Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00903175
Registration number
NCT00903175
Ethics application status
Date submitted
24/04/2009
Date registered
18/05/2009
Date last updated
8/11/2016
Titles & IDs
Public title
Efficacy and Safety Comparison of RAD001 Versus Sunitinib in the First-line and Second-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Query!
Scientific title
An Open-label, Multicenter Phase II Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of RAD001 as First-line Followed by Second-line Sunitinib Versus Sunitinib as First-line Followed by Second-line RAD001 in the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2009-011056-21
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
CRAD001L2202
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
RECORD-3
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Renal Cell Carcinoma
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Non melanoma skin cancer
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Kidney
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - everolimus
Treatment: Drugs - sunitinib
Experimental: everolimus 1L/sunitinib 2L - everolimus First Line: 10 mg orally, once daily, (two 5 mg tablets), continuous treatment. sunitinib Second Line: 50 mg orally, once daily, 4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off (4/2)
Active comparator: sunitinib 1L/everolimus 2L - sunitinib First Line: 50 mg orally, once daily, 4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off (4/2) everolimus Second Line: 10 mg orally, once daily (two 5 mg tablets), continuous treatment
Treatment: Drugs: everolimus
Everolimus was administered orally at 10 mg/day. Everolimus is formulated as tablets of 5 mg strength, blister-packed under aluminum foil in units of 10 tablets.
Treatment: Drugs: sunitinib
Sunitinib was administered orally 50 mg daily, on a schedule of 4 weeks on/2 weeks off. Sunitinib was supplied as hard gelatin capsules of 12.5 mg, 25 mg, or 50 mg strength according to local practice.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Progression Free Survival First-Line (PFS 1-L)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
PFS_1L based on investigator assessment of radiology data by RECIST 1.0, was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented disease progression or death due to any cause during or after first-line treatment with everolimus or sunitinib. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
based on radiological assessments every 3 months until disease progression, start of another antineoplastic therapy or for any other reason up to 35 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Progression-free Survival Combined (PFS-C)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
PFS-C (1L and 2L study drugs combined) was a composite endpoint which combined both lines of study treatment. It was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first of the following: date of death due to any cause, or date of the first radiologically documented progression disease during or after the second-line treatment period for patients with a radiologically documented progression disease in the first-line treatment period and who had crossed-over to second-line treatment no more than 6 weeks after progression.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
based on radiological assessments every 3 months until disease progression, start of another antineoplastic therapy or for any other reason up to about 56 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Overall survival was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. The analysis of OS included all deaths in the FAS regardless of when they were observed.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Every 2 months from randomization up to 3 years after last patient randomized
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Overall Response Rate (ORR) - First -Line (1-L)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
ORR was defined as the number of participants with best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) and was based on investigator assessment of radiology data per RECIST. Participants with best overall response of 'Unknown' were treated as non-responders in the calculation of the ORR. Confirmed CR = at least two determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart before progression. Confirmed PR = at least two determinations of PR or better at least 4 weeks apart before progression. CR required a disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR required at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of all target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters. Radiological assessments : every 12 weeks until disease progression, the start of another antineoplastic therapy or for any other reason.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
based on radiological assessments every 3 months until disease progression, start of another antineoplastic therapy or for any other reason up to 35 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Duration of Response (DoR) - First-Line (1-L)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Duration of overall response (CR or PR) applies only to patients whose Best Overall Response (BOR) was Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) during the first-line treatment period. The start date was the date of first documented response (CR or PR) during the first-line treatment and the end date was the date of the event defined as the first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer during or after the same treatment line.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
based on radiological assessments every 3 months until disease progression, start of another antineoplastic therapy or for any other reason up to 35 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the FKSI-DRS Risk Score by at Least 3 Score Units by First-line Drug
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Kidney Symptom Index, Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) is a set of items to assess symptoms experienced by patients with advanced kidney cancer. These symptoms include fatigue, pain, weight loss, dyspnea, cough, fever and hematuria. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much). The FKSI-DRS total score ranges from 0 (most severe symptoms) to 36 (no symptoms). Definitive deterioration was defined as a decrease by at least 3 units compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the 1-L of treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 3 units was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the patient.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
<=14 days prior to the first dose of study medication, on day 1, day 28 of every cycle, at the end of treatment visit, at the 28 day FUP visit and monthly thereafter for up to 3 months or until initiation of another anticancer therapy up to 35 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the FKSI-DRS Risk Score by at Least 3 Score Units by First and Second-line Drugs Combined
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Kidney Symptom Index, Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) is a set of items to assess symptoms experienced by patients with advanced kidney cancer. These symptoms include fatigue, pain, weight loss, dyspnea, cough, fever and hematuria. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much). The FKSI-DRS total score ranges from 0 (most severe symptoms) to 36 (no symptoms). Definitive deterioration was defined as a decrease by at least 3 units compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the 1-L or 2-L treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 3 units was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the patient.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
