visit in study PTC124-GD-007-DMD, will be initiated ataluren therapy in this extension study at the 5-, 5-, and 10-mg/kg dose level; dose will be increased to 10, 10, and 20 mg/kg at Week 6 and to 20, 20, and 40 mg/kg at Week 12, if the preceding dose level is well tolerated.
Treatment: Drugs: Ataluren
Ataluren oral powder for suspension will be administered as per dose and schedule specified in the arm.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Severity of an AE was classified as: mild (does not interfere with usual function), moderate (interferes to some extent with usual function) and severe (interferes significantly with usual function). Drug-related AEs: AEs with a possible or probable relationship to study drug. Serious AEs: death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized participant and required medical intervention. TEAE: AE that occurred or worsened in the period extending from first dose of study drug in this study to 6 weeks after last dose of study drug in this study. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007) up to Week 102
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Parameters
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Laboratory parameters tests included hematology, biochemistry assay (hepatic, renal, and serum electrolyte values), adrenal assays, and urinalysis. Clinical significance was defined as per investigator's judgement.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007) up to Week 102
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) at Week 60
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The 6MWD test was performed in a 30 meters long flat corridor, where the participant was instructed to walk as far as possible, back and forth around two cones, with the permission to slow down, rest, or stop if needed. Ambulation was assessed via the 6MWD test following standardized procedures by measuring the 6MWD in meters. Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices (walker, long leg braces, or short leg braces) during the 6MWD test.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007), Week 60
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Mean Activity Period/Day/Visit at Week 60, as Assessed by Step Activity Monitoring (SAM)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). Mean activity period/day/visit was computed for each participant. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that greater than (>) 2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that >2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was less than (<) 50 percent (%) of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007), Week 60
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Day/Visit During the Active Periods at Week 60, as Assessed by SAM
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). Mean total step count/day/visit during the active periods was computed for each participant. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that >2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that >2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was <50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007), Week 60
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Hour During the Active Period at Week 60, as Assessed by SAM
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
The SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). Mean total step count/hour during the active periods for the days in a visit was computed for each participant. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that >2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that >2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was <50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007), Week 60
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 60, as Assessed by SAM
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). The maximum continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute total step counts were computed for each participant. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that >2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that >2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was <50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007), Week 60
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Time During Active Period Spent at No Activity (0 Steps/Minute[Min]), Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [=]15 Steps/Min), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Min), and High Activity (Greater Than[>]30 Steps/Min) at Week 60
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again. Percentage of time during active periods spent at no activity (0 steps/min), low activity (=15 steps/min), medium activity (16-30 steps/min), and high activity (>30 steps/min) were computed for each participant. For each day, an active period was defined as first time after 3:00 AM that >2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that >2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was <50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007), Week 60
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Time to Stand From Supine Position at Week 60
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007), Week 60
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Time to Walk/Run 10 Meters at Week 60
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007), Week 60
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 60
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007), Week 60
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 60
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007), Week 60
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWD Test at Week 60, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The heart rate was measured with a Polar RS400 heart rate monitor, which consists of a transmitter strap worn around the chest and a wristwatch receiver. The monitor produces a digital text file with 1 value per minute that represents the mean heart rate for that minute. Mean heart rates values were collected prior to, during, and after the 6MWT. The participant rested for 5 minutes in a sitting position prior to the 6MWT, and the mean heart rate for the last minute of this rest period was collected and documented as the resting heart rate. During the 6MWT, the mean heart rate was collected and documented as the active heart rate. After completing the 6MWT and resting for 3 minutes, the mean heart rate for 1 minute was collected and documented as the recovery heart rate.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007), Week 60
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Number of Digits Recalled Forwards and Backwards on Digit Span Task at Week 60
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
Basic attention and working memory was measured using the digit span task. A series of digits (0-9) were presented to the child in an auditory format only. The task had 2 parts; in the forward condition, the child was requested to repeat back the digits in the order they were presented and in the backward condition, he was requested to reverse the order of presentation. A raw score of the total number of correct responses was converted to an age-scaled-score (z-score) by subtracting the corresponding mean and dividing by the corresponding standard deviation of a reference population for that age.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007), Week 60
