Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01110915
Registration number
NCT01110915
Ethics application status
Date submitted
23/04/2010
Date registered
27/04/2010
Date last updated
30/04/2013
Titles & IDs
Public title
Advisa MRI Clinical Study
Query!
Scientific title
Advisa MRI™ System Clinical Investigation
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
AdvisaMRI
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
0
0
Query!
Cardiac Pacemaker, Artificial
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Devices - Medtronic Advisa MRI Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG)
Treatment: Devices - Medtronic CapSureFix MRI™ active fixation MRI lead
Experimental: MRI group - Subjects randomized to the MRI group will undergo a one-hour MRI scan, including 16 individual sequences in the chest and head region, at 9-12 weeks post-implant.
Active comparator: Control group - Subjects randomized to the Control group will wait for one hour without having any MRI scan at 9-12 weeks post-implant.
Treatment: Devices: Medtronic Advisa MRI Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG)
Advisa MRI IPG is a dual chamber, multi-programmable IPG indicated to restore heart rates, improve cardiac output, prevent symptoms, or protect against arrhythmias related to cardiac impulse formation or conduction disorders. The IPG is indicated for use in patients who may benefit from rate-responsive pacing to support cardiac output during varying levels of activity and has been modified for use during an MRI exam.
Treatment: Devices: Medtronic CapSureFix MRI™ active fixation MRI lead
The Medtronic CapSureFix MRI™ active fixation MRI lead is a transvenous, bipolar, silicone, steroid eluting and active fixation pacing lead. It is based on the commercially available Medtronic Model 5076 lead and has been modified for use in the MRI environment. The MRI lead is used for both atrial and ventricular applications.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Related Complications
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
For each subject in this objective, the endpoint was the occurrence of an MRI-related complication within 30 days post-MRI. An independent Adverse Event Advisory Committee (AEAC) determined whether each adverse event was a complication and whether it was MRI-related.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
MRI scan to one-month post-MRI scan
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Atrial Pacing Capture Threshold Success
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Subjects' atrial pacing capture threshold was measured at the 9-12 week visit (pre-MRI/waiting period) and the 4-month visit (i.e. one month post-MRI/waiting period). A success was when a subject experienced an increase less than or equal to 0.5V (volts) between the two visits.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Pre-MRI/waiting period to one month post-MRI/waiting period
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
Ventricular Pacing Capture Threshold Success
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Subjects' ventricular pacing capture threshold was measured at the 9-12 week visit (pre-MRI/waiting period) and the 4-month visit (i.e. one month post-MRI/waiting period). A success was when a subject experienced an increase less than or equal to 0.5V (volts) between the two visits.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Pre-MRI /waiting period to 1-month post-MRI/waiting period
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Atrial Sensed Amplitude Success
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Subjects' atrial sensed amplitude was measured at the 9-12 week visit (pre-MRI/waiting period) and the 4-month visit (i.e. one month post-MRI/waiting period). A success was defined as a 50% or less decrease in atrial sensed amplitude between the two visits.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Pre-MRI /waiting period to 1-month post-MRI/waiting period
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Ventricular Sensed Amplitude Success
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Subjects' ventricular sensed amplitude was measured at the 9-12 week visit (pre-MRI/waiting period) and the 4-month visit (i.e. one month post-MRI/waiting period). A success was defined as a 50% or less decrease in ventricular sensed amplitude between the two visits.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Pre-MRI /waiting period to 1-month post-MRI/waiting period
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Occurrence of Sustained Ventricular Arrhythmias and Asystole During MRI Scans.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The endpoint was the occurrence of sustained ventricular arrhythmias and asystole during MRI scans and attributable to the MR scan. Sustained ventricular arrhythmias or asystole episodes that occurred during the MRI scan was considered attributable to the MR scan if so adjudicated by the AEAC.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
During MRI scans
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
System-related Complications
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Subjects with a complication related to the implanted system, which consisted of the pacemaker, leads to the right chambers of the heart (atrium and ventricle), pacemaker software, and programmer. All adverse events in the time frame were recorded at the subject's center and assessed the AEAC. The AEAC determined whether each adverse event was a complication (requiring invasive intervention), and whether the event was related to the system.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Implant to four months post implant
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Subjects who have a Class I or II indication for implantation of a dual chamber pacemaker according to the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) guidelines
* Subjects who are able to undergo a pectoral implant
* Subjects who are able and willing to undergo elective magnetic resonance (MR) scanning without sedation
* Subjects who are geographically stable and available for follow-up at the study center for the length of the study
Query!
