Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01119859
Registration number
NCT01119859
Ethics application status
Date submitted
1/04/2010
Date registered
10/05/2010
Date last updated
11/02/2013
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study of Tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) Versus Adalimumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Query!
Scientific title
A Multi-center, Randomized, Blinded, Parallel-group Study of the Reduction of Signs and Symptoms During Monotherapy Treatment With Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg Intravenously Versus Adalimumab 40 mg Subcutaneously in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2009-015845-21
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
WA19924
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Rheumatoid Arthritis
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Osteoarthritis
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Rheumatoid arthritis
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Tocilizumab
Experimental: Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg - Patients received 6 infusions of tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenously every 4 weeks and 12 injections of placebo to adalimumab subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
Active comparator: Adalimumab 40 mg - Patients received 12 injections of adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks and 6 infusions of placebo to tocilizumab intravenously every 4 weeks.
Treatment: Drugs: Tocilizumab
The maximum dose was 800 mg for patients weighing more than 100 kg. Tocilizumab was infused into an arm vein over a 1-hour period.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in rheumatic arthritis (RA) and includes swollen and tender joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and general health (GH) status. The index is calculated with the following formula: DAS28 = (0.56 × v(TJC28)) + (0.28 × v(SJC28)) + (0.7 × log(ESR)) + (0.014 × GH), where TJC28 = tender joint count and SJC28 = swollen joint count, each on 28 joints. GH = a patient's global assessment of disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a 100 mm visual analog scale (left end = no disease activity \[symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms\], right end = maximum disease activity \[maximum arthritis disease activity\]). When ESR equaled 0 mm/hr, it was set to 1 mm/hr. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent higher disease activity. A negative change score indicates improvement. The analysis was adjusted for stratification factors of duration of RA (= 2 years and \> 2 years) and region (US and non-US).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline to Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Patients With a Remission Response (Disease Activity Score 28 [DAS28] < 2.6) at Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The percentage of patients who achieved remission of their rheumatic arthritis at Week 24, as measured by a DAS28 score \< 2.6, is reported.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Patients With Low Disease Activity (Disease Activity Score 28 [DAS28] = 3.2) at Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The percentage of patients who had low rheumatic arthritis disease activity at Week 24, as measured by a DAS28 score of 3.2 or less, is reported.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Patients With an Improvement of at Least 20%, 50%, or 70% in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20/50/70) From Baseline at Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Improvement must be seen in tender and swollen joint counts (28 assessed joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: Separate patient and physician assessments of patient disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a visual analog scale (VAS, the extreme left end of the line "no disease activity" \[symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms\] and the extreme right end "maximum disease activity"; patient assessment of pain in previous the 24 hours on a VAS (extreme left end of the line "no pain" and the extreme right end "unbearable pain"); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do); and erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline to Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Percentage of Patients With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response at Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Change of the Disease Activity Score 28 score from baseline was used to determine EULAR responses of good, moderate, or no response. For a post-baseline score = 3.2, a change from baseline of \< -1.2 was a good response, \< -0.6 to = -1.2 was a moderate response, and = -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 3.2 to = 5.1, a change from baseline of \< -0.6 was a moderate response and = -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 5.1, a change from baseline \< -1.2 was a moderate response and = -1.2 was no response. A good response could not be achieved for post-baseline scores \> 3.2.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline to Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Percentage of Patients With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good or Moderate Response at Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Change of the Disease Activity Score 28 score from baseline was used to determine EULAR responses of good, moderate, or no response. For a post-baseline score = 3.2, a change from baseline of \< -1.2 was a good response, \< -0.6 to = -1.2 was a moderate response, and = -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 3.2 to = 5.1, a change from baseline of \< -0.6 was a moderate response and = -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score \> 5.1, a change from baseline \< -1.2 was a moderate response and = -1.2 was no response. A good response could not be achieved for post-baseline scores \> 3.2.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline to Week 24
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Adult patients, = 18 years of age.
