Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01202773
Registration number
NCT01202773
Ethics application status
Date submitted
14/09/2010
Date registered
16/09/2010
Date last updated
14/05/2018
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LY2127399 in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Had an Inadequate Response to One or More TNF-a Inhibitors (FLEX V)
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
H9B-MC-BCDV
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
13732
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
FLEX V
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Rheumatoid Arthritis
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Osteoarthritis
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Rheumatoid arthritis
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - LY2127399
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo Q4W
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo Q2W
Experimental: 120 milligrams (mg) LY2127399 - Given every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 24 weeks. Participants receive a 240-mg loading dose when initiating treatment.
During the Treatment Period, for blinding purposes, participants will alternate injections of LY2127399 and injections of placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W).
At Week 16, responders will receive 1 injection of 120 mg of LY2127399 and 1 injection of placebo, followed by 120 mg of LY2127399 Q4W for the rest of the 24-week treatment period.
At Week 16, non-responders (NR) will receive 1 injection of 90 mg of LY2127399 and 1 injection of placebo, followed by 90 mg of LY2127399 Q2W for the rest of the 24-week treatment period.
Experimental: 90 mg LY2127399 - Given Q2W for 24 weeks. Participants receive a 180-mg loading dose when initiating treatment.
At Week 16, both responders and NR will receive 1 injection of 90 mg of LY2127399 and 1 injection of placebo, followed by 90 mg of LY2127399 Q2W for the rest of the 24-week treatment period.
Placebo comparator: Placebo - Given Q2W for 24 weeks. Participants receive 2 injections of placebo when initiating treatment.
At Week 16, responders will receive 2 injections of placebo, followed by 1 injection of placebo Q2W for the rest of the 24-week treatment period.
At Week 16, NR will receive a 180-mg loading dose of LY2127399 (2 injections of 90 mg), followed by 90 mg of LY2127399 Q2W for the rest of the 24-week treatment period.
Treatment: Drugs: LY2127399
Administered Subcutaneously (SC)
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo Q4W
Administered SC
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo Q2W
Administered SC
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
ACR Responder Index: composite of clinical, laboratory, and functional measures of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). ACR20 Responder: a =20% improvement from baseline in both 68 tender joint counts (TJC) and 66 swollen joint counts (SJC) and a =20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 criteria: participant's and physician's global assessment of disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (which measured participants' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities), joint pain, and C-reactive protein (CRP). Percentage of participants achieving ACR20 response = (number of ACR20 responders / number of participants treated) \* 100. All NR at Week 16, as well as all participants who discontinued study treatment at any time for any reason, were defined as NR starting at that time-point and going forward, including Week 24 endpoint.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline through Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) and 70% (ACR70) Response
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
ACR Responder Index: composite of clinical, laboratory, and functional measures of RA. ACR50 Responder: had a =50% improvement from baseline in both 68 TJC and 66 SJC and a =50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 criteria: participant's (Pt's) and physician's global assessment of disease activity, HAQ-DI (measured Pts' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities), joint pain, and CRP. Percentage of Pt achieving ACR50 response = \[number (No.) of ACR50 responders / No. of Pts treated\]\*100. ACR70 Responder: had a =70% improvement from baseline in both TJC and SJC and a =70% improvement in at least 3 of same 5 criteria for ACR50. Percentage of Pts achieving ACR70 response = (No. of ACR70 responders / No. of Pts treated)\*100. All NR at Week 16, as well as all Pts who discontinued study treatment at any time for any reason, were defined as NR starting at that time-point and going forward, including Week 24 endpoint.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline through Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
American College of Rheumatology Percent Improvement (ACR-N)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
ACR-N is a continuous measure of clinical, laboratory, and functional outcomes in RA that characterizes percentage (%) of improvement in disease activity from baseline based on ACR core set. This index was calculated as minimum of either a) % change in TJC, b) % change in SJC, or c) the median % change of remaining 5 ACR core criteria: If =3 components of the 5 ACR core criteria were missing, then c) was set to missing; if any of 3 components a), b), or c) were missing, then ACR-N was set to missing. Percentage of improvement was truncated to range of -100 to 100 to minimize impact of outliers (greater values indicate greater % improvement) and negative scores indicate a decline. Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline Disease Activity Score based on 28 joint counts -CRP (DAS28-CRP) as a covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline through Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Tender Joint Count (68 Joint Count)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Tender joint count is the number of tender and painful joints determined for each participant by examination of 68 joints. Joints were assessed by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination. Participants were asked for pain sensations on these manipulations and watched for spontaneous pain reactions. Any positive response on pressure, movement, or both was translated into a single tender-versus-nontender dichotomy. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Swollen Joint Count (66 Joint Count)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Swollen joint count is the number of swollen joints determined for each participant by examination of 66 joints. Joints were classified as either swollen or not swollen. Swelling was defined as palpable fluctuating synovitis of the joint. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Participant's Assessment of Pain [Visual Analog Scale (VAS)]
