Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00885755
Registration number
NCT00885755
Ethics application status
Date submitted
16/03/2009
Date registered
22/04/2009
Date last updated
29/03/2018
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study of Herceptin (Trastuzumab)and Biomarkers in Patients With HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
Query!
Scientific title
A Prospective Study to Evaluate Alterations in Molecular Biomarkers in HER2 Neu Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Together With Assessment of Trastuzumab Use Beyond Progression After Initial Response to Trastuzumab-taxane Based Treatment
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2008-004013-94
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
MO22004
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Breast Cancer
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Breast
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Standard taxane therapy
Treatment: Drugs - capecitabine [Xeloda]
Treatment: Drugs - trastuzumab [Herceptin]
Experimental: 1 -
Treatment: Drugs: Standard taxane therapy
As prescribed
Treatment: Drugs: capecitabine [Xeloda]
1000mg/m2 po bid on days 1-14 of each 3-week cycle (only in patients who have progressed)
Treatment: Drugs: trastuzumab [Herceptin]
8mg/kg iv loading dose on day 1 of first 3-week cycle, and 6mg/kg iv on day 1 of each subsequent cycle
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Part I: Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Biomarker
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Progression was defined as an increase by at least 20 percent (%) from the smallest value in the Sum of Longest Diameter (SLD) of lesions. Biomarkers investigated: p95 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (p95HER2) positive (+ve) and negative (-ve) , insulin growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) less than (\<) median and greater than or equal to (=) median membrane H score, c-MET \<median and =median membrane H score, phosphatase and tensin homolog gene (PTEN) \<median and =median cytoplasm H score, HER2 \<median and =median membrane H score, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) catalytic subunit wild type (WT) and mutation (M), and FC gamma receptors IIIa homozygous Phenyl alanine (FF), heterozygous Phenyl alanine/Valine (VF) and homozygous Valine (VV), receptor IIa Phenotypes homozygous Histidine (HH), heterozygous Histidine/Arginine (HR) and homozygous Arginine (RR) IIb phenotypes homozygous Isoleucien (II),heterozygous Isoleucine/Threonine (IT) and homozygous Threonine (TT) .
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 Cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Part II: Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Biomarker
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
PFS was calculated from first study medication in Part II to date of progression or death.The relationship between PFS and the following biomarker variables was investigated in each of study Part 1 and 2: p95HER2 +ve and -ve population, IGF1R \<median and = median membrane H score, c-MET \<median and =median membrane H score, PTEN \<median and =median cytoplasm H score, HER2 \<median and =median membrane H score, PI3K catalytic subunit WT and M, and FC gamma receptors IIIa, IIa and IIb Phenotypes FF, VF and VV, HH, HR and RR, and II, IT and TT.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
Part I: Time to Progression (TTP) by Biomarker
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Progression was defined as an increase by at least 20% from the smallest value in the SLD of lesions.TTP was determined as the time in months from the date of screening until first progression.The relationship between PFS and the following biomarker variables was investigated in each of study Part 1 and 2: p95 HER2 +ve and -ve population, IGF1R \<median and =median, c-MET \<median and =median, PTEN \<median and =median, HER2 \<median and =median, PI3K catalytic subunit WT and M, and FC gamma receptors IIIa, IIa and IIb Phenotypes FF, VF and VV, HH, HR and RR, and II, IT and TT . The correlation between the biomarker variables and TTP were investigated using a univariate Cox regression model and time-to-event methods (Kaplan-Meier).
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 Cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 weeks
Query!
Primary outcome [4]
0
0
Part II: TTP by Biomarker
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
TTP was calculated from first study medication in Part II to date of progression. The relationship between TTP and the following biomarker variables was investigated in each of study Part 1 and 2: p95 HER2 +ve and -ve population, IGF1R \<median and =median, c-MET \<median and =median, PTEN \<median and =median, HER2 \<median and =median, PI3K catalytic subunit WT and M, and FC gamma receptors IIIa, IIa and IIb Phenotypes FF, VF and VV, HH, HR and RR, and II, IT and TT .
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months
Query!
Primary outcome [5]
0
0
Part I: Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD) or Progrerssive Disease (PD) by Biomarker
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
BOR was defined according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR: disappearance of all target lesions and all pathological lymph nodes below 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or persistence of non-target lesions. The relationship between best response and the following biomarkers was investigated: p95 HER2 (+ve/-ve), IGF1R, c-MET, PTEN, HER2 (median/=median), PI3K catalytic subunit (WT/M), and FC gamma receptors IIIa, IIa and IIb (phenotypes FF, VF, VV, HH, HR, RR and II, IT and TT respectively). The correlation between the biomarker variables and percentage of participants with best response were investigated using a univariate regression analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 weeks
Query!
