The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00065598




Registration number
NCT00065598
Ethics application status
Date submitted
20/06/2003
Date registered
25/06/2003
Date last updated
12/04/2010

Titles & IDs
Public title
Study of Irinotecan and Cetuximab Versus Irinotecan as Second-Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic, EGFR-Positive Colorectal Cancer
Scientific title
Revised Protocol 07 to Protocol CA225006 - A Phase III Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of Irinotecan and Cetuximab vs. Irinotecan as Second-Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic, EGFR-Positive Colorectal Carcinoma
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
CA225-006
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Colorectal Cancer 0 0
Condition category
Condition code

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Histologically documented colorectal cancer which is EGFR-positive by immunohistochemistry [IHC] (may be based on archival samples) and is metastatic.
* Prior oxaliplatin administered for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
* Prior fluoropyrimidine-containing regimen (5-fluorouracil [5-FU], capecitabine, or uracil/tegafur [UFT]), for the first-line treatment of metastatic disease.
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
* A serious uncontrolled medical disorder that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would impair the ability of the subject to receive protocol therapy
* Unresolved diarrhea, bowel obstruction, or history of inflammatory bowel disease
* Known or documented brain metastases

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 3
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
Eli Lilly and Company
Address
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
E-mail: ClinicalTrials@ ImClone.com
Address 0 0
Eli Lilly and Company
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries

No information has been provided regarding IPD availability


What supporting documents are/will be available?

No Supporting Document Provided



Results publications and other study-related documents

No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.