Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01197560
Registration number
NCT01197560
Ethics application status
Date submitted
29/07/2010
Date registered
9/09/2010
Date last updated
25/11/2019
Titles & IDs
Public title
Study of Lenalidomide to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase 2/3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide (Revlimid ®) Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
CC-5013-DLC-001
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Lymphoma (non Hodgkin's lymphoma) - High grade lymphoma
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Lymphoma (non Hodgkin's lymphoma) - Low grade lymphoma
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Lenalidomide
Treatment: Drugs - Gemcitabine
Treatment: Drugs - Oxaliplatin
Treatment: Drugs - Rituximab
Treatment: Drugs - Etoposide
Experimental: Lenalidomide - Lenalidomide 25 mg capsules by mouth on days 1-21 of each 28 day cycle. For patients with Creatinine Clearance = 30 mL/min but \< 60 mL/min, lenalidomide 10 mg (max escalation is 15 mg).
Active comparator: Investigators Choice - One of the following:
Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin, Rituximab, or Etoposide
Treatment: Drugs: Lenalidomide
Lenalidomide 25 mg orally for 21/28 days until Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) progressive disease. For patients with Creatinine Clearance = 30 mL/min but \< 60 mL/min, lenalidomide 10 mg (max escalation is 15 mg).
Treatment: Drugs: Gemcitabine
Suggested starting doses and regimens for Gemcitabine is 1,250 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) administration on days 1, 8, 15 every 28 days for 6 Cycles or 1,000 mg/m\^2 IV days 1 and 15 every 28 days for 6 Cycles
Treatment: Drugs: Oxaliplatin
Suggested starting dose and regimen for Oxaliplatin is 100 mg/m\^2 IV day 1 for 21 days for 6 Cycles
Treatment: Drugs: Rituximab
Suggested starting dose for Rituximab is 375 mg/m\^2 IV days 1, 8, 15, 22 during Cycle 1, and if stable disease at Week 12, also on Day 1 of Cycles 4, 6, 8, and 10 (CD20+ patients only)
Treatment: Drugs: Etoposide
Suggested starting doses for Etoposide are:
100 mg/m\^2 IV days 1-5 every 28 days for 6 Cycles, or 100 mg/m\^2 IV days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 Cycles, or 50 mg/m\^2 oral days 1-21 every 28 days for 6 Cycles, or 50 mg/m\^2 oral days 1-14 every 28 days for 6 Cycles, or 50 mg/m\^2 oral days 1-10 every 28 days for 6 Cycles
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Stage 1: Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response According to the International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL), Cheson 1999 and Evaluated by the Independent Response Adjudication Committee (IRAC)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
An overall response is a complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu) or partial response (PR) and was evaluated by the IRAC. A CR = complete disappearance of disease and related symptoms. Lymph nodes and nodal masses regressed on computed tomography to normal size (= 1.5 cm in their greatest transverse diameter for nodes \> 1.5 cm prior to therapy and = 1.0 cm in their short axis for nodes 1.1-1.5 cm in their long axis and \> 1.0 cm in their short axis prior to therapy). Spleen and/or liver not palpable on exam, normal size by imaging, and absence of nodules related to lymphoma. If bone marrow was involved prior to therapy, infiltrate must have cleared on repeat biopsy. PR = = 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in other nodes, liver, or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules regressed by = 50% in their SPD or for single nodules, in the greatest transverse diameter;no new disease.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From the date of randomization to the data cut-off of 4 July 2013; when all patients reached the scheduled 16-week assessment or had progressed/died before the scheduled 16-week assessment); the median study duration was 27.0 and 19.7 weeks, respectively.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Stage 1: Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response According to the IWG Response Criteria Based on the Investigators Assessment at the Final Data Cut During the Core Treatment Phase
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Response was defined as having a CR, CRu or PR, based on IWG 1999 Response Criteria for NHL as evaluated by the investigators. CR = complete disappearance of disease and disease related symptoms. All lymph nodes and nodal masses regressed on computed tomography to normal size (= 1.5 cm in their greatest transverse diameter for nodes \> 1.5 cm prior to therapy and = 1.0 cm in their short axis for nodes 1.1-1.5 cm in their long axis and \> 1.0 cm in their short axis prior to therapy). Spleen and/or liver not palpable on physical exam, normal size by imaging, and absence of nodules related to lymphoma. If BM was involved prior to therapy, infiltrate must have cleared on repeat biopsy. PR = = 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in the other nodes, liver, or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules regressed by = 50% in their SPD or, for single nodules, in the greatest transverse diameter. No new disease.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From the date of randomization to the final data cut-off date of 18 May 2018; median study duration was 27.0 and 19.7 weeks, respectively.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events (TEAEs) in the Overall Treatment Phase by Initial Treatment Assignment
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
A TEAE was defined as an AE that begins or worsens in intensity of frequency on or after the first dose of study drug through 28 days after last dose of study drug.