<=14 days prior to the first dose of study medication, on day 1, day 28 of every cycle, at the end of treatment visit, at the 28 day FUP visit and monthly thereafter for up to 3 months or until initiation of another anticancer therapy up to 35 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Physical Functioning (PF) Scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30 - by First-Line (1L) Drug
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items. The standardized score for the PF, fatigue subscales and global health status ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high level of symptom/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% was defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the first line of treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the participant.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
<=14 days prior to the first dose of study medication, on day 1, day 28 of every cycle, at the end of treatment visit, at the 28 day FUP visit and monthly thereafter for up to 3 months or until initiation of another anticancer therapy up to 35 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Physical Functioning Scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30 - by First and Second-Line Drugs Combined
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items.The standardized score for the PF, fatigue subscales and global health status ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high level of symptom/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% was defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the first line or second line treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the participant.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
<=14 days prior to the first dose of study medication, on day 1, day 28 of every cycle, at the end of treatment visit, at the 28 day FUP visit and monthly thereafter for up to 3 months or until initiation of another anticancer therapy up to 35 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Global Health Status/QoL Scores of the EORTC QLQ-C30 by First-Line Drug
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items.The standardized score for the PF, fatigue subscales and global health status ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high level of symptom/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% was defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the first line of treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the participant.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
<=14 days prior to the first dose of study medication, on day 1, day 28 of every cycle, at the end of treatment visit, at the 28 day FUP visit and monthly thereafter for up to 3 months or until initiation of another anticancer therapy up to 35 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Global Health Status/QoL Scores of the EORTC QLQ-C30 by First and Second-Line Drugs Combined
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items. The standardized score for the PF, fatigue subscales and global health status ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high level of symptom/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% was defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the first line or second line treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the participant.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
<=14 days prior to the first dose of study medication, on day 1, day 28 of every cycle, at the end of treatment visit, at the 28 day FUP visit and monthly thereafter for up to 3 months or until initiation of another anticancer therapy up to 35 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Fatigue Scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30 by First-Line Drug
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items.The standardized score for the PF, fatigue subscales and global health status ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high level of symptom/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% was defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the first line of treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the participant.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
<=14 days prior to the first dose of study medication, on day 1, day 28 of every cycle, at the end of treatment visit, at the 28 day FUP visit and monthly thereafter for up to 3 months or until initiation of another anticancer therapy up to 35 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Fatigue Scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30 by First and Second-Line Drugs Combined
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items. The standardized score for the PF, fatigue subscales and global health status ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high level of symptom/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% was defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the first line or second line treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the participant.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
<=14 days prior to the first dose of study medication, on day 1, day 28 of every cycle, at the end of treatment visit, at the 28 day FUP visit and monthly thereafter for up to 3 months or until initiation of another anticancer therapy up to 35 months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.
2. Patients with at least one measurable lesion.
3. Patients with a Karnofsky Performance Status =70%.
4. Adequate bone marrow function.
5. Adequate liver function.
6. Adequate renal function.
7. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) = lower limit of institutional normal (LLN)
8. Women of childbearing potential must have had a negative serum pregnancy test within 14 days prior to the administration of the study medication. Adequate contraception must be used while on study.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Less than 4 weeks post-major surgery
2. Patients who had radiation therapy within 4 weeks prior to start of study treatment (palliative radiotherapy to bone lesions allowed within 2 weeks prior to study treatment start).
3. Patients in need for major surgical procedure during the course of the study
4. Patients with a serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture
5. Patients with a history of seizure(s) not controlled with standard medical therapy
6. Patients who have received prior systemic treatment for their metastatic RCC
7. Patients who have previously received systemic mTOR inhibitors (sirolimus, temsirolimus, everolimus) or VEGF inhibitors. Note: History of adjuvant immunotherapy, vaccines or adjuvant sorafenib following localized surgical nephrectomy is acceptable.
8. Patients with a known hypersensitivity to RAD001 (everolimus) or other rapamycins (sirolimus, temsirolimus) or to its excipients Patients with a known hypersensitivity to RAD001 (everolimus) or other rapamycins or to its excipients
9. Patients with a known hypersensitivity to sunitinib or its excipients
10. History or clinical evidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Note: Subjects who have previously-treated CNS metastases (surgery plus or minus radiotherapy, radiosurgery, or gamma knife) and meet all 3 of the following criteria are eligible:
* Are asymptomatic and,
* have had no evidence of active CNS metastases for = 6 months prior to enrollment and,
* have no requirement for steroids or enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants (EIAC)
11. Clinically significant gastrointestinal abnormalities including, but not limited to:
* Malabsorption syndrome
* Major resection of the stomach or small bowel that could affect the absorption of study drug
* Active peptic ulcer disease
* Inflammatory bowel disease
* Ulcerative colitis, or other gastrointestinal conditions with increased risk of perforation
* History of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra abdominal abscess within 28 days prior to beginning study treatment.