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Participant's assessment of their current arthritis pain using VAS ranged from 0 millimeters (mm) (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain). A decrease in pain score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Participant's assessment of their current arthritis disease activity using VAS ranged from 0 mm (no arthritis activity) to 100 mm (extremely active arthritis). A decrease in disease activity score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS)
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Physician's assessment of the participant's current arthritis disease activity using VAS ranged from 0 mm (no arthritis activity) to 100 mm (extremely active arthritis). A decrease in disease activity score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The HAQ-DI questionnaire assesses the participant's self-perception on the degree of difficulty \[0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty), and 3 (unable to do)\] when dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and performing other daily activities. Scores for each functional area were averaged to calculate HAQ-DI scores, which ranged from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A decrease in HAQ-DI score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein Level (DAS28-CRP)
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Disease Activity Score (DAS) modified to include 28 joint count (DAS28) consisted of composite score of following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), CRP (milligrams per liter), and participant's global assessment of disease activity using VAS (participant global VAS). DAS28-CRP=0.56\*square root (sqrt)(TJC28)+0.28\*sqrt(SJC28)+0.36\*natural log(CRP+1)+0.014\*participant global VAS+0.96. Scores ranged from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity and remission is DAS28-CRP \<2.6. A decrease in DAS28-CRP indicated an improvement in participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP Based European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
EULAR Responder index categorizes clinical response based on improvement since baseline in DAS28-CRP. DAS28-CRP=0.56\*sqrt(TJC28)+0.28\*sqrt(SJC28)+0.36\*natural log(CRP+1)+0.014\*participant global VAS+0.96. DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity. High disease activity: DAS28-CRP \>5.1, low disease activity: DAS28-CRP \<3.2, and remission: DAS28-CRP \<2.6. Participants are categorized as EULAR responders or NR based on improvement of DAS28-CRP scores from baseline. EULAR DAS28-CRP responder index defines a good (absolute: \<3.2 or \>1.2 improvement from baseline), moderate (absolute: 3.2-5.1 or 0.6-1.2 improvement from baseline), or no response (absolute: \>5.1 or \<0.6 improvement from baseline). Percentage of participants with DAS28-CRP based EULAR response = ( number of participants with specific response) / (number of participants analyzed in the group) \* 100.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline through Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary Scores
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality, 2 component scores (CS), physical CS (PCS) and mental CS (MCS). Domain scores calculated by summing each item for each domain and transforming scores into 0-100 scale; higher scores indicated better health status. If \< 50% of the questions within a domain were answered, the raw score were not calculated. PCS score consisted of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. MCS score consisted of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales. Both PCS and MCS range from 0-100 with higher score indicating better mental or physical health. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment, region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact Scores
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
The BFI is a brief participant-reported questionnaire for the rapid assessment of fatigue severity and the impact of fatigue on daily functioning in the past 24 hours. The BFI contains 10 items; however, the first item is not included in the scoring of the scale as it asks about usual fatigue over the past week with the participant answering 'yes' or 'no'. The remaining 9 items assess fatigue severity (3 items) and impact of fatigue on daily functioning (6 items) using an 11-point numeric scale, with 0 = no fatigue and 10 = fatigue as bad as you can imagine. The fatigue impact subscale score is the average of the non-missing responses to 6 items: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. If more than 3 items within the fatigue impact subscale were not answered by a participant, the subscale is set to missing. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference Scores
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
The BPI-SF is a self-reported scale that measures the severity of pain based on the worst pain, least pain, average pain experienced during the past 24 hours and pain based on the pain right now, with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as severe as you can imagine). Pain interference score is the average of the responses in the past 24 hours to 7 items: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life \[each item scored from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes)\]. If more than 3 items of the Pain Interference Score are not answered by a participant, the score is set to missing. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Duration of Morning Stiffness (Minutes)
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
The Investigator asks participants about the duration of their morning stiffness (in minutes) in and around the joints and records the duration. The Investigator should ask participants about duration of morning stiffness on the day prior to the study visit to capture actual symptoms. If morning stiffness duration is longer than 12 hours (720 minutes), it was truncated to 720 minutes for statistical presentations and analyses.LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Time to ACR20 Response
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Baseline through Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Absolute B Cell Counts