A serious adverse event (SAE) is any:
* Death;
* Life-threatening event;
* Any inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;
* Persistent or significant disability or incapacity;
* Congenital anomaly or birth defect;
* Any other important medical event The investigator determined the relationship of an AE to study drug based on the timing of the AE relative to drug administration and whether or not other drugs, therapeutic interventions, or underlying conditions could provide a sufficient explanation for the event.The severity of an AE was evaluated by the investigator according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) (Version 4.03) where Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From first dose of study drug to the final data cut-off date of 18 May 2018; median study duration was 27.0 and 19.7 weeks, respectively.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Stage 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
ORR is defined as: Complete Response + Complete Response unconfirmed + Partial Response based on the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria \[IWRC\] (Cheson 1999).
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Approximately 3.5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Stage 2: Duration of Response (DoR)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Length of time of overall response (Complete Response + Complete Response unconfirmed + Partial Response) based on the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria \[IWRC\] (Cheson 1999).
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Approximately 3.5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Stage 2: Overall Survival (OS)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Overall survival was defined as time from randomization until death of any cause.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Approximately 3.5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Stage 2: Duration of Complete Response
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Length of time of complete response (Complete Response + Complete Response unconfirmed) based on the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria \[IWRC\] (Cheson 1999).
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Approximately 3.5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Stage 2: Overall Response Rate for With a Duration of Response Lasting = 16 Weeks
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Complete Response + Complete Response unconfirmed + Partial Response for participants with a duration of response lasting = 16 weeks based on the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria \[IWRC\] (Cheson 1999).
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Approximately 3.5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Stage 2: Time to Progression
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Length of time until disease progression occurs
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Approximately 3.5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Stage 2: Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaires
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Quality of Life based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and the EQ-5D assessments
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Approximately 3.5 years
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Histologically proven Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL).
* Relapsed or refractory to combination chemotherapy for DLBCL that contains rituximab and an anthracycline, and one additional combination chemotherapy or stem cell transplant.
* Measurable DLBCL disease by computed tomograph (CT) / magnetic resonance imagining (MRI).
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 - 2.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of lymphoma histologies other than DLBCL.
* History of malignancies, other than DLBCL, unless the patient has been disease free for 3 years or more.
* Eligible for autologous stem cell transplant.
* Known seropositive for, or history of, active human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV)
* Neuropathy grade 4.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 2
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
2/09/2010
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
5/04/2018
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
111
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Royal Adelaide Hospital - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Royal Brisbaine and Womens Hospital - Herston
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Princess Alexandra Hospital - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
5000 - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
4029 - Herston
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
4102 - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Mississippi
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
South Dakota
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Innsbruck
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Salzburg
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Vienna
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Hradec Kralove 5
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Praha
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Brest Cedex 2
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Grenoble
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
La Roche Sur Yon
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Lyon
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Marsielle
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Nantes Cedex 1
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Perpignan
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Pessac
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Rennes
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Toulouse
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Vandoeuvre-les Nancy cedex
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Bologna
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Firenze
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Genova
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Miano
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Napoli
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Pavia
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Rionero In Vulture (PZ)
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Terni
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Cordoba
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Marbella
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Ourense
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Pamplona
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Salamanca
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Umea
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Uppsala
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Bournemouth
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Exeter
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Leeds
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Manchester
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Plymouth
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Southhampton
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Sutton
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Celgene
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to compare lenalidomide to a control drug and see which one delays Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) disease progression longer.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01197560
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Czuczman MS, Trneny M, Davies A, Rule S, Linton KM, Wagner-Johnston N, Gascoyne RD, Slack GW, Brousset P, Eberhard DA, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri FJ, Salles G, Witzig TE, Zinzani PL, Wright GW, Staudt LM, Yang Y, Williams PM, Lih CJ, Russo J, Thakurta A, Hagner P, Fustier P, Song D, Lewis ID. A Phase 2/3 Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Aug 1;23(15):4127-4137. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2818. Epub 2017 Apr 5. Hernandez-Ilizaliturri FJ, Deeb G, Zinzani PL, Pileri SA, Malik F, Macon WR, Goy A, Witzig TE, Czuczman MS. Higher response to lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in nongerminal center B-cell-like than in germinal center B-cell-like phenotype. Cancer. 2011 Nov 15;117(22):5058-66. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26135. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Adrian Kilcoyne, MD
Query!
Address
0
0
Celgene Corporation
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Type
Citations or Other Details
Journal
Czuczman MS, Trneny M, Davies A, Rule S, Linton KM...
[
More Details
]
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01197560
Download to PDF