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 60
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The generic core module (including physical, emotional, social and school functioning scales) comprises 23 questions and the fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. The PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Examples of items in each of the generic core module scales include: "It is hard for me to run"; "I feel sad or blue"; "I cannot do things that other kids my age can do;" and "It is hard to pay attention in class." Each of the generic core module items was scored on a 5-point Likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 60.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007), Week 60
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 60
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The generic core module (including physical, emotional, social and school functioning scales) comprises 23 questions and the fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. The PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Examples of items in each of the generic core module scales include: "It is hard for me to run"; "I feel sad or blue"; "I cannot do things that other kids my age can do;" and "It is hard to pay attention in class." Each of the generic core module items was scored on a 5-point likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007), Week 60
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Participant-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 60
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Fatigue-specific module obtains information relating to items such as: "I feel too tired to do things that I like to do"; "I spend a lot of time in bed"; and "I have trouble remembering more than one thing at a time;" Each of the fatigue-specific module items was scored on a 5-point Likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating less fatigue. Total score was the sum of all items over the number of items answered on all scales. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 60.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007), Week 60
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 60
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. The PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Fatigue-specific module obtains information relating to items such as: "I feel too tired to do things that I like to do"; "I spend a lot of time in bed"; and "I have trouble remembering more than one thing at a time;" Each of the fatigue-specific module items was scored on a 5-point likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating less fatigue. Total score was the sum of all items over the number of items answered on all scales. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 60.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007), Week 60
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Participant and Parent/Caregiver Reported Activities of Daily Living of Participants Who Were Unable to Complete the 6MWT (Nonambulatory Participants), as Measured by the Egen Klassifikation (EK) Scale at Week 60
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Activities of daily living were measured using the EK scale in all participants who were unable to complete the 6MWT at Screening/Baseline on Day 1. The EK scale is an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 30 points where 0 represents the highest level of independent function and 30 the lowest. The scale consists of 10 categories (each scored 0 to 3), involving different functional domains including 1) ability to use wheelchair, 2) ability to transfer from wheelchair, 3) ability to stand, 4) ability to balance in the wheelchair, 5) ability to move the arms, 6) ability to use the hands and arms when eating, 7) ability to turn in bed, 8) ability to cough, 9) ability to speak, and 10) physical well-being. The administration of the EK scale consisted of an interview of the participant to capture how he performed the tasks of daily life (as described by Categories 1 to 9) and how he perceived his well-being (as described by Category 10).
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007), Week 60
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Score at Week 60
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
TSQM consisted of 14 questions about treatment satisfaction with drug in 4 domains: Effectiveness (Questions 1-3 scored as 1 [extremely dissatisfied] to 7 [extremely satisfied]), Side Effects (question 4 scored as 0 [no] or 1 [yes]; question 5 scored as 1 [extremely bothersome] to 5 [not at all bothersome]; questions 6 - 8 scored as 1 [a great deal] to 5 [not at all]), Convenience (questions 9 and 10 scored as 1 [extremely difficult] to 7 [extremely easy]; question 11 scored as 1 [extremely inconvenient] to 5 [extremely convenient]) and Global Satisfaction (question 12 scored as 1 [not at all confident] to 7 [extremely confident]; question 13 scored as 1 [not at all certain] to 5 [extremely certain]; question 14 scored as 1 [extremely dissatisfied] to 5 [extremely satisfied]). The scores of each of the domains were added together and an algorithm was used to create a score of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better treatment satisfaction.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007), Week 60
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Serum Concentration of Creatine Kinase (CK) at Week 60
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
Blood samples collected for chemistry assays were used to quantify serum CK concentrations. Serum CK was assessed as a potential biomarker for muscle fragility, with a reduction in serum CK considered to be a positive outcome.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007), Week 60
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Study Drug Compliance
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
Study drug compliance was assessed by participant daily diary and quantification of used and unused study drug. Compliance was assessed in terms of the percentage of drug actually taken relative to the amount that should have been taken during the study.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Baseline (Week 48 of Study 007) to Week 96
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Trough Ataluren Plasma Concentration
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
Plasma samples for the determination of ataluren concentrations were analyzed at the bioanalytical laboratory for ataluren parent drug using a validated high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS-MS) method with a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of 0.5 micrograms/millilitre (mcg/mL). Values below the LLOQ were set to 0.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Pre-morning dose (0 hour) at Baseline (Week 48 of 007 study), Weeks 54, 60, 72, 84, and 96
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- Completion of blinded study drug treatment in the previous Phase 2b study
(PTC124-GD-007-DMD).