Primary outcome [6]
0
0
Part II: Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of CR, PR, SD or PD by Biomarker
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Best Overall response was defined according to RECIST. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and all pathological lymph nodes below 10 mm.PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or persistence of non-target lesions. The relationship between best response and the following biomarkers was investigated: p95 HER2 (+ve/-ve), IGF1R, c-MET, PTEN, HER2 (\<median/=median) , PI3K catalytic subunit (WT/M), and FC gamma receptors IIIa, IIa and IIb (phenotypes FF, VF, VV, HH, HR, RR and II, IT and TT respectively). The correlation between the biomarker variables and percentage of participants with best response were investigated using a univariate regression analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Part I: TTP in Intent to Treat (ITT) Population
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
TTP was determined as the time in months from the date of screening until first progression. In participants with measurable disease, progression was defined according to RECIST (SLD increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study \[including baseline, if that is the smallest\]). In participants with non-measurable disease, progression was defined as the presence of new lesions or unequivocal progression during treatment.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Part I: PFS in ITT Population
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
PFS was determined as the time in months from the date of screening until first progression. In participants with measurable disease, progression was defined according to RECIST (SLD increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study \[including baseline, if that is the smallest\]).. In participants with non-measurable disease, progression was defined as the presence of new lesions or unequivocal progression during treatment.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Part II: TTP in Intent to Treat (ITT) Population
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
TTP was calculated from first study medication in Part II to date of progression. In participants with measurable disease progression was defined according to RECIST(SLD increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study \[including baseline, if that is the smallest\]). In participants with non-measurable disease, progression was defined as the presence of new lesions or unequivocal progression during treatment.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 Cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Part II: PFS in ITT Population
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
PFS was calculated from first study medication in Part II to date of progression or death. In participants with measurable disease progression was defined according to RECIST (SLD increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study \[including baseline, if that is the smallest\]). In participants with non-measurable disease, progression was defined as the presence of new lesions or unequivocal progression during treatment.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Overall Survival in Per Protocol Population
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Overall survival was calculated in months from the day of screening until death.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until death (up to 46 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Overall Survival in ITT Population
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Overall survival was calculated in months from the day of screening until death.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until death (up to 46 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Part I and II: Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of CR or PR in ITT Population
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Best Overall response was defined according to RECIST. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and all pathological lymph nodes below 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or persistence of non-target lesions.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 Cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Part I and II: Percentage of Participants With a Response by Best Overall Response by CR, PR, SD or PD in ITT Population
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Best Overall response was defined according to RECIST. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and all pathological lymph nodes below 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or persistence of non-target lesions.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* female patients, >=18 years of age;
* HER2-positive breast cancer;
* al least one metastatic site amenable for core biopsy;
* left ventricular ejection fraction >50%.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* prior adjuvant/neoadjuvant Herceptin within past 6 months;
* prior adjuvant taxane therapy within past 12 months;
* use of chemotherapy, immunotherapy or biological anticancer therapy within past 3 weeks;
* known bleeding diatheses.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
NA
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 2
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
13/08/2009
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
18/02/2013
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
33
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,VIC,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; Medical Oncology - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Royal North Shore Hospital; Oncology - St. Leonards
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Eastern Health Breast Cancer Research - East Ringwood
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Border Medical Oncology; Murray Valley Private Hospital - Wodonga
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Mount Medical Center - Perth
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Royal Perth Hospital; Department of Medical Oncology - Perth
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2050 - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2065 - St. Leonards
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
3135 - East Ringwood
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
3690 - Wodonga
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
6000 - Perth
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Cantabria
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Valencia
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Stockholm
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Uppsala
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Hull
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Manchester
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Nottingham
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Hoffmann-La Roche
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This single arm study will evaluate alterations in molecular marker expression in HER2-positive targeted therapy, and will evaluate the effect of continued treatment with Herceptin and Xeloda beyond progression following initial Herceptin-taxane chemotherapy. Patients who develop progressive disease will receive first-line Herceptin (8mg/kg iv loading dose and 6mg/kg iv every 3 weeks) + taxane therapy. patients who develop progressive disease within 9 weeks of treatment will continue treatment with Herceptin in combination with Xeloda (1000mg/m2 po bid on days 1-14 of each 3-week cycle).Biopsies of tumor tissue will be taken for biomarker and gene profiling evaluation. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, intolerable side effects or patient choice, and the target sample size is 100 individuals.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00885755
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Clinical Trials
Query!
Address
0
0
Hoffmann-La Roche
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00885755
Download to PDF