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Cell-surface marker cluster designation (CD) 3 negative, CD20 positive (CD3-CD20+) defines total mature B cells. B-lymphocyte antigen CD20 is an activated-glycosylated phosphoprotein expressed on the surface of all mature B cells. Baseline B cell count is the average of the values on or prior to the date of first injection of study treatment, including unscheduled visits. A positive or negative change indicated an increase or decrease, respectively in B cell count. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Immunoglobulin (Ig), or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Change from baseline in serum immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG), and immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels are reported. A negative change indicated a decrease in Ig levels. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Population Pharmacokinetics (PK): Constant Clearance
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
Population estimate of constant clearance as determined by population PK analysis. A 2-compartment model was used in PK modeling. Constant clearance is the PK parameter which describes the linear elimination of LY2127399 from serum.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Baseline through Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Developing Anti-LY2127399 Antibodies
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
Participants with treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody (ADA) were participants who had any sample from baseline up to and through Week 52 that was a 4-fold increase (2-dilution increase) in immunogenicity titer over baseline titer, or participants who tested negative at baseline and positive post-baseline (at titer of =1:20). Percentage of participants with ADA = (number of participants with treatment-emergent ADA) / (number of participants assessed) \* 100.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Baseline through Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in CRP
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
CRP is an indicator of inflammation. A negative change indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of RA of more than 6 months and less than 15 years
* At least 8 tender and swollen joints
* An abnormally high C-reactive protein (CRP) level or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)
* Positive for rheumatoid factor (RF) or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody
* Previously treated with biologic TNF-a inhibitor therapy (infliximab, certolizumab, golimumab, etanercept, adalimumab) and stopped treatment due to insufficient efficacy or intolerance
* Regular use of at least 1 conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD), with a stable dose for at least 8 weeks prior to study start
* Woman must not be pregnant, breastfeeding, or become pregnant during the study
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Use of unstable doses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) in the past 6 weeks
* Steroid injection or intravenous (IV) infusion in the last 6 weeks
* Use of more than 10 milligrams/day (mg/day) of oral steroids in the last 6 weeks
* History of a serious reaction to other biological DMARDs
* Use of an oral calcineurin inhibitor (for example, cyclosporin or tacrolimus) in the last 8 weeks
* Surgery on a joint or other major surgery less than 2 months ago, or plans to have joint surgery or major surgery during the study
* Active fibromyalgia, juvenile chronic arthritis, spondyloarthropathy, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, psoriatic arthritis, or other systemic inflammatory condition except RA
* Cervical cancer or squamous skin cancer within the past 3 years, or other cancer within the past 5 years
* Received a live vaccine received within the past 12 weeks (for example, vaccines for measles, mumps, rubella, and chicken pox, and nasal-spray flu vaccines)
* Hepatitis or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
* A serious bacterial infection (for example, pneumonia or cellulitis) within 3 months or a serious bone or joint infection within 6 months
* Symptoms of herpes zoster or herpes simplex within the last month
* Active or latent tuberculosis (TB)
* Current symptoms of a serious disorder or illness
* Use of an investigational drug within the last month
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Stopped early
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/01/2011
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/01/2014
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
456
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician. - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician. - Herston
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician. - Malvern East
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
04266-010 - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
4029 - Herston
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
3145 - Malvern East
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Arkansas
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Delaware
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Idaho
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Kansas
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Kentucky
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Mississippi
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Montana
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Nevada
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
New Hampshire
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
New Mexico
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
North Dakota
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Vermont
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
West Virginia
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Wisconsin
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Córdoba
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Lujan
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Mar Del Plata
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Quilmes
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
San Isidro
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Tucuman
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Campinas
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Goiania
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Juiz De Fora
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
São Paulo
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Colombia
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Bogota
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Colombia
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Medellin
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Montpellier