* Rheumatoid arthritis of > 6 months duration.
* Intolerant of methotrexate or continued treatment with methotrexate is considered inappropriate.
* All disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) are to be withdrawn prior to receiving study drug.
* Weight = 150 kg.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 12 weeks prior to baseline or planned major surgery within 6 months after baseline.
* History of or current inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
* Treatment with a biologic agent at any time prior to baseline.
* Intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids = 4 weeks prior to baseline.
* Active current infection or history of recurrent bacterial, viral, fungal or mycobacterial infection.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 4
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/05/2010
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/01/2012
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
326
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
- Maroochydore
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
- Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
4558 - Maroochydore
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2050 - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Arkansas
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Idaho
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Mississippi
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Nebraska
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
New Hampshire
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Bruxelles
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Liege
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Curitiba
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Goiania
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Sao Paulo
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Czech Republic
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Prague
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Finland
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Helsinki
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Finland
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Jyväskylä
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Baden-baden
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Essen
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Heidelberg
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Herne
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Hildesheim
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Köln
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Osnabrück
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Ratingen
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Würzburg
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Athens
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Heraklion
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Thessaloniki
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Mexicali
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Mexico, Df
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Obregon
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Almada
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Lisboa
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Porto
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
La Coruna
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Santiago de Compostela
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Stockholm
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Uppsala
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Aarau
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Genève
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Lausanne
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
St. Gallen
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Zürich
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Ankara
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Antalya
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Istanbul
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Cannock
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Leeds
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Newcastle Upon Tyne
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Poole
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Hoffmann-La Roche
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This randomized, blinded, parallel arm study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) versus adalimumab as monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who are intolerant of methotrexate or where continued treatment with methotrexate was considered inappropriate. Patients were randomized to receive either tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenously (iv) every 4 weeks plus placebo subcutaneously (sc) every 2 weeks, or adalimumab 40 mg sc every 2 weeks plus placebo iv every 4 weeks. Treatment was anticipated to last 24 weeks. With regard to the blind, the study nurse was unblinded due to the nature of the treatment administration, but the investigator and the patient remained blinded.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01119859
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Strand V, Michalska M, Birchwood C, Pei J, Tuckwell K, Finch R, Gabay C, Kavanaugh A, Jones G. Impact of tocilizumab monotherapy on patient-reported outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis from two randomised controlled trials. RMD Open. 2017 Sep 14;3(2):e000496. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000496. eCollection 2017. Gabay C, McInnes IB, Kavanaugh A, Tuckwell K, Klearman M, Pulley J, Sattar N. Comparison of lipid and lipid-associated cardiovascular risk marker changes after treatment with tocilizumab or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Oct;75(10):1806-12. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207872. Epub 2015 Nov 27. Dennis G Jr, Holweg CT, Kummerfeld SK, Choy DF, Setiadi AF, Hackney JA, Haverty PM, Gilbert H, Lin WY, Diehl L, Fischer S, Song A, Musselman D, Klearman M, Gabay C, Kavanaugh A, Endres J, Fox DA, Martin F, Townsend MJ. Synovial phenotypes in rheumatoid arthritis correlate with response to biologic therapeutics. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16(2):R90. doi: 10.1186/ar4555. Epub 2014 Apr 30. Gabay C, Emery P, van Vollenhoven R, Dikranian A, Alten R, Pavelka K, Klearman M, Musselman D, Agarwal S, Green J, Kavanaugh A; ADACTA Study Investigators. Tocilizumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (ADACTA): a randomised, double-blind, controlled phase 4 trial. Lancet. 2013 May 4;381(9877):1541-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60250-0. Epub 2013 Mar 18. Erratum In: Lancet. 2013 Dec 7;382(9908):1878. Lancet. 2013 May 4;381(9877):1540. Dosage error in article text.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Clinical Trials
Query!
Address
0
0
Hoffmann-La Roche
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01119859
Download to PDF