Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00876447
Registration number
NCT00876447
Ethics application status
Date submitted
1/04/2009
Date registered
6/04/2009
Date last updated
1/05/2019
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Long-term Follow-up Study of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Patients With Overactive Bladder as a Result of Spinal Injury or Multiple Sclerosis
Query!
Scientific title
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
191622-094
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Overactive Bladder
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Renal and Urogenital
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other renal and urogenital disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Other - Botulinum Toxin Type A 300U
Treatment: Other - Botulinum Toxin Type A 200U
Experimental: Botulinum Toxin Type A 300U - Botulinum toxin Type A 300U injections into the detrusor \> 12 weeks as needed for up to 3 years.
Experimental: Botulinum Toxin Type A 200U - Botulinum toxin Type A 200U injections into the detrusor \> 12 weeks as needed for up to 3 years.
Treatment: Other: Botulinum Toxin Type A 300U
Botulinum toxin Type A 300U injections into the detrusor \> 12 weeks as needed for up to 3 years.
Treatment: Other: Botulinum Toxin Type A 200U
Botulinum toxin Type A 200U injections into the detrusor \> 12 weeks as needed for up to 3 years.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded in a patient bladder diary in the 3 consecutive days prior to each study visit for study 191622-094 (or 7 days prior to each visit in study 191622-515 or 191622-516). The number of incontinence episodes are averaged daily during this period. The initial study baseline is obtained from the patient bladder diary in the 7 consecutive days prior to the first treatment in either study 191622-515 or 191622-516. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in incontinence episodes (improvement).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Study Baseline, Week 6 Treatment Cycle 1
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded in a patient bladder diary in the 3 consecutive days prior to each study visit for study 191622-094 (or 7 days prior to each visit in study 191622-515 or 191622-516). The number of incontinence episodes are averaged daily during this period. The initial study baseline is obtained from the patient bladder diary in the 7 consecutive days prior to the first treatment in either study 191622-515 or 191622-516. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in incontinence episodes (improvement).
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Study Baseline, Week 6 Treatment Cycle 2
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded in a patient bladder diary in the 3 consecutive days prior to each study visit for study 191622-094 (or 7 days prior to each visit in study 191622-515 or 191622-516). The number of incontinence episodes are averaged daily during this period. The initial study baseline is obtained from the patient bladder diary in the 7 consecutive days prior to the first treatment in either study 191622-515 or 191622-516. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in incontinence episodes (improvement).
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Study Baseline, Week 6 Treatment Cycle 3
Query!
Primary outcome [4]
0
0
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded in a patient bladder diary in the 3 consecutive days prior to each study visit for study 191622-094 (or 7 days prior to each visit in study 191622-515 or 191622-516). The number of incontinence episodes are averaged daily during this period. The initial study baseline is obtained from the patient bladder diary in the 7 consecutive days prior to the first treatment in either study 191622-515 or 191622-516. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in incontinence episodes (improvement).
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Study Baseline, Week 6 Treatment Cycle 4
Query!
Primary outcome [5]
0
0
Change From Study Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded in a patient bladder diary in the 3 consecutive days prior to each study visit for study 191622-094 (or 7 days prior to each visit in study 191622-515 or 191622-516). The number of incontinence episodes are averaged daily during this period. The initial study baseline is obtained from the patient bladder diary in the 7 consecutive days prior to the first treatment in either study 191622-515 or 191622-516. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in incontinence episodes (improvement).
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Study Baseline, Week 6 Treatment Cycle 5
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Study Baseline in the Incontinence Quality of Life Instrument (I-QOL) Total Summary Score
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The I-QOL questionnaire is a validated, disease-specific quality of life (QOL) questionnaire containing 22 questions designed to measure the impact of urinary incontinence on patients' lives. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale (1 = worst QOL and 5 = best QOL). The scores are totaled over the 22 questions and normalized to a score of 0-100 (0 = worst QOL and 100= best QOL). The I-QOL total score is calculated by combining the 22-item subscores from the 3 I-QOL domains: Avoidance Limiting Behavior, Psychological Impact, and Social Embarrassment. The initial study baseline is obtained from data collected prior to the first treatment in Study 191622-515 or 191622-516. Positive number changes from baseline indicate improved QOL.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Study Baseline, Week 6 Treatment Cycle 1
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Change From Study Baseline in the Incontinence Quality of Life Instrument (I-QOL) Total Summary Score
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The I-QOL questionnaire is a validated, disease-specific quality of life (QOL) questionnaire containing 22 questions designed to measure the impact of urinary incontinence on patients' lives. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale (1 = worst QOL and 5 = best QOL). The scores are totaled over the 22 questions and normalized to a score of 0-100 (0 = worst QOL and 100= best QOL). The I-QOL total score is calculated by combining the 22-item subscores from the 3 I-QOL domains: Avoidance Limiting Behavior, Psychological Impact, and Social Embarrassment. The initial study baseline is obtained from data collected prior to the first treatment in Study 191622-515 or 191622-516. Positive number changes from baseline indicate improved QOL.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Study Baseline, Week 6 Treatment Cycle 2
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Change From Study Baseline in the Incontinence Quality of Life Instrument (I-QOL) Total Summary Score
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The I-QOL questionnaire is a validated, disease-specific quality of life (QOL) questionnaire containing 22 questions designed to measure the impact of urinary incontinence on patients' lives. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale (1 = worst QOL and 5 = best QOL). The scores are totaled over the 22 questions and normalized to a score of 0-100 (0 = worst QOL and 100= best QOL). The I-QOL total score is calculated by combining the 22-item subscores from the 3 I-QOL domains: Avoidance Limiting Behavior, Psychological Impact, and Social Embarrassment. The initial study baseline is obtained from data collected prior to the first treatment in Study 191622-515 or 191622-516. Positive number changes from baseline indicate improved QOL.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Study Baseline, Week 6 Treatment Cycle 3
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Change From Study Baseline in the Incontinence Quality of Life Instrument (I-QOL) Total Summary Score
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