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Nice
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Orleans
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Saint-Etienne Cedex 02
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Strasbourg
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Toulouse
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Bad Doberan
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Bad Nauheim
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Baden-Baden
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Dresden
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Erlangen
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Frankfurt
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Göttingen
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Koeln
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Munich
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Haidari/Athens
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Heraklion
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Larissa
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Thessaloniki
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Arenzano
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Fukuoka
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Gunma
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Hyogo
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Kanagawa
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Miyazaki
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Nagasaki
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Okayama
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Tokyo
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Incheon
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Suwon-City
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Perak
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Putrajaya
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Sarawak
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Chihuahua
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Col Centro
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Guadalajara
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Mexico City
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Monterrey
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
Queretaro
Query!
Country [95]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [95]
0
0
San Luis Potosi
Query!
Country [96]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [96]
0
0
Tlalpan
Query!
Country [97]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [97]
0
0
Hamilton
Query!
Country [98]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [98]
0
0
Rotorua
Query!
Country [99]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [99]
0
0
Tauranga
Query!
Country [100]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [100]
0
0
Timaru
Query!
Country [101]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [101]
0
0
Bydgoszcz
Query!
Country [102]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [102]
0
0
Elblag
Query!
Country [103]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [103]
0
0
Lublin
Query!
Country [104]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [104]
0
0
Plock
Query!
Country [105]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [105]
0
0
Torun
Query!
Country [106]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [106]
0
0
Warsaw
Query!
Country [107]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [107]
0
0
Kazan
Query!
Country [108]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [108]
0
0
Khanty-Mansiysk
Query!
Country [109]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [109]
0
0
Kursk
Query!
Country [110]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [110]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [111]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [111]
0
0
Nizhny Novgorod
Query!
Country [112]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [112]
0
0
Petrozavodsk
Query!
Country [113]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [113]
0
0
Saint Petersburg
Query!
Country [114]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [114]
0
0
Stavropol
Query!
Country [115]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [115]
0
0
Voronezh
Query!
Country [116]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [116]
0
0
Benoni
Query!
Country [117]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [117]
0
0
Bloemfontein
Query!
Country [118]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [118]
0
0
Limpopo
Query!
Country [119]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [119]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [120]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [120]
0
0
Bilboa
Query!
Country [121]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [121]
0
0
La Coruña
Query!
Country [122]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [122]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [123]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [123]
0
0
Manises
Query!
Country [124]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [124]
0
0
Santiago De Compostela
Query!
Country [125]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [125]
0
0
Keelung
Query!
Country [126]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [126]
0
0
Taichung
Query!
Country [127]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [127]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Eli Lilly and Company
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The primary purpose of this study is to help answer if LY2127399 is safe and effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in participants with an inadequate response to one or more tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a) inhibitors. This study is comprised of 2 periods: Period 1: 24-week blinded treatment Period 2: 48-week post-treatment follow-up
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01202773
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Schiff M, Combe B, Dorner T, Kremer JM, Huizinga TW, Veenhuizen M, Gill A, Komocsar W, Berclaz PY, Ortmann R, Lee C. Efficacy and safety of tabalumab, an anti-BAFF monoclonal antibody, in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to TNF inhibitors: results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. RMD Open. 2015 Aug 12;1(1):e000037. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2014-000037. eCollection 2015.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST)
Query!
Address
0
0
Eli Lilly and Company
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01202773
Download to PDF