- Ability to provide written informed consent (parental/guardian consent if
applicable)/assent (if less than [<]18 years of age).
- In participants who are sexually active, willingness to abstain from sexual
intercourse or employ a barrier or medical method of contraception during PTC124
administration and the 6-week follow up period.
- Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, drug administration plan,
study procedures, laboratory tests, and study restrictions.
Query!
Minimum age
5
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Males
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
- Known hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients or excipients of the study drug
(Litesse® UltraTM [refined polydextrose], polyethylene glycol 3350, Lutrol® micro F127
[poloxamer 407], mannitol 25C, crospovidone XL10, hydroxyethyl cellulose, vanilla,
Cab-O-Sil® M5P [colloidal silica], magnesium stearate).
- Ongoing participation in any other therapeutic clinical trial.
- Prior or ongoing medical condition (for example, concomitant illness, psychiatric
condition, behavioral disorder, alcoholism, drug abuse), medical history, physical
findings, ECG findings, or laboratory abnormality that, in the investigator's opinion,
could adversely affect the safety of the subject, makes it unlikely that the course of
treatment or follow up would be completed, or could impair the assessment of study
results.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
N/A
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 2
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Terminated
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
31/01/2009
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
24/05/2010
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
173
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
The Royal Children's Hospital - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
The Children's Hospital at Westmead - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
3052 - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2145 - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Iowa
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Kansas
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Leuven
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Vancouver
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Marseille cedex 20
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Nantes cedex 1
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Essen
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Freiburg
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Jerusalem
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Milano
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Valencia
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Goteborg
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Stockholm
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Newcastle Upon Tyne
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Oswestry
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name
PTC Therapeutics
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy (DMD/BMD) is a genetic disorder that develops in boys. It
is caused by a mutation in the gene for dystrophin, a protein that is important for
maintaining normal muscle structure and function. Loss of dystrophin causes muscle fragility
that leads to weakness and loss of walking ability during childhood and teenage years. A
specific type of mutation, called a nonsense (premature stop codon) mutation is the cause of
DMD/BMD in approximately 10-15% of boys with the disease. Ataluren (PTC124) is an orally
delivered, investigational drug that has the potential to overcome the effects of the
nonsense mutation. This study is a Phase 2b extension trial that will evaluate the long-term
safety of ataluren (PTC124) in boys with nonsense mutation DMD/BMD, as determined by adverse
events and laboratory abnormalities. The study will also assess changes in walking, muscle
function, and other important clinical and laboratory measures.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00847379
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Hirawat S, Welch EM, Elfring GL, Northcutt VJ, Paushkin S, Hwang S, Leonard EM, Almstead NG, Ju W, Peltz SW, Miller LL. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of PTC124, a nonaminoglycoside nonsense mutation suppressor, following single- and multiple-dose administration to healthy male and female adult volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Apr;47(4):430-44. doi: 10.1177/0091270006297140.
Welch EM, Barton ER, Zhuo J, Tomizawa Y, Friesen WJ, Trifillis P, Paushkin S, Patel M, Trotta CR, Hwang S, Wilde RG, Karp G, Takasugi J, Chen G, Jones S, Ren H, Moon YC, Corson D, Turpoff AA, Campbell JA, Conn MM, Khan A, Almstead NG, Hedrick J, Mollin A, Risher N, Weetall M, Yeh S, Branstrom AA, Colacino JM, Babiak J, Ju WD, Hirawat S, Northcutt VJ, Miller LL, Spatrick P, He F, Kawana M, Feng H, Jacobson A, Peltz SW, Sweeney HL. PTC124 targets genetic disorders caused by nonsense mutations. Nature. 2007 May 3;447(7140):87-91. doi: 10.1038/nature05756. Epub 2007 Apr 22.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Leone Atkinson, M.D., Ph.D.
Query!
Address
0
0
PTC Therapeutics
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Summary Results
For IPD and results data, please see
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00847379
Download to PDF