12. Poorly controlled hypertension [defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) of =160mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of = 95mmHg]
13. Patients receiving chronic systemic treatment with corticosteroids or another immunosuppressive agent
14. Patients with a known history of HIV seropositivity.
15. Patients with active bleeding.
16. Patients who have any severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions or other conditions within the past 12 months that could affect their participation in the study such as:
* Cardiac angioplasty or stenting, unstable angina pectoris, symptomatic peripheral vascular disease, symptomatic congestive heart failure (NYHA II, III, IV), myocardial infarction = 6 months prior to first study treatment, serious uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, cerebrovascular accidents = 6 months before study treatment start.
* Prolongation of corrected QT interval (QTc) > 500 milliseconds (msecs).
* Severally impaired lung function as defined as spirometry and DLCO that is 50% of the normal predicted value and/or 0^2 saturation that is 88% or less at rest on room air.
* Poorly controlled diabetes as defined by fasting serum glucose >2.0 x ULN.
* Any active (acute or chronic) or uncontrolled infection/disorders that impair the ability to evaluate the patient or for the patient to complete the study.
* Liver disease such as chronic active hepatitis or chronic persistent hepatitis.
17. History of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) including transient ischemic attack (TIA).
18. History of pulmonary embolism or untreated deep venous thrombosis (DVT) within the past 6 months. Note: Subjects with recent DVT who have been treated with therapeutic anti-coagulating agents for at least 6 weeks are eligible.
19. Patients who have a history of another primary malignancy and off treatment for = 3 years
20. Female patients of child-bearing potential who are not using adequate birth control methods, or who are pregnant or breast feeding.
21. Patients who are using other investigational agents or who had received investigational drugs = 2 weeks prior to study treatment start.
22. Patients unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 2
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/10/2009
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/05/2015
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
471
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
SA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Woodville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
5011 - Woodville
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Arkansas
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
District of Columbia
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Montana
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Wisconsin
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Santa Fe
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Tucuman
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
RJ
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
RS
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
SP
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Saskatchewan
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Herlev
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Angers cedex 02
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Lille Cedex
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy Cede
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Aschaffenburg
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Weiden
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Hongkong
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Shatin, New Territories
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
AR
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
MO
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Napoli
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Korea
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Daejeon
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Chihuahua
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Den Haag
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Maastricht
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Peru
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Lima
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Alicante
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Andalucia
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Cataluna
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Taiwan, ROC
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Niaosong Township
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Bangkok
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Istanbul
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Avon
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Nottingham
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study assessed the efficacy and safety of first-line RAD001 followed by second-line sunitinib versus the opposite sequence: first-line sunitinib followed by second-line RAD001 for the treatment of patients with MRCC.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00903175
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Voss MH, Chen D, Reising A, Marker M, Shi J, Xu J, Ostrovnaya I, Seshan VE, Redzematovic A, Chen YB, Patel P, Han X, Hsieh JJ, Hakimi AA, Motzer RJ. PTEN Expression, Not Mutation Status in TSC1, TSC2, or mTOR, Correlates with the Outcome on Everolimus in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated on the Randomized RECORD-3 Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jan 15;25(2):506-514. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1833. Epub 2018 Oct 16. Knox JJ, Barrios CH, Kim TM, Cosgriff T, Srimuninnimit V, Pittman K, Sabbatini R, Rha SY, Flaig TW, Page RD, Beck JT, Cheung F, Yadav S, Patel P, Geoffrois L, Niolat J, Berkowitz N, Marker M, Chen D, Motzer RJ. Final overall survival analysis for the phase II RECORD-3 study of first-line everolimus followed by sunitinib versus first-line sunitinib followed by everolimus in metastatic RCC. Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;28(6):1339-1345. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx075. Erratum In: Ann Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;29(11):2269. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx807. Motzer RJ, Barrios CH, Kim TM, Falcon S, Cosgriff T, Harker WG, Srimuninnimit V, Pittman K, Sabbatini R, Rha SY, Flaig TW, Page R, Bavbek S, Beck JT, Patel P, Cheung FY, Yadav S, Schiff EM, Wang X, Niolat J, Sellami D, Anak O, Knox JJ. Phase II randomized trial comparing sequential first-line everolimus and second-line sunitinib versus first-line sunitinib and second-line everolimus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 1;32(25):2765-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.6911. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Query!
Address
0
0
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00903175
Download to PDF