The I-QOL questionnaire is a validated, disease-specific quality of life (QOL) questionnaire containing 22 questions designed to measure the impact of urinary incontinence on patients' lives. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale (1 = worst QOL and 5 = best QOL). The scores are totaled over the 22 questions and normalized to a score of 0-100 (0 = worst QOL and 100= best QOL). The I-QOL total score is calculated by combining the 22-item subscores from the 3 I-QOL domains: Avoidance Limiting Behavior, Psychological Impact, and Social Embarrassment. The initial study baseline is obtained from data collected prior to the first treatment in Study 191622-515 or 191622-516. Positive number changes from baseline indicate improved QOL.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Study Baseline, Week 6 Treatment Cycle 4
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Change From Study Baseline in the Incontinence Quality of Life Instrument (I-QOL) Total Summary Score
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
The I-QOL questionnaire is a validated, disease-specific quality of life (QOL) questionnaire containing 22 questions designed to measure the impact of urinary incontinence on patients' lives. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale (1 = worst QOL and 5 = best QOL). The scores are totaled over the 22 questions and normalized to a score of 0-100 (0 = worst QOL and 100= best QOL). The I-QOL total score is calculated by combining the 22-item subscores from the 3 I-QOL domains: Avoidance Limiting Behavior, Psychological Impact, and Social Embarrassment. The initial study baseline is obtained from data collected prior to the first treatment in Study 191622-515 or 191622-516. Positive number changes from baseline indicate improved QOL.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Study Baseline, Week 6 Treatment Cycle 5
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Change From Study Baseline in Volume Per Void
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The total volume voided (voluntary or by catheterization) is recorded by the patient over a 24-hour period preceding the study visit. The average volume per voiding episode is derived by dividing the total volume collected in a 24-hour period by the total number of urinary episodes with volume recorded in the same 24-hour period. The initial study baseline is obtained from data collected prior to the first treatment in Study 191622-515 or 191622-516. Positive number changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Study Baseline, Week 6 Treatment Cycle 1
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Change From Study Baseline in Volume Per Void
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The total volume voided (voluntary or by catheterization) is recorded by the patient over a 24-hour period preceding the study visit. The average volume per voiding episode is derived by dividing the total volume collected in a 24-hour period by the total number of urinary episodes with volume recorded in the same 24-hour period. The initial study baseline is obtained from data collected prior to the first treatment in Study 191622-515 or 191622-516. Positive number changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Study Baseline, Week 6 Treatment Cycle 2
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change From Study Baseline in Volume Per Void
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The total volume voided (voluntary or by catheterization) is recorded by the patient over a 24-hour period preceding the study visit. The average volume per voiding episode is derived by dividing the total volume collected in a 24-hour period by the total number of urinary episodes with volume recorded in the same 24-hour period. The initial study baseline is obtained from data collected prior to the first treatment in Study 191622-515 or 191622-516. Positive number changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Study Baseline, Week 6 Treatment Cycle 3
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change From Study Baseline in Volume Per Void
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The total volume voided (voluntary or by catheterization) is recorded by the patient over a 24-hour period preceding the study visit. The average volume per voiding episode is derived by dividing the total volume collected in a 24-hour period by the total number of urinary episodes with volume recorded in the same 24-hour period. The initial study baseline is obtained from data collected prior to the first treatment in Study 191622-515 or 191622-516. Positive number changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Study Baseline, Week 6 Treatment Cycle 4
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change From Study Baseline in Volume Per Void
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
The total volume voided (voluntary or by catheterization) is recorded by the patient over a 24-hour period preceding the study visit. The average volume per voiding episode is derived by dividing the total volume collected in a 24-hour period by the total number of urinary episodes with volume recorded in the same 24-hour period. The initial study baseline is obtained from data collected prior to the first treatment in Study 191622-515 or 191622-516. Positive number changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Study Baseline, Week 6 Treatment Cycle 5
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Patient has participated in study 191622-515 or 191622-516 and the following criteria fulfilled:
* Patient completed at least 52 weeks in the preceding study.
* No longer than 6 months has elapsed since completion of the preceding study
* Patient has not received any prohibited medications during any intervening period between the preceding study and this long-term study.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* History or evidence of pelvic or urologic abnormality.
* Previous or current diagnosis of bladder or prostate cancer.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/01/2009
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
4/09/2013
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
397
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
- Randwick
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Randwick
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Innsbruck
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Ghent
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Rio de Janeiro
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Ostrava
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Salouel
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Kiel
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Florence
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Amsterdam
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Epsom
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Poznan
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Porto
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Presov
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Pretoria
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Tenerife
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Hualien
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Kiev
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
London
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Allergan
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of botulinum toxin type A on patients with overactive bladder as a result of spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis. This is a follow-up study to two Allergan sponsored studies (NCT00311376 and NCT00461292).
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00876447
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Kennelly M, Dmochowski R, Schulte-Baukloh H, Ethans K, Del Popolo G, Moore C, Jenkins B, Guard S, Zheng Y, Karsenty G; 191622-094 Investigators. Efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA therapy are sustained over 4 years of treatment in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity: Final results of a long-term extension study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Feb;36(2):368-375. doi: 10.1002/nau.22934. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Medical Director
Query!
Address
0
0
Allergan
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00876447
Download to PDF