Minimum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Subjects with a mechanical tricuspid heart valve
* Subjects with a history of significant tricuspid valvular disease
* Subjects for whom a single dose of 1.0 milligram (mg) dexamethasone acetate may be contraindicated
* Subjects who require a legally authorized representative to obtain consent
* Subjects who have a previously implanted pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (abandoned pacemaker and/or defibrillator leads are not permitted; however subjects with complete system explants are not excluded)
* Subjects who are immediate candidates for an ICD
* Subjects who require an indicated MR scan, other than those specifically described in the study, before the 4 months follow-up
* Subjects with previously implanted active medical devices
* Subjects with a non-MRI compatible device (such as ICDs or neurostimulators) or material implant (e.g. non-MRI compatible sternal wires, neurostimulators, biostimulators, metals or alloys)
* Subjects with medical conditions that preclude the testing required by the protocol or limit study participation
* Subjects who are enrolled or intend to participate in another clinical trial (of an investigational drug or device, new indication for an approved drug or device, or requirement of additional testing beyond standard clinical practice) during this clinical study
* Pregnant women, or women of child bearing potential and who are not on a reliable form of birth control
* Subjects with exclusion criteria required by local law (e.g. age, breastfeeding)
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
NA
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/06/2010
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/03/2013
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
269
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,SA,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
St. George Hospital - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
The Prince Charles Hospital - Chermside
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Adelaide Cardiology - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Epworth - Richmond
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
- Chermside
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
- Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
- Richmond
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Iowa
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Sankt Pölten
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Gilly
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Montpellier
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Rouen Cedex
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Saint Etienne
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Bonn
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Rostock
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Ulm
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Haifa
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Milano
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Amsterdam
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Den Haag
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Nieuwegein
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Lausanne
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Zürich
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Bournemouth
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Manchester
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of the Advisa MRI System clinical study is to confirm safety and effectiveness in the clinical MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) environment when subjects receive MRI scans up to 2W/kg Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) without positioning restrictions (MRI scans may occur anywhere on the body including the chest).
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01110915
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Gimbel JR, Bello D, Schmitt M, Merkely B, Schwitter J, Hayes DL, Sommer T, Schloss EJ, Chang Y, Willey S, Kanal E; Advisa MRI System Study Investigators. Randomized trial of pacemaker and lead system for safe scanning at 1.5 Tesla. Heart Rhythm. 2013 May;10(5):685-91. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.01.022. Epub 2013 Jan 17. Schwitter J, Kanal E, Schmitt M, Anselme F, Albert T, Hayes DL, Bello D, Toth A, Chang Y, van Osch D, Sommer T; Advisa MRI System Study Investigators. Impact of the Advisa MRI pacing system on the diagnostic quality of cardiac MR images and contraction patterns of cardiac muscle during scans: Advisa MRI randomized clinical multicenter study results. Heart Rhythm. 2013 Jun;10(6):864-72. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.02.019. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Advisa MRI Trial Leader
Query!
Address
0
0
Medtronic
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Type
Citations or Other Details
Journal
Gimbel JR, Bello D, Schmitt M, Merkely B, Schwitte...
[
More Details
]
Journal
Schwitter J, Kanal E, Schmitt M, Anselme F, Albert...
[
More Details
]
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01110915
Download to PDF